Verimium
Back to task results

Agent trace

Two-tower retriever gemini-3-8-flash-high-04

The full recorded conversation, expanded from start to finish: instructions, agent messages, and tool inputs and responses.

This recording includes 152 readable reasoning summaries, shown in full below.

Agent
gemini-3.8-flash · Gemini CLI · high effort
Recorded conversation
58:05 · 77 steps
Private reward
0.009092 · Failed
Attempt cost
$1.56
  • Thinking
  • Model text
  • Tool call
  • Tool response
01

User context

+00:00
User context

<session_context> This is the Gemini CLI. We are setting up the context for our chat. Today's date is Tuesday, September 29, 2026 (formatted according to the user's locale). My operating system is: linux The project's temporary directory is: /home/agent/.gemini/tmp/app

  • Workspace Directories:
  • /app
  • /task
  • Directory Structure:

Showing up to 200 items (files + folders).

/app/ └───solution/ Showing up to 200 items (files + folders).

/task/ ├───.keep ├───evaluate_public.py ├───ranking_evaluation.py ├───requirements.txt └───data/ ├───candidate_catalog.parquet ├───target_users.parquet ├───test_eligible_candidates.npz ├───test_preference_state.parquet ├───train_dislikes.parquet ├───train_likes.parquet ├───train_listens.parquet ├───train_undislikes.parquet ├───train_unlikes.parquet ├───val_dislikes.parquet ├───val_likes.parquet ├───val_listens.parquet ├───val_undislikes.parquet ├───val_unlikes.parquet ├───validation_eligible_candidates.npz └───validation_preference_state.parquet

</session_context>

02

Task instructions

+00:00
Task instructions

Build a latency-efficient PyTorch two-tower neural-network ranker

Build a two-tower neural network in CPU PyTorch for the "Made for You" shelf of a music streaming service. Although the supplied benchmark is small, it represents a production system with millions of users and millions of items; the training approach must scale to that setting and therefore must not construct or decompose a global user-item interaction matrix. The production shelf has a strict request-time latency budget. Candidate item embeddings are computed offline and stored in a nearest-neighbor index. At request time, the system computes one user embedding and retrieves items by maximum inner-product search.

The model must therefore decompose exactly into a user vector and an independently precomputable item vector of the same dimensionality, with the final relevance score equal to their dot product. Both vectors must be produced by separate trainable user and item towers implemented as PyTorch neural networks. The user tower must derive its representation from interaction history rather than a user-ID lookup. Per-user candidate eligibility, cutoff-specific explicit preference state, and a temporal backtest are provided. Candidate eligibility is platform-owned; all modeling within that candidate boundary is in scope.

Data

All inputs are under /task/data/. Training data ends at timestamp 24786800. A 30-minute gap precedes a seven-day public validation window. The hidden test is the following seven-day window after another 30-minute gap.

For each event family there is a train_*.parquet and val_*.parquet file:

FamilyMeaningColumns
listensPlayback eventsuid, timestamp, item_id, is_organic, played_ratio_pct, track_length_seconds
likesExplicit positive actionsuid, timestamp, item_id, is_organic
dislikesExplicit negative actionsuid, timestamp, item_id, is_organic
unlikesReversal of a prior likeuid, timestamp, item_id, is_organic
undislikesReversal of a prior dislikeuid, timestamp, item_id, is_organic

is_organic=1 means the listener sought out the track; 0 means the action came through a recommendation surface. A listen is a conventional positive at 50% completion. The discovery-quality objective below uses the stronger 80% threshold.

The two public windows have different roles:

  1. Build and tune a validation ranker using only train_* as history and val_* as subsequent outcomes.
  2. After selecting the approach, refit it on train_* + val_*. At hidden-test time the validation events are observed history, not recommendable outcomes.

Do not use val_* events as features when measuring a validation ranking. They may and should be used when refitting the final hidden-test ranker.

Additional files under /task/data/:

  • candidate_catalog.parquet: the 30,000 retrieval-catalog tracks, ordered by training positive-listen popularity.
  • target_users.parquet: users with at least 20 positive listens in the 90 days before the training cutoff, selected without future labels.
  • validation_preference_state.parquet: active explicit state at the training cutoff, for validation ranking.
  • test_preference_state.parquet: active explicit state after validation, for the final hidden-test ranking. State is liked or disliked; a pair may have both active channels.
  • validation_eligible_candidates.npz and test_eligible_candidates.npz: cutoff-correct candidate sets for every target user. Each contains aligned arrays uids, item_ids, and packed_eligible. For user row r, recover the Boolean item mask with np.unpackbits(packed_eligible[r], count=len(item_ids), bitorder="little").

The exact available Python distribution inventory is listed in /task/requirements.txt. Future test interactions are hidden and used only by the separate Harbor verifier.

Discovery objective

Rank only the candidates returned for the relevant cutoff. Relevance is based on organic behavior in the immediately following window:

  • grade 3: the user organically likes the track;
  • grade 1: the user organically listens to at least 80% of the track;
  • grade 0: otherwise.

If both positive events occur, grade 3 wins. Ranking quality is measured with graded NDCG@10. DCG uses gain 2^grade - 1 and discount 1/log2(rank + 1), then averages per-user NDCG over users with at least one relevant item.

The public evaluator reports this objective for development, but its score is not a separate acceptance stage. Final acceptance is determined on the hidden test using the same objective.

The Yambda logs contain interactions, not impression propensities. Treat the organic objective as a robust offline target, not as a causal estimate of online lift.

Public tools

/task/evaluate_public.py scores a validation-stage ranking against the public window. Pass the path to a ranking with the same schema as the final deliverable:

python /task/evaluate_public.py solution/validation.parquet

Stage-independent evaluation helpers are available in /task/ranking_evaluation.py. The builder installs the same checked-in module in the public agent image and private verifier image so scoring mechanics cannot drift. The public copy contains no hidden labels, evaluator-owned data paths, or pass thresholds.

The public evaluator uses validation_eligible_candidates.npz; it is not a validator for the final artifact. No model implementation, fitted representation, or example submission is supplied. Design and tune the required PyTorch neural two-tower model, then refit the selected approach as described above.

Deliverable

Write /app/solution/submission.parquet or /app/solution/submission.csv, with exactly 100 rows for every target user and columns uid, item_id, rank. Ranks must be the integers 1-100 with no ties or duplicate items. Every submitted item must be present in that user's test_eligible_candidates.npz candidate set.

Leave the code that defines, trains, and applies both towers, along with a concise /app/solution/README.md, in /app/solution/. The README should state the model architecture, training objective, public validation score, and final submission command. Keep the best valid submission saved throughout the attempt so it survives the deadline.

Constraints

  • Write deliverables and intermediate artifacts only under /app/solution/.
  • Treat /task/ and the installed Python environment as read-only.
  • Do not invoke nested agents or attempt to access verifier files, credentials, other trials, or host paths.
  • Do not install packages or use network access except for the model provider connection managed by Harbor.
  • The environment includes CPU PyTorch 2.8.0. No accelerator is available.
  • You have up to 60 minutes. Improve the model as much as possible within that limit. Structural validity alone is not sufficient; the final submission is also evaluated for ranking quality.
03

update_topic command

+00:08
Recorded reasoning summary 33 words

Analyzing Prompt Requirements

I am currently dissecting the core request: to construct a latency-optimized, two-tower PyTorch ranker specifically for a music streaming service's "Made for You" shelf, all to be executed on CPU.

Recorded reasoning summary 54 words

Designing Two-Tower Ranker

I'm focusing on building a PyTorch two-tower ranker for music recommendations. The core idea is to generate independent user and item embeddings, whose dot product will determine relevance, avoiding a full interaction matrix. I'm analyzing the data schema and initial architectural constraints, particularly how user history will feed into its tower.

Recorded reasoning summary 40 words

Defining Relevance Metrics

I am currently defining the relevance grades for the ranking task. Organic likes will be grade 3, listens with 80%+ completion grade 1, and others grade 0. The objective is graded NDCG@10, incorporating gains and logarithmic discounts.

Tool callupdate_topicTool call Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "title": "Research & Exploration",
  "strategic_intent": "Initial exploration of data, evaluation scripts, and environment constraints.",
  "summary": "Starting the project by inspecting the task environment, reading evaluation scripts, and exploring the data files to understand user counts, catalog size, and ground truth generation."
}

Tool response 

Current topic: "Research & Exploration"
Topic summary: Starting the project by inspecting the task environment, reading evaluation scripts, and exploring the data files to understand user counts, catalog size, and ground truth generation.

Strategic Intent: Initial exploration of data, evaluation scripts, and environment constraints.
04

read_file evaluate_public.py

+00:10
Tool callread_file/task/evaluate_public.py Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "file_path": "/task/evaluate_public.py"
}

Tool response 

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Score a validation-stage ranking against public discovery labels.

``build_task.py`` publishes this module with the solver-visible task files. It
loads target users, validation eligibility, and validation-window events from
the adjacent ``data`` directory, then evaluates one ranking supplied on the
command line. Stage-independent mechanics come from the adjacent public
``ranking_evaluation.py`` module. The builder installs the same checked-in
module in the private judge, so public and private scoring mechanics cannot
drift. A relevant candidate receives grade 3 for an organic like or grade 1 for
an organic listen with at least 80 percent completion; a like takes precedence
when both events exist.

Before scoring, the ranking must contain exactly 100 distinct eligible items
for every target user, with integer-valued ``uid``, ``item_id``, and ``rank``
columns and ranks 1 through 100 exactly once per user. Extra columns are
ignored. Quality is graded NDCG@10, averaged only over users who have at least
one eligible relevant item in the validation window.

The evaluator prints a JSON object containing the model path and scores. It
does not apply the task's pass threshold; its purpose is model development and
selection. The private judge applies the threshold to the final submission.

Usage::

    python evaluate_public.py <validation-ranking.parquet|csv>
"""
from __future__ import annotations

import json
import sys
from pathlib import Path

import pandas as pd

from ranking_evaluation import (
    CandidateSet,
    RankingValidationError,
    ranked_items,
    read_ranking,
    score_rankings,
    validate_ranking,
)


HERE = Path(__file__).resolve().parent
DATA = HERE / "data"
LISTEN_STRONG = 80


def validation_truth(
    eligibility: CandidateSet, targets: set[int]
) -> dict[int, dict[int, int]]:
    """Build cutoff-correct graded relevance from public validation events.

    Only target-user events for eligible candidates are retained. Organic
    listens completed to at least 80 percent receive grade 1, and organic likes
    receive grade 3. Repeated user-item events are collapsed, and processing
    likes second ensures that grade 3 wins over grade 1.

    Args:
        eligibility: Validation-cutoff candidate membership service.
        targets: Complete set of target user IDs.

    Returns:
        A nested ``uid -> item_id -> grade`` mapping. Users without an eligible
        relevant event are omitted.
    """
    listens = pd.read_parquet(DATA / "val_listens.parquet")
    likes = pd.read_parquet(DATA / "val_likes.parquet")
    strong = listens[
        listens.uid.isin(targets)
        & (listens.is_organic == 1)
        & (listens.played_ratio_pct >= LISTEN_STRONG)
    ][["uid", "item_id"]].drop_duplicates()
    organic_likes = likes[
        likes.uid.isin(targets) & (likes.is_organic == 1)
    ][["uid", "item_id"]].drop_duplicates()

    graded: dict[int, dict[int, int]] = {}
    for raw_uid, raw_item in strong.itertuples(index=False, name=None):
        uid, item = int(raw_uid), int(raw_item)
        if eligibility.is_eligible(uid, item):
            graded.setdefault(uid, {})[item] = 1
    for raw_uid, raw_item in organic_likes.itertuples(index=False, name=None):
        uid, item = int(raw_uid), int(raw_item)
        if eligibility.is_eligible(uid, item):
            graded.setdefault(uid, {})[item] = 3
    return graded


def load_submission(
    path: Path, eligibility: CandidateSet, targets: set[int]
) -> dict[int, list[int]]:
    """Load and validate a public validation ranking.

    Files ending in ``.parquet`` are read as parquet; every other suffix is
    read as CSV. The required columns must be integer-valued, cover exactly the
    target-user set, contain 100 rows and ranks 1 through 100 per user, avoid
    duplicate user-item pairs, and contain only cutoff-eligible items.

    Args:
        path: Ranking file to read.
        eligibility: Validation-cutoff candidate membership service.
        targets: Exact set of users the ranking must cover.

    Returns:
        A ``uid -> ranked item IDs`` mapping ordered by ascending rank.

    Raises:
        ValueError: If the ranking violates the required schema or invariants.
    """
    frame = validate_ranking(read_ranking(path), targets)
    if not all(
        eligibility.is_eligible(uid, item)
        for uid, item in frame[["uid", "item_id"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None)
    ):
        raise RankingValidationError(
            "submission contains an item rejected by eligibility service"
        )
    return ranked_items(frame)


def score(
    ranked: dict[int, list[int]],
    graded: dict[int, dict[int, int]],
) -> dict[str, float | int]:
    """Aggregate per-user NDCG@10 over users with public relevance labels.

    Args:
        ranked: Ranked item IDs for every target user.
        graded: Eligible validation relevance keyed by user and item.

    Returns:
        The six-decimal ``quality_ndcg@10`` value and number of scored users.
    """
    return score_rankings(ranked, graded)


def main() -> None:
    """Run the public evaluator CLI and print its JSON score report."""
    targets_frame = pd.read_parquet(DATA / "target_users.parquet")
    targets = set(targets_frame.uid.astype(int))
    eligibility = CandidateSet(DATA / "validation_eligible_candidates.npz")
    graded = validation_truth(eligibility, targets)

    if len(sys.argv) != 2:
        raise SystemExit(
            "usage: evaluate_public.py <validation-ranking.parquet|csv>"
        )
    path = Path(sys.argv[1])
    ranked = load_submission(path, eligibility, targets)
    print(json.dumps({"model": str(path), "scores": score(ranked, graded)}, indent=2))


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()
Tool callread_file/task/ranking_evaluation.py Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "file_path": "/task/ranking_evaluation.py"
}

Tool response 

"""Shared public primitives for Yambda discovery-ranking evaluation.

Both the solver-visible validation evaluator and the private submission judge
import this module from the generated task's ``public`` directory. It owns the
stage-independent contract: reading a ranking, validating its shape, converting
it to per-user rank order, looking up packed candidate eligibility, and
computing graded NDCG@10.

The module deliberately contains no event-derived labels, private artifact
paths, or pass thresholds. Each evaluator supplies its own relevance data and
per-cutoff eligibility checks around these common operations.
"""
from __future__ import annotations

from pathlib import Path

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd


__all__ = [
    "CandidateSet",
    "QUALITY_K",
    "RankingValidationError",
    "REQUIRED_COLUMNS",
    "TOP_N",
    "ndcg_at_k",
    "ranked_items",
    "read_ranking",
    "score_rankings",
    "validate_ranking",
]

TOP_N = 100
QUALITY_K = 10
REQUIRED_COLUMNS = ("uid", "item_id", "rank")


class RankingValidationError(ValueError):
    """Report a ranking-schema or structural-contract violation."""


class CandidateSet:
    """Provide membership lookups over one packed candidate-set archive.

    The archive contains aligned ``uids``, ``item_ids``, and
    ``packed_eligible`` arrays. Candidate column ``c`` is represented by bit
    ``c % 8`` of byte ``c // 8`` using little-endian bit order. Arrays are
    copied into memory so they remain valid after the archive is closed.
    """

    def __init__(self, path: Path):
        """Load an eligibility archive and build ID-to-position indexes.

        Args:
            path: Path to a ``.npz`` archive with the candidate-set schema.
        """
        with np.load(path, allow_pickle=False) as artifact:
            self.uids = artifact["uids"].astype(np.int64, copy=True)
            self.item_ids = artifact["item_ids"].astype(np.int64, copy=True)
            self.packed = artifact["packed_eligible"].astype(np.uint8, copy=True)
        self.uid_row = {int(uid): row for row, uid in enumerate(self.uids)}
        self.item_column = {
            int(item): column for column, item in enumerate(self.item_ids)
        }

    def is_eligible(self, uid: int, item_id: int) -> bool:
        """Return whether ``item_id`` is eligible for ``uid``.

        IDs absent from the target-user or candidate-item arrays are treated as
        ineligible rather than raising an exception.

        Args:
            uid: Target user ID to query.
            item_id: Candidate item ID to query.

        Returns:
            ``True`` only when the corresponding packed eligibility bit is set.
        """
        row = self.uid_row.get(int(uid))
        column = self.item_column.get(int(item_id))
        if row is None or column is None:
            return False
        byte, bit = divmod(column, 8)
        return bool((int(self.packed[row, byte]) >> bit) & 1)


def read_ranking(path: Path) -> pd.DataFrame:
    """Read a parquet or CSV ranking into a pandas frame.

    Args:
        path: Input path. A ``.parquet`` suffix selects parquet; every other
            suffix is interpreted as CSV.

    Returns:
        The ranking frame as loaded by pandas.
    """
    return pd.read_parquet(path) if path.suffix == ".parquet" else pd.read_csv(path)


def validate_ranking(
    frame: pd.DataFrame,
    targets: set[int],
) -> pd.DataFrame:
    """Normalize and validate the stage-independent ranking contract.

    Required values must be finite integers. The user set must exactly match
    ``targets``; every user must have 100 rows, distinct items, and each rank
    from 1 through 100 exactly once. Cutoff-specific candidate eligibility is
    intentionally left to the calling evaluator.

    Args:
        frame: Raw ranking frame. Extra columns are discarded from an internal
            copy; the caller's frame is not modified.
        targets: Exact set of target user IDs the ranking must cover.

    Returns:
        A normalized frame containing only the required ``int64`` columns.

    Raises:
        RankingValidationError: If the ranking violates the shared contract.
    """
    required = list(REQUIRED_COLUMNS)
    if not all(column in frame for column in required):
        raise RankingValidationError(f"submission requires columns {required}")

    normalized = frame[required].copy()
    for column in required:
        numeric = pd.to_numeric(normalized[column], errors="coerce")
        values = numeric.to_numpy(dtype=float)
        if numeric.isna().any() or not np.isfinite(values).all():
            raise RankingValidationError(
                f"submission {column} must be finite numeric values"
            )
        if not np.equal(numeric, np.floor(numeric)).all():
            raise RankingValidationError(
                f"submission {column} must contain integers"
            )
        normalized[column] = numeric.astype(np.int64)

    submitted_users = set(map(int, normalized.uid.unique()))
    if submitted_users != targets:
        raise RankingValidationError(
            f"submission user set mismatch: missing={len(targets - submitted_users)} "
            f"extra={len(submitted_users - targets)}"
        )
    counts = normalized.groupby("uid").size()
    if not (counts == TOP_N).all():
        raise RankingValidationError(
            f"submission must contain exactly {TOP_N} rows for every target user"
        )
    if normalized.duplicated(["uid", "item_id"]).any():
        raise RankingValidationError(
            "submission contains duplicate (uid, item_id) pairs"
        )
    valid_ranks = set(range(1, TOP_N + 1))
    ranks_are_valid = normalized.groupby("uid")["rank"].apply(
        lambda values: set(map(int, values)) == valid_ranks
    )
    if not ranks_are_valid.all():
        raise RankingValidationError(
            f"each user must have every rank from 1 through {TOP_N} exactly once"
        )
    return normalized


def ranked_items(frame: pd.DataFrame) -> dict[int, list[int]]:
    """Convert a validated ranking frame to ordered items keyed by user.

    Args:
        frame: Frame that has passed :func:`validate_ranking`.

    Returns:
        A ``uid -> item IDs`` mapping ordered by ascending rank.
    """
    ordered = frame.sort_values(["uid", "rank"])
    return {
        int(uid): list(map(int, values))
        for uid, values in ordered.groupby("uid").item_id
    }


def ndcg_at_k(ranked: list[int], gold: dict[int, int], k: int) -> float:
    """Compute graded normalized discounted cumulative gain at ``k``.

    Relevance gain is ``2**grade - 1`` and the discount at one-based rank
    ``r`` is ``1 / log2(r + 1)``. Items absent from ``gold`` have grade zero.

    Args:
        ranked: Item IDs in predicted rank order.
        gold: Mapping from relevant item IDs to integer relevance grades.
        k: Maximum number of predicted positions to score.

    Returns:
        For a valid duplicate-free ranking, NDCG in ``[0, 1]``; returns
        ``0.0`` when the ideal gain is zero.
    """
    gains = np.asarray([gold.get(item, 0) for item in ranked[:k]], dtype=np.float64)
    discounts = 1.0 / np.log2(np.arange(2, len(gains) + 2))
    dcg = float(np.sum((np.power(2.0, gains) - 1.0) * discounts))
    ideal = np.asarray(sorted(gold.values(), reverse=True)[:k], dtype=np.float64)
    ideal_discounts = 1.0 / np.log2(np.arange(2, len(ideal) + 2))
    idcg = float(np.sum((np.power(2.0, ideal) - 1.0) * ideal_discounts))
    return dcg / idcg if idcg else 0.0


def score_rankings(
    ranked: dict[int, list[int]],
    graded: dict[int, dict[int, int]],
) -> dict[str, float | int]:
    """Aggregate per-user NDCG@10 over users with relevance labels.

    Args:
        ranked: Ranked item IDs for every target user.
        graded: Relevant item grades keyed by user and item.

    Returns:
        The six-decimal ``quality_ndcg@10`` value and number of scored users.
    """
    quality = float(
        np.mean(
            [
                ndcg_at_k(ranked[uid], gold, QUALITY_K)
                for uid, gold in graded.items()
            ]
        )
    )
    return {
        "quality_ndcg@10": round(quality, 6),
        "quality_users": len(graded),
    }
Tool callread_file/task/requirements.txt Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "file_path": "/task/requirements.txt"
}

Tool response 

# Exact distribution inventory for the Yambda two-tower task family.
#
# This is an input to `uv pip sync`, not a list of minimum requirements. A
# conforming task environment contains exactly these third-party Python
# distributions and no others. Python itself is pinned by task.toml and both
# Harbor image Dockerfiles.
attrs==26.1.0
bleach==6.4.0
certifi==2026.7.22
chardet==7.6.0
charset-normalizer==3.5.1
fastjsonschema==2.22.2
filelock==3.32.3
fsspec==2026.7.0
idna==3.18
Jinja2==3.1.6
joblib==1.5.3
jsonschema==4.26.0
jsonschema-specifications==2025.9.1
jupyter-core==5.9.1
jupytext==1.19.5
kaggle==2.2.4
kagglesdk==0.1.37
markdown-it-py==4.2.0
MarkupSafe==3.0.3
mdit-py-plugins==0.6.1
mdurl==0.1.2
mpmath==1.3.0
nbformat==5.11.1
networkx==3.6.1
numpy==2.2.6
packaging==26.3
pandas==2.3.3
pillow==12.3.0
pip==26.0.1
platformdirs==4.11.3
protobuf==7.35.1
pyarrow==18.1.0
python-dateutil==2.9.0.post0
python-dotenv==1.2.3
python-slugify==8.0.4
pytz==2026.3.post1
PyYAML==6.0.3
referencing==0.37.0
reportlab==4.2.5
requests==2.34.2
rpds-py==2026.6.3
scikit-learn==1.7.2
scipy==1.15.3
setuptools==84.0.0
six==1.17.0
sympy==1.14.0
text-unidecode==1.3
threadpoolctl==3.6.0
torch==2.8.0
tqdm==4.70.0
traitlets==5.16.1
typing-extensions==4.16.0
tzdata==2026.3
urllib3==2.7.0
webencodings==0.6.1
Tool calllist_directoryTool call Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "dir_path": "/app/solution"
}

Tool response 

Directory /app/solution is empty.
05

Check CPU cores and available memory

+00:12
Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck CPU cores and available memory Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "lscpu | grep -E \"Model name|CPU\\(s\\):|Thread|Core|Socket\"; free -h",
  "description": "Check CPU cores and available memory"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: CPU(s):                                  8
Model name:                              AMD EPYC 7R13 Processor
Thread(s) per core:                      2
Core(s) per socket:                      4
Socket(s):                               1
NUMA node0 CPU(s):                       0-7
/usr/bin/bash: line 4: free: command not found
Exit Code: 127
Process Group PGID: 1612
</untrusted_context>
06

Check RAM availability

+00:14
Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck RAM availability Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check RAM availability",
  "command": "cat /proc/meminfo | grep -E \"MemTotal|MemAvailable\""
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: MemTotal:       15988968 kB
MemAvailable:   14446072 kB
Process Group PGID: 1617
</untrusted_context>
07

Inspect all data files in /task/data

+00:17
Recorded reasoning summary 50 words

Exploring the Data Environment

My current focus is on understanding the computational resources available and the initial state of the dataset. I'm verifying the allocated vCPUs and RAM, then I plan to dive into the /task/data/ directory to inspect files and run initial exploratory scripts for data shapes and statistics.

Tool callrun_shell_commandInspect all data files in /task/data Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\ndata_dir = Path(\"/task/data\")\nfor p in sorted(data_dir.glob(\"*\")):\n    if p.suffix == \".parquet\":\n        df = pd.read_parquet(p)\n        print(f\"{p.name:35s}: shape={df.shape}, cols={list(df.columns)}\")\n    elif p.suffix == \".npz\":\n        npz = np.load(p)\n        print(f\"{p.name:35s}: keys={list(npz.keys())}, uids={len(npz[\\\"uids\\\"])}, items={len(npz[\\\"item_ids\\\"])}, packed_shape={npz[\\\"packed_eligible\\\"].shape}\")\n'",
  "description": "Inspect all data files in /task/data"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: File "<string>", line 13
    print(f"{p.name:35s}: keys={list(npz.keys())}, uids={len(npz[\"uids\"])}, items={len(npz[\"item_ids\"])}, packed_shape={npz[\"packed_eligible\"].shape}")
                                                                  ^
SyntaxError: unexpected character after line continuation character
Exit Code: 1
Process Group PGID: 1621
</untrusted_context>
08

Inspect data shapes and columns

+00:19
Tool callrun_shell_commandInspect data shapes and columns Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\ndata_dir = Path(\"/task/data\")\nfor p in sorted(data_dir.glob(\"*\")):\n    if p.suffix == \".parquet\":\n        df = pd.read_parquet(p)\n        print(f\"{p.name:35s}: shape={df.shape}, cols={list(df.columns)}\")\n    elif p.suffix == \".npz\":\n        npz = np.load(p)\n        print(f\"{p.name:35s}: keys={list(npz.keys())}, uids={len(npz[\\x27uids\\x27])}, items={len(npz[\\x27item_ids\\x27])}, packed_shape={npz[\\x27packed_eligible\\x27].shape}\")\n'",
  "description": "Inspect data shapes and columns"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: File "<string>", line 13
    print(f"{p.name:35s}: keys={list(npz.keys())}, uids={len(npz[\x27uids\x27])}, items={len(npz[\x27item_ids\x27])}, packed_shape={npz[\x27packed_eligible\x27].shape}")
                                                                  ^
SyntaxError: unexpected character after line continuation character
Exit Code: 1
Process Group PGID: 1624
</untrusted_context>
09

Inspect data shapes and columns without nested f-string quotes

+00:22
Tool callrun_shell_commandInspect data shapes and columns without nested f-string quotes Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Inspect data shapes and columns without nested f-string quotes",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\ndata_dir = Path(\"/task/data\")\nfor p in sorted(data_dir.glob(\"*\")):\n    if p.suffix == \".parquet\":\n        df = pd.read_parquet(p)\n        print(\"%-35s: shape=%s, cols=%s\" % (p.name, str(df.shape), str(list(df.columns))))\n    elif p.suffix == \".npz\":\n        npz = np.load(p)\n        print(\"%-35s: keys=%s, uids=%d, items=%d, packed_shape=%s\" % (p.name, str(list(npz.keys())), len(npz[\"uids\"]), len(npz[\"item_ids\"]), str(npz[\"packed_eligible\"].shape)))\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: candidate_catalog.parquet          : shape=(30000, 4), cols=['item_id', 'positive_listens', 'organic_positive_listens', 'popularity_rank']
target_users.parquet               : shape=(8456, 3), cols=['uid', 'recent_positive_listens', 'history_positive_listens']
test_eligible_candidates.npz       : keys=['uids', 'item_ids', 'packed_eligible'], uids=8456, items=30000, packed_shape=(8456, 3750)
test_preference_state.parquet      : shape=(484776, 3), cols=['uid', 'item_id', 'state']
train_dislikes.parquet             : shape=(101075, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
train_likes.parquet                : shape=(814831, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
train_listens.parquet              : shape=(43484159, 6), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct', 'track_length_seconds']
train_undislikes.parquet           : shape=(19960, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
train_unlikes.parquet              : shape=(292665, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
val_dislikes.parquet               : shape=(3563, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
val_likes.parquet                  : shape=(37795, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
val_listens.parquet                : shape=(1501697, 6), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct', 'track_length_seconds']
val_undislikes.parquet             : shape=(606, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
val_unlikes.parquet                : shape=(9346, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
validation_eligible_candidates.npz : keys=['uids', 'item_ids', 'packed_eligible'], uids=8456, items=30000, packed_shape=(8456, 3750)
validation_preference_state.parquet: shape=(469124, 3), cols=['uid', 'item_id', 'state']
Process Group PGID: 1627
</untrusted_context>
10

Check train_listens users and overlap with target_users

+00:31
Recorded reasoning summary 32 words

Processing Catalog Data

I've begun analyzing the candidate_catalog.parquet dataset, noting its 30,000 items and key columns like item_id and popularity_rank. I've also registered the target_users.parquet file, containing 8,456 users, for subsequent integration.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck train_listens users and overlap with target_users Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check train_listens users and overlap with target_users",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\n# Check schema and metadata of train_listens\nschema = pq.read_schema(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\")\nprint(\"train_listens schema:\", schema)\n\ntarget_users = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\ntarget_uids = set(target_users.uid)\nprint(f\"Number of target users: {len(target_uids)}\")\n\n# Sample or check total unique users in train_listens\nsample = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\"])\nprint(f\"Total rows in train_listens: {len(sample)}\")\nunique_uids = sample.uid.nunique()\nprint(f\"Total unique uids in train_listens: {unique_uids}\")\noverlap = sample.uid.isin(target_uids).sum()\nprint(f\"Rows belonging to target users: {overlap} ({overlap/len(sample):.2%})\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: train_listens schema: uid: uint32
timestamp: uint32
item_id: uint32
is_organic: uint8
played_ratio_pct: uint16
track_length_seconds: uint32
-- schema metadata --
pandas: '{"index_columns": [], "column_indexes": [], "columns": [{"name":' + 797
Number of target users: 8456
Total rows in train_listens: 43484159
Total unique uids in train_listens: 9238
Rows belonging to target users: 43222297 (99.40%)
Process Group PGID: 1647
</untrusted_context>
11

Check timestamp ranges

+00:42
Recorded reasoning summary 57 words

Analyzing User Data

My focus has shifted to understanding user engagement within the train_listens dataset. The sheer volume of data, with 43 million rows and a disproportionately small number of unique users (9238), highlights a significant average of ~4,700 listens per user. I'm now investigating the time distribution of these listens across both training and validation sets.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck timestamp ranges Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check timestamp ranges",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\n\nfor name in [\"train_listens\", \"val_listens\"]:\n    df = pd.read_parquet(f\"/task/data/{name}.parquet\", columns=[\"timestamp\"])\n    print(name, \"min ts:\", df.timestamp.min(), \"max ts:\", df.timestamp.max(), \"span (days):\", (df.timestamp.max() - df.timestamp.min()) / 86400)\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: train_listens min ts: 0 max ts: 24786795 span (days): 286.88420138888887
val_listens min ts: 24788600 max ts: 25393395 span (days): 6.99994212962963
Process Group PGID: 1673
</untrusted_context>
12

Inspect catalog, target users, preference state, and eligibility counts

+00:52
Recorded reasoning summary 57 words

Analyzing Data Split

My current focus is on understanding the temporal spans of the training and validation datasets. I've noted that train_listens covers roughly 287 days, while val_listens spans a more concise 7-day period. Interestingly, the end of the training data and the start of the validation data exhibit a precise 30-minute gap, confirming my prior understanding.

Recorded reasoning summary 36 words

Confirming Test Set

I've confirmed the structure of the validation and subsequent test periods. Following the 7-day validation window, there's another 30-minute gap, and then the hidden 7-day test set begins, aligning with expected production timelines.

Recorded reasoning summary 63 words

Refining Feature Generation

My thoughts are now centered on how to best leverage interaction history for the user tower, specifically avoiding simple ID lookups. I'm considering how to combine user and item representations via dot product and exploring the implications of using separate trainable towers for each. The distinct roles of the validation and test windows are also a key area of focus.

Recorded reasoning summary 50 words

Evaluating Ranking Metrics

I'm now focusing on how the ranking quality will be measured. Specifically, I'm processing the definition of graded NDCG@10, understanding that a grade of 3 signifies an organic like, 1 means an 80% listen, and 0 is otherwise. If both positive events occur, grade 3 takes precedence.

Tool callrun_shell_commandInspect catalog, target users, preference state, and eligibility counts Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\nprint(\"Catalog items:\", len(catalog), \"id range:\", catalog.item_id.min(), catalog.item_id.max())\n\ntargets = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\nprint(\"Target users:\", len(targets), \"uid range:\", targets.uid.min(), targets.uid.max())\n\nval_pref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\nprint(\"Val pref state:\", len(val_pref), val_pref.head())\nprint(\"Val pref state values:\", val_pref.state.value_counts())\n\ntest_pref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/test_preference_state.parquet\")\nprint(\"Test pref state:\", len(test_pref), test_pref.state.value_counts())\n\nval_npz = np.load(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nprint(\"Val npz items == catalog items?\", np.array_equal(val_npz[\"item_ids\"], catalog.item_id.values))\npacked = val_npz[\"packed_eligible\"]\ncounts = []\nfor r in range(min(100, len(targets))):\n    mask = np.unpackbits(packed[r], count=len(catalog), bitorder=\"little\")\n    counts.append(mask.sum())\nprint(\"Eligible items per user (sample 100): min, mean, max =\", np.min(counts), np.mean(counts), np.max(counts))\n'",
  "description": "Inspect catalog, target users, preference state, and eligibility counts"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Catalog items: 30000 id range: 206 9390294
Target users: 8456 uid range: 100 1000000
Val pref state: 469124    uid  item_id  state
0  100   410868  liked
1  100   732449  liked
2  100   982903  liked
3  100  1730273  liked
4  100  2621343  liked
Val pref state values: state
liked       418435
disliked     50689
Name: count, dtype: int64
Test pref state: 484776 state
liked       432659
disliked     52117
Name: count, dtype: int64
Val npz items == catalog items? True
Eligible items per user (sample 100): min, mean, max = 25547 29098.94 29971
Process Group PGID: 1692
</untrusted_context>
13

Check uid and item_id alignment across npz files and target_users

+00:57
Recorded reasoning summary 56 words

Analyzing Eligibility

I've been examining the data, and it's fascinating how consistently almost all of the 30,000 catalog items, roughly 29,100, are eligible for each user. This implies only a small fraction, around 900, are typically excluded for reasons like prior listening, dislikes, or restrictions. I'm now focusing on the val_npz["item_ids"] to understand these specific exclusions.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck uid and item_id alignment across npz files and target_users Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check uid and item_id alignment across npz files and target_users",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\n\nval_npz = np.load(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\ntest_npz = np.load(\"/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz\")\ntargets = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\n\nprint(\"uids equal?\", np.array_equal(val_npz[\"uids\"], targets.uid.values), np.array_equal(test_npz[\"uids\"], targets.uid.values))\nprint(\"item_ids equal?\", np.array_equal(val_npz[\"item_ids\"], test_npz[\"item_ids\"]))\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: uids equal? True True
item_ids equal? True
Process Group PGID: 1709
</untrusted_context>
14

Inspect validation ground truth statistics

+01:02
Recorded reasoning summary 49 words

Confirming Data Integrity

I've confirmed that the uids within the npz files precisely align with the targets.uid.values, covering all 8456 target users. Similarly, the item_ids in the npz files accurately correspond to the 30000 items in the candidate_catalog.parquet. This complete alignment sets the stage for the next validation steps.

Tool callrun_shell_commandInspect validation ground truth statistics Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport sys\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nimport evaluate_public\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet\nimport pandas as pd\n\ntargets_frame = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\ntargets = set(targets_frame.uid.astype(int))\neligibility = CandidateSet(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\ngraded = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility, targets)\n\nprint(f\"Users with graded items in val: {len(graded)} / {len(targets)} ({len(graded)/len(targets):.2%})\")\ntotal_items = sum(len(items) for items in graded.values())\ngrade_counts = {1: 0, 3: 0}\nfor items in graded.values():\n    for g in items.values():\n        grade_counts[g] += 1\nprint(f\"Total graded items: {total_items}, distribution: {grade_counts}\")\nuser_item_counts = [len(items) for items in graded.values()]\nimport numpy as np\nprint(\"Items per graded user: min=%d, p50=%d, mean=%.1f, max=%d\" % (np.min(user_item_counts), np.median(user_item_counts), np.mean(user_item_counts), np.max(user_item_counts)))\n'",
  "description": "Inspect validation ground truth statistics"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Users with graded items in val: 4263 / 8456 (50.41%)
Total graded items: 37769, distribution: {1: 33352, 3: 4417}
Items per graded user: min=1, p50=4, mean=8.9, max=442
Process Group PGID: 1725
</untrusted_context>
15

Compute popularity baseline score

+01:13
Recorded reasoning summary 32 words

Assessing Pure Popularity

I'm currently establishing a baseline by evaluating a purely popularity-driven approach on public validation data. This will serve as my initial benchmark and simultaneously validate the entire evaluation pipeline.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCompute popularity baseline score Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport sys\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nimport evaluate_public\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, score_rankings\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ntargets_frame = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\ntargets = set(targets_frame.uid.astype(int))\neligibility = CandidateSet(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\ngraded = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility, targets)\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\n# catalog is sorted by positive_listens / popularity_rank\ntop_items = catalog.item_id.values\n\n# For each user, pick top 100 eligible items\nval_npz = np.load(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nuids = val_npz[\"uids\"]\nitem_ids = val_npz[\"item_ids\"]\npacked = val_npz[\"packed_eligible\"]\n\nranked = {}\nfor r, uid in enumerate(uids):\n    uid = int(uid)\n    mask = np.unpackbits(packed[r], count=len(item_ids), bitorder=\"little\")\n    # mask is boolean array for item_ids\n    eligible_items = item_ids[mask.astype(bool)]\n    ranked[uid] = list(map(int, eligible_items[:100]))\n\nscores = score_rankings(ranked, graded)\nprint(\"Popularity baseline score:\", scores)\n'",
  "description": "Compute popularity baseline score"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Popularity baseline score: {'quality_ndcg@10': 0.01071, 'quality_users': 4263}
Process Group PGID: 1745
</untrusted_context>
16

Compute organic popularity baseline score

+01:20
Tool callrun_shell_commandCompute organic popularity baseline score Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport sys\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nimport evaluate_public\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, score_rankings\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ntargets_frame = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\ntargets = set(targets_frame.uid.astype(int))\neligibility = CandidateSet(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\ngraded = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility, targets)\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\ntop_items_org = catalog.sort_values(\"organic_positive_listens\", ascending=False).item_id.values\n\nval_npz = np.load(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nuids = val_npz[\"uids\"]\nitem_ids = val_npz[\"item_ids\"]\n# map item_id to org rank\norder_map = {item: i for i, item in enumerate(top_items_org)}\npacked = val_npz[\"packed_eligible\"]\n\nranked = {}\nfor r, uid in enumerate(uids):\n    uid = int(uid)\n    mask = np.unpackbits(packed[r], count=len(item_ids), bitorder=\"little\")\n    eligible_items = item_ids[mask.astype(bool)]\n    # sort eligible by org rank\n    sorted_eligible = sorted(eligible_items, key=lambda x: order_map[x])\n    ranked[uid] = [int(x) for x in sorted_eligible[:100]]\n\nscores = score_rankings(ranked, graded)\nprint(\"Organic popularity baseline score:\", scores)\n'",
  "description": "Compute organic popularity baseline score"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Organic popularity baseline score: {'quality_ndcg@10': 0.010578, 'quality_users': 4263}
Process Group PGID: 1765
</untrusted_context>
17

Inspect candidate_catalog.parquet in detail

+02:51
Recorded reasoning summary 45 words

Analyzing Architectural Nuances

I'm currently dissecting the core architectural demands, specifically focusing on constructing a two-tower neural network within PyTorch for CPU execution. The prompt's emphasis on scaling to millions of users, despite a small benchmark, is a key consideration I'm integrating into my design.

Recorded reasoning summary 52 words

Developing Tower Architectures

I'm now focusing on the specifics of the user and item towers. Crucially, the user tower must learn from interaction history, not just an ID. I'm considering how to integrate per-user candidate eligibility and explicit preference state into this dynamic. This ensures the model scales and meets latency requirements.

Recorded reasoning summary 43 words

Formulating Interaction Embeddings

I'm now concentrating on how the user tower will process interaction history. Instead of a simple ID lookup, it needs to aggregate representations from past user actions to form a coherent user vector for dot product scoring with item vectors.

Recorded reasoning summary 43 words

Refining User Embeddings

I'm now exploring how to represent user history effectively. I've confirmed that I can leverage the item embedding table, passing interaction sequences through pooling mechanisms like attention or GRUs to derive a rich user vector, incorporating recency and action types.

Recorded reasoning summary 45 words

Designing Negative Sampling

I'm now considering how to efficiently train the two towers without a global matrix. This involves exploring in-batch negative sampling strategies and loss functions like sampled softmax or BPR, crucial for scaling to millions of users and items in a production setting.

Recorded reasoning summary 45 words

Implementing In-Batch Negatives

I'm now incorporating the concept of in-batch negative sampling within the contrastive loss function for training the two towers. This approach, commonly used in large-scale recommendation systems, allows for efficient learning without constructing a full user-item matrix, directly addressing the scalability requirements.

Tool callrun_shell_commandInspect candidate_catalog.parquet in detail Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Inspect candidate_catalog.parquet in detail",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\nprint(catalog.head(10))\nprint(catalog.describe())\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: item_id  positive_listens  organic_positive_listens  popularity_rank
0  5862961             26615                     20620                1
1  6901374             25536                     17347                2
2  5635052             24691                     17194                3
3  3542184             24075                     17699                4
4  9378983             24036                     18195                5
5  5463340             22746                     17398                6
6  8213481             22505                     17071                7
7   906358             22238                     17183                8
8  2859641             18380                     13704                9
9  3033749             16682                     12267               10
            item_id  ...  popularity_rank
count  3.000000e+04  ...     30000.000000
mean   4.698278e+06  ...     15000.500000
std    2.700274e+06  ...      8660.398374
min    2.060000e+02  ...         1.000000
25%    2.382368e+06  ...      7500.750000
50%    4.687992e+06  ...     15000.500000
75%    7.040711e+06  ...     22500.250000
max    9.390294e+06  ...     30000.000000

[8 rows x 4 columns]
Process Group PGID: 1791
</untrusted_context>
18

Check item catalog coverage across datasets

+02:59
Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck item catalog coverage across datasets Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\ncat_items = set(catalog.item_id)\nprint(\"Catalog unique items:\", len(cat_items))\n\nfor name in [\"train_likes\", \"train_dislikes\", \"val_likes\"]:\n    df = pd.read_parquet(f\"/task/data/{name}.parquet\")\n    in_cat = df.item_id.isin(cat_items).mean()\n    print(f\"{name}: total {len(df)}, unique items {df.item_id.nunique()}, in catalog {in_cat:.2%}\")\n\nlistens_sample = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"item_id\"])\nprint(f\"train_listens: total {len(listens_sample)}, unique items {listens_sample.item_id.nunique()}, in catalog {listens_sample.item_id.isin(cat_items).mean():.2%}\")\n'",
  "description": "Check item catalog coverage across datasets"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Catalog unique items: 30000
train_likes: total 814831, unique items 172303, in catalog 68.09%
train_dislikes: total 101075, unique items 50876, in catalog 64.63%
val_likes: total 37795, unique items 22902, in catalog 55.71%
train_listens: total 43484159, unique items 845395, in catalog 71.86%
Process Group PGID: 1814
</untrusted_context>
19

Check preference state overlap with catalog

+03:15
Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck preference state overlap with catalog Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\ncat_items = set(catalog.item_id)\n\nval_pref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\nprint(\"val_pref items in catalog:\", val_pref.item_id.isin(cat_items).mean())\n\ntest_pref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/test_preference_state.parquet\")\nprint(\"test_pref items in catalog:\", test_pref.item_id.isin(cat_items).mean())\n'",
  "description": "Check preference state overlap with catalog"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: val_pref items in catalog: 1.0
test_pref items in catalog: 1.0
Process Group PGID: 1835
</untrusted_context>
20

Check train_listens parquet metadata and row groups

+03:30
Recorded reasoning summary 51 words

Confirming Data Completeness

I've confirmed that all items within both val_pref and test_pref are present in the candidate catalog. This means our preference data is fully covered. My next step is to examine the discovery objective for any interactions and understand how relevance is determined by organic behavior at the cutoff.

Recorded reasoning summary 39 words

Investigating User Behavior

I'm now digging into user interaction data. My focus is on understanding organic behavior, specifically how users engage with tracks in the validation set. I'm analyzing listen percentages and likes to define the relevance grading system.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck train_listens parquet metadata and row groups Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check train_listens parquet metadata and row groups",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport time\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\nt0 = time.time()\nmeta = pq.read_metadata(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\")\nprint(f\"Num rows: {meta.num_rows}, num row groups: {meta.num_row_groups}, time: {time.time()-t0:.2f}s\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Num rows: 43484159, num row groups: 42, time: 0.00s
Process Group PGID: 1852
</untrusted_context>
21

Check train_listens row group statistics

+03:39
Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck train_listens row group statistics Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check train_listens row group statistics",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\nmeta = pq.read_metadata(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\")\nrg0 = meta.row_group(0)\nprint(\"Columns in schema:\", meta.schema)\nfor i in range(min(5, meta.num_row_groups)):\n    rg = meta.row_group(i)\n    ts_col = rg.column(1) # timestamp\n    print(f\"RG {i}: rows={rg.num_rows}, ts min={ts_col.statistics.min}, max={ts_col.statistics.max}\")\nlast_rg = meta.row_group(meta.num_row_groups - 1)\nprint(f\"Last RG: rows={last_rg.num_rows}, ts min={last_rg.column(1).statistics.min}, max={last_rg.column(1).statistics.max}\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Columns in schema: <pyarrow._parquet.ParquetSchema object at 0x7a43f83219c0>
required group field_id=-1 schema {
  optional int32 field_id=-1 uid (Int(bitWidth=32, isSigned=false));
  optional int32 field_id=-1 timestamp (Int(bitWidth=32, isSigned=false));
  optional int32 field_id=-1 item_id (Int(bitWidth=32, isSigned=false));
  optional int32 field_id=-1 is_organic (Int(bitWidth=8, isSigned=false));
  optional int32 field_id=-1 played_ratio_pct (Int(bitWidth=16, isSigned=false));
  optional int32 field_id=-1 track_length_seconds (Int(bitWidth=32, isSigned=false));
}

RG 0: rows=1048576, ts min=15, max=24786690
RG 1: rows=1048576, ts min=185, max=24786725
RG 2: rows=1048576, ts min=15320, max=24786790
RG 3: rows=1048576, ts min=3625, max=24786795
RG 4: rows=1048576, ts min=5735, max=24786740
Last RG: rows=492543, ts min=20, max=24786690
Process Group PGID: 1863
</untrusted_context>
22

Check train_listens uid row groups

+03:43
Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck train_listens uid row groups Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\nmeta = pq.read_metadata(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\")\nfor i in range(min(5, meta.num_row_groups)):\n    rg = meta.row_group(i)\n    uid_col = rg.column(0) # uid\n    print(f\"RG {i}: uid min={uid_col.statistics.min}, max={uid_col.statistics.max}\")\n'",
  "description": "Check train_listens uid row groups"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: RG 0: uid min=100, max=26500
RG 1: uid min=26500, max=50300
RG 2: uid min=50300, max=73100
RG 3: uid min=73100, max=98200
RG 4: uid min=98200, max=122600
Process Group PGID: 1874
</untrusted_context>
23

Inspect train_likes structure

+03:47
Tool callrun_shell_commandInspect train_likes structure Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Inspect train_likes structure",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\ndf = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\nprint(\"train_likes:\", df.head())\nprint(\"min uid, max uid:\", df.uid.min(), df.uid.max())\nprint(\"is sorted by uid?\", df.uid.is_monotonic_increasing)\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: train_likes:    uid  timestamp  item_id  is_organic
0  100      44755   732449           1
1  100    1155860  6568592           0
2  100    1259125  5411243           1
3  100    1260005  7371186           0
4  100    1263935  4943655           0
min uid, max uid: 100 1000000
is sorted by uid? True
Process Group PGID: 1885
</untrusted_context>
24

Check validation_preference_state coverage of target users

+03:57
Recorded reasoning summary 46 words

Analyzing User Data

I'm currently processing the event logs, noting their uid sorting. My focus has shifted to analyzing the target_users.parquet file, which contains 8,456 users. The prompt emphasizes deriving user representation from interaction history, not direct ID lookups, which is my next area of exploration.

Recorded reasoning summary 81 words

Refining Candidate Eligibility

My thoughts are now centered on the provided criteria for candidate eligibility, recognizing it as platform-owned and defining the scope of my modeling. I'm distinguishing between the roles of the two public windows: one for building and tuning a validation ranker using train_* as history and val_* as outcomes, and the other for refitting the final ranker on combined train_* + val_* history for hidden-test evaluation, ensuring val_* events are not used as features in validation performance measurement.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck validation_preference_state coverage of target users Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check validation_preference_state coverage of target users",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\n\nvpref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\nprint(\"Total rows:\", len(vpref))\nprint(\"Unique uids in vpref:\", vpref.uid.nunique())\nprint(\"Unique items in vpref:\", vpref.item_id.nunique())\nprint(\"States:\", vpref.state.value_counts())\n\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\").uid)\nprint(\"Target users in vpref:\", len(targets.intersection(set(vpref.uid))))\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Total rows: 469124
Unique uids in vpref: 7038
Unique items in vpref: 28814
States: state
liked       418435
disliked     50689
Name: count, dtype: int64
Target users in vpref: 7038
Process Group PGID: 1908
</untrusted_context>
25

Inspect target_users.parquet columns and values

+04:27
Recorded reasoning summary 35 words

Investigating User Data

I'm currently focused on understanding the remaining 1418 users not captured by validation_preference_state. I'm exploring their listening habits and how that might inform their preferences, as they lack explicit likes/dislikes in vpref.

Tool callrun_shell_commandInspect target_users.parquet columns and values Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Inspect target_users.parquet columns and values",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\ntargets = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\nprint(\"Target users summary:\")\nprint(targets.describe())\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Target users summary:
                  uid  recent_positive_listens  history_positive_listens
count     8456.000000              8456.000000               8456.000000
mean    502289.108325              1251.076750               3236.440752
std     287953.395912              1414.340904               3697.575286
min        100.000000                20.000000                 20.000000
25%     254375.000000               281.000000                630.000000
50%     503850.000000               784.500000               1920.500000
75%     751725.000000              1706.250000               4494.250000
max    1000000.000000             19592.000000              26597.000000
Process Group PGID: 1926
</untrusted_context>
26

Check distribution of listens over time

+04:34
Recorded reasoning summary 39 words

Analyzing Listen Distribution

My focus is now on understanding the recent listen patterns. I'm examining the distribution of listens within the last 90 days, specifically to confirm the threshold for "recent positive listens" and its implications for user engagement.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck distribution of listens over time Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check distribution of listens over time",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\n# Check how many listens in the last 30, 60, 90 days\ncutoff = 24786800\nt30 = cutoff - 30 * 86400\nt90 = cutoff - 90 * 86400\n\n# Let us count using pyarrow dataset or reading timestamp column\nt = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"timestamp\"])\nts = t[\"timestamp\"].to_numpy()\nprint(\"Total listens:\", len(ts))\nprint(\"Last 90 days (>= t90):\", (ts >= t90).sum(), f\"({(ts >= t90).mean():.2%})\")\nprint(\"Last 30 days (>= t30):\", (ts >= t30).sum(), f\"({(ts >= t30).mean():.2%})\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Total listens: 43484159
Last 90 days (>= t90): 16769274 (38.56%)
Last 30 days (>= t30): 6126103 (14.09%)
Process Group PGID: 1942
</untrusted_context>
27

Check overlap between validation ground truth and active preference state

+04:46
Recorded reasoning summary 52 words

Analyzing Listenership Trends

I'm currently dissecting recent listenership data, specifically focusing on organic engagement over the past month. My immediate next step involves identifying key predictors for positive organic listens and likes within the upcoming week, and I'm examining the intersection of validation positive events with historical listener preferences and past engagement.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck overlap between validation ground truth and active preference state Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport sys\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nimport evaluate_public\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ntargets_frame = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\ntargets = set(targets_frame.uid.astype(int))\neligibility = CandidateSet(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\ngraded = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility, targets)\n\n# Check active preference state for validation\nvpref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\nliked_pairs = set(zip(vpref[vpref.state == \"liked\"].uid, vpref[vpref.state == \"liked\"].item_id))\ndisliked_pairs = set(zip(vpref[vpref.state == \"disliked\"].uid, vpref[vpref.state == \"disliked\"].item_id))\n\ntotal_val_pos = 0\nin_liked_pref = 0\nin_disliked_pref = 0\n\nfor uid, items in graded.items():\n    for item, grade in items.items():\n        total_val_pos += 1\n        if (uid, item) in liked_pairs:\n            in_liked_pref += 1\n        if (uid, item) in disliked_pairs:\n            in_disliked_pref += 1\n\nprint(f\"Total val positive (eligible) events: {total_val_pos}\")\nprint(f\"In active liked preference state: {in_liked_pref} ({in_liked_pref/total_val_pos:.2%})\")\nprint(f\"In active disliked preference state: {in_disliked_pref} ({in_disliked_pref/total_val_pos:.2%})\")\n'",
  "description": "Check overlap between validation ground truth and active preference state"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Total val positive (eligible) events: 37769
In active liked preference state: 0 (0.00%)
In active disliked preference state: 0 (0.00%)
Process Group PGID: 1962
</untrusted_context>
28

Check whether preference state items are eligible in candidate set

+04:55
Recorded reasoning summary 38 words

Investigating Preference States

I'm currently examining why no active liked or disliked preference states are being registered. My initial hypothesis is that the eligibility mask might be inadvertently filtering these out. I'm testing this to pinpoint the cause.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck whether preference state items are eligible in candidate set Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet\n\neligibility = CandidateSet(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nvpref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\n\nsample_pairs = list(zip(vpref.uid[:1000], vpref.item_id[:1000]))\neligible_count = sum(eligibility.is_eligible(uid, item) for uid, item in sample_pairs)\nprint(f\"Eligible pairs in preference state: {eligible_count} / {len(sample_pairs)}\")\n'",
  "description": "Check whether preference state items are eligible in candidate set"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 3, in <module>
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ranking_evaluation'
Exit Code: 1
Process Group PGID: 1982
</untrusted_context>
29

Check whether preference state items are eligible in candidate set

+05:01
Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck whether preference state items are eligible in candidate set Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport sys\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nimport pandas as pd\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet\n\neligibility = CandidateSet(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nvpref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\n\nsample_pairs = list(zip(vpref.uid[:1000], vpref.item_id[:1000]))\neligible_count = sum(eligibility.is_eligible(uid, item) for uid, item in sample_pairs)\nprint(f\"Eligible pairs in preference state: {eligible_count} / {len(sample_pairs)}\")\n'",
  "description": "Check whether preference state items are eligible in candidate set"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Eligible pairs in preference state: 0 / 1000
Process Group PGID: 1999
</untrusted_context>
30

Check if validation graded items were listened to in train

+05:14
Recorded reasoning summary 46 words

Refining Eligibility Criteria

I'm currently focused on refining the eligibility criteria for tracks. My latest consideration involves excluding tracks the user has previously listened to, in addition to those already in their active preference state. This should lead to a more nuanced and personalized selection process.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck if validation graded items were listened to in train Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport sys\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nimport evaluate_public\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ntargets_frame = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\ntargets = set(targets_frame.uid.astype(int))\neligibility = CandidateSet(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\ngraded = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility, targets)\n\n# Let us check 10 users and see how many graded items they listened to in train\nsample_uids = list(graded.keys())[:10]\nsample_graded_items = {uid: set(graded[uid].keys()) for uid in sample_uids}\n\n# Read train_listens for these 10 users\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\n\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\"], filters=[(\"uid\", \"in\", sample_uids)])\ntrain_df = table.to_pandas()\n\nfor uid in sample_uids:\n    user_train_items = set(train_df[train_df.uid == uid].item_id)\n    val_items = sample_graded_items[uid]\n    overlap = val_items.intersection(user_train_items)\n    print(f\"User {uid}: {len(val_items)} graded items, {len(overlap)} already in train listens ({len(overlap)/len(val_items):.1%}), {len(user_train_items)} total train items\")\n'",
  "description": "Check if validation graded items were listened to in train"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: User 200: 13 graded items, 0 already in train listens (0.0%), 195 total train items
User 800: 25 graded items, 0 already in train listens (0.0%), 4415 total train items
User 900: 1 graded items, 0 already in train listens (0.0%), 519 total train items
User 1100: 20 graded items, 0 already in train listens (0.0%), 1682 total train items
User 1400: 38 graded items, 0 already in train listens (0.0%), 3884 total train items
User 1500: 15 graded items, 0 already in train listens (0.0%), 585 total train items
User 1900: 9 graded items, 0 already in train listens (0.0%), 3131 total train items
User 2000: 8 graded items, 0 already in train listens (0.0%), 525 total train items
User 2100: 28 graded items, 0 already in train listens (0.0%), 784 total train items
User 2200: 1 graded items, 0 already in train listens (0.0%), 1147 total train items
Process Group PGID: 2017
</untrusted_context>
31

Check if any past train listens are eligible

+05:21
Recorded reasoning summary 39 words

Investigating Discovery

I'm currently exploring whether the absence of items in train listens within validation eligible candidates signifies genuine discovery or if other filtering mechanisms are at play. I'll be examining more users and the impact of eligibility criteria.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck if any past train listens are eligible Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check if any past train listens are eligible",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport sys\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nimport evaluate_public\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\n# Sample 50 users from graded\ntargets_frame = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\ntargets = set(targets_frame.uid.astype(int))\neligibility = CandidateSet(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\ngraded = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility, targets)\nsample_uids = list(graded.keys())[:50]\n\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\"], filters=[(\"uid\", \"in\", sample_uids)])\ntrain_df = table.to_pandas()\ntrain_pairs = set(zip(train_df.uid, train_df.item_id))\n\ntot_val = 0\nin_train = 0\nfor uid in sample_uids:\n    for item in graded[uid]:\n        tot_val += 1\n        if (uid, item) in train_pairs:\n            in_train += 1\nprint(f\"Total val items in sample: {tot_val}, in train listens: {in_train} ({in_train/tot_val:.2%})\")\n\n# Also check if ANY item in train listens is eligible!\nsample_train_pairs = list(train_pairs)[:1000]\neligible_in_train = sum(eligibility.is_eligible(uid, item) for uid, item in sample_train_pairs)\nprint(f\"Eligible items among past train listens: {eligible_in_train} / {len(sample_train_pairs)}\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Total val items in sample: 430, in train listens: 0 (0.00%)
Eligible items among past train listens: 0 / 1000
Process Group PGID: 2039
</untrusted_context>
32

Compare ineligible items with user interacted catalog items

+05:36
Recorded reasoning summary 51 words

Exploring Candidate Eligibility

I've just realized a significant detail: the candidate eligibility filter is quite strict. It's excluding all tracks I've previously listened to, as well as any I've liked or disliked. This means the "eligible items among past train listens" count is currently zero. I need to investigate this further.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCompare ineligible items with user interacted catalog items Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\nnpz = np.load(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nuids = npz[\"uids\"]\nitem_ids = npz[\"item_ids\"]\ncat_items = set(item_ids)\n\nuid = uids[0]\nmask = np.unpackbits(npz[\"packed_eligible\"][0], count=len(item_ids), bitorder=\"little\")\nineligible_items = set(item_ids[~mask.astype(bool)])\nprint(f\"User {uid}: {len(ineligible_items)} ineligible items out of {len(item_ids)}\")\n\n# Load user 100 listens and likes\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"item_id\"], filters=[(\"uid\", \"==\", uid)])\nuser_listens = set(table[\"item_id\"].to_pylist())\nuser_catalog_listens = user_listens.intersection(cat_items)\n\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\nuser_likes = set(likes[likes.uid == uid].item_id).intersection(cat_items)\n\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_dislikes.parquet\")\nuser_dislikes = set(dislikes[dislikes.uid == uid].item_id).intersection(cat_items)\n\nuser_all_interacted = user_catalog_listens.union(user_likes).union(user_dislikes)\nprint(f\"User {uid} interacted with {len(user_all_interacted)} catalog items.\")\nprint(f\"Difference between ineligible and interacted: {len(ineligible_items - user_all_interacted)}, {len(user_all_interacted - ineligible_items)}\")\n'",
  "description": "Compare ineligible items with user interacted catalog items"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: User 100: 682 ineligible items out of 30000
User 100 interacted with 682 catalog items.
Difference between ineligible and interacted: 0, 0
Process Group PGID: 2061
</untrusted_context>
33

Inspect likes and dislikes per user statistics

+05:56
Recorded reasoning summary 32 words

Confirming Candidate Logic

I've confirmed that the candidate set for each user is exclusively composed of catalog items they've never interacted with, as evidenced by zero overlap between ineligible and interacted items.

Recorded reasoning summary 55 words

Refining Ranking Objective

My focus is now on precisely defining the ranking problem: identifying the top 100 unconsumed items most likely to be organically listened to (>= 80%) or liked within the next 7 days, from approximately 29,300 candidates per user. I'm also scrutinizing the NDCG@10 scoring mechanism and submission requirements for the final output.

Recorded reasoning summary 47 words

Developing Two-Tower Architecture

I'm now focused on constructing a two-tower neural network using PyTorch on CPU. This architecture will independently generate user and item embeddings, with their dot product determining relevance. The user tower will learn from interaction history, not simple IDs, to meet request-time latency requirements.

Recorded reasoning summary 63 words

Optimizing Computational Efficiency

I'm now concentrating on the computational aspects, ensuring my PyTorch model trains quickly on CPU within the 60-minute limit. This involves streamlining data processing to enable rapid iterations, as validation and test set evaluations are crucial for tracking progress against the deadline. I'm also carefully examining how positive interactions are defined in the training data to accurately inform the model.

Recorded reasoning summary 41 words

Incorporating Temporal Dynamics

I'm now exploring how to best represent users by incorporating temporal dynamics, specifically considering session-based training or next-item prediction. This involves leveraging features like recent organic listens, liked items, and other positive interactions to build richer user embeddings.

Tool callrun_shell_commandInspect likes and dislikes per user statistics Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\nprint(\"Train likes per user:\")\nprint(likes.groupby(\"uid\").size().describe())\n\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_dislikes.parquet\")\nprint(\"Train dislikes per user:\")\nprint(dislikes.groupby(\"uid\").size().describe())\n\n# Organic likes\norg_likes = likes[likes.is_organic == 1]\nprint(\"Organic likes per user:\")\nprint(org_likes.groupby(\"uid\").size().describe())\n'",
  "description": "Inspect likes and dislikes per user statistics"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Train likes per user:
count    8144.000000
mean      100.052922
std       178.043200
min         1.000000
25%         9.000000
50%        41.000000
75%       118.000000
max      3479.000000
dtype: float64
Train dislikes per user:
count    5732.000000
mean       17.633461
std        90.505121
min         1.000000
25%         2.000000
50%         4.000000
75%        10.000000
max      2985.000000
dtype: float64
Organic likes per user:
count    7846.000000
mean       58.862988
std       116.705148
min         1.000000
25%         6.000000
50%        23.000000
75%        64.000000
max      2209.000000
dtype: float64
Process Group PGID: 2082
</untrusted_context>
34

Check user listen counts in recent window

+06:11
Recorded reasoning summary 46 words

Analyzing User Engagement Metrics

I'm currently diving into user interaction patterns, specifically focusing on likes, dislikes, and recent listening habits. My goal is to understand the average number of likes and dislikes per user, and then to investigate unique listening counts within 30 and 60-day windows.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck user listen counts in recent window Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check user listen counts in recent window",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\ncutoff = 24786800\nt30 = cutoff - 30 * 86400\nt14 = cutoff - 14 * 86400\n\n# Sample 500 target users\ntargets = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\").uid.values[:500]\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"], filters=[(\"uid\", \"in\", targets), (\"timestamp\", \">=\", t30)])\ndf = table.to_pandas()\n\nprint(\"Listens in last 30 days for 500 users:\", len(df))\nstrong_org = df[(df.is_organic == 1) & (df.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]\nprint(\"Strong organic listens in last 30 days:\", len(strong_org))\nprint(\"Per user strong organic listens in last 30 days:\")\nprint(strong_org.groupby(\"uid\").size().describe())\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Listens in last 30 days for 500 users: 359842
Strong organic listens in last 30 days: 105639
Per user strong organic listens in last 30 days:
count     450.000000
mean      234.753333
std       323.038413
min         1.000000
25%        41.250000
50%       133.000000
75%       279.500000
max      3439.000000
dtype: float64
Process Group PGID: 2105
</untrusted_context>
35

Check if track_length_seconds is constant per item

+06:23
Recorded reasoning summary 45 words

Analyzing Organic Listen Trends

I'm currently reviewing the recent organic listening data, noting an average of 133 strong listens per user over the past month. Concurrently, I'm investigating the mechanics of item embeddings within the two-tower model, specifically concerning our catalog of 30,000 indexed items.

Recorded reasoning summary 40 words

Verifying Item Indices

I've confirmed that the item_id in candidate_catalog.parquet directly corresponds to the indices $0$ through $29999$. I'm now investigating the train_listens.parquet data to understand if track_length_seconds is consistent for each item, which would be valuable for feature extraction.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck if track_length_seconds is constant per item Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/val_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"item_id\", \"track_length_seconds\"])\ndf = table.to_pandas()\nstd_per_item = df.groupby(\"item_id\")[\"track_length_seconds\"].std().dropna()\nprint(\"Max std of track_length_seconds per item:\", std_per_item.max())\n'",
  "description": "Check if track_length_seconds is constant per item"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Max std of track_length_seconds per item: 0.0
Process Group PGID: 2127
</untrusted_context>
36

Benchmark PyTorch CPU EmbeddingBag speed

+06:51
Recorded reasoning summary 34 words

Confirming Track Lengths

I'm verifying if every catalog item is accounted for in train_listens or has a defined track_length_seconds, given the consistent length observed. This step is crucial for ensuring data integrity before proceeding.

Recorded reasoning summary 42 words

Defining Model Architecture

I am currently reviewing the core architectural mandates from the prompt. My focus is on understanding how to design the two-tower model to satisfy production latency constraints and avoid global matrix operations, ensuring independent user and item vector precomputation.

Recorded reasoning summary 117 words

Designing User Tower

My thoughts are now centered on constructing the user tower. I'm prioritizing its representation derivation from interaction history, rather than simple user-ID lookups, as per instruction.

Refining Temporal Backtesting

I'm focusing on how to effectively utilize the provided per-user candidate eligibility, cutoff-specific explicit preference state, and temporal backtest. My aim is to correctly implement the two public windows for validation and refitting, ensuring val_* events aren't incorrectly used as features during validation ranking.

Structuring Output Format

I'm concentrating on the final deliverable format. My current task is to ensure the output file, /app/solution/submission.parquet or /app/solution/submission.csv, strictly adheres to the 100-row-per-target-user requirement, with uid, item_id, and rank columns populated correctly as integers 1-100 without ties.

Recorded reasoning summary 42 words

Analyzing Two-Tower Discovery

I'm dissecting the intricacies of the two-tower model's role in discovery ranking. The core challenge is predicting new item engagement within a 7-day window for each user, considering their history up to a cutoff, with a constrained candidate set.

Recorded reasoning summary 46 words

Optimizing Inference Performance

I've confirmed that the matrix multiplication for scoring candidates, even with a large item set, is remarkably fast on an 8-core CPU. This indicates the two-tower approach inherently meets production latency requirements, allowing me to focus on optimal tower design and training strategies.

Recorded reasoning summary 57 words

Designing Item Tower

I am now focusing on the item tower's architecture. My current thinking revolves around leveraging both item embeddings and rich numerical features like listen counts and popularity rank, processed through an MLP for a more nuanced representation. The benefit of an MLP over a pure embedding is its ability to integrate these diverse features.

Recorded reasoning summary 38 words

Incorporating Item Popularity

I'm realizing the item tower's output norm can intrinsically capture item popularity, which is crucial for discovery ranking. I'm also exploring how to explicitly encode item bias within the item tower's output for further fine-tuning.

Recorded reasoning summary 44 words

Deriving User Representations

I'm focusing on how to derive user representations from interaction history, avoiding simple ID lookups. My thoughts are now on effectively processing sequences of item interactions, considering their features, to build a rich user vector that captures nuanced preferences for discovery.

Recorded reasoning summary 44 words

Combining User Interactions

I am now considering how to mathematically combine the various user interaction components into a coherent user vector. My focus is on exploring options like average pooling of item embeddings, potentially incorporating learned attention weights, to create a rich user representation.

Recorded reasoning summary 73 words

Combining User History Components

I am now exploring how to integrate the representations derived from liked items, recent strong listens, and disliked items into a unified user vector. The idea is to concatenate these aggregated representations and then process them through a user-specific MLP, potentially incorporating attention mechanisms for learned weighting, to create a comprehensive user embedding. I am also considering the possibility of sharing item embeddings between the user and item towers.

Recorded reasoning summary 39 words

Refining User Representations

I'm refining how to represent users by pooling embeddings from liked items and exploring attention mechanisms to capture distinct musical tastes. This approach, especially with shared item embeddings, seems more robust than simple averaging for discovery.

Tool callrun_shell_commandBenchmark PyTorch CPU EmbeddingBag speed Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport torch\nimport time\n\nprint(\"PyTorch version:\", torch.__version__)\nprint(\"PyTorch threads:\", torch.get_num_threads())\n\nemb_bag = torch.nn.EmbeddingBag(30005, 64, mode=\"mean\")\nindices = torch.randint(0, 30000, (8456 * 50,))\noffsets = torch.arange(0, 8456 * 50, 50)\n\nt0 = time.time()\nfor _ in range(10):\n    out = emb_bag(indices, offsets)\nt1 = time.time()\nprint(f\"Time for 10 batches of 8456 users (50 items each): {t1-t0:.4f}s ({1000*(t1-t0)/10:.2f}ms per forward pass)\")\n'",
  "description": "Benchmark PyTorch CPU EmbeddingBag speed"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: PyTorch version: 2.8.0+cpu
PyTorch threads: 4
Time for 10 batches of 8456 users (50 items each): 0.0270s (2.70ms per forward pass)
Process Group PGID: 2150
</untrusted_context>
37

Check number of strong organic listens in train_listens

+07:08
Recorded reasoning summary 42 words

Testing CPU Performance

I've confirmed that PyTorch's EmbeddingBag on CPU is achieving an impressive 2.7 milliseconds per forward pass for all 8,456 users. I'm now setting torch.set_num_threads(8) to leverage our 8 vCPUs and will proceed to examine the training objective and data.

Recorded reasoning summary 52 words

Analyzing Training Objectives

I'm focusing on how to best train this two-tower model. The core task is predicting new items a user will organically like or strongly engage with, given their past history. I'm now analyzing the available training data to determine the most effective temporal windows for generating positive user-item pairs.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck number of strong organic listens in train_listens Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check number of strong organic listens in train_listens",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\n# Check how many strong organic listens in train_listens\nt = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"])\norg = t[\"is_organic\"].to_numpy()\nratio = t[\"played_ratio_pct\"].to_numpy()\n\nstrong_org = (org == 1) & (ratio >= 80)\nprint(f\"Total strong organic listens in train: {strong_org.sum()} ({strong_org.mean():.2%})\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Total strong organic listens in train: 12177583 (28.00%)
Process Group PGID: 2169
</untrusted_context>
38

Inspect first-time vs repeat interactions

+07:16
Recorded reasoning summary 51 words

Discovering First-Time Listens

I'm currently analyzing the 12.1 million organic listens from train_listens to pinpoint the exact number of first-time, or discovery, listens. My focus is on how many of these represent new track engagements for the users, building on the prior observation that validation data exclusively comprised novel track interactions.

Tool callrun_shell_commandInspect first-time vs repeat interactions Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\n# Test on 100 users\ntargets = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\").uid.values[:100]\nt = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"], filters=[(\"uid\", \"in\", targets)])\ndf = t.to_pandas()\ndf = df.sort_values([\"uid\", \"timestamp\"])\n\n# Find first interaction of each user with each item\nfirst_interactions = df.drop_duplicates(subset=[\"uid\", \"item_id\"], keep=\"first\")\nprint(f\"Total listens: {len(df)}, unique user-item interactions: {len(first_interactions)} ({len(first_interactions)/len(df):.2%})\")\n\n# Among first interactions, how many are strong organic?\nstrong_org_first = first_interactions[(first_interactions.is_organic == 1) & (first_interactions.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]\nprint(f\"First-time strong organic listens: {len(strong_org_first)} ({len(strong_org_first)/len(first_interactions):.2%})\")\n'",
  "description": "Inspect first-time vs repeat interactions"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Total listens: 458761, unique user-item interactions: 135035 (29.43%)
First-time strong organic listens: 24538 (18.17%)
Process Group PGID: 2190
</untrusted_context>
39

Check recent 4-week events volume and loading time

+07:30
Recorded reasoning summary 38 words

Analyzing Listen Counts

I've been reviewing the listen data. It's impressive to see over 24,000 first-time strong organic listens per 100 users, totaling around 2 million for the target group. Next, I'm shifting focus to analyze first-time likes.

Recorded reasoning summary 74 words

Examining Engagement Metrics

My focus has shifted to first-time likes, and it appears they largely mirror first-time listens. I've also detailed the precise temporal structure of the benchmark, including training, validation, and hidden test windows, noting its clean symmetry.

Validating Temporal Structure

I'm currently scrutinizing the validation setup, specifically the 7-day window post-training cutoff. The active preference state and eligible candidates for this period are under review to ensure accurate assessment of organic behavior.

Recorded reasoning summary 45 words

Exploring Training Approaches

I'm now considering how to structure our training data. Beyond simple temporal windows, I'm exploring the possibility of training on positive interactions representing first-time discovery events. This involves examining multiple preceding temporal windows within the training period to capture diverse discovery patterns.

Recorded reasoning summary 42 words

Refining Training Strategies

I'm currently exploring a window-based training approach that precisely mirrors our evaluation protocol. This involves using user history prior to a cutoff date and identifying positive targets within a subsequent 7-day window, aiming for a zero train-test distribution shift.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck recent 4-week events volume and loading time Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport time\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\nt0 = time.time()\ncutoff = 24786800\nw = 7 * 86400\n\n# Let us check train_likes in the last 4 weeks\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\norg_likes = likes[likes.is_organic == 1]\nprint(f\"Total org likes: {len(org_likes)}, in last 4 weeks: {(org_likes.timestamp >= cutoff - 4*w).sum()}\")\n\n# Let us check listens in the last 4 weeks\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"], filters=[(\"timestamp\", \">=\", cutoff - 4*w)])\ndf_recent = table.to_pandas()\nprint(f\"Listens in last 4 weeks: {len(df_recent)}, time: {time.time()-t0:.2f}s\")\n'",
  "description": "Check recent 4-week events volume and loading time"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Total org likes: 461839, in last 4 weeks: 63959
Listens in last 4 weeks: 5736707, time: 0.40s
Process Group PGID: 2211
</untrusted_context>
40

Check 12-week listens loading time

+09:34
Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck 12-week listens loading time Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport time\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\nt0 = time.time()\ncutoff = 24786800\nw = 7 * 86400\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"], filters=[(\"timestamp\", \">=\", cutoff - 12*w)])\ndf_recent = table.to_pandas()\nprint(f\"Listens in last 12 weeks: {len(df_recent)}, time: {time.time()-t0:.2f}s\")\n'",
  "description": "Check 12-week listens loading time"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Listens in last 12 weeks: 15822626, time: 1.41s
Process Group PGID: 2245
</untrusted_context>
41

Benchmark full inference and top-100 ranking speed

+09:56
Recorded reasoning summary 45 words

Exploring Recommendation Drivers

My focus has shifted to understanding the core mechanics of music relevance. I'm delving into the "why" behind user engagement, particularly what drives listenership and preference for specific tracks. Initial hypotheses point towards genre, artist, and stylistic similarities as key influencing factors.

Recorded reasoning summary 46 words

Refining Similarity Metrics

I'm now considering how to leverage item embeddings trained via contrastive loss or sequential co-occurrence. The goal is to capture nuanced similarity, moving beyond simple genre matching, while also factoring in user taste, popularity, and explicit negative preferences to avoid recommending disliked content.

Recorded reasoning summary 61 words

Building Scalable User Embeddings

I'm focused on ensuring our user embedding generation scales efficiently. The model needs to avoid constructing a global user-item matrix for production. Instead, candidate item embeddings are pre-computed offline, and at request time, I'll generate a single user embedding for fast retrieval via nearest-neighbor search. Both user and item embeddings will be distinct, trainable neural network towers.

Recorded reasoning summary 37 words

Training Two-Tower Models

I'm examining the end-to-end training process for two-tower architectures. My analysis reveals that in these models, user and item towers are trained jointly, leveraging in-batch negatives to compute relevance scores and minimize cross-entropy loss.

Recorded reasoning summary 49 words

Optimizing Gradient Flow

I'm confirming that gradients backpropagate effectively through both user and item towers. This architecture is indeed the industry standard for scalability, mirroring approaches from YouTube and Google/Meta, and avoids global matrix construction. I'm now exploring how to incorporate graded relevance into the loss function for discovery.

Recorded reasoning summary 47 words

Incorporating Mixed Negatives

I'm now investigating the inclusion of mixed negative sampling within the two-tower framework. This involves incorporating both in-batch and randomly sampled catalog items as negatives to improve training robustness, particularly for less popular items. I'm also confirming candidate eligibility considerations during the evaluation phase.

Tool callrun_shell_commandBenchmark full inference and top-100 ranking speed Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport time\nimport torch\nimport numpy as np\n\ntorch.set_num_threads(8)\nD = 64\nN_users = 8456\nN_items = 30000\n\nU = torch.randn(N_users, D)\nV = torch.randn(N_items, D)\n\nnpz = np.load(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\npacked = npz[\"packed_eligible\"]\nitem_ids = torch.from_numpy(npz[\"item_ids\"])\n\nt0 = time.time()\nscores = torch.matmul(U, V.t()) # shape (8456, 30000)\nt1 = time.time()\n\n# Now masking and top-100\n# Unpack bits for all users at once\npacked_tensor = torch.from_numpy(packed)\n# In numpy: np.unpackbits\nunpacked = np.unpackbits(packed, axis=1, count=N_items, bitorder=\"little\")\nt2 = time.time()\n\nscores_np = scores.numpy()\nscores_np[unpacked == 0] = -1e9\n# top 100 per user using np.argpartition or torch.topk\nscores_torch = torch.from_numpy(scores_np)\ntopk = torch.topk(scores_torch, 100, dim=1)\nt3 = time.time()\n\nprint(f\"Matrix multiply (8456x30000): {t1-t0:.4f}s\")\nprint(f\"Unpack bits (8456x30000): {t2-t1:.4f}s\")\nprint(f\"Masking + Top-100 (8456 users): {t3-t2:.4f}s\")\nprint(f\"Total inference + ranking time: {t3-t0:.4f}s\")\n'",
  "description": "Benchmark full inference and top-100 ranking speed"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Matrix multiply (8456x30000): 0.1788s
Unpack bits (8456x30000): 0.0277s
Masking + Top-100 (8456 users): 0.3378s
Total inference + ranking time: 0.5443s
Process Group PGID: 2267
</untrusted_context>
42

Test popularity baseline with evaluate_public.py

+10:06
Recorded reasoning summary 44 words

Achieving Blazing Speed

I'm thrilled to report that the total inference and ranking time across all 8,456 users has been a mere 0.54 seconds – truly remarkable! My next step is to validate this rapid scoring by running the evaluation pipeline with actual files.

Tool callrun_shell_commandTest popularity baseline with evaluate_public.py Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Test popularity baseline with evaluate_public.py",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport sys\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nimport subprocess\nimport torch\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\n# Popularity ranking as baseline\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\nnpz = np.load(\"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nuids = npz[\"uids\"]\nitem_ids = npz[\"item_ids\"]\npacked = npz[\"packed_eligible\"]\n\nunpacked = np.unpackbits(packed, axis=1, count=len(item_ids), bitorder=\"little\")\n\n# Catalog is sorted by popularity, so item index 0 is most popular\n# Score is simply -item_index\nscores = -np.arange(len(item_ids), dtype=np.float32)\nscores_matrix = np.tile(scores, (len(uids), 1))\nscores_matrix[unpacked == 0] = -1e9\n\n# Top 100\ntopk_indices = np.argsort(-scores_matrix, axis=1)[:, :100]\n\n# Flatten into submission format\nflat_uids = np.repeat(uids, 100)\nflat_items = item_ids[topk_indices].flatten()\nflat_ranks = np.tile(np.arange(1, 101), len(uids))\n\ndf = pd.DataFrame({\"uid\": flat_uids, \"item_id\": flat_items, \"rank\": flat_ranks})\nout_path = Path(\"/app/solution/val_pop_test.parquet\")\ndf.to_parquet(out_path, index=False)\n\nres = subprocess.run([\"python3\", \"/task/evaluate_public.py\", str(out_path)], capture_output=True, text=True)\nprint(res.stdout)\nout_path.unlink()\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: {
  "model": "/app/solution/val_pop_test.parquet",
  "scores": {
    "quality_ndcg@10": 0.01071,
    "quality_users": 4263
  }
}
Process Group PGID: 2297
</untrusted_context>
43

Generate and validate baseline test submission

+10:26
Recorded reasoning summary 34 words

Confirming Baseline Accuracy

My latest thoughts confirm the baseline test has successfully run, yielding an exact JSON output of quality_ndcg@10: 0.01071. I'm diligently preserving this best valid submission to ensure it remains accessible post-deadline.

Tool callrun_shell_commandGenerate and validate baseline test submission Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\n# Load test eligible candidates\nnpz = np.load(\"/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nuids = npz[\"uids\"]\nitem_ids = npz[\"item_ids\"]\npacked = npz[\"packed_eligible\"]\n\nunpacked = np.unpackbits(packed, axis=1, count=len(item_ids), bitorder=\"little\")\n\n# Catalog is sorted by popularity, so item index 0 is most popular\nscores = -np.arange(len(item_ids), dtype=np.float32)\nscores_matrix = np.tile(scores, (len(uids), 1))\nscores_matrix[unpacked == 0] = -1e9\n\ntopk_indices = np.argsort(-scores_matrix, axis=1)[:, :100]\n\nflat_uids = np.repeat(uids, 100)\nflat_items = item_ids[topk_indices].flatten()\nflat_ranks = np.tile(np.arange(1, 101), len(uids))\n\ndf = pd.DataFrame({\"uid\": flat_uids, \"item_id\": flat_items, \"rank\": flat_ranks})\nout_path = Path(\"/app/solution/submission.parquet\")\ndf.to_parquet(out_path, index=False)\nprint(\"Saved baseline submission. Shape:\", df.shape)\n\n# Validate with ranking_evaluation\nimport sys\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, validate_ranking, read_ranking\ntargets_frame = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\ntargets = set(targets_frame.uid.astype(int))\nvalidated = validate_ranking(read_ranking(out_path), targets)\neligibility = CandidateSet(\"/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nall_eligible = all(eligibility.is_eligible(uid, item) for uid, item in validated[[\"uid\", \"item_id\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None))\nprint(\"Validation passed:\", all_eligible)\n'",
  "description": "Generate and validate baseline test submission"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Saved baseline submission. Shape: (845600, 3)
Validation passed: True
Process Group PGID: 2332
</untrusted_context>
44

update_topic command

+10:59
Recorded reasoning summary 28 words

Finalizing Baseline

The baseline submission has been successfully saved and validated at /app/solution/submission.parquet. I'm now shifting focus to the design and engineering phase for the PyTorch Two-Tower Ranker.

Tool callupdate_topicTool call Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "strategic_intent": "Design and implement the PyTorch two-tower neural network ranker architecture and training pipeline.",
  "summary": "Completed data exploration and verified the validation pipeline and candidate eligibility constraints. Established a validated baseline submission. Now transitioning to designing the two-tower model architecture, user history representations, item features, and contrastive training pipeline.",
  "title": "Two-Tower Architecture & Training Design"
}

Tool response 

Current topic: "Two-Tower Architecture & Training Design"
Topic summary: Completed data exploration and verified the validation pipeline and candidate eligibility constraints. Established a validated baseline submission. Now transitioning to designing the two-tower model architecture, user history representations, item features, and contrastive training pipeline.

Strategic Intent: Design and implement the PyTorch two-tower neural network ranker architecture and training pipeline.
45

Measure weekly event volume in train data

+11:55
Recorded reasoning summary 37 words

Exploring Two-Tower Architecture

I'm currently delving into the intricate details of the two-tower model's architecture, features, and training. My focus is on meticulously dissecting each requirement and constraint, ensuring a robust design that aligns with our objectives.

Recorded reasoning summary 41 words

Refining User Representation

I'm now concentrating on how to construct the user vector. The key insight is that it must be derived from the interaction history, not a simple ID lookup, ensuring a richer, context-aware representation that can be precomputed independently.

Recorded reasoning summary 46 words

Validating Ranker Performance

My current focus is on meticulously validating the ranker's performance. Specifically, I'm experimenting with using only train_* events as history while val_* events serve as subsequent outcomes. This allows for an unbiased evaluation before refitting the model with combined training and validation data.

Recorded reasoning summary 42 words

Precomputing Item Vectors

I'm now focused on precomputing the item tower's output vectors. The key realization is that these vectors are entirely independent of user interactions, relying solely on item IDs and catalog features. This allows for efficient offline computation of $V$.

Recorded reasoning summary 39 words

Designing User Tower

I am now focusing on the user tower's design, specifically extracting features from interaction history. This includes leveraging liked items, potentially with recency decay weighting, and incorporating recent strong organic listens to create a richer representation.

Recorded reasoning summary 40 words

Integrating Disliked Items

I am now incorporating signals from disliked items into the user tower. This negative preference data, accessed through an EmbeddingBag, will allow the model to learn to actively steer away from undesirable regions in the embedding space.

Recorded reasoning summary 51 words

Sharing Item Embeddings

I'm now considering the potential to share the item embedding table between the user and item towers. The current architecture allows for this; however, I need to verify if this sharing is truly optimal and if it introduces any unforeseen constraints or compromises to either tower's representation learning.

Recorded reasoning summary 52 words

Sharing Embedding Tables

I'm now exploring the implications of sharing the item embedding table between both towers. This seems highly beneficial for memory efficiency and automatically aligns the representation spaces, although I still need to confirm if it optimizes performance. The possibility of separate embeddings is also under consideration for comparative evaluation.

Recorded reasoning summary 53 words

Analyzing Training Data Structure

I am now examining the structure of our training data, specifically the available listens, likes, and dislikes. My current thought process is focused on understanding how to best leverage this data to define and generate training samples, considering the temporal aspect and the precise prediction targets for the model.

Recorded reasoning summary 50 words

Structuring Training Data

I am currently analyzing the structure of our training data, focusing on how to best define and generate training samples from listens, likes, and dislikes. My thoughts are centered on leveraging the temporal aspects and determining the precise prediction targets for the model based on these interactions.

Recorded reasoning summary 52 words

Testing Training Speed

I am now focused on verifying the estimated training speed. The calculations suggest incredibly fast epoch times due to precomputed user histories and efficient batch processing. I need to implement a Python test to confirm these impressive timings and assess the coverage and diversity of weekly user history windows.

Tool callrun_shell_commandMeasure weekly event volume in train data Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport time\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\nt0 = time.time()\ncutoff = 24786800\nweek = 7 * 86400\nnum_weeks = 8\n\n# Target users\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\").uid)\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\ncat_items = set(catalog.item_id)\n\n# Load likes and listens for the last 8 weeks\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\nlikes = likes[likes.uid.isin(targets) & likes.item_id.isin(cat_items) & (likes.is_organic == 1) & (likes.timestamp >= cutoff - num_weeks * week)]\n\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"], filters=[(\"timestamp\", \">=\", cutoff - num_weeks * week)])\nlistens = table.to_pandas()\nlistens = listens[listens.uid.isin(targets) & listens.item_id.isin(cat_items) & (listens.is_organic == 1) & (listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]\n\nprint(f\"Loaded in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s:\")\nprint(f\"  Org likes in last {num_weeks} weeks: {len(likes)}\")\nprint(f\"  Strong org listens in last {num_weeks} weeks: {len(listens)}\")\n\n# Count events per week\nfor w in range(num_weeks):\n    w_start = cutoff - (w + 1) * week\n    w_end = cutoff - w * week\n    n_likes = ((likes.timestamp >= w_start) & (likes.timestamp < w_end)).sum()\n    n_listens = ((listens.timestamp >= w_start) & (listens.timestamp < w_end)).sum()\n    print(f\"  Week {w+1} (t-{w+1}): likes={n_likes}, listens={n_listens}, total={n_likes+n_listens}\")\n'",
  "description": "Measure weekly event volume in train data"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Loaded in 2.09s:
  Org likes in last 8 weeks: 61572
  Strong org listens in last 8 weeks: 2272793
  Week 1 (t-1): likes=7774, listens=304885, total=312659
  Week 2 (t-2): likes=7129, listens=289060, total=296189
  Week 3 (t-3): likes=7451, listens=287015, total=294466
  Week 4 (t-4): likes=7631, listens=289176, total=296807
  Week 5 (t-5): likes=7492, listens=281021, total=288513
  Week 6 (t-6): likes=7449, listens=270884, total=278333
  Week 7 (t-7): likes=9969, listens=278653, total=288622
  Week 8 (t-8): likes=6677, listens=272099, total=278776
Process Group PGID: 2357
</untrusted_context>
46

Check fraction of first-time discovery events in Week 1

+12:50
Recorded reasoning summary 44 words

Analyzing Listener Behavior

I'm currently focused on understanding the immense organic engagement, with hundreds of thousands of listens and thousands of likes weekly. My recent analysis, completed in mere seconds, reveals a clear discovery rule: users exhibit prior listening history before a given week.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck fraction of first-time discovery events in Week 1 Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport time\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\ncutoff = 24786800\nweek = 7 * 86400\nt_w1 = cutoff - week\n\n# Let us check 100 users\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\").uid.values[:100])\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\ncat_items = set(catalog.item_id)\n\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"], filters=[(\"uid\", \"in\", list(targets))])\ndf = table.to_pandas()\ndf = df[df.item_id.isin(cat_items)]\n\n# Prior items before t_w1\nprior_items = df[df.timestamp < t_w1].groupby(\"uid\")[\"item_id\"].apply(set).to_dict()\n\n# Week 1 events\nw1 = df[(df.timestamp >= t_w1) & (df.is_organic == 1) & (df.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]\ntot_w1 = len(w1)\ndiscovery_w1 = 0\nfor uid, item in zip(w1.uid, w1.item_id):\n    if item not in prior_items.get(uid, set()):\n        discovery_w1 += 1\n\nprint(f\"Sample 100 users: Total strong org listens in Week 1: {tot_w1}, Discovery (never before): {discovery_w1} ({discovery_w1/tot_w1:.1%})\")\n'",
  "description": "Check fraction of first-time discovery events in Week 1"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Sample 100 users: Total strong org listens in Week 1: 2757, Discovery (never before): 663 (24.0%)
Process Group PGID: 2385
</untrusted_context>
47

Check fraction of first-time organic likes in Week 1

+13:01
Recorded reasoning summary 51 words

Discovering Organic Listens

I'm focusing on the strong organic listens, noting that a significant 24% represent first-time discovery events for our target users. This translates to around 72,000 weekly first-time strong organic listens from our 8,456 users. My next step is to analyze organic likes similarly to gauge their discovery impact.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck fraction of first-time organic likes in Week 1 Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check fraction of first-time organic likes in Week 1",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\n\ncutoff = 24786800\nweek = 7 * 86400\nt_w1 = cutoff - week\n\n# Let us check 100 users\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\").uid.values[:100])\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\ncat_items = set(catalog.item_id)\n\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\nlikes = likes[likes.uid.isin(targets) & likes.item_id.isin(cat_items) & (likes.is_organic == 1)]\n\nprior_likes = likes[likes.timestamp < t_w1].groupby(\"uid\")[\"item_id\"].apply(set).to_dict()\nw1_likes = likes[likes.timestamp >= t_w1]\n\ntot_w1 = len(w1_likes)\ndiscovery_w1 = 0\nfor uid, item in zip(w1_likes.uid, w1_likes.item_id):\n    if item not in prior_likes.get(uid, set()):\n        discovery_w1 += 1\n\nprint(f\"Sample 100 users: Total org likes in Week 1: {tot_w1}, Discovery: {discovery_w1} ({discovery_w1/tot_w1:.1%})\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Sample 100 users: Total org likes in Week 1: 80, Discovery: 80 (100.0%)
Process Group PGID: 2406
</untrusted_context>
48

Check item statistics and correlations in train data

+13:21
Recorded reasoning summary 39 words

Analyzing Engagement Metrics

I'm currently focused on understanding the distinct value of organic likes versus listens. It appears organic likes represent entirely new user interactions, and importantly, are weighted significantly higher, seven times more than listens according to NDCG.

Recorded reasoning summary 53 words

Mapping Catalog Items

My current focus is on establishing clear mappings for catalog items within our system. I'm determining the number of unique catalog items and will assign each a specific integer index. I'm also considering how to handle items that fall outside the main catalog, exploring options like OOV indexing or exclusion.

Recorded reasoning summary 45 words

Integrating User History

I've realized that items in user history directly map to the candidate catalog, which is excellent. I'm now exploring how to represent the user by pooling embeddings from their liked and disliked items, considering weighting by recency for a more nuanced understanding.

Recorded reasoning summary 60 words

Refining User Representations

I'm now exploring how to effectively pool embeddings from user likes and listens, incorporating recency weights to capture evolving preferences. I'm also considering how to handle scenarios where a user might lack likes or dislikes, perhaps by using learned defaults or zero vectors. This refined user representation will then feed into a User MLP alongside statistical features.

Recorded reasoning summary 46 words

Normalizing Embeddings

I'm considering L2 normalization for my final user and item embeddings to enable cosine similarity. This approach aligns with common practices in modern two-tower retrieval systems and offers stability by bounding the score range and preventing norm issues, making it suitable for InfoNCE loss.

Recorded reasoning summary 60 words

Incorporating Popularity Dynamics

I'm now thinking about how to integrate item popularity directly into the item tower's output. My current idea is to augment the content embedding with a popularity feature, scaled by a trainable parameter. This allows the user tower to learn its reliance on popularity, effectively combining content preference with popularity bias in the final dot product score.

Recorded reasoning summary 46 words

Adding Popularity to Item Features

I'm now evaluating the specific features to feed the item tower, focusing on including popularity dynamics. I'm considering positive_listens, organic_positive_listens, and popularity_rank, alongside features derived from training history such as like/dislike counts, organic like ratio, average play ratio, and track length.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck item statistics and correlations in train data Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check item statistics and correlations in train data",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_dislikes.parquet\")\n\n# Count likes and dislikes per item\nlike_counts = likes.groupby(\"item_id\").size().rename(\"train_likes\")\ndislike_counts = dislikes.groupby(\"item_id\").size().rename(\"train_dislikes\")\n\ncat = catalog.merge(like_counts, on=\"item_id\", how=\"left\").merge(dislike_counts, on=\"item_id\", how=\"left\").fillna(0)\nprint(cat.head(10))\nprint(\"Correlation between catalog positive_listens and train_likes:\")\nprint(cat[[\"positive_listens\", \"organic_positive_listens\", \"train_likes\", \"train_dislikes\"]].corr())\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: item_id  positive_listens  ...  train_likes  train_dislikes
0  5862961             26615  ...        759.0            77.0
1  6901374             25536  ...        791.0            74.0
2  5635052             24691  ...        603.0            87.0
3  3542184             24075  ...        789.0           149.0
4  9378983             24036  ...        794.0            89.0
5  5463340             22746  ...        736.0            66.0
6  8213481             22505  ...        511.0           127.0
7   906358             22238  ...        667.0            97.0
8  2859641             18380  ...        418.0            77.0
9  3033749             16682  ...        364.0            74.0

[10 rows x 6 columns]
Correlation between catalog positive_listens and train_likes:
                          positive_listens  ...  train_dislikes
positive_listens                  1.000000  ...        0.828066
organic_positive_listens          0.927798  ...        0.839515
train_likes                       0.881351  ...        0.850376
train_dislikes                    0.828066  ...        1.000000

[4 rows x 4 columns]
Process Group PGID: 2432
</untrusted_context>
49

Filter train data for temporal windows

+19:48
Recorded reasoning summary 40 words

Analyzing Feature Correlations

I'm seeing strong correlations between existing catalog features like positive_listens, organic_positive_listens, and popularity_rank. train_likes and train_dislikes also offer valuable additional signals, such as like-to-dislike ratios and dislike penalties. I'm now investigating how these can be further leveraged.

Recorded reasoning summary 47 words

Exploring Embedding Interactions

I'm realizing that the two-tower architecture inherently learns item co-occurrence through embedding dot products. By pooling historical item embeddings and applying an MLP, the user vector naturally captures similarities between past and candidate items, with learned weights indicating the importance of different interaction types.

Recorded reasoning summary 45 words

Training Item Embeddings

I'm exploring training item embeddings from scratch end-to-end using AdamW on a large interaction dataset. The scale of item embeddings (30k items x 64 dimensions) is manageable, and I'm assessing if this approach yields effective representations compared to pre-training methods like Item2Vec.

Recorded reasoning summary 197 words

Designing Two-Tower Training

I'm focusing on implementing trainable user and item towers using PyTorch, ensuring the user tower derives representations from interaction history. I've confirmed that mini-batch SGD or Adam on user-history/target-item pairs is compliant and scalable, avoiding global interaction matrices. I'm also investigating Item2Vec for listen sequences.

Prototyping Two-Tower Model

I'm planning to build a prototype two-tower model and evaluate its performance on public validation data, assessing training speed and validation scores. This will help determine if end-to-end InfoNCE or sampled softmax training is effective.

Validating Item Embedding Approach

I'm exploring training item embeddings from scratch end-to-end with AdamW on a large interaction dataset. The scale of item embeddings (30k items x 64 dimensions) is manageable, and I'm assessing if this approach yields effective representations.

Leveraging Catalog Features

I'm seeing strong correlations between existing catalog features and observing how train_likes and train_dislikes offer valuable additional signals, such as like-to-dislike ratios. I'm now investigating how these can be further leveraged.

Investigating Embedding Interactions

I'm realizing that the two-tower architecture inherently learns item co-occurrence through embedding dot products. By pooling historical item embeddings and applying an MLP, the user vector naturally captures similarities between past and candidate items.

Recorded reasoning summary 48 words

Defining Validation Splits

I'm now establishing the validation dataset, setting the evaluation cutoff at $T_0$. The training data will be derived from history prior to this, with multiple weekly cutoffs planned to generate positive targets from graded listens and likes within subsequent 7-day windows, excluding previously interacted items.

Tool callrun_shell_commandFilter train data for temporal windows Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport time\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\nt0 = time.time()\ncutoff = 24786800\nweek = 7 * 86400\nnum_weeks = 8\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\ncat_items = set(catalog.item_id)\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\").uid)\n\n# Read likes and listens in the last 12 weeks\nt_start = cutoff - (num_weeks + 4) * week\n\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\nlikes = likes[likes.uid.isin(targets) & likes.item_id.isin(cat_items) & (likes.is_organic == 1)]\n\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"], filters=[(\"timestamp\", \">=\", t_start)])\nlistens = table.to_pandas()\nlistens = listens[listens.uid.isin(targets) & listens.item_id.isin(cat_items)]\n\nprint(f\"Data filtered in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s\")\n'",
  "description": "Filter train data for temporal windows"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Data filtered in 2.85s
Process Group PGID: 2485
</untrusted_context>
50

Count discovery pairs across 8 weekly windows

+22:22
Tool callrun_shell_commandCount discovery pairs across 8 weekly windows Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Count discovery pairs across 8 weekly windows",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport time\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\nt0 = time.time()\ncutoff = 24786800\nweek = 7 * 86400\nnum_weeks = 8\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\ncat_items = set(catalog.item_id)\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\").uid)\n\nt_history_start = cutoff - (num_weeks + 8) * week\n\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\nlikes = likes[likes.uid.isin(targets) & likes.item_id.isin(cat_items)]\n\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"], filters=[(\"timestamp\", \">=\", t_history_start)])\nlistens = table.to_pandas()\nlistens = listens[listens.uid.isin(targets) & listens.item_id.isin(cat_items)]\n\n# Combine all events to track seen items per user\n# We want to know for each cutoff T_k: what items did user interact with before T_k?\n# And in [T_k, T_k + week]: what discovery items did user organically like or listen to (>= 80%)?\n\ntotal_positives = 0\nfor w in range(num_weeks):\n    w_cut = cutoff - (w + 1) * week\n    w_end = w_cut + week\n    \n    # Seen before w_cut\n    seen_likes = set(zip(likes[likes.timestamp < w_cut].uid, likes[likes.timestamp < w_cut].item_id))\n    seen_listens = set(zip(listens[listens.timestamp < w_cut].uid, listens[listens.timestamp < w_cut].item_id))\n    seen = seen_likes.union(seen_listens)\n    \n    # Discovery events in [w_cut, w_end]\n    w_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= w_cut) & (likes.timestamp < w_end) & (likes.is_organic == 1)]\n    w_listens = listens[(listens.timestamp >= w_cut) & (listens.timestamp < w_end) & (listens.is_organic == 1) & (listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]\n    \n    # Grade 3 for like, grade 1 for listen\n    disc_likes = [pair for pair in zip(w_likes.uid, w_likes.item_id) if pair not in seen]\n    disc_listens = [pair for pair in zip(w_listens.uid, w_listens.item_id) if pair not in seen]\n    \n    unique_pairs = set(disc_likes).union(set(disc_listens))\n    total_positives += len(unique_pairs)\n    print(f\"Week {w+1}: cutoff={w_cut}, unique discovery pairs={len(unique_pairs)} (likes={len(set(disc_likes))}, listens={len(set(disc_listens))})\")\n\nprint(f\"Total positive training pairs across {num_weeks} weeks: {total_positives}, time: {time.time()-t0:.2f}s\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Week 1: cutoff=24182000, unique discovery pairs=48112 (likes=5575, listens=45651)
Week 2: cutoff=23577200, unique discovery pairs=46742 (likes=4997, listens=44742)
Week 3: cutoff=22972400, unique discovery pairs=47056 (likes=5502, listens=44618)
Week 4: cutoff=22367600, unique discovery pairs=46147 (likes=5557, listens=43665)
Week 5: cutoff=21762800, unique discovery pairs=46198 (likes=5334, listens=43751)
Week 6: cutoff=21158000, unique discovery pairs=43484 (likes=5367, listens=40919)
Week 7: cutoff=20553200, unique discovery pairs=47069 (likes=7747, listens=42284)
Week 8: cutoff=19948400, unique discovery pairs=45271 (likes=4799, listens=43081)
Total positive training pairs across 8 weeks: 370079, time: 52.21s
Process Group PGID: 2519
</untrusted_context>
51

Test UserTower architecture and forward pass speed

+23:43
Recorded reasoning summary 41 words

Analyzing Discovery Trends

I'm observing significant progress, with over 370,000 unique positive discovery pairs identified across eight weeks. Weekly metrics show approximately 5,300 organic likes and a substantial 44,000 strong organic listens. The speed of this discovery pipeline is also encouraging.

Recorded reasoning summary 69 words

Refining User Representation

I'm now focusing on how to effectively represent user history at any given cutoff point $T$. This involves defining interaction sets like liked items, recent strong organic listens, general listens, and disliked items, and then considering how to process these lists within PyTorch. I'm exploring fixed maximum lengths for these item sets, such as truncating likes to 64 and dislikes to 16, to manage computational complexity.

Recorded reasoning summary 56 words

Implementing Recency Weighting

I'm now exploring how to incorporate item recency by applying an exponential decay weight, $w_i = \exp(-\lambda \Delta t)$, where $\Delta t$ represents item age in days. This weighting could be applied during the pooling of item embeddings, potentially with $\lambda$ as a trainable parameter, to refine how recent user interactions influence representations.

Tool callrun_shell_commandTest UserTower architecture and forward pass speed Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport time\n\nclass UserTower(nn.Module):\n    def __init__(self, num_items=30001, emb_dim=64, out_dim=64):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.item_emb = nn.Embedding(num_items, emb_dim, padding_idx=0)\n        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(\n            nn.Linear(emb_dim * 4 + 4, 128),\n            nn.LayerNorm(128),\n            nn.GELU(),\n            nn.Linear(128, out_dim)\n        )\n    \n    def pool(self, item_ids, weights=None):\n        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids) # (B, L, D)\n        mask = (item_ids > 0).float() # (B, L)\n        if weights is not None:\n            mask = mask * weights\n        denom = mask.sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True).clamp(min=1e-5)\n        pooled = (emb * mask.unsqueeze(-1)).sum(dim=1) / denom\n        return pooled\n\n    def forward(self, likes, org_listens, all_listens, dislikes, user_stats, weights=None):\n        h_likes = self.pool(likes, weights.get(\"likes\") if weights else None)\n        h_org = self.pool(org_listens, weights.get(\"org\") if weights else None)\n        h_all = self.pool(all_listens, weights.get(\"all\") if weights else None)\n        h_dis = self.pool(dislikes, weights.get(\"dis\") if weights else None)\n        h = torch.cat([h_likes, h_org, h_all, h_dis, user_stats], dim=-1)\n        u = self.mlp(h)\n        return nn.functional.normalize(u, p=2, dim=-1)\n\nmodel = UserTower()\nB = 512\nlikes = torch.randint(0, 30000, (B, 64))\norg = torch.randint(0, 30000, (B, 64))\nall_l = torch.randint(0, 30000, (B, 64))\ndis = torch.randint(0, 30000, (B, 16))\nstats = torch.randn(B, 4)\n\nt0 = time.time()\nfor _ in range(100):\n    out = model(likes, org, all_l, dis, stats)\nt1 = time.time()\nprint(f\"Time for 100 batches of size 512: {t1-t0:.4f}s ({1000*(t1-t0)/100:.2f}ms per batch)\")\n'",
  "description": "Test UserTower architecture and forward pass speed"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Time for 100 batches of size 512: 0.5756s (5.76ms per batch)
Process Group PGID: 2553
</untrusted_context>
52

Test ItemTower offline embedding precomputation speed

+23:53
Recorded reasoning summary 56 words

Analyzing ItemTower Performance

I'm currently investigating the performance of the ItemTower architecture. Initial benchmarks show a batch processing time of 5.76ms for 512 users, achieving 100 batches in just 0.57s. My next step is to understand its core function, specifically how it handles item IDs and features like log positive listens and log organic positive interactions.

Recorded reasoning summary 41 words

Precomputing ItemEmbeddings

I'm exploring the possibility of precomputing all item embeddings offline. My analysis suggests this is feasible; the ItemTower architecture can efficiently generate embeddings for the entire catalog of 30,000 items. I'm now timing this precomputation to quantify its performance.

Tool callrun_shell_commandTest ItemTower offline embedding precomputation speed Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Test ItemTower offline embedding precomputation speed",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport time\n\nclass ItemTower(nn.Module):\n    def __init__(self, num_items=30001, feat_dim=4, emb_dim=64, out_dim=64):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.item_emb = nn.Embedding(num_items, emb_dim, padding_idx=0)\n        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(\n            nn.Linear(emb_dim + feat_dim, 128),\n            nn.LayerNorm(128),\n            nn.GELU(),\n            nn.Linear(128, out_dim)\n        )\n    def forward(self, item_ids, item_feats):\n        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)\n        h = torch.cat([emb, item_feats], dim=-1)\n        v = self.mlp(h)\n        return nn.functional.normalize(v, p=2, dim=-1)\n\nmodel = ItemTower()\nitem_ids = torch.arange(1, 30001)\nitem_feats = torch.randn(30000, 4)\n\nt0 = time.time()\nwith torch.no_grad():\n    v_all = model(item_ids, item_feats)\nt1 = time.time()\nprint(f\"Time to precompute all 30,000 item embeddings: {t1-t0:.4f}s, shape: {v_all.shape}\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Time to precompute all 30,000 item embeddings: 0.0214s, shape: torch.Size([30000, 64])
Process Group PGID: 2566
</untrusted_context>
53

Test fast filtering of events for target users

+24:34
Recorded reasoning summary 45 words

Calculating Embeddings Quickly

My recent thoughts are focused on the astonishing speed of embedding computation. I've precomputed 30,000 item embeddings offline in just 21 milliseconds. Furthermore, at request time, I can generate user embeddings from their history in approximately 0.5 milliseconds, enabling rapid relevance scoring.

Recorded reasoning summary 53 words

Refining Training Objectives

I'm currently exploring how to integrate user engagement grades into our contrastive training loss. Specifically, I'm considering sample weighting within the CrossEntropyLoss function, with the goal of assigning higher importance to positive interactions based on their associated grades. This should allow us to better differentiate between varying levels of relevance.

Recorded reasoning summary 54 words

Differentiating Interaction Strengths

I'm exploring methods to better distinguish between different user interaction grades within our training. This includes considering margin adjustments, oversampling higher-grade items, or a combination of both, to more effectively rank highly relevant content. I'm also contemplating the implications of using only in-batch negatives versus a broader candidate catalog for training.

Recorded reasoning summary 63 words

Integrating Negative Sampling

My current focus is on refining negative sampling strategies for training. I'm analyzing a mixed sampling approach, inspired by a Google paper, which combines in-batch negatives with randomly sampled catalog items. This strategy appears to offer a computationally efficient way to balance hard and broad negative representations, with matrix multiplication costs under 1 ms for a batch size of 512.

Recorded reasoning summary 50 words

Incorporating Dislikes

My latest thoughts are on using disliked items as explicit hard negatives during training. The user tower can learn to adapt representations away from these items, potentially improving ranking by ensuring user representations are low for disliked items. I'm planning tests to measure NDCG@10 against a popularity baseline.

Recorded reasoning summary 41 words

Processing User History

I'm currently processing user history for training. This involves extracting recent liked, strongly organic listened, and recently listened items, up to 64 each, alongside disliked items and statistical features. I'm also preparing to extract future organic positive events.

Tool callrun_shell_commandTest fast filtering of events for target users Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Test fast filtering of events for target users",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport time\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\nt0 = time.time()\ncutoff = 24786800\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\ntarget_uids = targets_df.uid.values\nuid2idx = {uid: i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}\nN_users = len(target_uids)\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\n# 1-indexed: 1..30000. 0 is padding.\nitem2idx = {item: i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(catalog.item_id.values)}\n\n# 1. Likes\nlikes_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\nlikes_df = likes_df[likes_df.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes_df.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\nprint(f\"Filtered likes: {len(likes_df)}, time: {time.time()-t0:.2f}s\")\n\n# 2. Dislikes\ndislikes_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_dislikes.parquet\")\ndislikes_df = dislikes_df[dislikes_df.uid.isin(uid2idx) & dislikes_df.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\nprint(f\"Filtered dislikes: {len(dislikes_df)}, time: {time.time()-t0:.2f}s\")\n\n# 3. Preference state\npref_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\npref_df = pref_df[pref_df.uid.isin(uid2idx) & pref_df.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\nprint(f\"Filtered pref: {len(pref_df)}, time: {time.time()-t0:.2f}s\")\n\n# 4. Listens in recent 60 days\nt_60d = cutoff - 60 * 86400\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"], filters=[(\"timestamp\", \">=\", t_60d)])\nlistens_df = table.to_pandas()\nlistens_df = listens_df[listens_df.uid.isin(uid2idx) & listens_df.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\nprint(f\"Filtered listens in last 60d: {len(listens_df)}, total time: {time.time()-t0:.2f}s\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Filtered likes: 472889, time: 0.25s
Filtered dislikes: 54901, time: 0.29s
Filtered pref: 469124, time: 0.43s
Filtered listens in last 60d: 8403492, total time: 3.41s
Process Group PGID: 2585
</untrusted_context>
54

Benchmark populating dense user history sequences

+27:04
Tool callrun_shell_commandBenchmark populating dense user history sequences Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport time\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\nt0 = time.time()\ncutoff = 24786800\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\ntarget_uids = targets_df.uid.values\nuid2idx = {uid: i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}\nN_users = len(target_uids)\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\nitem2idx = {item: i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(catalog.item_id.values)}\n\n# Fast groupby to sequences\nMAX_LEN = 64\nMAX_DIS = 16\n\n# 1. Likes\nlikes_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\nlikes_df = likes_df[likes_df.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes_df.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\nlikes_df[\"u_idx\"] = likes_df.uid.map(uid2idx)\nlikes_df[\"i_idx\"] = likes_df.item_id.map(item2idx)\nlikes_df = likes_df.sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"])\n\nlikes_mat = np.zeros((N_users, MAX_LEN), dtype=np.int32)\n# Tail MAX_LEN per user\ntail_likes = likes_df.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN)\nfor u, group in tail_likes.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n    items = group[\"i_idx\"].values\n    likes_mat[u, :len(items)] = items\n\nprint(f\"Likes processed: non-zero users = {(likes_mat[:, 0] > 0).sum()}, time = {time.time()-t0:.2f}s\")\n'",
  "description": "Benchmark populating dense user history sequences"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Likes processed: non-zero users = 6874, time = 0.58s
Process Group PGID: 2619
</untrusted_context>
55

Check target users in liked preference state

+27:42
Recorded reasoning summary 48 words

Processing User Preferences

I've successfully extracted and populated the likes sequence for all 8,456 users in just 0.58 seconds. My next step is to investigate the preference state, noting that validation_preference_state.parquet contains 'liked' and 'disliked' states. I'm currently reviewing the data within this file, which contains 41 entries.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck target users in liked preference state Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check target users in liked preference state",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\nvpref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\nliked = vpref[vpref.state == \"liked\"]\nprint(f\"Users in liked pref: {liked.uid.nunique()}\")\n\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\nprint(\"Target users:\", len(targets_df))\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Users in liked pref: 6769
Target users: 8456
Process Group PGID: 2636
</untrusted_context>
56

Test loading and mapping data for 4 weeks

+27:54
Recorded reasoning summary 37 words

Analyzing User Engagement

My current focus is on understanding user engagement beyond simple likes. I've confirmed that all 8,456 target users possess a substantial listening history, with a minimum of 20 positive listens each, indicating deep interaction.

Recorded reasoning summary 46 words

Exploring Temporal Dynamics

I'm now considering how to best leverage the temporal aspect of listening history. I'm investigating the feasibility of using multiple weekly historical windows, exploring whether calculating these up to 8 windows in advance would be computationally prohibitive or if dynamic, recent history suffices.

Tool callrun_shell_commandTest loading and mapping data for 4 weeks Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Test loading and mapping data for 4 weeks",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport time\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\nt0 = time.time()\ncutoff = 24786800\nweek = 7 * 86400\nnum_weeks = 4 # test with 4 weeks first\n\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\ntarget_uids = targets_df.uid.values\nuid2idx = {uid: i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}\nN_users = len(target_uids)\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\nitem2idx = {item: i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(catalog.item_id.values)}\n\n# Read all likes for target users\nlikes_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\nlikes_df = likes_df[likes_df.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes_df.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\nlikes_df[\"u_idx\"] = likes_df.uid.map(uid2idx)\nlikes_df[\"i_idx\"] = likes_df.item_id.map(item2idx)\n\n# Read listens in the last 16 weeks\nt_start = cutoff - 16 * week\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"], filters=[(\"timestamp\", \">=\", t_start)])\nlistens_df = table.to_pandas()\nlistens_df = listens_df[listens_df.uid.isin(uid2idx) & listens_df.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\nlistens_df[\"u_idx\"] = listens_df.uid.map(uid2idx)\nlistens_df[\"i_idx\"] = listens_df.item_id.map(item2idx)\n\nprint(f\"Data loaded in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Data loaded in 5.48s
Process Group PGID: 2660
</untrusted_context>
57

Check PyTorch imports

+28:14
Recorded reasoning summary 33 words

Processing Training Data

The initial data loading phase concluded swiftly at 5.48 seconds. My current focus is on the specifics of training sample preparation, particularly how we're constructing batches of 512 user-item pairs.

Recorded reasoning summary 40 words

Considering Shared Embeddings

I'm currently exploring the implications of sharing item embeddings between the user and item towers. My analysis is focused on how this might impact the PyTorch implementation and its downstream effects on training dynamics and loss calculation.

Recorded reasoning summary 50 words

Refining Embedding Strategy

I'm confirming the elegance of using a single item_embedding module shared across both user and item towers, ensuring consistency within the embedding space. My attention is now on how the MLPs allow for specialized projections and how item bias might be incorporated into the Item Tower's output.

Recorded reasoning summary 50 words

Incorporating Popularity Bias

I'm investigating how to naturally embed item popularity into the scoring mechanism. My current line of thought explores augmenting the item tower's output with a learned bias term, effectively allowing the dot product to reflect both user-item affinity and general item popularity. This mathematical formulation seems promising.

Recorded reasoning summary 100 words

Validating MIPS Compliance

I've confirmed that the relevance score, defined as the dot product of user and item vectors, strictly adheres to the MIPS contract. This design allows dynamic user modulation of popularity preference via a w_pop parameter and implicitly incorporates item popularity through a learned bias b_j, fulfilling all prompt requirements.

Initiating Prototype Training

I am now proceeding to construct a prototype training script. This script will handle the extraction of user histories and training events, define the PyTorch Two-Tower model, and execute initial training epochs. Subsequently, I will precompute item embeddings for evaluation on the public validation set.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck PyTorch imports Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport sys\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nimport time\nimport math\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nprint(\"PyTorch:\", torch.__version__, \"threads:\", torch.get_num_threads())\n'",
  "description": "Check PyTorch imports"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: PyTorch: 2.8.0+cpu threads: 4
Process Group PGID: 2682
</untrusted_context>
58

Test TwoTower architecture forward pass

+28:33
Recorded reasoning summary 38 words

Setting Thread Count

I'm focusing on optimizing performance by setting the number of threads to eight, aligning with our available vCPUs. My next step involves meticulously scripting the data preparation and training logic within /app/solution/experiment_v1.py to initiate testing.

Recorded reasoning summary 36 words

Designing Item Features

I'm currently defining the input features for the Item Tower. This includes embedding Item IDs and incorporating normalized catalog features like pos_listens_norm and org_ratio. I will then pass these through an Item MLP.

Recorded reasoning summary 43 words

Testing Combination Function

I'm evaluating a new dot product formulation combining preference and popularity. This aims to simultaneously capture taste alignment and popularity scaling. My next step is to define the input history channels for the User Tower and map out its architecture.

Tool callrun_shell_commandTest TwoTower architecture forward pass Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nclass TwoTower(nn.Module):\n    def __init__(self, num_items=30001, emb_dim=64, out_dim=64, feat_dim=4, stats_dim=5):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.item_emb = nn.Embedding(num_items, emb_dim, padding_idx=0)\n        nn.init.normal_(self.item_emb.weight, std=0.02)\n        \n        # User Tower\n        self.user_mlp = nn.Sequential(\n            nn.Linear(emb_dim * 4 + stats_dim, 128),\n            nn.LayerNorm(128),\n            nn.GELU(),\n            nn.Dropout(0.1),\n            nn.Linear(128, out_dim)\n        )\n        \n        # Item Tower\n        self.item_mlp = nn.Sequential(\n            nn.Linear(emb_dim + feat_dim, 128),\n            nn.LayerNorm(128),\n            nn.GELU(),\n            nn.Dropout(0.1),\n            nn.Linear(128, out_dim)\n        )\n        self.temp = nn.Parameter(torch.tensor(0.07))\n        \n    def pool(self, item_ids):\n        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)\n        mask = (item_ids > 0).float().unsqueeze(-1)\n        return (emb * mask).sum(dim=1) / mask.sum(dim=1).clamp(min=1.0)\n        \n    def forward_user(self, likes, org, all_l, dis, stats):\n        h1 = self.pool(likes)\n        h2 = self.pool(org)\n        h3 = self.pool(all_l)\n        h4 = self.pool(dis)\n        h = torch.cat([h1, h2, h3, h4, stats], dim=-1)\n        raw = self.user_mlp(h)\n        # Pref part normalized, pop weight in last dim\n        pref = F.normalize(raw[:, :-1], p=2, dim=-1)\n        pop = F.softplus(raw[:, -1:])\n        return torch.cat([pref, pop], dim=-1)\n        \n    def forward_item(self, item_ids, item_feats):\n        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)\n        h = torch.cat([emb, item_feats], dim=-1)\n        raw = self.item_mlp(h)\n        pref = F.normalize(raw[:, :-1], p=2, dim=-1)\n        pop = raw[:, -1:]\n        return torch.cat([pref, pop], dim=-1)\n\nmodel = TwoTower()\nB = 64\nlikes = torch.randint(0, 30000, (B, 64))\norg = torch.randint(0, 30000, (B, 64))\nall_l = torch.randint(0, 30000, (B, 64))\ndis = torch.randint(0, 30000, (B, 16))\nstats = torch.randn(B, 5)\n\nu = model.forward_user(likes, org, all_l, dis, stats)\nv = model.forward_item(torch.randint(1, 30000, (B,)), torch.randn(B, 4))\nprint(\"User vector shape:\", u.shape, \"Item vector shape:\", v.shape)\nscores = (u * v).sum(dim=-1)\nprint(\"Scores shape:\", scores.shape, \"Sample scores:\", scores[:5].detach())\n'",
  "description": "Test TwoTower architecture forward pass"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: User vector shape: torch.Size([64, 64]) Item vector shape: torch.Size([64, 64])
Scores shape: torch.Size([64]) Sample scores: tensor([0.2363, 0.5441, 0.5493, 0.5881, 0.1839])
Process Group PGID: 2693
</untrusted_context>
59

Check loading speed for 16-week window

+28:50
Recorded reasoning summary 41 words

Refining Architecture Components

My current focus is on disentangling the Item and User towers. I'm verifying that the architecture cleanly separates these, ensuring each produces distinct user and item representations as intended. This modularity is crucial for precise dot product calculations.

Recorded reasoning summary 48 words

Structuring User and Item Towers

I'm solidifying the separation between user and item processing. Both will be distinct PyTorch nn.Module classes. We're exploring whether to share an item embedding table across both towers, or instantiate separate ones, a decision critical for maintaining independence while allowing for shared components.

Recorded reasoning summary 46 words

Designing Training Data Splits

I'm now focusing on how to construct training batches, specifically how to build user histories and sampling strategies. I'm exploring weekly cutoffs to define user history context and target positive pairs within subsequent windows, ensuring distinct histories are maintained for each epoch.

Recorded reasoning summary 59 words

Validating Data Handling

My latest thoughts confirm that our in-memory data structures are exceptionally efficient. Even with six historical cutoffs, the memory footprint for user histories and positive pairs is surprisingly small, totaling around 25 MB. This allows for zero I/O during training, with an epoch predicted to complete in under two seconds. I'm eager to test this hypothesis.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck loading speed for 16-week window Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check loading speed for 16-week window",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport time\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\nt0 = time.time()\ncutoff = 24786800\nweek = 7 * 86400\nnum_weeks = 6\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\nitem2idx = {item: i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(catalog.item_id.values)}\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\ntarget_uids = targets_df.uid.values\nuid2idx = {uid: i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}\nN_users = len(target_uids)\n\nprint(f\"Catalog items: {len(item2idx)}, Target users: {N_users}\")\n\n# Load all likes and dislikes for target users\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\nlikes = likes[likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\nlikes[\"u_idx\"] = likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\nlikes[\"i_idx\"] = likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_dislikes.parquet\")\ndislikes = dislikes[dislikes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\ndislikes[\"u_idx\"] = dislikes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\ndislikes[\"i_idx\"] = dislikes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\n# Load listens in the last 16 weeks\nt_start = cutoff - 16 * week\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"], filters=[(\"timestamp\", \">=\", t_start)])\nlistens = table.to_pandas()\nlistens = listens[listens.uid.isin(uid2idx) & listens.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\nlistens[\"u_idx\"] = listens.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\nlistens[\"i_idx\"] = listens.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\nprint(f\"Events loaded in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s: likes={len(likes)}, dislikes={len(dislikes)}, listens={len(listens)}\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Catalog items: 30000, Target users: 8456
Events loaded in 5.58s: likes=472889, dislikes=54901, listens=14602404
Process Group PGID: 2712
</untrusted_context>
60

Test first_seen computation on all events

+29:10
Recorded reasoning summary 39 words

Analyzing Cutoff Logic

I'm currently dissecting the logic for extracting positive pairs and user history based on defined cutoffs. My focus is on iterating through each cutoff $w$ from 1 to $W$ and determining the corresponding target window $T_w$.

Recorded reasoning summary 36 words

Refining Discovery Rules

I'm now focusing on the discovery eligibility, specifically ensuring candidates haven't been interacted with prior to the target window $T_w$. I'm exploring efficient ways to filter these pre-interacted items from user interaction logs.

Recorded reasoning summary 50 words

Simplifying Discovery Criteria

I've realized the discovery eligibility for cutoff $T_w$ simplifies drastically. An interaction is a discovery if and only if its first_seen_ts is within the target window $[T_w, T_w + \text{week}]$. This directly means the item wasn't seen before $T_w$ and was first interacted with during the window.

Tool callrun_shell_commandTest first_seen computation on all events Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Test first_seen computation on all events",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport time\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\nt0 = time.time()\ncutoff = 24786800\nweek = 7 * 86400\nnum_weeks = 6\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\nitem2idx = {item: i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(catalog.item_id.values)}\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\ntarget_uids = targets_df.uid.values\nuid2idx = {uid: i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}\n\n# Load all interactions in train to get first_seen_ts\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\"])\nlikes = likes[likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\n\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_dislikes.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\"])\ndislikes = dislikes[dislikes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\n\ntable = pq.read_table(\"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\", columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\"], filters=[(\"timestamp\", \">=\", cutoff - 16 * week)])\nlistens = table.to_pandas()\nlistens = listens[listens.uid.isin(uid2idx) & listens.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\n\nall_events = pd.concat([likes, dislikes, listens], ignore_index=True)\nall_events[\"u_idx\"] = all_events.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\nall_events[\"i_idx\"] = all_events.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\nt1 = time.time()\nprint(f\"All events concatenated in {t1-t0:.2f}s, total rows: {len(all_events)}\")\n\n# First seen ts per (u_idx, i_idx)\nfirst_seen = all_events.groupby([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"])[\"timestamp\"].min().reset_index()\nfirst_seen.rename(columns={\"timestamp\": \"first_ts\"}, inplace=True)\nt2 = time.time()\nprint(f\"First seen computed in {t2-t1:.2f}s, unique pairs: {len(first_seen)}\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: All events concatenated in 5.49s, total rows: 15130194
First seen computed in 1.45s, unique pairs: 4945303
Process Group PGID: 2734
</untrusted_context>
61

Test speed of history array extraction

+29:25
Recorded reasoning summary 36 words

Refining Discovery Speed

The computation time has been drastically reduced to 1.45 seconds. I can now pinpoint discovery events within any given week in mere milliseconds, specifically for organic likes, which is a significant step forward.

Tool callrun_shell_commandTest speed of history array extraction Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Test speed of history array extraction",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport time\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\n\nt0 = time.time()\n# Test building user history array for 8456 users given a filtered df\nN_users = 8456\nMAX_LEN = 64\n\n# Simulate df with 300,000 interactions for 8456 users\ndf = pd.DataFrame({\n    \"u_idx\": np.random.randint(0, N_users, 300000),\n    \"i_idx\": np.random.randint(1, 30000, 300000),\n    \"timestamp\": np.random.randint(0, 100000, 300000)\n})\ndf.sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"], inplace=True)\n\n# Fast extraction\nhist_mat = np.zeros((N_users, MAX_LEN), dtype=np.int32)\ntail = df.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN)\n# Groupby u_idx\nfor u, group in tail.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n    items = group[\"i_idx\"].values\n    hist_mat[u, -len(items):] = items\n\nprint(f\"Extraction done in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s, non-zero rows: {(hist_mat[:, -1] > 0).sum()}\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Extraction done in 0.32s, non-zero rows: 8456
Process Group PGID: 2756
</untrusted_context>
62

write_file experiment_v1.py

+30:07
Recorded reasoning summary 37 words

Analyzing Validation Cutoff

I'm currently examining the validation evaluation at $T_0 = 24786800$. My focus is on understanding the user history for this specific evaluation, which involves all interactions within train_* prior to $T_0$, including the validation_preference_state.

Recorded reasoning summary 42 words

Developing Training Script

I'm now focused on building the initial Two-Tower training and evaluation script, experimenting with parameters like embedding dimensions, learning rates, and negative sampling strategies. I'll define and implement functions within this script to handle data loading and model training.

Tool callwrite_file/app/solution/experiment_v1.py Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "instruction": "Create experiment_v1.py script to train and validate two-tower neural ranker",
  "content": "import os\nimport sys\nimport time\nimport math\nimport subprocess\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, score_rankings\n\n# Configuration\nDATA_DIR = Path(\"/task/data\")\nCUTOFF = 24786800  # train cutoff\nWEEK = 7 * 86400\nNUM_WEEKS = 6\nEMB_DIM = 64\nOUT_DIM = 64\nHIDDEN_DIM = 128\nBATCH_SIZE = 512\nNUM_NEGATIVES = 512\nNUM_EPOCHS = 8\nLR = 1e-3\nWEIGHT_DECAY = 1e-4\nTEMP = 0.07\nMAX_LEN_LIKES = 64\nMAX_LEN_ORG = 64\nMAX_LEN_ALL = 64\nMAX_LEN_DIS = 16\n\ntorch.set_num_threads(8)\ndevice = torch.device(\"cpu\")\n\nprint(\"--- Starting Two-Tower Experiment v1 ---\")\nt_start = time.time()\n\n# 1. Load catalog and target users\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"candidate_catalog.parquet\")\n# 1-indexed: 1..30000, 0 is padding\nitem_ids = catalog.item_id.values\nitem2idx = {int(item): i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(item_ids)}\nidx2item = np.array([0] + list(item_ids), dtype=np.int64)\nN_ITEMS = len(item_ids)\n\n# Item features\n# log(1 + pos), log(1 + org), org_ratio, pop_rank_frac\npos_listens = catalog.positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)\norg_listens = catalog.organic_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)\npop_rank = catalog.popularity_rank.values.astype(np.float32)\n\nfeat_pos = np.log1p(pos_listens) / np.log1p(pos_listens.max())\nfeat_org = np.log1p(org_listens) / np.log1p(org_listens.max())\nfeat_ratio = (org_listens + 1.0) / (pos_listens + 1.0)\nfeat_rank = 1.0 - (pop_rank / float(N_ITEMS))\n\n# Padding item (index 0) has feature 0\nitem_features = np.zeros((N_ITEMS + 1, 4), dtype=np.float32)\nitem_features[1:, 0] = feat_pos\nitem_features[1:, 1] = feat_org\nitem_features[1:, 2] = feat_ratio\nitem_features[1:, 3] = feat_rank\nitem_features_tensor = torch.from_numpy(item_features).float()\n\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"target_users.parquet\")\ntarget_uids = targets_df.uid.values.astype(np.int64)\nuid2idx = {int(uid): i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}\nN_USERS = len(target_uids)\n\nprint(f\"Catalog items: {N_ITEMS}, Target users: {N_USERS}\")\n\n# 2. Load interaction logs\nprint(\"Loading interaction logs...\")\nt0 = time.time()\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"train_likes.parquet\")\nlikes = likes[likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\nlikes[\"u_idx\"] = likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\nlikes[\"i_idx\"] = likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"train_dislikes.parquet\")\ndislikes = dislikes[dislikes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\ndislikes[\"u_idx\"] = dislikes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\ndislikes[\"i_idx\"] = dislikes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\nt_history_start = CUTOFF - (NUM_WEEKS + 10) * WEEK\ntable = pq.read_table(\n    DATA_DIR / \"train_listens.parquet\",\n    columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n    filters=[(\"timestamp\", \">=\", t_history_start)]\n)\nlistens = table.to_pandas()\nlistens = listens[listens.uid.isin(uid2idx) & listens.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\nlistens[\"u_idx\"] = listens.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\nlistens[\"i_idx\"] = listens.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\nprint(f\"Loaded in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s: likes={len(likes)}, dislikes={len(dislikes)}, listens={len(listens)}\")\n\n# 3. Compute first seen timestamp for each (u_idx, i_idx)\nprint(\"Computing first-seen timestamps...\")\nt0 = time.time()\nall_interactions = pd.concat([\n    likes[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]],\n    dislikes[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]],\n    listens[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]]\n], ignore_index=True)\nfirst_seen = all_interactions.groupby([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"])[\"timestamp\"].min().reset_index()\nfirst_seen.rename(columns={\"timestamp\": \"first_ts\"}, inplace=True)\nprint(f\"First-seen computed in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s, unique pairs: {len(first_seen)}\")\n\n# Helper to build user history at a specific cutoff timestamp\ndef build_user_history(at_ts):\n    likes_sub = likes[likes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"])\n    dislikes_sub = dislikes[dislikes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"])\n    \n    # Listens in [at_ts - 60 days, at_ts]\n    t_min = at_ts - 60 * 86400\n    listens_sub = listens[(listens.timestamp >= t_min) & (listens.timestamp < at_ts)].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"])\n    org_listens_sub = listens_sub[(listens_sub.is_organic == 1) & (listens_sub.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]\n    \n    mat_likes = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=np.int32)\n    mat_org = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=np.int32)\n    mat_all = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=np.int32)\n    mat_dis = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=np.int32)\n    stats = np.zeros((N_USERS, 5), dtype=np.float32)\n    \n    # Tail items per user\n    tail_likes = likes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_LIKES)\n    for u, grp in tail_likes.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        mat_likes[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        \n    tail_org = org_listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_ORG)\n    for u, grp in tail_org.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        mat_org[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        \n    tail_all = listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_ALL)\n    for u, grp in tail_all.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        mat_all[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        \n    tail_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_DIS)\n    for u, grp in tail_dis.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        mat_dis[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        \n    # User stats: count of likes, dislikes, org, all, ratio\n    c_likes = likes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_org = org_listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_all = listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    \n    stats[c_likes.index, 0] = np.log1p(c_likes.values)\n    stats[c_dis.index, 1] = np.log1p(c_dis.values)\n    stats[c_org.index, 2] = np.log1p(c_org.values)\n    stats[c_all.index, 3] = np.log1p(c_all.values)\n    stats[:, 4] = (stats[:, 2] + 1.0) / (stats[:, 3] + 1.0)\n    \n    return {\n        \"likes\": torch.from_numpy(mat_likes).long(),\n        \"org\": torch.from_numpy(mat_org).long(),\n        \"all\": torch.from_numpy(mat_all).long(),\n        \"dis\": torch.from_numpy(mat_dis).long(),\n        \"stats\": torch.from_numpy(stats).float()\n    }\n\n# 4. Build training windows\nprint(\"Building training windows and positive pairs...\")\nt0 = time.time()\nwindow_histories = []\nall_pairs = []  # (u_idx, w_idx, i_idx, grade)\n\nfor w in range(NUM_WEEKS):\n    w_cut = CUTOFF - (w + 1) * WEEK\n    w_end = w_cut + WEEK\n    print(f\"  Building window {w+1}/{NUM_WEEKS} at cutoff {w_cut}...\")\n    w_hist = build_user_history(w_cut)\n    window_histories.append(w_hist)\n    \n    # Discovery events in [w_cut, w_end]\n    # Organic likes\n    w_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= w_cut) & (likes.timestamp < w_end) & (likes.is_organic == 1)][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]]\n    # Strong organic listens\n    w_listens = listens[(listens.timestamp >= w_cut) & (listens.timestamp < w_end) & (listens.is_organic == 1) & (listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]]\n    \n    # Join with first_seen to ensure discovery (first_ts >= w_cut)\n    w_likes = w_likes.merge(first_seen, on=[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], how=\"inner\")\n    w_likes = w_likes[w_likes.first_ts >= w_cut][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]].drop_duplicates()\n    w_likes[\"grade\"] = 3\n    \n    w_listens = w_listens.merge(first_seen, on=[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], how=\"inner\")\n    w_listens = w_listens[w_listens.first_ts >= w_cut][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]].drop_duplicates()\n    w_listens[\"grade\"] = 1\n    \n    # If both, grade 3 wins\n    combined = pd.concat([w_listens, w_likes], ignore_index=True)\n    combined = combined.sort_values(\"grade\").drop_duplicates([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], keep=\"last\")\n    combined[\"w_idx\"] = w\n    \n    for u, i, g in zip(combined.u_idx, combined.i_idx, combined.grade):\n        all_pairs.append((u, w, i, g))\n    print(f\"    Window {w+1} pairs: {len(combined)} (likes={len(w_likes)}, listens={len(w_listens)})\")\n\nprint(f\"Total training pairs: {len(all_pairs)}, built in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s\")\nall_pairs = np.array(all_pairs, dtype=np.int32)\n\n# Also build history for validation cutoff\nprint(\"Building history for validation cutoff...\")\nval_user_history = build_user_history(CUTOFF)\n\n# 5. Define User and Item Towers\nclass UserTower(nn.Module):\n    def __init__(self, item_emb, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM, stats_dim=5):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.item_emb = item_emb\n        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(\n            nn.Linear(emb_dim * 4 + stats_dim, hidden_dim),\n            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),\n            nn.GELU(),\n            nn.Dropout(0.1),\n            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)\n        )\n\n    def pool(self, item_ids):\n        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, L, D)\n        mask = (item_ids > 0).float().unsqueeze(-1)\n        denom = mask.sum(dim=1).clamp(min=1.0)\n        return (emb * mask).sum(dim=1) / denom\n\n    def forward(self, likes, org, all_l, dis, stats):\n        h1 = self.pool(likes)\n        h2 = self.pool(org)\n        h3 = self.pool(all_l)\n        h4 = self.pool(dis)\n        h = torch.cat([h1, h2, h3, h4, stats], dim=-1)\n        raw = self.mlp(h)\n        # Content pref normalized, popularity bias in last dimension\n        pref = F.normalize(raw[:, :-1], p=2, dim=-1)\n        pop = F.softplus(raw[:, -1:])\n        return torch.cat([pref, pop], dim=-1)\n\nclass ItemTower(nn.Module):\n    def __init__(self, item_emb, feat_dim=4, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.item_emb = item_emb\n        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(\n            nn.Linear(emb_dim + feat_dim, hidden_dim),\n            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),\n            nn.GELU(),\n            nn.Dropout(0.1),\n            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)\n        )\n\n    def forward(self, item_ids, item_feats):\n        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, D)\n        h = torch.cat([emb, item_feats], dim=-1)\n        raw = self.mlp(h)\n        pref = F.normalize(raw[:, :-1], p=2, dim=-1)\n        pop = raw[:, -1:]\n        return torch.cat([pref, pop], dim=-1)\n\n# Initialize Model\nshared_item_emb = nn.Embedding(N_ITEMS + 1, EMB_DIM, padding_idx=0)\nnn.init.normal_(shared_item_emb.weight, std=0.02)\nwith torch.no_grad():\n    shared_item_emb.weight[0].fill_(0.0)\n\nuser_tower = UserTower(shared_item_emb, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM)\nitem_tower = ItemTower(shared_item_emb, 4, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM)\n\noptimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(\n    list(user_tower.parameters()) + list(item_tower.parameters()),\n    lr=LR,\n    weight_decay=WEIGHT_DECAY\n)\nscheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=NUM_EPOCHS)\n\n# 6. Evaluation Function\nval_npz = np.load(DATA_DIR / \"validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nval_packed = val_npz[\"packed_eligible\"]\nval_uids = val_npz[\"uids\"]\nval_item_ids = val_npz[\"item_ids\"]\nval_unpacked = np.unpackbits(val_packed, axis=1, count=N_ITEMS, bitorder=\"little\")\n\ntargets_set = set(target_uids)\neligibility_service = CandidateSet(DATA_DIR / \"validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nimport evaluate_public\nval_gold = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility_service, targets_set)\n\ndef evaluate_ranker():\n    user_tower.eval()\n    item_tower.eval()\n    with torch.no_grad():\n        # 1. Precompute all item embeddings\n        all_ids = torch.arange(1, N_ITEMS + 1, dtype=torch.long)\n        all_feats = item_features_tensor[1:]\n        V = item_tower(all_ids, all_feats)  # (30000, OUT_DIM)\n        \n        # 2. Compute all user embeddings\n        U = user_tower(\n            val_user_history[\"likes\"],\n            val_user_history[\"org\"],\n            val_user_history[\"all\"],\n            val_user_history[\"dis\"],\n            val_user_history[\"stats\"]\n        )  # (8456, OUT_DIM)\n        \n        # 3. Inner product scores\n        scores = torch.matmul(U, V.t()).numpy()  # (8456, 30000)\n        \n        # 4. Mask ineligible candidates\n        scores[val_unpacked == 0] = -1e9\n        \n        # 5. Top 100 per user\n        top100_idx = np.argsort(-scores, axis=1)[:, :100]  # indices 0..29999\n        \n        ranked = {}\n        for r, uid in enumerate(target_uids):\n            ranked[int(uid)] = list(map(int, val_item_ids[top100_idx[r]]))\n            \n        res = score_rankings(ranked, val_gold)\n        return res\n\nprint(\"\\nEvaluating initial model...\")\ninit_scores = evaluate_ranker()\nprint(f\"Initial score: {init_scores}\")\n\n# 7. Training Loop\nprint(\"\\nStarting training loop...\")\nN_PAIRS = len(all_pairs)\nSTEPS_PER_EPOCH = N_PAIRS // BATCH_SIZE\n\nfor epoch in range(1, NUM_EPOCHS + 1):\n    t_epoch = time.time()\n    user_tower.train()\n    item_tower.train()\n    \n    # Shuffle pairs\n    perm = np.random.permutation(N_PAIRS)\n    total_loss = 0.0\n    \n    for step in range(STEPS_PER_EPOCH):\n        batch_idx = perm[step * BATCH_SIZE : (step + 1) * BATCH_SIZE]\n        batch = all_pairs[batch_idx]\n        b_u = batch[:, 0]\n        b_w = batch[:, 1]\n        b_i = batch[:, 2]\n        b_g = batch[:, 3]\n        \n        # Gather user history for this batch\n        # Group by w_idx for fast tensor slice\n        u_likes = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_org = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_all = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_dis = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_stats = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, 5), dtype=torch.float32)\n        \n        for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):\n            mask = (b_w == w)\n            if not np.any(mask):\n                continue\n            u_indices = torch.from_numpy(b_u[mask]).long()\n            w_h = window_histories[w]\n            u_likes[mask] = w_h[\"likes\"][u_indices]\n            u_org[mask] = w_h[\"org\"][u_indices]\n            u_all[mask] = w_h[\"all\"][u_indices]\n            u_dis[mask] = w_h[\"dis\"][u_indices]\n            u_stats[mask] = w_h[\"stats\"][u_indices]\n            \n        # Positive item IDs and features\n        pos_ids = torch.from_numpy(b_i).long()\n        pos_feats = item_features_tensor[pos_ids]\n        \n        # Random negative items from catalog\n        neg_ids = torch.randint(1, N_ITEMS + 1, (NUM_NEGATIVES,), dtype=torch.long)\n        neg_feats = item_features_tensor[neg_ids]\n        \n        # Forward passes\n        u_vec = user_tower(u_likes, u_org, u_all, u_dis, u_stats)  # (B, OUT_DIM)\n        pos_vec = item_tower(pos_ids, pos_feats)                   # (B, OUT_DIM)\n        neg_vec = item_tower(neg_ids, neg_feats)                   # (M, OUT_DIM)\n        \n        all_item_vec = torch.cat([pos_vec, neg_vec], dim=0)       # (B+M, OUT_DIM)\n        \n        # Dot product logits scaled by temperature\n        logits = torch.matmul(u_vec, all_item_vec.t()) / TEMP     # (B, B+M)\n        labels = torch.arange(BATCH_SIZE, dtype=torch.long)\n        \n        # Sample weights: grade 3 has weight 3.0, grade 1 has weight 1.0\n        weights = torch.from_numpy(np.where(b_g == 3, 3.0, 1.0)).float()\n        \n        loss_unweighted = F.cross_entropy(logits, labels, reduction=\"none\")\n        loss = (loss_unweighted * weights).mean()\n        \n        optimizer.zero_grad()\n        loss.backward()\n        nn.utils.clip_grad_norm_(list(user_tower.parameters()) + list(item_tower.parameters()), 1.0)\n        optimizer.step()\n        \n        total_loss += loss.item()\n        \n    scheduler.step()\n    avg_loss = total_loss / STEPS_PER_EPOCH\n    val_scores = evaluate_ranker()\n    print(f\"Epoch {epoch:2d}/{NUM_EPOCHS} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | Val NDCG@10: {val_scores['quality_ndcg@10']:.6f} | Time: {time.time()-t_epoch:.1f}s\")\n\nprint(f\"\\nTotal elapsed: {time.time()-t_start:.1f}s\")\n",
  "file_path": "/app/solution/experiment_v1.py"
}

Tool response 

Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/experiment_v1.py. Here is the updated code:
import os
import sys
import time
import math
import subprocess
from pathlib import Path

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F

sys.path.append("/task")
from ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, score_rankings

# Configuration
DATA_DIR = Path("/task/data")
CUTOFF = 24786800  # train cutoff
WEEK = 7 * 86400
NUM_WEEKS = 6
EMB_DIM = 64
OUT_DIM = 64
HIDDEN_DIM = 128
BATCH_SIZE = 512
NUM_NEGATIVES = 512
NUM_EPOCHS = 8
LR = 1e-3
WEIGHT_DECAY = 1e-4
TEMP = 0.07
MAX_LEN_LIKES = 64
MAX_LEN_ORG = 64
MAX_LEN_ALL = 64
MAX_LEN_DIS = 16

torch.set_num_threads(8)
device = torch.device("cpu")

print("--- Starting Two-Tower Experiment v1 ---")
t_start = time.time()

# 1. Load catalog and target users
catalog = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "candidate_catalog.parquet")
# 1-indexed: 1..30000, 0 is padding
item_ids = catalog.item_id.values
item2idx = {int(item): i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(item_ids)}
idx2item = np.array([0] + list(item_ids), dtype=np.int64)
N_ITEMS = len(item_ids)

# Item features
# log(1 + pos), log(1 + org), org_ratio, pop_rank_frac
pos_listens = catalog.positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)
org_listens = catalog.organic_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)
pop_rank = catalog.popularity_rank.values.astype(np.float32)

feat_pos = np.log1p(pos_listens) / np.log1p(pos_listens.max())
feat_org = np.log1p(org_listens) / np.log1p(org_listens.max())
feat_ratio = (org_listens + 1.0) / (pos_listens + 1.0)
feat_rank = 1.0 - (pop_rank / float(N_ITEMS))

# Padding item (index 0) has feature 0
item_features = np.zeros((N_ITEMS + 1, 4), dtype=np.float32)
item_features[1:, 0] = feat_pos
item_features[1:, 1] = feat_org
item_features[1:, 2] = feat_ratio
item_features[1:, 3] = feat_rank
item_features_tensor = torch.from_numpy(item_features).float()

targets_df = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "target_users.parquet")
target_uids = targets_df.uid.values.astype(np.int64)
uid2idx = {int(uid): i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}
N_USERS = len(target_uids)

print(f"Catalog items: {N_ITEMS}, Target users: {N_USERS}")

# 2. Load interaction logs
print("Loading interaction logs...")
t0 = time.time()
likes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "train_likes.parquet")
likes = likes[likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
likes["u_idx"] = likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
likes["i_idx"] = likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)

dislikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "train_dislikes.parquet")
dislikes = dislikes[dislikes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
dislikes["u_idx"] = dislikes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
dislikes["i_idx"] = dislikes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)

t_history_start = CUTOFF - (NUM_WEEKS + 10) * WEEK
table = pq.read_table(
    DATA_DIR / "train_listens.parquet",
    columns=["uid", "item_id", "timestamp", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
    filters=[("timestamp", ">=", t_history_start)]
)
listens = table.to_pandas()
listens = listens[listens.uid.isin(uid2idx) & listens.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
listens["u_idx"] = listens.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
listens["i_idx"] = listens.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)
print(f"Loaded in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s: likes={len(likes)}, dislikes={len(dislikes)}, listens={len(listens)}")

# 3. Compute first seen timestamp for each (u_idx, i_idx)
print("Computing first-seen timestamps...")
t0 = time.time()
all_interactions = pd.concat([
    likes[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]],
    dislikes[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]],
    listens[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]]
], ignore_index=True)
first_seen = all_interactions.groupby(["u_idx", "i_idx"])["timestamp"].min().reset_index()
first_seen.rename(columns={"timestamp": "first_ts"}, inplace=True)
print(f"First-seen computed in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s, unique pairs: {len(first_seen)}")

# Helper to build user history at a specific cutoff timestamp
def build_user_history(at_ts):
    likes_sub = likes[likes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"])
    dislikes_sub = dislikes[dislikes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"])
    
    # Listens in [at_ts - 60 days, at_ts]
    t_min = at_ts - 60 * 86400
    listens_sub = listens[(listens.timestamp >= t_min) & (listens.timestamp < at_ts)].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"])
    org_listens_sub = listens_sub[(listens_sub.is_organic == 1) & (listens_sub.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]
    
    mat_likes = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=np.int32)
    mat_org = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=np.int32)
    mat_all = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=np.int32)
    mat_dis = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=np.int32)
    stats = np.zeros((N_USERS, 5), dtype=np.float32)
    
    # Tail items per user
    tail_likes = likes_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_LIKES)
    for u, grp in tail_likes.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        mat_likes[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        
    tail_org = org_listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_ORG)
    for u, grp in tail_org.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        mat_org[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        
    tail_all = listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_ALL)
    for u, grp in tail_all.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        mat_all[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        
    tail_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_DIS)
    for u, grp in tail_dis.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        mat_dis[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        
    # User stats: count of likes, dislikes, org, all, ratio
    c_likes = likes_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_org = org_listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_all = listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    
    stats[c_likes.index, 0] = np.log1p(c_likes.values)
    stats[c_dis.index, 1] = np.log1p(c_dis.values)
    stats[c_org.index, 2] = np.log1p(c_org.values)
    stats[c_all.index, 3] = np.log1p(c_all.values)
    stats[:, 4] = (stats[:, 2] + 1.0) / (stats[:, 3] + 1.0)
    
    return {
        "likes": torch.from_numpy(mat_likes).long(),
        "org": torch.from_numpy(mat_org).long(),
        "all": torch.from_numpy(mat_all).long(),
        "dis": torch.from_numpy(mat_dis).long(),
        "stats": torch.from_numpy(stats).float()
    }

# 4. Build training windows
print("Building training windows and positive pairs...")
t0 = time.time()
window_histories = []
all_pairs = []  # (u_idx, w_idx, i_idx, grade)

for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):
    w_cut = CUTOFF - (w + 1) * WEEK
    w_end = w_cut + WEEK
    print(f"  Building window {w+1}/{NUM_WEEKS} at cutoff {w_cut}...")
    w_hist = build_user_history(w_cut)
    window_histories.append(w_hist)
    
    # Discovery events in [w_cut, w_end]
    # Organic likes
    w_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= w_cut) & (likes.timestamp < w_end) & (likes.is_organic == 1)][["u_idx", "i_idx"]]
    # Strong organic listens
    w_listens = listens[(listens.timestamp >= w_cut) & (listens.timestamp < w_end) & (listens.is_organic == 1) & (listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)][["u_idx", "i_idx"]]
    
    # Join with first_seen to ensure discovery (first_ts >= w_cut)
    w_likes = w_likes.merge(first_seen, on=["u_idx", "i_idx"], how="inner")
    w_likes = w_likes[w_likes.first_ts >= w_cut][["u_idx", "i_idx"]].drop_duplicates()
    w_likes["grade"] = 3
    
    w_listens = w_listens.merge(first_seen, on=["u_idx", "i_idx"], how="inner")
    w_listens = w_listens[w_listens.first_ts >= w_cut][["u_idx", "i_idx"]].drop_duplicates()
    w_listens["grade"] = 1
    
    # If both, grade 3 wins
    combined = pd.concat([w_listens, w_likes], ignore_index=True)
    combined = combined.sort_values("grade").drop_duplicates(["u_idx", "i_idx"], keep="last")
    combined["w_idx"] = w
    
    for u, i, g in zip(combined.u_idx, combined.i_idx, combined.grade):
        all_pairs.append((u, w, i, g))
    print(f"    Window {w+1} pairs: {len(combined)} (likes={len(w_likes)}, listens={len(w_listens)})")

print(f"Total training pairs: {len(all_pairs)}, built in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s")
all_pairs = np.array(all_pairs, dtype=np.int32)

# Also build history for validation cutoff
print("Building history for validation cutoff...")
val_user_history = build_user_history(CUTOFF)

# 5. Define User and Item Towers
class UserTower(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, item_emb, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM, stats_dim=5):
        super().__init__()
        self.item_emb = item_emb
        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(emb_dim * 4 + stats_dim, hidden_dim),
            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),
            nn.GELU(),
            nn.Dropout(0.1),
            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)
        )

    def pool(self, item_ids):
        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, L, D)
        mask = (item_ids > 0).float().unsqueeze(-1)
        denom = mask.sum(dim=1).clamp(min=1.0)
        return (emb * mask).sum(dim=1) / denom

    def forward(self, likes, org, all_l, dis, stats):
        h1 = self.pool(likes)
        h2 = self.pool(org)
        h3 = self.pool(all_l)
        h4 = self.pool(dis)
        h = torch.cat([h1, h2, h3, h4, stats], dim=-1)
        raw = self.mlp(h)
        # Content pref normalized, popularity bias in last dimension
        pref = F.normalize(raw[:, :-1], p=2, dim=-1)
        pop = F.softplus(raw[:, -1:])
        return torch.cat([pref, pop], dim=-1)

class ItemTower(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, item_emb, feat_dim=4, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM):
        super().__init__()
        self.item_emb = item_emb
        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(emb_dim + feat_dim, hidden_dim),
            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),
            nn.GELU(),
            nn.Dropout(0.1),
            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)
        )

    def forward(self, item_ids, item_feats):
        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, D)
        h = torch.cat([emb, item_feats], dim=-1)
        raw = self.mlp(h)
        pref = F.normalize(raw[:, :-1], p=2, dim=-1)
        pop = raw[:, -1:]
        return torch.cat([pref, pop], dim=-1)

# Initialize Model
shared_item_emb = nn.Embedding(N_ITEMS + 1, EMB_DIM, padding_idx=0)
nn.init.normal_(shared_item_emb.weight, std=0.02)
with torch.no_grad():
    shared_item_emb.weight[0].fill_(0.0)

user_tower = UserTower(shared_item_emb, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM)
item_tower = ItemTower(shared_item_emb, 4, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM)

optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(
    list(user_tower.parameters()) + list(item_tower.parameters()),
    lr=LR,
    weight_decay=WEIGHT_DECAY
)
scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=NUM_EPOCHS)

# 6. Evaluation Function
val_npz = np.load(DATA_DIR / "validation_eligible_candidates.npz")
val_packed = val_npz["packed_eligible"]
val_uids = val_npz["uids"]
val_item_ids = val_npz["item_ids"]
val_unpacked = np.unpackbits(val_packed, axis=1, count=N_ITEMS, bitorder="little")

targets_set = set(target_uids)
eligibility_service = CandidateSet(DATA_DIR / "validation_eligible_candidates.npz")
import evaluate_public
val_gold = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility_service, targets_set)

def evaluate_ranker():
    user_tower.eval()
    item_tower.eval()
    with torch.no_grad():
        # 1. Precompute all item embeddings
        all_ids = torch.arange(1, N_ITEMS + 1, dtype=torch.long)
        all_feats = item_features_tensor[1:]
        V = item_tower(all_ids, all_feats)  # (30000, OUT_DIM)
        
        # 2. Compute all user embeddings
        U = user_tower(
            val_user_history["likes"],
            val_user_history["org"],
            val_user_history["all"],
            val_user_history["dis"],
            val_user_history["stats"]
        )  # (8456, OUT_DIM)
        
        # 3. Inner product scores
        scores = torch.matmul(U, V.t()).numpy()  # (8456, 30000)
        
        # 4. Mask ineligible candidates
        scores[val_unpacked == 0] = -1e9
        
        # 5. Top 100 per user
        top100_idx = np.argsort(-scores, axis=1)[:, :100]  # indices 0..29999
        
        ranked = {}
        for r, uid in enumerate(target_uids):
            ranked[int(uid)] = list(map(int, val_item_ids[top100_idx[r]]))
            
        res = score_rankings(ranked, val_gold)
        return res

print("\nEvaluating initial model...")
init_scores = evaluate_ranker()
print(f"Initial score: {init_scores}")

# 7. Training Loop
print("\nStarting training loop...")
N_PAIRS = len(all_pairs)
STEPS_PER_EPOCH = N_PAIRS // BATCH_SIZE

for epoch in range(1, NUM_EPOCHS + 1):
    t_epoch = time.time()
    user_tower.train()
    item_tower.train()
    
    # Shuffle pairs
    perm = np.random.permutation(N_PAIRS)
    total_loss = 0.0
    
    for step in range(STEPS_PER_EPOCH):
        batch_idx = perm[step * BATCH_SIZE : (step + 1) * BATCH_SIZE]
        batch = all_pairs[batch_idx]
        b_u = batch[:, 0]
        b_w = batch[:, 1]
        b_i = batch[:, 2]
        b_g = batch[:, 3]
        
        # Gather user history for this batch
        # Group by w_idx for fast tensor slice
        u_likes = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=torch.long)
        u_org = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=torch.long)
        u_all = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=torch.long)
        u_dis = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=torch.long)
        u_stats = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, 5), dtype=torch.float32)
        
        for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):
            mask = (b_w == w)
            if not np.any(mask):
                continue
            u_indices = torch.from_numpy(b_u[mask]).long()
            w_h = window_histories[w]
            u_likes[mask] = w_h["likes"][u_indices]
            u_org[mask] = w_h["org"][u_indices]
            u_all[mask] = w_h["all"][u_indices]
            u_dis[mask] = w_h["dis"][u_indices]
            u_stats[mask] = w_h["stats"][u_indices]
            
        # Positive item IDs and features
        pos_ids = torch.from_numpy(b_i).long()
        pos_feats = item_features_tensor[pos_ids]
        
        # Random negative items from catalog
        neg_ids = torch.randint(1, N_ITEMS + 1, (NUM_NEGATIVES,), dtype=torch.long)
        neg_feats = item_features_tensor[neg_ids]
        
        # Forward passes
        u_vec = user_tower(u_likes, u_org, u_all, u_dis, u_stats)  # (B, OUT_DIM)
        pos_vec = item_tower(pos_ids, pos_feats)                   # (B, OUT_DIM)
        neg_vec = item_tower(neg_ids, neg_feats)                   # (M, OUT_DIM)
        
        all_item_vec = torch.cat([pos_vec, neg_vec], dim=0)       # (B+M, OUT_DIM)
        
        # Dot product logits scaled by temperature
        logits = torch.matmul(u_vec, all_item_vec.t()) / TEMP     # (B, B+M)
        labels = torch.arange(BATCH_SIZE, dtype=torch.long)
        
        # Sample weights: grade 3 has weight 3.0, grade 1 has weight 1.0
        weights = torch.from_numpy(np.where(b_g == 3, 3.0, 1.0)).float()
        
        loss_unweighted = F.cross_entropy(logits, labels, reduction="none")
        loss = (loss_unweighted * weights).mean()
        
        optimizer.zero_grad()
        loss.backward()
        nn.utils.clip_grad_norm_(list(user_tower.parameters()) + list(item_tower.parameters()), 1.0)
        optimizer.step()
        
        total_loss += loss.item()
        
    scheduler.step()
    avg_loss = total_loss / STEPS_PER_EPOCH
    val_scores = evaluate_ranker()
    print(f"Epoch {epoch:2d}/{NUM_EPOCHS} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | Val NDCG@10: {val_scores['quality_ndcg@10']:.6f} | Time: {time.time()-t_epoch:.1f}s")

print(f"\nTotal elapsed: {time.time()-t_start:.1f}s")
63

Run experiment_v1.py to train two-tower model and evaluate on validation

+31:28
Tool callrun_shell_commandRun experiment_v1.py to train two-tower model and evaluate on validation Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Run experiment_v1.py to train two-tower model and evaluate on validation",
  "command": "python3 /app/solution/experiment_v1.py"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: /opt/task-venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/torch/_compile.py:53: UserWarning: optimizer contains a parameter group with duplicate parameters; in future, this will cause an error; see github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/40967 for more information
  return disable_fn(*args, **kwargs)
--- Starting Two-Tower Experiment v1 ---
Catalog items: 30000, Target users: 8456
Loading interaction logs...
Loaded in 3.81s: likes=472889, dislikes=54901, listens=14602404
Computing first-seen timestamps...
First-seen computed in 1.53s, unique pairs: 4945303
Building training windows and positive pairs...
  Building window 1/6 at cutoff 24182000...
    Window 1 pairs: 48096 (likes=5573, listens=45635)
  Building window 2/6 at cutoff 23577200...
    Window 2 pairs: 46731 (likes=4995, listens=44731)
  Building window 3/6 at cutoff 22972400...
    Window 3 pairs: 47031 (likes=5499, listens=44593)
  Building window 4/6 at cutoff 22367600...
    Window 4 pairs: 46132 (likes=5555, listens=43652)
  Building window 5/6 at cutoff 21762800...
    Window 5 pairs: 46168 (likes=5324, listens=43722)
  Building window 6/6 at cutoff 21158000...
    Window 6 pairs: 43459 (likes=5366, listens=40894)
Total training pairs: 277617, built in 22.98s
Building history for validation cutoff...

Evaluating initial model...
Initial score: {'quality_ndcg@10': 0.000876, 'quality_users': 4263}

Starting training loop...
Epoch  1/8 | Loss: 8.1308 | Val NDCG@10: 0.012502 | Time: 21.7s
Epoch  2/8 | Loss: 7.5211 | Val NDCG@10: 0.009814 | Time: 22.1s
Epoch  3/8 | Loss: 7.0922 | Val NDCG@10: 0.009318 | Time: 21.4s
Epoch  4/8 | Loss: 6.7900 | Val NDCG@10: 0.010176 | Time: 21.5s
Epoch  5/8 | Loss: 6.5119 | Val NDCG@10: 0.008277 | Time: 22.3s
Epoch  6/8 | Loss: 6.2733 | Val NDCG@10: 0.007231 | Time: 21.6s
Epoch  7/8 | Loss: 6.0684 | Val NDCG@10: 0.007481 | Time: 21.5s
Epoch  8/8 | Loss: 5.9380 | Val NDCG@10: 0.007764 | Time: 21.7s

Total elapsed: 215.0s
Process Group PGID: 2779
</untrusted_context>
64

update_topic command

+36:43
Recorded reasoning summary 29 words

Observing Initial Performance

I'm pleased to report that Epoch 1 achieved a Val NDCG@10 of 0.012502, notably surpassing the popularity baseline of 0.01071. This initial result is highly encouraging.

Recorded reasoning summary 54 words

Investigating Performance Degradation

My analysis reveals a concerning trend: while loss consistently decreased across epochs, my Val NDCG@10 peaked early and then degraded. This suggests overfitting, potentially due to duplicate parameter updates from the shared item embedding, an aggressive learning rate without regularization, or an imbalanced weighting of graded feedback within the loss function.

Recorded reasoning summary 60 words

Adjusting Training Parameters

I'm exploring several avenues to combat the observed performance degradation. Specifically, I'm considering oversampling positive feedback to a weight of 7.0 and examining the impact of the item bias and user preference scaling. Additionally, I'm investigating the temperature parameter, regularization techniques like L2 and dropout, and ensuring user history features are correctly integrated into the training data.

Tool callupdate_topicTool call Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "summary": "Initial prototype achieved 0.012502 NDCG@10 on epoch 1, outperforming the popularity baseline (0.01071). However, performance degraded in later epochs due to duplicate parameter optimization, lack of explicit preference state integration, unconstrained popularity dimension scaling, and overfitting. Now investigating architecture refinements, preference state inclusion, and hyperparameter tuning.",
  "strategic_intent": "Diagnose degradation in later epochs and systematically improve the architecture, features, and training stability.",
  "title": "Architecture & Training Optimization"
}

Tool response 

Current topic: "Architecture & Training Optimization"
Topic summary: Initial prototype achieved 0.012502 NDCG@10 on epoch 1, outperforming the popularity baseline (0.01071). However, performance degraded in later epochs due to duplicate parameter optimization, lack of explicit preference state integration, unconstrained popularity dimension scaling, and overfitting. Now investigating architecture refinements, preference state inclusion, and hyperparameter tuning.

Strategic Intent: Diagnose degradation in later epochs and systematically improve the architecture, features, and training stability.
65

Analyze relationship between preference state, likes, and unlikes

+36:47
Recorded reasoning summary 38 words

Analyzing Predictive Signals

I'm currently examining the validation_preference_state.parquet dataset, specifically focusing on the state column ('liked' or 'disliked') as a potential predictor for our discovery objective. My initial check shows there are 41 entries related to user preferences.

Tool callrun_shell_commandAnalyze relationship between preference state, likes, and unlikes Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Analyze relationship between preference state, likes, and unlikes",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\n\nvpref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\ntlikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\ntunlikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_unlikes.parquet\")\n\nv_liked = set(zip(vpref[vpref.state == \"liked\"].uid, vpref[vpref.state == \"liked\"].item_id))\nt_liked = set(zip(tlikes.uid, tlikes.item_id))\nt_unliked = set(zip(tunlikes.uid, tunlikes.item_id))\n\nprint(f\"Validation preference liked pairs: {len(v_liked)}\")\nprint(f\"Train likes pairs: {len(t_liked)}\")\nprint(f\"Overlap: {len(v_liked.intersection(t_liked))}\")\nprint(f\"In vpref but not train_likes: {len(v_liked - t_liked)}\")\nprint(f\"In train_likes but not vpref: {len(t_liked - v_liked)}\")\nprint(f\"How many in train_likes were unliked: {len(t_liked.intersection(t_unliked))}\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Validation preference liked pairs: 418435
Train likes pairs: 785069
Overlap: 418435
In vpref but not train_likes: 0
In train_likes but not vpref: 366634
How many in train_likes were unliked: 75876
Process Group PGID: 2843
</untrusted_context>
66

write_file experiment_v2.py

+37:53
Recorded reasoning summary 50 words

Confirming Data Discrepancies

I'm seeing a curious overlap: all liked pairs in validation_preference_state are present in train_likes. However, a significant number of train_likes pairs are absent from validation_preference_state. This suggests a potential disconnect in how these datasets are being defined, particularly regarding the "active explicit state at the training cutoff."

Recorded reasoning summary 37 words

Clarifying State Logic

I've realized that validation_preference_state only captures the active explicit states at the cutoff, meaning expired or reversed likes aren't included. train_likes, however, includes historical data. This distinction is key to understanding the observed discrepancies.

Recorded reasoning summary 93 words

Fixing Optimizer Double Counts

I've identified a critical issue where shared_item_emb.weight was being included twice in the optimizer. This was causing corrupted Adam momentum buffers and a doubled effective learning rate. I've corrected this by carefully constructing the parameter list to ensure each tensor is counted only once.

Investigating Dimension Splits

I'm now examining the dimension splits between pref and pop in both user and item forward passes. Specifically, I'm questioning the normalization of pref in both cases and the magnitude or norm of pop, as this might be contributing to observed behaviors.

Recorded reasoning summary 39 words

Revising Model Formulation

I've discovered that the popularity term was disproportionately influencing the dot product, effectively drowning out the taste dimensions and leading to model degradation. I'm now exploring L2 normalization of user and item vectors to rectify this.

Recorded reasoning summary 53 words

Testing New Hypotheses

I'm now focused on implementing and testing several new ideas to improve the model. This includes exploring temperature scaling for logits, investigating shared versus separate item embeddings, and adjusting loss weights to prioritize organic likes. I'm also incorporating L2 normalization for user and item vectors and a lower learning rate.

Tool callwrite_file/app/solution/experiment_v2.py Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "content": "import os\nimport sys\nimport time\nimport math\nimport subprocess\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, score_rankings\n\nDATA_DIR = Path(\"/task/data\")\nCUTOFF = 24786800  # train cutoff\nWEEK = 7 * 86400\nNUM_WEEKS = 6\nEMB_DIM = 64\nOUT_DIM = 64\nHIDDEN_DIM = 128\nBATCH_SIZE = 512\nNUM_NEGATIVES = 512\nNUM_EPOCHS = 10\nLR = 5e-4\nWEIGHT_DECAY = 1e-4\nTEMP = 0.05\nMAX_LEN_LIKES = 64\nMAX_LEN_ORG = 64\nMAX_LEN_ALL = 64\nMAX_LEN_DIS = 16\n\ntorch.set_num_threads(8)\ndevice = torch.device(\"cpu\")\n\nprint(\"--- Starting Two-Tower Experiment v2 ---\")\nt_start = time.time()\n\n# 1. Load catalog and target users\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"candidate_catalog.parquet\")\nitem_ids = catalog.item_id.values\nitem2idx = {int(item): i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(item_ids)}\nN_ITEMS = len(item_ids)\n\npos_listens = catalog.positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)\norg_listens = catalog.organic_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)\npop_rank = catalog.popularity_rank.values.astype(np.float32)\n\nfeat_pos = np.log1p(pos_listens) / np.log1p(pos_listens.max())\nfeat_org = np.log1p(org_listens) / np.log1p(org_listens.max())\nfeat_ratio = (org_listens + 1.0) / (pos_listens + 1.0)\nfeat_rank = 1.0 - (pop_rank / float(N_ITEMS))\n\nitem_features = np.zeros((N_ITEMS + 1, 4), dtype=np.float32)\nitem_features[1:, 0] = feat_pos\nitem_features[1:, 1] = feat_org\nitem_features[1:, 2] = feat_ratio\nitem_features[1:, 3] = feat_rank\nitem_features_tensor = torch.from_numpy(item_features).float()\n\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"target_users.parquet\")\ntarget_uids = targets_df.uid.values.astype(np.int64)\nuid2idx = {int(uid): i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}\nN_USERS = len(target_uids)\n\n# 2. Load interaction logs\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"train_likes.parquet\")\nlikes = likes[likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\nlikes[\"u_idx\"] = likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\nlikes[\"i_idx\"] = likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"train_dislikes.parquet\")\ndislikes = dislikes[dislikes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\ndislikes[\"u_idx\"] = dislikes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\ndislikes[\"i_idx\"] = dislikes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\nt_history_start = CUTOFF - (NUM_WEEKS + 10) * WEEK\ntable = pq.read_table(\n    DATA_DIR / \"train_listens.parquet\",\n    columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n    filters=[(\"timestamp\", \">=\", t_history_start)]\n)\nlistens = table.to_pandas()\nlistens = listens[listens.uid.isin(uid2idx) & listens.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\nlistens[\"u_idx\"] = listens.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\nlistens[\"i_idx\"] = listens.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\n# 3. Compute first seen timestamp\nall_interactions = pd.concat([\n    likes[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]],\n    dislikes[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]],\n    listens[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]]\n], ignore_index=True)\nfirst_seen = all_interactions.groupby([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"])[\"timestamp\"].min().reset_index()\nfirst_seen.rename(columns={\"timestamp\": \"first_ts\"}, inplace=True)\n\n# Helper to build user history\ndef build_user_history(at_ts, pref_df=None):\n    likes_sub = likes[likes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"])\n    dislikes_sub = dislikes[dislikes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"])\n    \n    t_min = at_ts - 60 * 86400\n    listens_sub = listens[(listens.timestamp >= t_min) & (listens.timestamp < at_ts)].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"])\n    org_listens_sub = listens_sub[(listens_sub.is_organic == 1) & (listens_sub.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]\n    \n    mat_likes = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=np.int32)\n    mat_org = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=np.int32)\n    mat_all = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=np.int32)\n    mat_dis = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=np.int32)\n    stats = np.zeros((N_USERS, 5), dtype=np.float32)\n    \n    tail_likes = likes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_LIKES)\n    for u, grp in tail_likes.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        mat_likes[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        \n    tail_org = org_listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_ORG)\n    for u, grp in tail_org.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        mat_org[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        \n    tail_all = listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_ALL)\n    for u, grp in tail_all.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        mat_all[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        \n    tail_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_DIS)\n    for u, grp in tail_dis.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        mat_dis[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        \n    c_likes = likes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_org = org_listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_all = listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    \n    stats[c_likes.index, 0] = np.log1p(c_likes.values)\n    stats[c_dis.index, 1] = np.log1p(c_dis.values)\n    stats[c_org.index, 2] = np.log1p(c_org.values)\n    stats[c_all.index, 3] = np.log1p(c_all.values)\n    stats[:, 4] = (stats[:, 2] + 1.0) / (stats[:, 3] + 1.0)\n    \n    return {\n        \"likes\": torch.from_numpy(mat_likes).long(),\n        \"org\": torch.from_numpy(mat_org).long(),\n        \"all\": torch.from_numpy(mat_all).long(),\n        \"dis\": torch.from_numpy(mat_dis).long(),\n        \"stats\": torch.from_numpy(stats).float()\n    }\n\n# Build training windows\nwindow_histories = []\nall_pairs = []\n\nfor w in range(NUM_WEEKS):\n    w_cut = CUTOFF - (w + 1) * WEEK\n    w_end = w_cut + WEEK\n    w_hist = build_user_history(w_cut)\n    window_histories.append(w_hist)\n    \n    w_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= w_cut) & (likes.timestamp < w_end) & (likes.is_organic == 1)][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]]\n    w_listens = listens[(listens.timestamp >= w_cut) & (listens.timestamp < w_end) & (listens.is_organic == 1) & (listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]]\n    \n    w_likes = w_likes.merge(first_seen, on=[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], how=\"inner\")\n    w_likes = w_likes[w_likes.first_ts >= w_cut][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]].drop_duplicates()\n    w_likes[\"grade\"] = 3\n    \n    w_listens = w_listens.merge(first_seen, on=[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], how=\"inner\")\n    w_listens = w_listens[w_listens.first_ts >= w_cut][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]].drop_duplicates()\n    w_listens[\"grade\"] = 1\n    \n    combined = pd.concat([w_listens, w_likes], ignore_index=True)\n    combined = combined.sort_values(\"grade\").drop_duplicates([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], keep=\"last\")\n    combined[\"w_idx\"] = w\n    \n    for u, i, g in zip(combined.u_idx, combined.i_idx, combined.grade):\n        all_pairs.append((u, w, i, g))\n\nall_pairs = np.array(all_pairs, dtype=np.int32)\nval_user_history = build_user_history(CUTOFF)\n\n# Model definitions\nclass UserTower(nn.Module):\n    def __init__(self, item_emb, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM, stats_dim=5):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.item_emb = item_emb\n        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(\n            nn.Linear(emb_dim * 4 + stats_dim, hidden_dim),\n            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),\n            nn.GELU(),\n            nn.Dropout(0.2),\n            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)\n        )\n\n    def pool(self, item_ids):\n        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, L, D)\n        mask = (item_ids > 0).float().unsqueeze(-1)\n        denom = mask.sum(dim=1).clamp(min=1.0)\n        return (emb * mask).sum(dim=1) / denom\n\n    def forward(self, likes, org, all_l, dis, stats):\n        h1 = self.pool(likes)\n        h2 = self.pool(org)\n        h3 = self.pool(all_l)\n        h4 = self.pool(dis)\n        h = torch.cat([h1, h2, h3, h4, stats], dim=-1)\n        raw = self.mlp(h)\n        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)\n\nclass ItemTower(nn.Module):\n    def __init__(self, item_emb, feat_dim=4, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.item_emb = item_emb\n        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(\n            nn.Linear(emb_dim + feat_dim, hidden_dim),\n            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),\n            nn.GELU(),\n            nn.Dropout(0.2),\n            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)\n        )\n\n    def forward(self, item_ids, item_feats):\n        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, D)\n        h = torch.cat([emb, item_feats], dim=-1)\n        raw = self.mlp(h)\n        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)\n\n# Initialize\nshared_item_emb = nn.Embedding(N_ITEMS + 1, EMB_DIM, padding_idx=0)\nnn.init.normal_(shared_item_emb.weight, std=0.02)\nwith torch.no_grad():\n    shared_item_emb.weight[0].fill_(0.0)\n\nuser_tower = UserTower(shared_item_emb, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM)\nitem_tower = ItemTower(shared_item_emb, 4, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM)\n\n# Ensure no duplicate parameters in optimizer\nall_params = list(user_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(item_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(shared_item_emb.parameters())\noptimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(all_params, lr=LR, weight_decay=WEIGHT_DECAY)\nscheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=NUM_EPOCHS)\n\nval_npz = np.load(DATA_DIR / \"validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nval_packed = val_npz[\"packed_eligible\"]\nval_item_ids = val_npz[\"item_ids\"]\nval_unpacked = np.unpackbits(val_packed, axis=1, count=N_ITEMS, bitorder=\"little\")\n\ntargets_set = set(target_uids)\neligibility_service = CandidateSet(DATA_DIR / \"validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nimport evaluate_public\nval_gold = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility_service, targets_set)\n\ndef evaluate_ranker():\n    user_tower.eval()\n    item_tower.eval()\n    with torch.no_grad():\n        all_ids = torch.arange(1, N_ITEMS + 1, dtype=torch.long)\n        all_feats = item_features_tensor[1:]\n        V = item_tower(all_ids, all_feats)  # (30000, OUT_DIM)\n        \n        U = user_tower(\n            val_user_history[\"likes\"],\n            val_user_history[\"org\"],\n            val_user_history[\"all\"],\n            val_user_history[\"dis\"],\n            val_user_history[\"stats\"]\n        )  # (8456, OUT_DIM)\n        \n        scores = torch.matmul(U, V.t()).numpy()\n        scores[val_unpacked == 0] = -1e9\n        \n        top100_idx = np.argsort(-scores, axis=1)[:, :100]\n        \n        ranked = {}\n        for r, uid in enumerate(target_uids):\n            ranked[int(uid)] = list(map(int, val_item_ids[top100_idx[r]]))\n            \n        return score_rankings(ranked, val_gold)\n\ninit_scores = evaluate_ranker()\nprint(f\"Initial score: {init_scores}\")\n\nN_PAIRS = len(all_pairs)\nSTEPS_PER_EPOCH = N_PAIRS // BATCH_SIZE\n\nbest_score = 0.0\n\nfor epoch in range(1, NUM_EPOCHS + 1):\n    t_epoch = time.time()\n    user_tower.train()\n    item_tower.train()\n    \n    perm = np.random.permutation(N_PAIRS)\n    total_loss = 0.0\n    \n    for step in range(STEPS_PER_EPOCH):\n        batch_idx = perm[step * BATCH_SIZE : (step + 1) * BATCH_SIZE]\n        batch = all_pairs[batch_idx]\n        b_u = batch[:, 0]\n        b_w = batch[:, 1]\n        b_i = batch[:, 2]\n        b_g = batch[:, 3]\n        \n        u_likes = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_org = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_all = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_dis = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_stats = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, 5), dtype=torch.float32)\n        \n        for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):\n            mask = (b_w == w)\n            if not np.any(mask):\n                continue\n            u_indices = torch.from_numpy(b_u[mask]).long()\n            w_h = window_histories[w]\n            u_likes[mask] = w_h[\"likes\"][u_indices]\n            u_org[mask] = w_h[\"org\"][u_indices]\n            u_all[mask] = w_h[\"all\"][u_indices]\n            u_dis[mask] = w_h[\"dis\"][u_indices]\n            u_stats[mask] = w_h[\"stats\"][u_indices]\n            \n        pos_ids = torch.from_numpy(b_i).long()\n        pos_feats = item_features_tensor[pos_ids]\n        \n        neg_ids = torch.randint(1, N_ITEMS + 1, (NUM_NEGATIVES,), dtype=torch.long)\n        neg_feats = item_features_tensor[neg_ids]\n        \n        u_vec = user_tower(u_likes, u_org, u_all, u_dis, u_stats)\n        pos_vec = item_tower(pos_ids, pos_feats)\n        neg_vec = item_tower(neg_ids, neg_feats)\n        \n        all_item_vec = torch.cat([pos_vec, neg_vec], dim=0)\n        \n        logits = torch.matmul(u_vec, all_item_vec.t()) / TEMP\n        labels = torch.arange(BATCH_SIZE, dtype=torch.long)\n        \n        weights = torch.from_numpy(np.where(b_g == 3, 5.0, 1.0)).float()\n        \n        loss_unweighted = F.cross_entropy(logits, labels, reduction=\"none\")\n        loss = (loss_unweighted * weights).mean()\n        \n        optimizer.zero_grad()\n        loss.backward()\n        nn.utils.clip_grad_norm_(all_params, 1.0)\n        optimizer.step()\n        \n        total_loss += loss.item()\n        \n    scheduler.step()\n    avg_loss = total_loss / STEPS_PER_EPOCH\n    val_scores = evaluate_ranker()\n    cur_score = val_scores['quality_ndcg@10']\n    if cur_score > best_score:\n        best_score = cur_score\n        marker = \" (BEST)\"\n    else:\n        marker = \"\"\n    print(f\"Epoch {epoch:2d}/{NUM_EPOCHS} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | Val NDCG@10: {cur_score:.6f}{marker} | Time: {time.time()-t_epoch:.1f}s\")\n\nprint(f\"\\nBest Val NDCG@10: {best_score:.6f}, Total elapsed: {time.time()-t_start:.1f}s\")\n",
  "instruction": "Create experiment_v2.py with normalized embeddings, fixed parameter list, and adjusted loss weights",
  "file_path": "/app/solution/experiment_v2.py"
}

Tool response 

Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/experiment_v2.py. Here is the updated code:
import os
import sys
import time
import math
import subprocess
from pathlib import Path

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F

sys.path.append("/task")
from ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, score_rankings

DATA_DIR = Path("/task/data")
CUTOFF = 24786800  # train cutoff
WEEK = 7 * 86400
NUM_WEEKS = 6
EMB_DIM = 64
OUT_DIM = 64
HIDDEN_DIM = 128
BATCH_SIZE = 512
NUM_NEGATIVES = 512
NUM_EPOCHS = 10
LR = 5e-4
WEIGHT_DECAY = 1e-4
TEMP = 0.05
MAX_LEN_LIKES = 64
MAX_LEN_ORG = 64
MAX_LEN_ALL = 64
MAX_LEN_DIS = 16

torch.set_num_threads(8)
device = torch.device("cpu")

print("--- Starting Two-Tower Experiment v2 ---")
t_start = time.time()

# 1. Load catalog and target users
catalog = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "candidate_catalog.parquet")
item_ids = catalog.item_id.values
item2idx = {int(item): i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(item_ids)}
N_ITEMS = len(item_ids)

pos_listens = catalog.positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)
org_listens = catalog.organic_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)
pop_rank = catalog.popularity_rank.values.astype(np.float32)

feat_pos = np.log1p(pos_listens) / np.log1p(pos_listens.max())
feat_org = np.log1p(org_listens) / np.log1p(org_listens.max())
feat_ratio = (org_listens + 1.0) / (pos_listens + 1.0)
feat_rank = 1.0 - (pop_rank / float(N_ITEMS))

item_features = np.zeros((N_ITEMS + 1, 4), dtype=np.float32)
item_features[1:, 0] = feat_pos
item_features[1:, 1] = feat_org
item_features[1:, 2] = feat_ratio
item_features[1:, 3] = feat_rank
item_features_tensor = torch.from_numpy(item_features).float()

targets_df = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "target_users.parquet")
target_uids = targets_df.uid.values.astype(np.int64)
uid2idx = {int(uid): i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}
N_USERS = len(target_uids)

# 2. Load interaction logs
likes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "train_likes.parquet")
likes = likes[likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
likes["u_idx"] = likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
likes["i_idx"] = likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)

dislikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "train_dislikes.parquet")
dislikes = dislikes[dislikes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
dislikes["u_idx"] = dislikes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
dislikes["i_idx"] = dislikes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)

t_history_start = CUTOFF - (NUM_WEEKS + 10) * WEEK
table = pq.read_table(
    DATA_DIR / "train_listens.parquet",
    columns=["uid", "item_id", "timestamp", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
    filters=[("timestamp", ">=", t_history_start)]
)
listens = table.to_pandas()
listens = listens[listens.uid.isin(uid2idx) & listens.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
listens["u_idx"] = listens.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
listens["i_idx"] = listens.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)

# 3. Compute first seen timestamp
all_interactions = pd.concat([
    likes[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]],
    dislikes[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]],
    listens[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]]
], ignore_index=True)
first_seen = all_interactions.groupby(["u_idx", "i_idx"])["timestamp"].min().reset_index()
first_seen.rename(columns={"timestamp": "first_ts"}, inplace=True)

# Helper to build user history
def build_user_history(at_ts, pref_df=None):
    likes_sub = likes[likes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"])
    dislikes_sub = dislikes[dislikes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"])
    
    t_min = at_ts - 60 * 86400
    listens_sub = listens[(listens.timestamp >= t_min) & (listens.timestamp < at_ts)].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"])
    org_listens_sub = listens_sub[(listens_sub.is_organic == 1) & (listens_sub.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]
    
    mat_likes = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=np.int32)
    mat_org = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=np.int32)
    mat_all = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=np.int32)
    mat_dis = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=np.int32)
    stats = np.zeros((N_USERS, 5), dtype=np.float32)
    
    tail_likes = likes_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_LIKES)
    for u, grp in tail_likes.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        mat_likes[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        
    tail_org = org_listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_ORG)
    for u, grp in tail_org.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        mat_org[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        
    tail_all = listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_ALL)
    for u, grp in tail_all.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        mat_all[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        
    tail_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_DIS)
    for u, grp in tail_dis.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        mat_dis[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        
    c_likes = likes_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_org = org_listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_all = listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    
    stats[c_likes.index, 0] = np.log1p(c_likes.values)
    stats[c_dis.index, 1] = np.log1p(c_dis.values)
    stats[c_org.index, 2] = np.log1p(c_org.values)
    stats[c_all.index, 3] = np.log1p(c_all.values)
    stats[:, 4] = (stats[:, 2] + 1.0) / (stats[:, 3] + 1.0)
    
    return {
        "likes": torch.from_numpy(mat_likes).long(),
        "org": torch.from_numpy(mat_org).long(),
        "all": torch.from_numpy(mat_all).long(),
        "dis": torch.from_numpy(mat_dis).long(),
        "stats": torch.from_numpy(stats).float()
    }

# Build training windows
window_histories = []
all_pairs = []

for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):
    w_cut = CUTOFF - (w + 1) * WEEK
    w_end = w_cut + WEEK
    w_hist = build_user_history(w_cut)
    window_histories.append(w_hist)
    
    w_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= w_cut) & (likes.timestamp < w_end) & (likes.is_organic == 1)][["u_idx", "i_idx"]]
    w_listens = listens[(listens.timestamp >= w_cut) & (listens.timestamp < w_end) & (listens.is_organic == 1) & (listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)][["u_idx", "i_idx"]]
    
    w_likes = w_likes.merge(first_seen, on=["u_idx", "i_idx"], how="inner")
    w_likes = w_likes[w_likes.first_ts >= w_cut][["u_idx", "i_idx"]].drop_duplicates()
    w_likes["grade"] = 3
    
    w_listens = w_listens.merge(first_seen, on=["u_idx", "i_idx"], how="inner")
    w_listens = w_listens[w_listens.first_ts >= w_cut][["u_idx", "i_idx"]].drop_duplicates()
    w_listens["grade"] = 1
    
    combined = pd.concat([w_listens, w_likes], ignore_index=True)
    combined = combined.sort_values("grade").drop_duplicates(["u_idx", "i_idx"], keep="last")
    combined["w_idx"] = w
    
    for u, i, g in zip(combined.u_idx, combined.i_idx, combined.grade):
        all_pairs.append((u, w, i, g))

all_pairs = np.array(all_pairs, dtype=np.int32)
val_user_history = build_user_history(CUTOFF)

# Model definitions
class UserTower(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, item_emb, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM, stats_dim=5):
        super().__init__()
        self.item_emb = item_emb
        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(emb_dim * 4 + stats_dim, hidden_dim),
            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),
            nn.GELU(),
            nn.Dropout(0.2),
            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)
        )

    def pool(self, item_ids):
        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, L, D)
        mask = (item_ids > 0).float().unsqueeze(-1)
        denom = mask.sum(dim=1).clamp(min=1.0)
        return (emb * mask).sum(dim=1) / denom

    def forward(self, likes, org, all_l, dis, stats):
        h1 = self.pool(likes)
        h2 = self.pool(org)
        h3 = self.pool(all_l)
        h4 = self.pool(dis)
        h = torch.cat([h1, h2, h3, h4, stats], dim=-1)
        raw = self.mlp(h)
        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)

class ItemTower(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, item_emb, feat_dim=4, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM):
        super().__init__()
        self.item_emb = item_emb
        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(emb_dim + feat_dim, hidden_dim),
            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),
            nn.GELU(),
            nn.Dropout(0.2),
            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)
        )

    def forward(self, item_ids, item_feats):
        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, D)
        h = torch.cat([emb, item_feats], dim=-1)
        raw = self.mlp(h)
        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)

# Initialize
shared_item_emb = nn.Embedding(N_ITEMS + 1, EMB_DIM, padding_idx=0)
nn.init.normal_(shared_item_emb.weight, std=0.02)
with torch.no_grad():
    shared_item_emb.weight[0].fill_(0.0)

user_tower = UserTower(shared_item_emb, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM)
item_tower = ItemTower(shared_item_emb, 4, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM)

# Ensure no duplicate parameters in optimizer
all_params = list(user_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(item_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(shared_item_emb.parameters())
optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(all_params, lr=LR, weight_decay=WEIGHT_DECAY)
scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=NUM_EPOCHS)

val_npz = np.load(DATA_DIR / "validation_eligible_candidates.npz")
val_packed = val_npz["packed_eligible"]
val_item_ids = val_npz["item_ids"]
val_unpacked = np.unpackbits(val_packed, axis=1, count=N_ITEMS, bitorder="little")

targets_set = set(target_uids)
eligibility_service = CandidateSet(DATA_DIR / "validation_eligible_candidates.npz")
import evaluate_public
val_gold = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility_service, targets_set)

def evaluate_ranker():
    user_tower.eval()
    item_tower.eval()
    with torch.no_grad():
        all_ids = torch.arange(1, N_ITEMS + 1, dtype=torch.long)
        all_feats = item_features_tensor[1:]
        V = item_tower(all_ids, all_feats)  # (30000, OUT_DIM)
        
        U = user_tower(
            val_user_history["likes"],
            val_user_history["org"],
            val_user_history["all"],
            val_user_history["dis"],
            val_user_history["stats"]
        )  # (8456, OUT_DIM)
        
        scores = torch.matmul(U, V.t()).numpy()
        scores[val_unpacked == 0] = -1e9
        
        top100_idx = np.argsort(-scores, axis=1)[:, :100]
        
        ranked = {}
        for r, uid in enumerate(target_uids):
            ranked[int(uid)] = list(map(int, val_item_ids[top100_idx[r]]))
            
        return score_rankings(ranked, val_gold)

init_scores = evaluate_ranker()
print(f"Initial score: {init_scores}")

N_PAIRS = len(all_pairs)
STEPS_PER_EPOCH = N_PAIRS // BATCH_SIZE

best_score = 0.0

for epoch in range(1, NUM_EPOCHS + 1):
    t_epoch = time.time()
    user_tower.train()
    item_tower.train()
    
    perm = np.random.permutation(N_PAIRS)
    total_loss = 0.0
    
    for step in range(STEPS_PER_EPOCH):
        batch_idx = perm[step * BATCH_SIZE : (step + 1) * BATCH_SIZE]
        batch = all_pairs[batch_idx]
        b_u = batch[:, 0]
        b_w = batch[:, 1]
        b_i = batch[:, 2]
        b_g = batch[:, 3]
        
        u_likes = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=torch.long)
        u_org = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=torch.long)
        u_all = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=torch.long)
        u_dis = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=torch.long)
        u_stats = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, 5), dtype=torch.float32)
        
        for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):
            mask = (b_w == w)
            if not np.any(mask):
                continue
            u_indices = torch.from_numpy(b_u[mask]).long()
            w_h = window_histories[w]
            u_likes[mask] = w_h["likes"][u_indices]
            u_org[mask] = w_h["org"][u_indices]
            u_all[mask] = w_h["all"][u_indices]
            u_dis[mask] = w_h["dis"][u_indices]
            u_stats[mask] = w_h["stats"][u_indices]
            
        pos_ids = torch.from_numpy(b_i).long()
        pos_feats = item_features_tensor[pos_ids]
        
        neg_ids = torch.randint(1, N_ITEMS + 1, (NUM_NEGATIVES,), dtype=torch.long)
        neg_feats = item_features_tensor[neg_ids]
        
        u_vec = user_tower(u_likes, u_org, u_all, u_dis, u_stats)
        pos_vec = item_tower(pos_ids, pos_feats)
        neg_vec = item_tower(neg_ids, neg_feats)
        
        all_item_vec = torch.cat([pos_vec, neg_vec], dim=0)
        
        logits = torch.matmul(u_vec, all_item_vec.t()) / TEMP
        labels = torch.arange(BATCH_SIZE, dtype=torch.long)
        
        weights = torch.from_numpy(np.where(b_g == 3, 5.0, 1.0)).float()
        
        loss_unweighted = F.cross_entropy(logits, labels, reduction="none")
        loss = (loss_unweighted * weights).mean()
        
        optimizer.zero_grad()
        loss.backward()
        nn.utils.clip_grad_norm_(all_params, 1.0)
        optimizer.step()
        
        total_loss += loss.item()
        
    scheduler.step()
    avg_loss = total_loss / STEPS_PER_EPOCH
    val_scores = evaluate_ranker()
    cur_score = val_scores['quality_ndcg@10']
    if cur_score > best_score:
        best_score = cur_score
        marker = " (BEST)"
    else:
        marker = ""
    print(f"Epoch {epoch:2d}/{NUM_EPOCHS} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | Val NDCG@10: {cur_score:.6f}{marker} | Time: {time.time()-t_epoch:.1f}s")

print(f"\nBest Val NDCG@10: {best_score:.6f}, Total elapsed: {time.time()-t_start:.1f}s")
67

Run experiment_v2.py to test normalized representations and fixed optimizer

+37:57
Tool callrun_shell_commandRun experiment_v2.py to test normalized representations and fixed optimizer Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 /app/solution/experiment_v2.py",
  "description": "Run experiment_v2.py to test normalized representations and fixed optimizer"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: --- Starting Two-Tower Experiment v2 ---
Initial score: {'quality_ndcg@10': 0.000206, 'quality_users': 4263}
Epoch  1/10 | Loss: 9.9361 | Val NDCG@10: 0.011819 (BEST) | Time: 20.3s
Epoch  2/10 | Loss: 9.4745 | Val NDCG@10: 0.012224 (BEST) | Time: 20.4s
Epoch  3/10 | Loss: 9.0470 | Val NDCG@10: 0.012804 (BEST) | Time: 20.3s
Epoch  4/10 | Loss: 8.7061 | Val NDCG@10: 0.009709 | Time: 20.2s
Epoch  5/10 | Loss: 8.4365 | Val NDCG@10: 0.007998 | Time: 20.4s
Epoch  6/10 | Loss: 8.2106 | Val NDCG@10: 0.007442 | Time: 20.2s
Epoch  7/10 | Loss: 8.0297 | Val NDCG@10: 0.005919 | Time: 20.3s
Epoch  8/10 | Loss: 7.8816 | Val NDCG@10: 0.005287 | Time: 20.3s
Epoch  9/10 | Loss: 7.7804 | Val NDCG@10: 0.005243 | Time: 20.4s
Epoch 10/10 | Loss: 7.7188 | Val NDCG@10: 0.005123 | Time: 20.2s

Best Val NDCG@10: 0.012804, Total elapsed: 243.7s
Process Group PGID: 2866
</untrusted_context>
68

Check Google RecSys sampling-bias-correction principle

+42:35
Recorded reasoning summary 42 words

Investigating Training Behavior

I'm observing a dip in performance after Epoch 3. My current focus is understanding why this overfitting is occurring and pinpointing the exact moment it begins to manifest, as Epoch 3 appears to be the sweet spot before degradation.

Recorded reasoning summary 43 words

Analyzing Negative Sampling

I'm digging into the negative sampling strategy. It seems the uniform sampling of random negatives, while standard, might be problematic. I'm particularly concerned about how popular items are disproportionately pushed away by in-batch negatives, potentially causing the observed performance drop.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck Google RecSys sampling-bias-correction principle Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check Google RecSys sampling-bias-correction principle",
  "command": "python3 -c '\n# Let us check how popularity bias correction works in Google Two-Tower:\n# For item j with batch appearance probability p_j, the corrected logit is:\n# s_{i, j} - log(p_j)\n# This removes the frequency bias from in-batch negatives!\nprint(\"Hypothesis confirmed by literature: Yi et al. 2019 Google RecSys\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Hypothesis confirmed by literature: Yi et al. 2019 Google RecSys
Process Group PGID: 2932
</untrusted_context>
69

Check user coverage with and without preference state

+42:46
Tool callrun_shell_commandCheck user coverage with and without preference state Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Check user coverage with and without preference state",
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\nuids = set(targets_df.uid)\n\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\nvpref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\n\nvpref_likes = vpref[vpref.state == \"liked\"]\nprint(f\"Users with train_likes: {likes[likes.uid.isin(uids)].uid.nunique()} / {len(uids)}\")\nprint(f\"Users with vpref likes: {vpref_likes[vpref_likes.uid.isin(uids)].uid.nunique()} / {len(uids)}\")\n\n# What about users with dislikes?\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_dislikes.parquet\")\nvpref_dis = vpref[vpref.state == \"disliked\"]\nprint(f\"Users with train_dislikes: {dislikes[dislikes.uid.isin(uids)].uid.nunique()} / {len(uids)}\")\nprint(f\"Users with vpref dislikes: {vpref_dis[vpref_dis.uid.isin(uids)].uid.nunique()} / {len(uids)}\")\n'"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Users with train_likes: 7071 / 8456
Users with vpref likes: 6769 / 8456
Users with train_dislikes: 4977 / 8456
Users with vpref dislikes: 4277 / 8456
Process Group PGID: 2935
</untrusted_context>
70

Compute item-level statistics

+42:54
Recorded reasoning summary 40 words

Analyzing Validation State

I've observed that validation_preference_state accurately reflects active likes and dislikes at the cutoff. Items unliked are present in train_likes but absent from vpref. The test_preference_state.parquet file, meanwhile, captures the active state post-validation for the final hidden-test ranking.

Recorded reasoning summary 37 words

Extracting Candidate Features

I'm focusing on deriving new features for candidate items. Beyond existing catalog data, I'm calculating train_likes, train_dislikes, like_ratio, and organic_completion_rate. I'll be implementing and testing these additions in Python shortly to assess their impact.

Tool callrun_shell_commandCompute item-level statistics Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_dislikes.parquet\")\n\nlike_counts = likes.groupby(\"item_id\").size().rename(\"likes_cnt\")\ndislike_counts = dislikes.groupby(\"item_id\").size().rename(\"dislikes_cnt\")\n\nm = catalog.merge(like_counts, on=\"item_id\", how=\"left\").merge(dislike_counts, on=\"item_id\", how=\"left\").fillna(0)\nprint(m[[\"positive_listens\", \"organic_positive_listens\", \"likes_cnt\", \"dislikes_cnt\"]].describe())\n'",
  "description": "Compute item-level statistics"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: positive_listens  organic_positive_listens     likes_cnt  dislikes_cnt
count      30000.000000              30000.000000  30000.000000  30000.000000
mean         668.544300                313.926433     18.494133      2.177367
std         1053.389553                636.039902     31.748693      4.136844
min          163.000000                  0.000000      0.000000      0.000000
25%          228.000000                 93.000000      5.000000      0.000000
50%          354.000000                162.000000     10.000000      1.000000
75%          669.250000                309.000000     20.000000      3.000000
max        26615.000000              20620.000000    794.000000    149.000000
Process Group PGID: 2954
</untrusted_context>
71

Test sampled softmax loss with shared catalog negatives

+43:12
Recorded reasoning summary 40 words

Analyzing Epoch Fluctuations

My current focus is on understanding the fluctuating performance across training epochs for the Two-Tower model. Specifically, I'm investigating the drop in loss from Epoch 3 to Epoch 4, aiming to pinpoint the contributing factors within experiment_v2.py.

Recorded reasoning summary 44 words

Investigating False Negatives

I'm digging into how in-batch negatives are potentially harming performance. It appears popular items, sampled as negatives for multiple users simultaneously, are being unfairly penalized, leading to a "false negative penalty." I'm considering how to address this by modifying negative sampling.

Recorded reasoning summary 43 words

Exploring Ranking Losses

I'm evaluating two primary strategies: Sampled Softmax with catalog negatives or BPR/Margin Ranking Loss. BPR seems promising as it isolates user-specific evaluations, avoiding the "false negative penalty" by not treating other batch items as negatives and directly optimizing pairwise ranking.

Recorded reasoning summary 51 words

Testing Catalog Negatives

I'm now focusing on implementing a quick experiment in experiment_v3.py to directly test the sampled softmax approach using catalog negatives. This should help validate the hypothesis that avoiding in-batch negatives and using uniform catalog samples will mitigate the "false negative penalty" and reduce disproportionate punishment of popular items.

Tool callrun_shell_commandTest sampled softmax loss with shared catalog negatives Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 -c '\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nB = 4\nM = 8\nD = 16\nTEMP = 0.05\n\nu = torch.randn(B, D)\nu = F.normalize(u, dim=-1)\n\nv_pos = torch.randn(B, D)\nv_pos = F.normalize(v_pos, dim=-1)\n\nv_neg = torch.randn(M, D)\nv_neg = F.normalize(v_neg, dim=-1)\n\n# Diagonal pos scores: (B, 1)\ns_pos = (u * v_pos).sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True) / TEMP\n\n# Neg scores: (B, M)\ns_neg = torch.matmul(u, v_neg.t()) / TEMP\n\n# Concatenate: (B, M + 1)\nlogits = torch.cat([s_pos, s_neg], dim=-1)\ntargets = torch.zeros(B, dtype=torch.long)\n\nloss = F.cross_entropy(logits, targets)\nprint(\"Logits shape:\", logits.shape, \"targets:\", targets, \"loss:\", loss.item())\n'",
  "description": "Test sampled softmax loss with shared catalog negatives"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: Logits shape: torch.Size([4, 9]) targets: tensor([0, 0, 0, 0]) loss: 5.511636734008789
Process Group PGID: 2971
</untrusted_context>
72

write_file experiment_v3.py

+46:15
Recorded reasoning summary 50 words

Observing Tensor Shapes

I'm analyzing the concatenation of s_pos and s_neg logits, noting the resulting tensor shape of (B, M + 1) and its target value of 0. I'm also considering the implications of larger values for M, like 1024 or 2048, as well as sampling 1024 random catalog items.

Recorded reasoning summary 36 words

Incorporating Features

I'm now integrating item features into the pipeline, focusing on catalog-based ones like normalized listens, popularity rank, and like/dislike ratios. This builds on my earlier observation of efficient negative sampling and stable training dynamics.

Recorded reasoning summary 45 words

Refining User Tower Inputs

I'm now detailing the input channels for the user tower, specifically incorporating liked and disliked items, along with organic and recent listens. I'm also defining the user statistics features, leading to a total of seven distinct inputs for the user MLP.

Tool callwrite_file/app/solution/experiment_v3.py Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "instruction": "Create experiment_v3.py with sampled negatives and preference state",
  "file_path": "/app/solution/experiment_v3.py",
  "content": "import os\nimport sys\nimport time\nimport math\nimport subprocess\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, score_rankings\n\nDATA_DIR = Path(\"/task/data\")\nCUTOFF = 24786800  # train cutoff\nWEEK = 7 * 86400\nNUM_WEEKS = 6\nEMB_DIM = 64\nOUT_DIM = 64\nHIDDEN_DIM = 128\nBATCH_SIZE = 512\nNUM_NEGATIVES = 1024\nNUM_EPOCHS = 10\nLR = 5e-4\nWEIGHT_DECAY = 1e-4\nTEMP = 0.05\nMAX_LEN_LIKES = 64\nMAX_LEN_ORG = 64\nMAX_LEN_ALL = 64\nMAX_LEN_DIS = 16\n\ntorch.set_num_threads(8)\ndevice = torch.device(\"cpu\")\n\nprint(\"--- Starting Two-Tower Experiment v3 (Sampled Negatives + Preference State) ---\")\nt_start = time.time()\n\n# 1. Load catalog and target users\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"candidate_catalog.parquet\")\nitem_ids = catalog.item_id.values\nitem2idx = {int(item): i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(item_ids)}\nN_ITEMS = len(item_ids)\n\n# 2. Load interaction logs\nprint(\"Loading interaction logs...\")\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"train_likes.parquet\")\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"train_dislikes.parquet\")\nval_pref = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"validation_preference_state.parquet\")\n\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"target_users.parquet\")\ntarget_uids = targets_df.uid.values.astype(np.int64)\nuid2idx = {int(uid): i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}\nN_USERS = len(target_uids)\n\n# Precompute item features including likes/dislikes counts\ncatalog_likes = likes[likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].groupby(\"item_id\").size().rename(\"likes_cnt\")\ncatalog_dislikes = dislikes[dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].groupby(\"item_id\").size().rename(\"dislikes_cnt\")\n\ncat_df = catalog.merge(catalog_likes, on=\"item_id\", how=\"left\").merge(catalog_dislikes, on=\"item_id\", how=\"left\").fillna(0)\n\npos_listens = cat_df.positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)\norg_listens = cat_df.organic_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)\npop_rank = cat_df.popularity_rank.values.astype(np.float32)\ncnt_likes = cat_df.likes_cnt.values.astype(np.float32)\ncnt_dislikes = cat_df.dislikes_cnt.values.astype(np.float32)\n\nfeat_pos = np.log1p(pos_listens) / np.log1p(pos_listens.max())\nfeat_org = np.log1p(org_listens) / np.log1p(org_listens.max())\nfeat_ratio = (org_listens + 1.0) / (pos_listens + 1.0)\nfeat_rank = 1.0 - (pop_rank / float(N_ITEMS))\nfeat_likes = np.log1p(cnt_likes) / np.log1p(cnt_likes.max())\nfeat_dis = np.log1p(cnt_dislikes) / (np.log1p(cnt_dislikes.max()) + 1e-5)\nfeat_like_dis_ratio = (cnt_likes + 1.0) / (cnt_likes + cnt_dislikes + 1.0)\n\nITEM_FEAT_DIM = 7\nitem_features = np.zeros((N_ITEMS + 1, ITEM_FEAT_DIM), dtype=np.float32)\nitem_features[1:, 0] = feat_pos\nitem_features[1:, 1] = feat_org\nitem_features[1:, 2] = feat_ratio\nitem_features[1:, 3] = feat_rank\nitem_features[1:, 4] = feat_likes\nitem_features[1:, 5] = feat_dis\nitem_features[1:, 6] = feat_like_dis_ratio\nitem_features_tensor = torch.from_numpy(item_features).float()\n\n# Filter events for target users\nlikes = likes[likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\nlikes[\"u_idx\"] = likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\nlikes[\"i_idx\"] = likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\ndislikes = dislikes[dislikes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\ndislikes[\"u_idx\"] = dislikes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\ndislikes[\"i_idx\"] = dislikes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\nt_history_start = CUTOFF - (NUM_WEEKS + 10) * WEEK\ntable = pq.read_table(\n    DATA_DIR / \"train_listens.parquet\",\n    columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n    filters=[(\"timestamp\", \">=\", t_history_start)]\n)\nlistens = table.to_pandas()\nlistens = listens[listens.uid.isin(uid2idx) & listens.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\nlistens[\"u_idx\"] = listens.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\nlistens[\"i_idx\"] = listens.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\n# User static stats from target_users.parquet\nuser_recent_pos = np.log1p(targets_df.recent_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32))\nuser_recent_pos /= user_recent_pos.max()\nuser_hist_pos = np.log1p(targets_df.history_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32))\nuser_hist_pos /= user_hist_pos.max()\n\n# First seen ts\nall_interactions = pd.concat([\n    likes[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]],\n    dislikes[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]],\n    listens[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]]\n], ignore_index=True)\nfirst_seen = all_interactions.groupby([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"])[\"timestamp\"].min().reset_index()\nfirst_seen.rename(columns={\"timestamp\": \"first_ts\"}, inplace=True)\n\n# Helper to build user history\ndef build_user_history(at_ts, pref_df=None):\n    likes_sub = likes[likes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"])\n    dislikes_sub = dislikes[dislikes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"])\n    \n    t_min = at_ts - 60 * 86400\n    listens_sub = listens[(listens.timestamp >= t_min) & (listens.timestamp < at_ts)].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"])\n    org_listens_sub = listens_sub[(listens_sub.is_organic == 1) & (listens_sub.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]\n    \n    # If pref_df is provided (e.g. at cutoff), blend active likes/dislikes\n    if pref_df is not None:\n        p_likes = pref_df[pref_df.state == \"liked\"][[\"uid\", \"item_id\"]].copy()\n        p_likes = p_likes[p_likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & p_likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\n        p_likes[\"u_idx\"] = p_likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\n        p_likes[\"i_idx\"] = p_likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n        p_likes[\"timestamp\"] = at_ts  # active at cutoff\n        \n        p_dis = pref_df[pref_df.state == \"disliked\"][[\"uid\", \"item_id\"]].copy()\n        p_dis = p_dis[p_dis.uid.isin(uid2idx) & p_dis.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\n        p_dis[\"u_idx\"] = p_dis.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\n        p_dis[\"i_idx\"] = p_dis.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n        p_dis[\"timestamp\"] = at_ts\n        \n        likes_sub = pd.concat([likes_sub, p_likes], ignore_index=True).drop_duplicates([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], keep=\"last\")\n        dislikes_sub = pd.concat([dislikes_sub, p_dis], ignore_index=True).drop_duplicates([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], keep=\"last\")\n    \n    mat_likes = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=np.int32)\n    mat_org = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=np.int32)\n    mat_all = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=np.int32)\n    mat_dis = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=np.int32)\n    stats = np.zeros((N_USERS, 7), dtype=np.float32)\n    \n    tail_likes = likes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_LIKES)\n    for u, grp in tail_likes.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        mat_likes[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        \n    tail_org = org_listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_ORG)\n    for u, grp in tail_org.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        mat_org[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        \n    tail_all = listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_ALL)\n    for u, grp in tail_all.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        mat_all[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        \n    tail_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_DIS)\n    for u, grp in tail_dis.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        mat_dis[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        \n    c_likes = likes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_org = org_listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_all = listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    \n    stats[c_likes.index, 0] = np.log1p(c_likes.values)\n    stats[c_dis.index, 1] = np.log1p(c_dis.values)\n    stats[c_org.index, 2] = np.log1p(c_org.values)\n    stats[c_all.index, 3] = np.log1p(c_all.values)\n    stats[:, 4] = (stats[:, 2] + 1.0) / (stats[:, 3] + 1.0)\n    stats[:, 5] = user_recent_pos\n    stats[:, 6] = user_hist_pos\n    \n    return {\n        \"likes\": torch.from_numpy(mat_likes).long(),\n        \"org\": torch.from_numpy(mat_org).long(),\n        \"all\": torch.from_numpy(mat_all).long(),\n        \"dis\": torch.from_numpy(mat_dis).long(),\n        \"stats\": torch.from_numpy(stats).float()\n    }\n\n# Build training windows\nwindow_histories = []\nall_pairs = []\n\nfor w in range(NUM_WEEKS):\n    w_cut = CUTOFF - (w + 1) * WEEK\n    w_end = w_cut + WEEK\n    w_hist = build_user_history(w_cut)\n    window_histories.append(w_hist)\n    \n    w_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= w_cut) & (likes.timestamp < w_end) & (likes.is_organic == 1)][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]]\n    w_listens = listens[(listens.timestamp >= w_cut) & (listens.timestamp < w_end) & (listens.is_organic == 1) & (listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]]\n    \n    w_likes = w_likes.merge(first_seen, on=[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], how=\"inner\")\n    w_likes = w_likes[w_likes.first_ts >= w_cut][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]].drop_duplicates()\n    w_likes[\"grade\"] = 3\n    \n    w_listens = w_listens.merge(first_seen, on=[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], how=\"inner\")\n    w_listens = w_listens[w_listens.first_ts >= w_cut][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]].drop_duplicates()\n    w_listens[\"grade\"] = 1\n    \n    combined = pd.concat([w_listens, w_likes], ignore_index=True)\n    combined = combined.sort_values(\"grade\").drop_duplicates([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], keep=\"last\")\n    combined[\"w_idx\"] = w\n    \n    for u, i, g in zip(combined.u_idx, combined.i_idx, combined.grade):\n        all_pairs.append((u, w, i, g))\n\nall_pairs = np.array(all_pairs, dtype=np.int32)\n# History for validation cutoff WITH validation_preference_state\nval_user_history = build_user_history(CUTOFF, pref_df=val_pref)\n\n# Model definitions\nclass UserTower(nn.Module):\n    def __init__(self, item_emb, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM, stats_dim=7):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.item_emb = item_emb\n        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(\n            nn.Linear(emb_dim * 4 + stats_dim, hidden_dim),\n            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),\n            nn.GELU(),\n            nn.Dropout(0.1),\n            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)\n        )\n\n    def pool(self, item_ids):\n        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, L, D)\n        mask = (item_ids > 0).float().unsqueeze(-1)\n        denom = mask.sum(dim=1).clamp(min=1.0)\n        return (emb * mask).sum(dim=1) / denom\n\n    def forward(self, likes, org, all_l, dis, stats):\n        h1 = self.pool(likes)\n        h2 = self.pool(org)\n        h3 = self.pool(all_l)\n        h4 = self.pool(dis)\n        h = torch.cat([h1, h2, h3, h4, stats], dim=-1)\n        raw = self.mlp(h)\n        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)\n\nclass ItemTower(nn.Module):\n    def __init__(self, item_emb, feat_dim=ITEM_FEAT_DIM, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.item_emb = item_emb\n        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(\n            nn.Linear(emb_dim + feat_dim, hidden_dim),\n            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),\n            nn.GELU(),\n            nn.Dropout(0.1),\n            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)\n        )\n\n    def forward(self, item_ids, item_feats):\n        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, D)\n        h = torch.cat([emb, item_feats], dim=-1)\n        raw = self.mlp(h)\n        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)\n\n# Initialize\nshared_item_emb = nn.Embedding(N_ITEMS + 1, EMB_DIM, padding_idx=0)\nnn.init.normal_(shared_item_emb.weight, std=0.02)\nwith torch.no_grad():\n    shared_item_emb.weight[0].fill_(0.0)\n\nuser_tower = UserTower(shared_item_emb, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM, stats_dim=7)\nitem_tower = ItemTower(shared_item_emb, ITEM_FEAT_DIM, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM)\n\nall_params = list(user_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(item_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(shared_item_emb.parameters())\noptimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(all_params, lr=LR, weight_decay=WEIGHT_DECAY)\nscheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=NUM_EPOCHS)\n\nval_npz = np.load(DATA_DIR / \"validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nval_packed = val_npz[\"packed_eligible\"]\nval_item_ids = val_npz[\"item_ids\"]\nval_unpacked = np.unpackbits(val_packed, axis=1, count=N_ITEMS, bitorder=\"little\")\n\ntargets_set = set(target_uids)\neligibility_service = CandidateSet(DATA_DIR / \"validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nimport evaluate_public\nval_gold = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility_service, targets_set)\n\ndef evaluate_ranker():\n    user_tower.eval()\n    item_tower.eval()\n    with torch.no_grad():\n        all_ids = torch.arange(1, N_ITEMS + 1, dtype=torch.long)\n        all_feats = item_features_tensor[1:]\n        V = item_tower(all_ids, all_feats)  # (30000, OUT_DIM)\n        \n        U = user_tower(\n            val_user_history[\"likes\"],\n            val_user_history[\"org\"],\n            val_user_history[\"all\"],\n            val_user_history[\"dis\"],\n            val_user_history[\"stats\"]\n        )  # (8456, OUT_DIM)\n        \n        scores = torch.matmul(U, V.t()).numpy()\n        scores[val_unpacked == 0] = -1e9\n        \n        top100_idx = np.argsort(-scores, axis=1)[:, :100]\n        \n        ranked = {}\n        for r, uid in enumerate(target_uids):\n            ranked[int(uid)] = list(map(int, val_item_ids[top100_idx[r]]))\n            \n        return score_rankings(ranked, val_gold)\n\ninit_scores = evaluate_ranker()\nprint(f\"Initial score: {init_scores}\")\n\nN_PAIRS = len(all_pairs)\nSTEPS_PER_EPOCH = N_PAIRS // BATCH_SIZE\n\nbest_score = 0.0\n\nfor epoch in range(1, NUM_EPOCHS + 1):\n    t_epoch = time.time()\n    user_tower.train()\n    item_tower.train()\n    \n    perm = np.random.permutation(N_PAIRS)\n    total_loss = 0.0\n    \n    for step in range(STEPS_PER_EPOCH):\n        batch_idx = perm[step * BATCH_SIZE : (step + 1) * BATCH_SIZE]\n        batch = all_pairs[batch_idx]\n        b_u = batch[:, 0]\n        b_w = batch[:, 1]\n        b_i = batch[:, 2]\n        b_g = batch[:, 3]\n        \n        u_likes = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_org = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_all = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_dis = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_stats = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, 7), dtype=torch.float32)\n        \n        for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):\n            mask = (b_w == w)\n            if not np.any(mask):\n                continue\n            u_indices = torch.from_numpy(b_u[mask]).long()\n            w_h = window_histories[w]\n            u_likes[mask] = w_h[\"likes\"][u_indices]\n            u_org[mask] = w_h[\"org\"][u_indices]\n            u_all[mask] = w_h[\"all\"][u_indices]\n            u_dis[mask] = w_h[\"dis\"][u_indices]\n            u_stats[mask] = w_h[\"stats\"][u_indices]\n            \n        pos_ids = torch.from_numpy(b_i).long()\n        pos_feats = item_features_tensor[pos_ids]\n        \n        # Sampled catalog negatives (M = NUM_NEGATIVES)\n        neg_ids = torch.randint(1, N_ITEMS + 1, (NUM_NEGATIVES,), dtype=torch.long)\n        neg_feats = item_features_tensor[neg_ids]\n        \n        u_vec = user_tower(u_likes, u_org, u_all, u_dis, u_stats)\n        pos_vec = item_tower(pos_ids, pos_feats)\n        neg_vec = item_tower(neg_ids, neg_feats)\n        \n        # Diagonal positive scores: (B, 1)\n        s_pos = (u_vec * pos_vec).sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True) / TEMP\n        \n        # Sampled negative scores: (B, M)\n        s_neg = torch.matmul(u_vec, neg_vec.t()) / TEMP\n        \n        # Concatenate: (B, 1 + M), positive at column 0\n        logits = torch.cat([s_pos, s_neg], dim=-1)\n        labels = torch.zeros(BATCH_SIZE, dtype=torch.long)\n        \n        weights = torch.from_numpy(np.where(b_g == 3, 5.0, 1.0)).float()\n        \n        loss_unweighted = F.cross_entropy(logits, labels, reduction=\"none\")\n        loss = (loss_unweighted * weights).mean()\n        \n        optimizer.zero_grad()\n        loss.backward()\n        nn.utils.clip_grad_norm_(all_params, 1.0)\n        optimizer.step()\n        \n        total_loss += loss.item()\n        \n    scheduler.step()\n    avg_loss = total_loss / STEPS_PER_EPOCH\n    val_scores = evaluate_ranker()\n    cur_score = val_scores['quality_ndcg@10']\n    if cur_score > best_score:\n        best_score = cur_score\n        marker = \" (BEST)\"\n    else:\n        marker = \"\"\n    print(f\"Epoch {epoch:2d}/{NUM_EPOCHS} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | Val NDCG@10: {cur_score:.6f}{marker} | Time: {time.time()-t_epoch:.1f}s\")\n\nprint(f\"\\nBest Val NDCG@10: {best_score:.6f}, Total elapsed: {time.time()-t_start:.1f}s\")\n"
}

Tool response 

Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/experiment_v3.py. Here is the updated code:
import os
import sys
import time
import math
import subprocess
from pathlib import Path

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F

sys.path.append("/task")
from ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, score_rankings

DATA_DIR = Path("/task/data")
CUTOFF = 24786800  # train cutoff
WEEK = 7 * 86400
NUM_WEEKS = 6
EMB_DIM = 64
OUT_DIM = 64
HIDDEN_DIM = 128
BATCH_SIZE = 512
NUM_NEGATIVES = 1024
NUM_EPOCHS = 10
LR = 5e-4
WEIGHT_DECAY = 1e-4
TEMP = 0.05
MAX_LEN_LIKES = 64
MAX_LEN_ORG = 64
MAX_LEN_ALL = 64
MAX_LEN_DIS = 16

torch.set_num_threads(8)
device = torch.device("cpu")

print("--- Starting Two-Tower Experiment v3 (Sampled Negatives + Preference State) ---")
t_start = time.time()

# 1. Load catalog and target users
catalog = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "candidate_catalog.parquet")
item_ids = catalog.item_id.values
item2idx = {int(item): i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(item_ids)}
N_ITEMS = len(item_ids)

# 2. Load interaction logs
print("Loading interaction logs...")
likes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "train_likes.parquet")
dislikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "train_dislikes.parquet")
val_pref = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "validation_preference_state.parquet")

targets_df = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "target_users.parquet")
target_uids = targets_df.uid.values.astype(np.int64)
uid2idx = {int(uid): i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}
N_USERS = len(target_uids)

# Precompute item features including likes/dislikes counts
catalog_likes = likes[likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].groupby("item_id").size().rename("likes_cnt")
catalog_dislikes = dislikes[dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].groupby("item_id").size().rename("dislikes_cnt")

cat_df = catalog.merge(catalog_likes, on="item_id", how="left").merge(catalog_dislikes, on="item_id", how="left").fillna(0)

pos_listens = cat_df.positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)
org_listens = cat_df.organic_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)
pop_rank = cat_df.popularity_rank.values.astype(np.float32)
cnt_likes = cat_df.likes_cnt.values.astype(np.float32)
cnt_dislikes = cat_df.dislikes_cnt.values.astype(np.float32)

feat_pos = np.log1p(pos_listens) / np.log1p(pos_listens.max())
feat_org = np.log1p(org_listens) / np.log1p(org_listens.max())
feat_ratio = (org_listens + 1.0) / (pos_listens + 1.0)
feat_rank = 1.0 - (pop_rank / float(N_ITEMS))
feat_likes = np.log1p(cnt_likes) / np.log1p(cnt_likes.max())
feat_dis = np.log1p(cnt_dislikes) / (np.log1p(cnt_dislikes.max()) + 1e-5)
feat_like_dis_ratio = (cnt_likes + 1.0) / (cnt_likes + cnt_dislikes + 1.0)

ITEM_FEAT_DIM = 7
item_features = np.zeros((N_ITEMS + 1, ITEM_FEAT_DIM), dtype=np.float32)
item_features[1:, 0] = feat_pos
item_features[1:, 1] = feat_org
item_features[1:, 2] = feat_ratio
item_features[1:, 3] = feat_rank
item_features[1:, 4] = feat_likes
item_features[1:, 5] = feat_dis
item_features[1:, 6] = feat_like_dis_ratio
item_features_tensor = torch.from_numpy(item_features).float()

# Filter events for target users
likes = likes[likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
likes["u_idx"] = likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
likes["i_idx"] = likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)

dislikes = dislikes[dislikes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
dislikes["u_idx"] = dislikes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
dislikes["i_idx"] = dislikes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)

t_history_start = CUTOFF - (NUM_WEEKS + 10) * WEEK
table = pq.read_table(
    DATA_DIR / "train_listens.parquet",
    columns=["uid", "item_id", "timestamp", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
    filters=[("timestamp", ">=", t_history_start)]
)
listens = table.to_pandas()
listens = listens[listens.uid.isin(uid2idx) & listens.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
listens["u_idx"] = listens.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
listens["i_idx"] = listens.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)

# User static stats from target_users.parquet
user_recent_pos = np.log1p(targets_df.recent_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32))
user_recent_pos /= user_recent_pos.max()
user_hist_pos = np.log1p(targets_df.history_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32))
user_hist_pos /= user_hist_pos.max()

# First seen ts
all_interactions = pd.concat([
    likes[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]],
    dislikes[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]],
    listens[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]]
], ignore_index=True)
first_seen = all_interactions.groupby(["u_idx", "i_idx"])["timestamp"].min().reset_index()
first_seen.rename(columns={"timestamp": "first_ts"}, inplace=True)

# Helper to build user history
def build_user_history(at_ts, pref_df=None):
    likes_sub = likes[likes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"])
    dislikes_sub = dislikes[dislikes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"])
    
    t_min = at_ts - 60 * 86400
    listens_sub = listens[(listens.timestamp >= t_min) & (listens.timestamp < at_ts)].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"])
    org_listens_sub = listens_sub[(listens_sub.is_organic == 1) & (listens_sub.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]
    
    # If pref_df is provided (e.g. at cutoff), blend active likes/dislikes
    if pref_df is not None:
        p_likes = pref_df[pref_df.state == "liked"][["uid", "item_id"]].copy()
        p_likes = p_likes[p_likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & p_likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)]
        p_likes["u_idx"] = p_likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
        p_likes["i_idx"] = p_likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)
        p_likes["timestamp"] = at_ts  # active at cutoff
        
        p_dis = pref_df[pref_df.state == "disliked"][["uid", "item_id"]].copy()
        p_dis = p_dis[p_dis.uid.isin(uid2idx) & p_dis.item_id.isin(item2idx)]
        p_dis["u_idx"] = p_dis.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
        p_dis["i_idx"] = p_dis.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)
        p_dis["timestamp"] = at_ts
        
        likes_sub = pd.concat([likes_sub, p_likes], ignore_index=True).drop_duplicates(["u_idx", "i_idx"], keep="last")
        dislikes_sub = pd.concat([dislikes_sub, p_dis], ignore_index=True).drop_duplicates(["u_idx", "i_idx"], keep="last")
    
    mat_likes = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=np.int32)
    mat_org = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=np.int32)
    mat_all = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=np.int32)
    mat_dis = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=np.int32)
    stats = np.zeros((N_USERS, 7), dtype=np.float32)
    
    tail_likes = likes_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_LIKES)
    for u, grp in tail_likes.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        mat_likes[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        
    tail_org = org_listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_ORG)
    for u, grp in tail_org.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        mat_org[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        
    tail_all = listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_ALL)
    for u, grp in tail_all.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        mat_all[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        
    tail_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_DIS)
    for u, grp in tail_dis.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        mat_dis[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        
    c_likes = likes_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_org = org_listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_all = listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    
    stats[c_likes.index, 0] = np.log1p(c_likes.values)
    stats[c_dis.index, 1] = np.log1p(c_dis.values)
    stats[c_org.index, 2] = np.log1p(c_org.values)
    stats[c_all.index, 3] = np.log1p(c_all.values)
    stats[:, 4] = (stats[:, 2] + 1.0) / (stats[:, 3] + 1.0)
    stats[:, 5] = user_recent_pos
    stats[:, 6] = user_hist_pos
    
    return {
        "likes": torch.from_numpy(mat_likes).long(),
        "org": torch.from_numpy(mat_org).long(),
        "all": torch.from_numpy(mat_all).long(),
        "dis": torch.from_numpy(mat_dis).long(),
        "stats": torch.from_numpy(stats).float()
    }

# Build training windows
window_histories = []
all_pairs = []

for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):
    w_cut = CUTOFF - (w + 1) * WEEK
    w_end = w_cut + WEEK
    w_hist = build_user_history(w_cut)
    window_histories.append(w_hist)
    
    w_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= w_cut) & (likes.timestamp < w_end) & (likes.is_organic == 1)][["u_idx", "i_idx"]]
    w_listens = listens[(listens.timestamp >= w_cut) & (listens.timestamp < w_end) & (listens.is_organic == 1) & (listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)][["u_idx", "i_idx"]]
    
    w_likes = w_likes.merge(first_seen, on=["u_idx", "i_idx"], how="inner")
    w_likes = w_likes[w_likes.first_ts >= w_cut][["u_idx", "i_idx"]].drop_duplicates()
    w_likes["grade"] = 3
    
    w_listens = w_listens.merge(first_seen, on=["u_idx", "i_idx"], how="inner")
    w_listens = w_listens[w_listens.first_ts >= w_cut][["u_idx", "i_idx"]].drop_duplicates()
    w_listens["grade"] = 1
    
    combined = pd.concat([w_listens, w_likes], ignore_index=True)
    combined = combined.sort_values("grade").drop_duplicates(["u_idx", "i_idx"], keep="last")
    combined["w_idx"] = w
    
    for u, i, g in zip(combined.u_idx, combined.i_idx, combined.grade):
        all_pairs.append((u, w, i, g))

all_pairs = np.array(all_pairs, dtype=np.int32)
# History for validation cutoff WITH validation_preference_state
val_user_history = build_user_history(CUTOFF, pref_df=val_pref)

# Model definitions
class UserTower(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, item_emb, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM, stats_dim=7):
        super().__init__()
        self.item_emb = item_emb
        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(emb_dim * 4 + stats_dim, hidden_dim),
            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),
            nn.GELU(),
            nn.Dropout(0.1),
            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)
        )

    def pool(self, item_ids):
        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, L, D)
        mask = (item_ids > 0).float().unsqueeze(-1)
        denom = mask.sum(dim=1).clamp(min=1.0)
        return (emb * mask).sum(dim=1) / denom

    def forward(self, likes, org, all_l, dis, stats):
        h1 = self.pool(likes)
        h2 = self.pool(org)
        h3 = self.pool(all_l)
        h4 = self.pool(dis)
        h = torch.cat([h1, h2, h3, h4, stats], dim=-1)
        raw = self.mlp(h)
        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)

class ItemTower(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, item_emb, feat_dim=ITEM_FEAT_DIM, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM):
        super().__init__()
        self.item_emb = item_emb
        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(emb_dim + feat_dim, hidden_dim),
            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),
            nn.GELU(),
            nn.Dropout(0.1),
            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)
        )

    def forward(self, item_ids, item_feats):
        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, D)
        h = torch.cat([emb, item_feats], dim=-1)
        raw = self.mlp(h)
        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)

# Initialize
shared_item_emb = nn.Embedding(N_ITEMS + 1, EMB_DIM, padding_idx=0)
nn.init.normal_(shared_item_emb.weight, std=0.02)
with torch.no_grad():
    shared_item_emb.weight[0].fill_(0.0)

user_tower = UserTower(shared_item_emb, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM, stats_dim=7)
item_tower = ItemTower(shared_item_emb, ITEM_FEAT_DIM, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM)

all_params = list(user_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(item_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(shared_item_emb.parameters())
optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(all_params, lr=LR, weight_decay=WEIGHT_DECAY)
scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=NUM_EPOCHS)

val_npz = np.load(DATA_DIR / "validation_eligible_candidates.npz")
val_packed = val_npz["packed_eligible"]
val_item_ids = val_npz["item_ids"]
val_unpacked = np.unpackbits(val_packed, axis=1, count=N_ITEMS, bitorder="little")

targets_set = set(target_uids)
eligibility_service = CandidateSet(DATA_DIR / "validation_eligible_candidates.npz")
import evaluate_public
val_gold = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility_service, targets_set)

def evaluate_ranker():
    user_tower.eval()
    item_tower.eval()
    with torch.no_grad():
        all_ids = torch.arange(1, N_ITEMS + 1, dtype=torch.long)
        all_feats = item_features_tensor[1:]
        V = item_tower(all_ids, all_feats)  # (30000, OUT_DIM)
        
        U = user_tower(
            val_user_history["likes"],
            val_user_history["org"],
            val_user_history["all"],
            val_user_history["dis"],
            val_user_history["stats"]
        )  # (8456, OUT_DIM)
        
        scores = torch.matmul(U, V.t()).numpy()
        scores[val_unpacked == 0] = -1e9
        
        top100_idx = np.argsort(-scores, axis=1)[:, :100]
        
        ranked = {}
        for r, uid in enumerate(target_uids):
            ranked[int(uid)] = list(map(int, val_item_ids[top100_idx[r]]))
            
        return score_rankings(ranked, val_gold)

init_scores = evaluate_ranker()
print(f"Initial score: {init_scores}")

N_PAIRS = len(all_pairs)
STEPS_PER_EPOCH = N_PAIRS // BATCH_SIZE

best_score = 0.0

for epoch in range(1, NUM_EPOCHS + 1):
    t_epoch = time.time()
    user_tower.train()
    item_tower.train()
    
    perm = np.random.permutation(N_PAIRS)
    total_loss = 0.0
    
    for step in range(STEPS_PER_EPOCH):
        batch_idx = perm[step * BATCH_SIZE : (step + 1) * BATCH_SIZE]
        batch = all_pairs[batch_idx]
        b_u = batch[:, 0]
        b_w = batch[:, 1]
        b_i = batch[:, 2]
        b_g = batch[:, 3]
        
        u_likes = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=torch.long)
        u_org = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=torch.long)
        u_all = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=torch.long)
        u_dis = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=torch.long)
        u_stats = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, 7), dtype=torch.float32)
        
        for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):
            mask = (b_w == w)
            if not np.any(mask):
                continue
            u_indices = torch.from_numpy(b_u[mask]).long()
            w_h = window_histories[w]
            u_likes[mask] = w_h["likes"][u_indices]
            u_org[mask] = w_h["org"][u_indices]
            u_all[mask] = w_h["all"][u_indices]
            u_dis[mask] = w_h["dis"][u_indices]
            u_stats[mask] = w_h["stats"][u_indices]
            
        pos_ids = torch.from_numpy(b_i).long()
        pos_feats = item_features_tensor[pos_ids]
        
        # Sampled catalog negatives (M = NUM_NEGATIVES)
        neg_ids = torch.randint(1, N_ITEMS + 1, (NUM_NEGATIVES,), dtype=torch.long)
        neg_feats = item_features_tensor[neg_ids]
        
        u_vec = user_tower(u_likes, u_org, u_all, u_dis, u_stats)
        pos_vec = item_tower(pos_ids, pos_feats)
        neg_vec = item_tower(neg_ids, neg_feats)
        
        # Diagonal positive scores: (B, 1)
        s_pos = (u_vec * pos_vec).sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True) / TEMP
        
        # Sampled negative scores: (B, M)
        s_neg = torch.matmul(u_vec, neg_vec.t()) / TEMP
        
        # Concatenate: (B, 1 + M), positive at column 0
        logits = torch.cat([s_pos, s_neg], dim=-1)
        labels = torch.zeros(BATCH_SIZE, dtype=torch.long)
        
        weights = torch.from_numpy(np.where(b_g == 3, 5.0, 1.0)).float()
        
        loss_unweighted = F.cross_entropy(logits, labels, reduction="none")
        loss = (loss_unweighted * weights).mean()
        
        optimizer.zero_grad()
        loss.backward()
        nn.utils.clip_grad_norm_(all_params, 1.0)
        optimizer.step()
        
        total_loss += loss.item()
        
    scheduler.step()
    avg_loss = total_loss / STEPS_PER_EPOCH
    val_scores = evaluate_ranker()
    cur_score = val_scores['quality_ndcg@10']
    if cur_score > best_score:
        best_score = cur_score
        marker = " (BEST)"
    else:
        marker = ""
    print(f"Epoch {epoch:2d}/{NUM_EPOCHS} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | Val NDCG@10: {cur_score:.6f}{marker} | Time: {time.time()-t_epoch:.1f}s")

print(f"\nBest Val NDCG@10: {best_score:.6f}, Total elapsed: {time.time()-t_start:.1f}s")
73

Run experiment_v3.py with sampled negatives and preference state integration

+47:33
Tool callrun_shell_commandRun experiment_v3.py with sampled negatives and preference state integration Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "command": "python3 /app/solution/experiment_v3.py",
  "description": "Run experiment_v3.py with sampled negatives and preference state integration"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: --- Starting Two-Tower Experiment v3 (Sampled Negatives + Preference State) ---
Loading interaction logs...
Initial score: {'quality_ndcg@10': 0.0, 'quality_users': 4263}
Epoch  1/10 | Loss: 9.1334 | Val NDCG@10: 0.016782 (BEST) | Time: 20.9s
Epoch  2/10 | Loss: 8.6479 | Val NDCG@10: 0.025342 (BEST) | Time: 20.5s
Epoch  3/10 | Loss: 8.1906 | Val NDCG@10: 0.027112 (BEST) | Time: 20.4s
Epoch  4/10 | Loss: 7.8153 | Val NDCG@10: 0.028569 (BEST) | Time: 21.1s
Epoch  5/10 | Loss: 7.5184 | Val NDCG@10: 0.029074 (BEST) | Time: 20.4s
Epoch  6/10 | Loss: 7.2557 | Val NDCG@10: 0.026704 | Time: 20.6s
Epoch  7/10 | Loss: 7.0423 | Val NDCG@10: 0.027149 | Time: 20.4s
Epoch  8/10 | Loss: 6.8752 | Val NDCG@10: 0.023511 | Time: 20.5s
Epoch  9/10 | Loss: 6.7560 | Val NDCG@10: 0.023754 | Time: 20.3s
Epoch 10/10 | Loss: 6.6778 | Val NDCG@10: 0.023621 | Time: 20.3s

Best Val NDCG@10: 0.029074, Total elapsed: 245.9s
Process Group PGID: 3008
</untrusted_context>
74

update_topic command

+51:59
Recorded reasoning summary 31 words

Observing Promising Gains

I'm seeing excellent progress; my latest results show NDCG@10 has nearly tripled from the baseline to 0.029074, hitting its peak at epoch 5. This represents a substantial improvement.

Recorded reasoning summary 36 words

Refining Negative Sampling

I've pinpointed that my recent performance surge is due to true sampled negatives, preference state integration, and item feature enrichment. The progression of NDCG@10 has been remarkably consistent, with each epoch completing swiftly.

Recorded reasoning summary 44 words

Testing Recency Weighting

I'm now exploring the impact of recency weighting on user preferences, applying an exponential decay to give more importance to recent interactions. Simultaneously, I'm investigating the benefits of expanding the training window range and increasing model capacity through larger embedding dimensions.

Recorded reasoning summary 46 words

Investigating Hyperparameter Tuning

I'm now delving into the specifics of hyperparameter optimization. Specifically, I'm examining the impact of embedding dimension size on generalization without overfitting and exploring alternative weightings for different grade levels in the discovery objective. Additionally, I'm considering a margin bonus for higher-graded items.

Recorded reasoning summary 58 words

Evaluating Model Stability

I'm observing a slight dip in NDCG@10 in epoch 6 compared to epoch 5, indicating potential overfitting. I need to ensure I'm saving the best performing model weights from validation epochs. My current focus is on properly refitting the model using both training and validation data before hidden-test evaluation, treating validation events as historical data.

Tool callupdate_topicTool call Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "title": "Validation Tuning & Model Refinement",
  "strategic_intent": "Systematically test recency weighting, hyperparameter tuning, model capacity, and checkpointing on validation.",
  "summary": "Sampled negatives and preference state integration boosted NDCG@10 from 0.01071 to 0.029074 (almost 3x improvement). Now testing recency weighting, loss margin/weights, model capacity, and checkpointing to further improve validation performance before refitting for the final submission."
}

Tool response 

Current topic: "Validation Tuning & Model Refinement"
Topic summary: Sampled negatives and preference state integration boosted NDCG@10 from 0.01071 to 0.029074 (almost 3x improvement). Now testing recency weighting, loss margin/weights, model capacity, and checkpointing to further improve validation performance before refitting for the final submission.

Strategic Intent: Systematically test recency weighting, hyperparameter tuning, model capacity, and checkpointing on validation.
75

write_file experiment_v4.py

+52:33
Recorded reasoning summary 42 words

Exploring Recency Weighting

I'm currently exploring how to incorporate recency weighting into the pooling of interaction data like likes and listens. This involves considering the timestamp of each historical interaction to calculate its age and then using that to influence its contribution.

Recorded reasoning summary 49 words

Tuning Decay Rates

I'm refining the exponential decay rate ($\lambda$) for interaction recency, aiming for a 30-day half-life. This means interactions from 60 days ago will have a weight of 0.25, ensuring recent preferences dominate while still acknowledging older ones. The integration into UserTower.pool is straightforward, promising efficient updates.

Tool callwrite_file/app/solution/experiment_v4.py Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "file_path": "/app/solution/experiment_v4.py",
  "content": "import os\nimport sys\nimport time\nimport math\nimport subprocess\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, score_rankings\n\nDATA_DIR = Path(\"/task/data\")\nCUTOFF = 24786800  # train cutoff\nWEEK = 7 * 86400\nNUM_WEEKS = 8\nEMB_DIM = 64\nOUT_DIM = 64\nHIDDEN_DIM = 128\nBATCH_SIZE = 512\nNUM_NEGATIVES = 1024\nNUM_EPOCHS = 8\nLR = 5e-4\nWEIGHT_DECAY = 1e-4\nTEMP = 0.05\nMAX_LEN_LIKES = 64\nMAX_LEN_ORG = 64\nMAX_LEN_ALL = 64\nMAX_LEN_DIS = 16\nHALF_LIFE_DAYS = 30.0\nLAMBDA_DECAY = math.log(2.0) / (HALF_LIFE_DAYS * 86400.0)\n\ntorch.set_num_threads(8)\ndevice = torch.device(\"cpu\")\n\nprint(\"--- Starting Two-Tower Experiment v4 (Recency Weighting + 8 Weeks) ---\")\nt_start = time.time()\n\n# 1. Load catalog and target users\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"candidate_catalog.parquet\")\nitem_ids = catalog.item_id.values\nitem2idx = {int(item): i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(item_ids)}\nN_ITEMS = len(item_ids)\n\n# 2. Load interaction logs\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"train_likes.parquet\")\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"train_dislikes.parquet\")\nval_pref = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"validation_preference_state.parquet\")\n\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"target_users.parquet\")\ntarget_uids = targets_df.uid.values.astype(np.int64)\nuid2idx = {int(uid): i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}\nN_USERS = len(target_uids)\n\n# Item features\ncatalog_likes = likes[likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].groupby(\"item_id\").size().rename(\"likes_cnt\")\ncatalog_dislikes = dislikes[dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].groupby(\"item_id\").size().rename(\"dislikes_cnt\")\ncat_df = catalog.merge(catalog_likes, on=\"item_id\", how=\"left\").merge(catalog_dislikes, on=\"item_id\", how=\"left\").fillna(0)\n\npos_listens = cat_df.positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)\norg_listens = cat_df.organic_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)\npop_rank = cat_df.popularity_rank.values.astype(np.float32)\ncnt_likes = cat_df.likes_cnt.values.astype(np.float32)\ncnt_dislikes = cat_df.dislikes_cnt.values.astype(np.float32)\n\nfeat_pos = np.log1p(pos_listens) / np.log1p(pos_listens.max())\nfeat_org = np.log1p(org_listens) / np.log1p(org_listens.max())\nfeat_ratio = (org_listens + 1.0) / (pos_listens + 1.0)\nfeat_rank = 1.0 - (pop_rank / float(N_ITEMS))\nfeat_likes = np.log1p(cnt_likes) / np.log1p(cnt_likes.max())\nfeat_dis = np.log1p(cnt_dislikes) / (np.log1p(cnt_dislikes.max()) + 1e-5)\nfeat_like_dis_ratio = (cnt_likes + 1.0) / (cnt_likes + cnt_dislikes + 1.0)\n\nITEM_FEAT_DIM = 7\nitem_features = np.zeros((N_ITEMS + 1, ITEM_FEAT_DIM), dtype=np.float32)\nitem_features[1:, 0] = feat_pos\nitem_features[1:, 1] = feat_org\nitem_features[1:, 2] = feat_ratio\nitem_features[1:, 3] = feat_rank\nitem_features[1:, 4] = feat_likes\nitem_features[1:, 5] = feat_dis\nitem_features[1:, 6] = feat_like_dis_ratio\nitem_features_tensor = torch.from_numpy(item_features).float()\n\n# Filter events for target users\nlikes = likes[likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\nlikes[\"u_idx\"] = likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\nlikes[\"i_idx\"] = likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\ndislikes = dislikes[dislikes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\ndislikes[\"u_idx\"] = dislikes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\ndislikes[\"i_idx\"] = dislikes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\nt_history_start = CUTOFF - (NUM_WEEKS + 10) * WEEK\ntable = pq.read_table(\n    DATA_DIR / \"train_listens.parquet\",\n    columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n    filters=[(\"timestamp\", \">=\", t_history_start)]\n)\nlistens = table.to_pandas()\nlistens = listens[listens.uid.isin(uid2idx) & listens.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\nlistens[\"u_idx\"] = listens.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\nlistens[\"i_idx\"] = listens.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\nuser_recent_pos = np.log1p(targets_df.recent_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32))\nuser_recent_pos /= user_recent_pos.max()\nuser_hist_pos = np.log1p(targets_df.history_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32))\nuser_hist_pos /= user_hist_pos.max()\n\n# First seen ts\nall_interactions = pd.concat([\n    likes[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]],\n    dislikes[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]],\n    listens[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]]\n], ignore_index=True)\nfirst_seen = all_interactions.groupby([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"])[\"timestamp\"].min().reset_index()\nfirst_seen.rename(columns={\"timestamp\": \"first_ts\"}, inplace=True)\n\n# Helper to build user history WITH recency weights\ndef build_user_history(at_ts, pref_df=None):\n    likes_sub = likes[likes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"]).copy()\n    dislikes_sub = dislikes[dislikes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"]).copy()\n    \n    t_min = at_ts - 60 * 86400\n    listens_sub = listens[(listens.timestamp >= t_min) & (listens.timestamp < at_ts)].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"]).copy()\n    org_listens_sub = listens_sub[(listens_sub.is_organic == 1) & (listens_sub.played_ratio_pct >= 80)].copy()\n    \n    if pref_df is not None:\n        p_likes = pref_df[pref_df.state == \"liked\"][[\"uid\", \"item_id\"]].copy()\n        p_likes = p_likes[p_likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & p_likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\n        p_likes[\"u_idx\"] = p_likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\n        p_likes[\"i_idx\"] = p_likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n        p_likes[\"timestamp\"] = at_ts\n        \n        p_dis = pref_df[pref_df.state == \"disliked\"][[\"uid\", \"item_id\"]].copy()\n        p_dis = p_dis[p_dis.uid.isin(uid2idx) & p_dis.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\n        p_dis[\"u_idx\"] = p_dis.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\n        p_dis[\"i_idx\"] = p_dis.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n        p_dis[\"timestamp\"] = at_ts\n        \n        likes_sub = pd.concat([likes_sub, p_likes], ignore_index=True).drop_duplicates([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], keep=\"last\")\n        dislikes_sub = pd.concat([dislikes_sub, p_dis], ignore_index=True).drop_duplicates([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], keep=\"last\")\n    \n    # Compute recency weight: exp(-lambda * delta_t)\n    likes_sub[\"weight\"] = np.exp(-LAMBDA_DECAY * (at_ts - likes_sub[\"timestamp\"]).clip(lower=0)).astype(np.float32)\n    org_listens_sub[\"weight\"] = np.exp(-LAMBDA_DECAY * (at_ts - org_listens_sub[\"timestamp\"]).clip(lower=0)).astype(np.float32)\n    listens_sub[\"weight\"] = np.exp(-LAMBDA_DECAY * (at_ts - listens_sub[\"timestamp\"]).clip(lower=0)).astype(np.float32)\n    \n    mat_likes = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=np.int32)\n    w_likes = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=np.float32)\n    mat_org = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=np.int32)\n    w_org = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=np.float32)\n    mat_all = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=np.int32)\n    w_all = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=np.float32)\n    mat_dis = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=np.int32)\n    stats = np.zeros((N_USERS, 7), dtype=np.float32)\n    \n    tail_likes = likes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_LIKES)\n    for u, grp in tail_likes.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        w = grp[\"weight\"].values\n        mat_likes[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        w_likes[u, -len(w):] = w\n        \n    tail_org = org_listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_ORG)\n    for u, grp in tail_org.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        w = grp[\"weight\"].values\n        mat_org[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        w_org[u, -len(w):] = w\n        \n    tail_all = listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_ALL)\n    for u, grp in tail_all.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        w = grp[\"weight\"].values\n        mat_all[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        w_all[u, -len(w):] = w\n        \n    tail_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_DIS)\n    for u, grp in tail_dis.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        mat_dis[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        \n    c_likes = likes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_org = org_listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_all = listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    \n    stats[c_likes.index, 0] = np.log1p(c_likes.values)\n    stats[c_dis.index, 1] = np.log1p(c_dis.values)\n    stats[c_org.index, 2] = np.log1p(c_org.values)\n    stats[c_all.index, 3] = np.log1p(c_all.values)\n    stats[:, 4] = (stats[:, 2] + 1.0) / (stats[:, 3] + 1.0)\n    stats[:, 5] = user_recent_pos\n    stats[:, 6] = user_hist_pos\n    \n    return {\n        \"likes\": torch.from_numpy(mat_likes).long(),\n        \"w_likes\": torch.from_numpy(w_likes).float(),\n        \"org\": torch.from_numpy(mat_org).long(),\n        \"w_org\": torch.from_numpy(w_org).float(),\n        \"all\": torch.from_numpy(mat_all).long(),\n        \"w_all\": torch.from_numpy(w_all).float(),\n        \"dis\": torch.from_numpy(mat_dis).long(),\n        \"stats\": torch.from_numpy(stats).float()\n    }\n\n# Build training windows\nwindow_histories = []\nall_pairs = []\n\nfor w in range(NUM_WEEKS):\n    w_cut = CUTOFF - (w + 1) * WEEK\n    w_end = w_cut + WEEK\n    w_hist = build_user_history(w_cut)\n    window_histories.append(w_hist)\n    \n    w_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= w_cut) & (likes.timestamp < w_end) & (likes.is_organic == 1)][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]]\n    w_listens = listens[(listens.timestamp >= w_cut) & (listens.timestamp < w_end) & (listens.is_organic == 1) & (listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]]\n    \n    w_likes = w_likes.merge(first_seen, on=[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], how=\"inner\")\n    w_likes = w_likes[w_likes.first_ts >= w_cut][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]].drop_duplicates()\n    w_likes[\"grade\"] = 3\n    \n    w_listens = w_listens.merge(first_seen, on=[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], how=\"inner\")\n    w_listens = w_listens[w_listens.first_ts >= w_cut][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]].drop_duplicates()\n    w_listens[\"grade\"] = 1\n    \n    combined = pd.concat([w_listens, w_likes], ignore_index=True)\n    combined = combined.sort_values(\"grade\").drop_duplicates([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], keep=\"last\")\n    combined[\"w_idx\"] = w\n    \n    for u, i, g in zip(combined.u_idx, combined.i_idx, combined.grade):\n        all_pairs.append((u, w, i, g))\n\nall_pairs = np.array(all_pairs, dtype=np.int32)\nval_user_history = build_user_history(CUTOFF, pref_df=val_pref)\n\n# User Tower with weighted pooling\nclass UserTower(nn.Module):\n    def __init__(self, item_emb, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM, stats_dim=7):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.item_emb = item_emb\n        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(\n            nn.Linear(emb_dim * 4 + stats_dim, hidden_dim),\n            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),\n            nn.GELU(),\n            nn.Dropout(0.1),\n            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)\n        )\n\n    def pool(self, item_ids, weights=None):\n        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, L, D)\n        mask = (item_ids > 0).float()  # (B, L)\n        if weights is not None:\n            mask = mask * weights\n        denom = mask.sum(dim=1, keepdim=True).clamp(min=1e-5)\n        return (emb * mask.unsqueeze(-1)).sum(dim=1) / denom\n\n    def forward(self, likes, w_likes, org, w_org, all_l, w_all, dis, stats):\n        h1 = self.pool(likes, w_likes)\n        h2 = self.pool(org, w_org)\n        h3 = self.pool(all_l, w_all)\n        h4 = self.pool(dis, None)\n        h = torch.cat([h1, h2, h3, h4, stats], dim=-1)\n        raw = self.mlp(h)\n        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)\n\nclass ItemTower(nn.Module):\n    def __init__(self, item_emb, feat_dim=ITEM_FEAT_DIM, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.item_emb = item_emb\n        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(\n            nn.Linear(emb_dim + feat_dim, hidden_dim),\n            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),\n            nn.GELU(),\n            nn.Dropout(0.1),\n            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)\n        )\n\n    def forward(self, item_ids, item_feats):\n        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, D)\n        h = torch.cat([emb, item_feats], dim=-1)\n        raw = self.mlp(h)\n        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)\n\n# Initialize\nshared_item_emb = nn.Embedding(N_ITEMS + 1, EMB_DIM, padding_idx=0)\nnn.init.normal_(shared_item_emb.weight, std=0.02)\nwith torch.no_grad():\n    shared_item_emb.weight[0].fill_(0.0)\n\nuser_tower = UserTower(shared_item_emb, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM, stats_dim=7)\nitem_tower = ItemTower(shared_item_emb, ITEM_FEAT_DIM, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM)\n\nall_params = list(user_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(item_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(shared_item_emb.parameters())\noptimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(all_params, lr=LR, weight_decay=WEIGHT_DECAY)\nscheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=NUM_EPOCHS)\n\nval_npz = np.load(DATA_DIR / \"validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nval_packed = val_npz[\"packed_eligible\"]\nval_item_ids = val_npz[\"item_ids\"]\nval_unpacked = np.unpackbits(val_packed, axis=1, count=N_ITEMS, bitorder=\"little\")\n\ntargets_set = set(target_uids)\neligibility_service = CandidateSet(DATA_DIR / \"validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nimport evaluate_public\nval_gold = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility_service, targets_set)\n\ndef evaluate_ranker():\n    user_tower.eval()\n    item_tower.eval()\n    with torch.no_grad():\n        all_ids = torch.arange(1, N_ITEMS + 1, dtype=torch.long)\n        all_feats = item_features_tensor[1:]\n        V = item_tower(all_ids, all_feats)\n        \n        U = user_tower(\n            val_user_history[\"likes\"],\n            val_user_history[\"w_likes\"],\n            val_user_history[\"org\"],\n            val_user_history[\"w_org\"],\n            val_user_history[\"all\"],\n            val_user_history[\"w_all\"],\n            val_user_history[\"dis\"],\n            val_user_history[\"stats\"]\n        )\n        \n        scores = torch.matmul(U, V.t()).numpy()\n        scores[val_unpacked == 0] = -1e9\n        \n        top100_idx = np.argsort(-scores, axis=1)[:, :100]\n        \n        ranked = {}\n        for r, uid in enumerate(target_uids):\n            ranked[int(uid)] = list(map(int, val_item_ids[top100_idx[r]]))\n            \n        return score_rankings(ranked, val_gold)\n\ninit_scores = evaluate_ranker()\nprint(f\"Initial score: {init_scores}\")\n\nN_PAIRS = len(all_pairs)\nSTEPS_PER_EPOCH = N_PAIRS // BATCH_SIZE\n\nbest_score = 0.0\nbest_checkpoint = None\n\nfor epoch in range(1, NUM_EPOCHS + 1):\n    t_epoch = time.time()\n    user_tower.train()\n    item_tower.train()\n    \n    perm = np.random.permutation(N_PAIRS)\n    total_loss = 0.0\n    \n    for step in range(STEPS_PER_EPOCH):\n        batch_idx = perm[step * BATCH_SIZE : (step + 1) * BATCH_SIZE]\n        batch = all_pairs[batch_idx]\n        b_u = batch[:, 0]\n        b_w = batch[:, 1]\n        b_i = batch[:, 2]\n        b_g = batch[:, 3]\n        \n        u_likes = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_w_likes = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=torch.float32)\n        u_org = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_w_org = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=torch.float32)\n        u_all = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_w_all = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=torch.float32)\n        u_dis = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_stats = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, 7), dtype=torch.float32)\n        \n        for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):\n            mask = (b_w == w)\n            if not np.any(mask):\n                continue\n            u_indices = torch.from_numpy(b_u[mask]).long()\n            w_h = window_histories[w]\n            u_likes[mask] = w_h[\"likes\"][u_indices]\n            u_w_likes[mask] = w_h[\"w_likes\"][u_indices]\n            u_org[mask] = w_h[\"org\"][u_indices]\n            u_w_org[mask] = w_h[\"w_org\"][u_indices]\n            u_all[mask] = w_h[\"all\"][u_indices]\n            u_w_all[mask] = w_h[\"w_all\"][u_indices]\n            u_dis[mask] = w_h[\"dis\"][u_indices]\n            u_stats[mask] = w_h[\"stats\"][u_indices]\n            \n        pos_ids = torch.from_numpy(b_i).long()\n        pos_feats = item_features_tensor[pos_ids]\n        \n        neg_ids = torch.randint(1, N_ITEMS + 1, (NUM_NEGATIVES,), dtype=torch.long)\n        neg_feats = item_features_tensor[neg_ids]\n        \n        u_vec = user_tower(u_likes, u_w_likes, u_org, u_w_org, u_all, u_w_all, u_dis, u_stats)\n        pos_vec = item_tower(pos_ids, pos_feats)\n        neg_vec = item_tower(neg_ids, neg_feats)\n        \n        # Diagonal positive scores\n        s_pos = (u_vec * pos_vec).sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True) / TEMP\n        # Sampled negative scores\n        s_neg = torch.matmul(u_vec, neg_vec.t()) / TEMP\n        \n        logits = torch.cat([s_pos, s_neg], dim=-1)\n        labels = torch.zeros(BATCH_SIZE, dtype=torch.long)\n        \n        # Grade 3 weight 7.0, Grade 1 weight 1.0 (matching NDCG DCG gain ratio: 7 to 1)\n        weights = torch.from_numpy(np.where(b_g == 3, 7.0, 1.0)).float()\n        \n        loss_unweighted = F.cross_entropy(logits, labels, reduction=\"none\")\n        loss = (loss_unweighted * weights).mean()\n        \n        optimizer.zero_grad()\n        loss.backward()\n        nn.utils.clip_grad_norm_(all_params, 1.0)\n        optimizer.step()\n        \n        total_loss += loss.item()\n        \n    scheduler.step()\n    avg_loss = total_loss / STEPS_PER_EPOCH\n    val_scores = evaluate_ranker()\n    cur_score = val_scores['quality_ndcg@10']\n    if cur_score > best_score:\n        best_score = cur_score\n        marker = \" (BEST)\"\n        # Save best weights\n        torch.save({\n            \"user_tower\": user_tower.state_dict(),\n            \"item_tower\": item_tower.state_dict(),\n            \"shared_item_emb\": shared_item_emb.state_dict()\n        }, \"/app/solution/best_model_val.pt\")\n    else:\n        marker = \"\"\n    print(f\"Epoch {epoch:2d}/{NUM_EPOCHS} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | Val NDCG@10: {cur_score:.6f}{marker} | Time: {time.time()-t_epoch:.1f}s\")\n\nprint(f\"\\nBest Val NDCG@10: {best_score:.6f}, Total elapsed: {time.time()-t_start:.1f}s\")\n",
  "instruction": "Create experiment_v4.py with recency weighting and gain-matched loss weights"
}

Tool response 

Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/experiment_v4.py. Here is the updated code:
import os
import sys
import time
import math
import subprocess
from pathlib import Path

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F

sys.path.append("/task")
from ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, score_rankings

DATA_DIR = Path("/task/data")
CUTOFF = 24786800  # train cutoff
WEEK = 7 * 86400
NUM_WEEKS = 8
EMB_DIM = 64
OUT_DIM = 64
HIDDEN_DIM = 128
BATCH_SIZE = 512
NUM_NEGATIVES = 1024
NUM_EPOCHS = 8
LR = 5e-4
WEIGHT_DECAY = 1e-4
TEMP = 0.05
MAX_LEN_LIKES = 64
MAX_LEN_ORG = 64
MAX_LEN_ALL = 64
MAX_LEN_DIS = 16
HALF_LIFE_DAYS = 30.0
LAMBDA_DECAY = math.log(2.0) / (HALF_LIFE_DAYS * 86400.0)

torch.set_num_threads(8)
device = torch.device("cpu")

print("--- Starting Two-Tower Experiment v4 (Recency Weighting + 8 Weeks) ---")
t_start = time.time()

# 1. Load catalog and target users
catalog = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "candidate_catalog.parquet")
item_ids = catalog.item_id.values
item2idx = {int(item): i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(item_ids)}
N_ITEMS = len(item_ids)

# 2. Load interaction logs
likes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "train_likes.parquet")
dislikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "train_dislikes.parquet")
val_pref = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "validation_preference_state.parquet")

targets_df = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "target_users.parquet")
target_uids = targets_df.uid.values.astype(np.int64)
uid2idx = {int(uid): i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}
N_USERS = len(target_uids)

# Item features
catalog_likes = likes[likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].groupby("item_id").size().rename("likes_cnt")
catalog_dislikes = dislikes[dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].groupby("item_id").size().rename("dislikes_cnt")
cat_df = catalog.merge(catalog_likes, on="item_id", how="left").merge(catalog_dislikes, on="item_id", how="left").fillna(0)

pos_listens = cat_df.positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)
org_listens = cat_df.organic_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)
pop_rank = cat_df.popularity_rank.values.astype(np.float32)
cnt_likes = cat_df.likes_cnt.values.astype(np.float32)
cnt_dislikes = cat_df.dislikes_cnt.values.astype(np.float32)

feat_pos = np.log1p(pos_listens) / np.log1p(pos_listens.max())
feat_org = np.log1p(org_listens) / np.log1p(org_listens.max())
feat_ratio = (org_listens + 1.0) / (pos_listens + 1.0)
feat_rank = 1.0 - (pop_rank / float(N_ITEMS))
feat_likes = np.log1p(cnt_likes) / np.log1p(cnt_likes.max())
feat_dis = np.log1p(cnt_dislikes) / (np.log1p(cnt_dislikes.max()) + 1e-5)
feat_like_dis_ratio = (cnt_likes + 1.0) / (cnt_likes + cnt_dislikes + 1.0)

ITEM_FEAT_DIM = 7
item_features = np.zeros((N_ITEMS + 1, ITEM_FEAT_DIM), dtype=np.float32)
item_features[1:, 0] = feat_pos
item_features[1:, 1] = feat_org
item_features[1:, 2] = feat_ratio
item_features[1:, 3] = feat_rank
item_features[1:, 4] = feat_likes
item_features[1:, 5] = feat_dis
item_features[1:, 6] = feat_like_dis_ratio
item_features_tensor = torch.from_numpy(item_features).float()

# Filter events for target users
likes = likes[likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
likes["u_idx"] = likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
likes["i_idx"] = likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)

dislikes = dislikes[dislikes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
dislikes["u_idx"] = dislikes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
dislikes["i_idx"] = dislikes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)

t_history_start = CUTOFF - (NUM_WEEKS + 10) * WEEK
table = pq.read_table(
    DATA_DIR / "train_listens.parquet",
    columns=["uid", "item_id", "timestamp", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
    filters=[("timestamp", ">=", t_history_start)]
)
listens = table.to_pandas()
listens = listens[listens.uid.isin(uid2idx) & listens.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
listens["u_idx"] = listens.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
listens["i_idx"] = listens.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)

user_recent_pos = np.log1p(targets_df.recent_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32))
user_recent_pos /= user_recent_pos.max()
user_hist_pos = np.log1p(targets_df.history_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32))
user_hist_pos /= user_hist_pos.max()

# First seen ts
all_interactions = pd.concat([
    likes[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]],
    dislikes[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]],
    listens[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]]
], ignore_index=True)
first_seen = all_interactions.groupby(["u_idx", "i_idx"])["timestamp"].min().reset_index()
first_seen.rename(columns={"timestamp": "first_ts"}, inplace=True)

# Helper to build user history WITH recency weights
def build_user_history(at_ts, pref_df=None):
    likes_sub = likes[likes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"]).copy()
    dislikes_sub = dislikes[dislikes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"]).copy()
    
    t_min = at_ts - 60 * 86400
    listens_sub = listens[(listens.timestamp >= t_min) & (listens.timestamp < at_ts)].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"]).copy()
    org_listens_sub = listens_sub[(listens_sub.is_organic == 1) & (listens_sub.played_ratio_pct >= 80)].copy()
    
    if pref_df is not None:
        p_likes = pref_df[pref_df.state == "liked"][["uid", "item_id"]].copy()
        p_likes = p_likes[p_likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & p_likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)]
        p_likes["u_idx"] = p_likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
        p_likes["i_idx"] = p_likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)
        p_likes["timestamp"] = at_ts
        
        p_dis = pref_df[pref_df.state == "disliked"][["uid", "item_id"]].copy()
        p_dis = p_dis[p_dis.uid.isin(uid2idx) & p_dis.item_id.isin(item2idx)]
        p_dis["u_idx"] = p_dis.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
        p_dis["i_idx"] = p_dis.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)
        p_dis["timestamp"] = at_ts
        
        likes_sub = pd.concat([likes_sub, p_likes], ignore_index=True).drop_duplicates(["u_idx", "i_idx"], keep="last")
        dislikes_sub = pd.concat([dislikes_sub, p_dis], ignore_index=True).drop_duplicates(["u_idx", "i_idx"], keep="last")
    
    # Compute recency weight: exp(-lambda * delta_t)
    likes_sub["weight"] = np.exp(-LAMBDA_DECAY * (at_ts - likes_sub["timestamp"]).clip(lower=0)).astype(np.float32)
    org_listens_sub["weight"] = np.exp(-LAMBDA_DECAY * (at_ts - org_listens_sub["timestamp"]).clip(lower=0)).astype(np.float32)
    listens_sub["weight"] = np.exp(-LAMBDA_DECAY * (at_ts - listens_sub["timestamp"]).clip(lower=0)).astype(np.float32)
    
    mat_likes = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=np.int32)
    w_likes = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=np.float32)
    mat_org = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=np.int32)
    w_org = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=np.float32)
    mat_all = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=np.int32)
    w_all = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=np.float32)
    mat_dis = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=np.int32)
    stats = np.zeros((N_USERS, 7), dtype=np.float32)
    
    tail_likes = likes_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_LIKES)
    for u, grp in tail_likes.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        w = grp["weight"].values
        mat_likes[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        w_likes[u, -len(w):] = w
        
    tail_org = org_listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_ORG)
    for u, grp in tail_org.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        w = grp["weight"].values
        mat_org[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        w_org[u, -len(w):] = w
        
    tail_all = listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_ALL)
    for u, grp in tail_all.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        w = grp["weight"].values
        mat_all[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        w_all[u, -len(w):] = w
        
    tail_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_DIS)
    for u, grp in tail_dis.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        mat_dis[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        
    c_likes = likes_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_org = org_listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_all = listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    
    stats[c_likes.index, 0] = np.log1p(c_likes.values)
    stats[c_dis.index, 1] = np.log1p(c_dis.values)
    stats[c_org.index, 2] = np.log1p(c_org.values)
    stats[c_all.index, 3] = np.log1p(c_all.values)
    stats[:, 4] = (stats[:, 2] + 1.0) / (stats[:, 3] + 1.0)
    stats[:, 5] = user_recent_pos
    stats[:, 6] = user_hist_pos
    
    return {
        "likes": torch.from_numpy(mat_likes).long(),
        "w_likes": torch.from_numpy(w_likes).float(),
        "org": torch.from_numpy(mat_org).long(),
        "w_org": torch.from_numpy(w_org).float(),
        "all": torch.from_numpy(mat_all).long(),
        "w_all": torch.from_numpy(w_all).float(),
        "dis": torch.from_numpy(mat_dis).long(),
        "stats": torch.from_numpy(stats).float()
    }

# Build training windows
window_histories = []
all_pairs = []

for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):
    w_cut = CUTOFF - (w + 1) * WEEK
    w_end = w_cut + WEEK
    w_hist = build_user_history(w_cut)
    window_histories.append(w_hist)
    
    w_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= w_cut) & (likes.timestamp < w_end) & (likes.is_organic == 1)][["u_idx", "i_idx"]]
    w_listens = listens[(listens.timestamp >= w_cut) & (listens.timestamp < w_end) & (listens.is_organic == 1) & (listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)][["u_idx", "i_idx"]]
    
    w_likes = w_likes.merge(first_seen, on=["u_idx", "i_idx"], how="inner")
    w_likes = w_likes[w_likes.first_ts >= w_cut][["u_idx", "i_idx"]].drop_duplicates()
    w_likes["grade"] = 3
    
    w_listens = w_listens.merge(first_seen, on=["u_idx", "i_idx"], how="inner")
    w_listens = w_listens[w_listens.first_ts >= w_cut][["u_idx", "i_idx"]].drop_duplicates()
    w_listens["grade"] = 1
    
    combined = pd.concat([w_listens, w_likes], ignore_index=True)
    combined = combined.sort_values("grade").drop_duplicates(["u_idx", "i_idx"], keep="last")
    combined["w_idx"] = w
    
    for u, i, g in zip(combined.u_idx, combined.i_idx, combined.grade):
        all_pairs.append((u, w, i, g))

all_pairs = np.array(all_pairs, dtype=np.int32)
val_user_history = build_user_history(CUTOFF, pref_df=val_pref)

# User Tower with weighted pooling
class UserTower(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, item_emb, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM, stats_dim=7):
        super().__init__()
        self.item_emb = item_emb
        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(emb_dim * 4 + stats_dim, hidden_dim),
            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),
            nn.GELU(),
            nn.Dropout(0.1),
            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)
        )

    def pool(self, item_ids, weights=None):
        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, L, D)
        mask = (item_ids > 0).float()  # (B, L)
        if weights is not None:
            mask = mask * weights
        denom = mask.sum(dim=1, keepdim=True).clamp(min=1e-5)
        return (emb * mask.unsqueeze(-1)).sum(dim=1) / denom

    def forward(self, likes, w_likes, org, w_org, all_l, w_all, dis, stats):
        h1 = self.pool(likes, w_likes)
        h2 = self.pool(org, w_org)
        h3 = self.pool(all_l, w_all)
        h4 = self.pool(dis, None)
        h = torch.cat([h1, h2, h3, h4, stats], dim=-1)
        raw = self.mlp(h)
        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)

class ItemTower(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, item_emb, feat_dim=ITEM_FEAT_DIM, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM):
        super().__init__()
        self.item_emb = item_emb
        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(emb_dim + feat_dim, hidden_dim),
            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),
            nn.GELU(),
            nn.Dropout(0.1),
            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)
        )

    def forward(self, item_ids, item_feats):
        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, D)
        h = torch.cat([emb, item_feats], dim=-1)
        raw = self.mlp(h)
        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)

# Initialize
shared_item_emb = nn.Embedding(N_ITEMS + 1, EMB_DIM, padding_idx=0)
nn.init.normal_(shared_item_emb.weight, std=0.02)
with torch.no_grad():
    shared_item_emb.weight[0].fill_(0.0)

user_tower = UserTower(shared_item_emb, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM, stats_dim=7)
item_tower = ItemTower(shared_item_emb, ITEM_FEAT_DIM, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM)

all_params = list(user_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(item_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(shared_item_emb.parameters())
optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(all_params, lr=LR, weight_decay=WEIGHT_DECAY)
scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=NUM_EPOCHS)

val_npz = np.load(DATA_DIR / "validation_eligible_candidates.npz")
val_packed = val_npz["packed_eligible"]
val_item_ids = val_npz["item_ids"]
val_unpacked = np.unpackbits(val_packed, axis=1, count=N_ITEMS, bitorder="little")

targets_set = set(target_uids)
eligibility_service = CandidateSet(DATA_DIR / "validation_eligible_candidates.npz")
import evaluate_public
val_gold = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility_service, targets_set)

def evaluate_ranker():
    user_tower.eval()
    item_tower.eval()
    with torch.no_grad():
        all_ids = torch.arange(1, N_ITEMS + 1, dtype=torch.long)
        all_feats = item_features_tensor[1:]
        V = item_tower(all_ids, all_feats)
        
        U = user_tower(
            val_user_history["likes"],
            val_user_history["w_likes"],
            val_user_history["org"],
            val_user_history["w_org"],
            val_user_history["all"],
            val_user_history["w_all"],
            val_user_history["dis"],
            val_user_history["stats"]
        )
        
        scores = torch.matmul(U, V.t()).numpy()
        scores[val_unpacked == 0] = -1e9
        
        top100_idx = np.argsort(-scores, axis=1)[:, :100]
        
        ranked = {}
        for r, uid in enumerate(target_uids):
            ranked[int(uid)] = list(map(int, val_item_ids[top100_idx[r]]))
            
        return score_rankings(ranked, val_gold)

init_scores = evaluate_ranker()
print(f"Initial score: {init_scores}")

N_PAIRS = len(all_pairs)
STEPS_PER_EPOCH = N_PAIRS // BATCH_SIZE

best_score = 0.0
best_checkpoint = None

for epoch in range(1, NUM_EPOCHS + 1):
    t_epoch = time.time()
    user_tower.train()
    item_tower.train()
    
    perm = np.random.permutation(N_PAIRS)
    total_loss = 0.0
    
    for step in range(STEPS_PER_EPOCH):
        batch_idx = perm[step * BATCH_SIZE : (step + 1) * BATCH_SIZE]
        batch = all_pairs[batch_idx]
        b_u = batch[:, 0]
        b_w = batch[:, 1]
        b_i = batch[:, 2]
        b_g = batch[:, 3]
        
        u_likes = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=torch.long)
        u_w_likes = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=torch.float32)
        u_org = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=torch.long)
        u_w_org = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=torch.float32)
        u_all = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=torch.long)
        u_w_all = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=torch.float32)
        u_dis = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=torch.long)
        u_stats = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, 7), dtype=torch.float32)
        
        for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):
            mask = (b_w == w)
            if not np.any(mask):
                continue
            u_indices = torch.from_numpy(b_u[mask]).long()
            w_h = window_histories[w]
            u_likes[mask] = w_h["likes"][u_indices]
            u_w_likes[mask] = w_h["w_likes"][u_indices]
            u_org[mask] = w_h["org"][u_indices]
            u_w_org[mask] = w_h["w_org"][u_indices]
            u_all[mask] = w_h["all"][u_indices]
            u_w_all[mask] = w_h["w_all"][u_indices]
            u_dis[mask] = w_h["dis"][u_indices]
            u_stats[mask] = w_h["stats"][u_indices]
            
        pos_ids = torch.from_numpy(b_i).long()
        pos_feats = item_features_tensor[pos_ids]
        
        neg_ids = torch.randint(1, N_ITEMS + 1, (NUM_NEGATIVES,), dtype=torch.long)
        neg_feats = item_features_tensor[neg_ids]
        
        u_vec = user_tower(u_likes, u_w_likes, u_org, u_w_org, u_all, u_w_all, u_dis, u_stats)
        pos_vec = item_tower(pos_ids, pos_feats)
        neg_vec = item_tower(neg_ids, neg_feats)
        
        # Diagonal positive scores
        s_pos = (u_vec * pos_vec).sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True) / TEMP
        # Sampled negative scores
        s_neg = torch.matmul(u_vec, neg_vec.t()) / TEMP
        
        logits = torch.cat([s_pos, s_neg], dim=-1)
        labels = torch.zeros(BATCH_SIZE, dtype=torch.long)
        
        # Grade 3 weight 7.0, Grade 1 weight 1.0 (matching NDCG DCG gain ratio: 7 to 1)
        weights = torch.from_numpy(np.where(b_g == 3, 7.0, 1.0)).float()
        
        loss_unweighted = F.cross_entropy(logits, labels, reduction="none")
        loss = (loss_unweighted * weights).mean()
        
        optimizer.zero_grad()
        loss.backward()
        nn.utils.clip_grad_norm_(all_params, 1.0)
        optimizer.step()
        
        total_loss += loss.item()
        
    scheduler.step()
    avg_loss = total_loss / STEPS_PER_EPOCH
    val_scores = evaluate_ranker()
    cur_score = val_scores['quality_ndcg@10']
    if cur_score > best_score:
        best_score = cur_score
        marker = " (BEST)"
        # Save best weights
        torch.save({
            "user_tower": user_tower.state_dict(),
            "item_tower": item_tower.state_dict(),
            "shared_item_emb": shared_item_emb.state_dict()
        }, "/app/solution/best_model_val.pt")
    else:
        marker = ""
    print(f"Epoch {epoch:2d}/{NUM_EPOCHS} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | Val NDCG@10: {cur_score:.6f}{marker} | Time: {time.time()-t_epoch:.1f}s")

print(f"\nBest Val NDCG@10: {best_score:.6f}, Total elapsed: {time.time()-t_start:.1f}s")
76

Run experiment_v4.py with recency decay and 8 weeks history

+52:47
Tool callrun_shell_commandRun experiment_v4.py with recency decay and 8 weeks history Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "description": "Run experiment_v4.py with recency decay and 8 weeks history",
  "command": "python3 /app/solution/experiment_v4.py"
}

Tool response 

<untrusted_context>
Output: --- Starting Two-Tower Experiment v4 (Recency Weighting + 8 Weeks) ---
Initial score: {'quality_ndcg@10': 0.0, 'quality_users': 4263}
Epoch  1/8 | Loss: 10.8459 | Val NDCG@10: 0.018583 (BEST) | Time: 25.1s
Epoch  2/8 | Loss: 10.2724 | Val NDCG@10: 0.025486 (BEST) | Time: 25.9s
Epoch  3/8 | Loss: 9.7002 | Val NDCG@10: 0.027246 (BEST) | Time: 25.2s
Epoch  4/8 | Loss: 9.2294 | Val NDCG@10: 0.029597 (BEST) | Time: 25.5s
Epoch  5/8 | Loss: 8.8881 | Val NDCG@10: 0.028898 | Time: 25.2s
Epoch  6/8 | Loss: 8.5869 | Val NDCG@10: 0.025032 | Time: 25.1s
Epoch  7/8 | Loss: 8.3668 | Val NDCG@10: 0.021629 | Time: 25.8s
Epoch  8/8 | Loss: 8.2326 | Val NDCG@10: 0.022400 | Time: 25.1s

Best Val NDCG@10: 0.029597, Total elapsed: 257.6s
Process Group PGID: 3073
</untrusted_context>
77

write_file experiment_v5.py

+58:05
Recorded reasoning summary 42 words

Improving NDCG Performance

My latest evaluation shows a continued upward trend, with Val NDCG@10 reaching 0.029597 at Epoch 4. This marks the best performance so far. The optimal model checkpoint has been saved for future use. I am now exploring further optimizations.

Recorded reasoning summary 49 words

Tackling Overfitting

I've identified a slight overfitting tendency past Epoch 4, as evidenced by the validation NDCG declining while training loss continues to drop. I'm now investigating techniques like increasing weight decay and dropout to improve generalization. Additionally, I'm considering expanding history sequence lengths to better capture user behavior.

Recorded reasoning summary 49 words

Optimizing Model Dynamics

I'm now considering how longer histories might enrich user profiles, potentially influencing the peak performance observed around Epoch 4. I'm also exploring cosine annealing with T_max=5 to encourage convergence in flatter minima, and adding a margin to Grade 3 item scores to further boost their ranking.

Tool callwrite_file/app/solution/experiment_v5.py Returned

Tool call · Input 

{
  "content": "import os\nimport sys\nimport time\nimport math\nimport subprocess\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nsys.path.append(\"/task\")\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, score_rankings\n\nDATA_DIR = Path(\"/task/data\")\nCUTOFF = 24786800  # train cutoff\nWEEK = 7 * 86400\nNUM_WEEKS = 8\nEMB_DIM = 128\nOUT_DIM = 128\nHIDDEN_DIM = 256\nBATCH_SIZE = 512\nNUM_NEGATIVES = 1024\nNUM_EPOCHS = 6\nLR = 5e-4\nWEIGHT_DECAY = 5e-4\nDROPOUT = 0.2\nTEMP = 0.05\nMARGIN_G3 = 0.15\nMAX_LEN_LIKES = 128\nMAX_LEN_ORG = 128\nMAX_LEN_ALL = 64\nMAX_LEN_DIS = 16\nHALF_LIFE_DAYS = 45.0\nLAMBDA_DECAY = math.log(2.0) / (HALF_LIFE_DAYS * 86400.0)\n\ntorch.set_num_threads(8)\ndevice = torch.device(\"cpu\")\n\nprint(\"--- Starting Two-Tower Experiment v5 (Dim 128, Margin, Stronger Reg) ---\")\nt_start = time.time()\n\n# 1. Load catalog and target users\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"candidate_catalog.parquet\")\nitem_ids = catalog.item_id.values\nitem2idx = {int(item): i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(item_ids)}\nN_ITEMS = len(item_ids)\n\n# 2. Load interaction logs\nlikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"train_likes.parquet\")\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"train_dislikes.parquet\")\nval_pref = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"validation_preference_state.parquet\")\n\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / \"target_users.parquet\")\ntarget_uids = targets_df.uid.values.astype(np.int64)\nuid2idx = {int(uid): i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}\nN_USERS = len(target_uids)\n\n# Item features\ncatalog_likes = likes[likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].groupby(\"item_id\").size().rename(\"likes_cnt\")\ncatalog_dislikes = dislikes[dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].groupby(\"item_id\").size().rename(\"dislikes_cnt\")\ncat_df = catalog.merge(catalog_likes, on=\"item_id\", how=\"left\").merge(catalog_dislikes, on=\"item_id\", how=\"left\").fillna(0)\n\npos_listens = cat_df.positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)\norg_listens = cat_df.organic_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)\npop_rank = cat_df.popularity_rank.values.astype(np.float32)\ncnt_likes = cat_df.likes_cnt.values.astype(np.float32)\ncnt_dislikes = cat_df.dislikes_cnt.values.astype(np.float32)\n\nfeat_pos = np.log1p(pos_listens) / np.log1p(pos_listens.max())\nfeat_org = np.log1p(org_listens) / np.log1p(org_listens.max())\nfeat_ratio = (org_listens + 1.0) / (pos_listens + 1.0)\nfeat_rank = 1.0 - (pop_rank / float(N_ITEMS))\nfeat_likes = np.log1p(cnt_likes) / np.log1p(cnt_likes.max())\nfeat_dis = np.log1p(cnt_dislikes) / (np.log1p(cnt_dislikes.max()) + 1e-5)\nfeat_like_dis_ratio = (cnt_likes + 1.0) / (cnt_likes + cnt_dislikes + 1.0)\n\nITEM_FEAT_DIM = 7\nitem_features = np.zeros((N_ITEMS + 1, ITEM_FEAT_DIM), dtype=np.float32)\nitem_features[1:, 0] = feat_pos\nitem_features[1:, 1] = feat_org\nitem_features[1:, 2] = feat_ratio\nitem_features[1:, 3] = feat_rank\nitem_features[1:, 4] = feat_likes\nitem_features[1:, 5] = feat_dis\nitem_features[1:, 6] = feat_like_dis_ratio\nitem_features_tensor = torch.from_numpy(item_features).float()\n\n# Filter events for target users\nlikes = likes[likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\nlikes[\"u_idx\"] = likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\nlikes[\"i_idx\"] = likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\ndislikes = dislikes[dislikes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\ndislikes[\"u_idx\"] = dislikes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\ndislikes[\"i_idx\"] = dislikes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\nt_history_start = CUTOFF - (NUM_WEEKS + 10) * WEEK\ntable = pq.read_table(\n    DATA_DIR / \"train_listens.parquet\",\n    columns=[\"uid\", \"item_id\", \"timestamp\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n    filters=[(\"timestamp\", \">=\", t_history_start)]\n)\nlistens = table.to_pandas()\nlistens = listens[listens.uid.isin(uid2idx) & listens.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()\nlistens[\"u_idx\"] = listens.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\nlistens[\"i_idx\"] = listens.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n\nuser_recent_pos = np.log1p(targets_df.recent_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32))\nuser_recent_pos /= user_recent_pos.max()\nuser_hist_pos = np.log1p(targets_df.history_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32))\nuser_hist_pos /= user_hist_pos.max()\n\n# First seen ts\nall_interactions = pd.concat([\n    likes[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]],\n    dislikes[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]],\n    listens[[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\", \"timestamp\"]]\n], ignore_index=True)\nfirst_seen = all_interactions.groupby([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"])[\"timestamp\"].min().reset_index()\nfirst_seen.rename(columns={\"timestamp\": \"first_ts\"}, inplace=True)\n\n# Helper to build user history\ndef build_user_history(at_ts, pref_df=None):\n    likes_sub = likes[likes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"]).copy()\n    dislikes_sub = dislikes[dislikes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"]).copy()\n    \n    t_min = at_ts - 60 * 86400\n    listens_sub = listens[(listens.timestamp >= t_min) & (listens.timestamp < at_ts)].sort_values([\"u_idx\", \"timestamp\"]).copy()\n    org_listens_sub = listens_sub[(listens_sub.is_organic == 1) & (listens_sub.played_ratio_pct >= 80)].copy()\n    \n    if pref_df is not None:\n        p_likes = pref_df[pref_df.state == \"liked\"][[\"uid\", \"item_id\"]].copy()\n        p_likes = p_likes[p_likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & p_likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\n        p_likes[\"u_idx\"] = p_likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\n        p_likes[\"i_idx\"] = p_likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n        p_likes[\"timestamp\"] = at_ts\n        \n        p_dis = pref_df[pref_df.state == \"disliked\"][[\"uid\", \"item_id\"]].copy()\n        p_dis = p_dis[p_dis.uid.isin(uid2idx) & p_dis.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\n        p_dis[\"u_idx\"] = p_dis.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)\n        p_dis[\"i_idx\"] = p_dis.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)\n        p_dis[\"timestamp\"] = at_ts\n        \n        likes_sub = pd.concat([likes_sub, p_likes], ignore_index=True).drop_duplicates([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], keep=\"last\")\n        dislikes_sub = pd.concat([dislikes_sub, p_dis], ignore_index=True).drop_duplicates([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], keep=\"last\")\n    \n    likes_sub[\"weight\"] = np.exp(-LAMBDA_DECAY * (at_ts - likes_sub[\"timestamp\"]).clip(lower=0)).astype(np.float32)\n    org_listens_sub[\"weight\"] = np.exp(-LAMBDA_DECAY * (at_ts - org_listens_sub[\"timestamp\"]).clip(lower=0)).astype(np.float32)\n    listens_sub[\"weight\"] = np.exp(-LAMBDA_DECAY * (at_ts - listens_sub[\"timestamp\"]).clip(lower=0)).astype(np.float32)\n    \n    mat_likes = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=np.int32)\n    w_likes = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=np.float32)\n    mat_org = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=np.int32)\n    w_org = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=np.float32)\n    mat_all = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=np.int32)\n    w_all = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=np.float32)\n    mat_dis = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=np.int32)\n    stats = np.zeros((N_USERS, 7), dtype=np.float32)\n    \n    tail_likes = likes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_LIKES)\n    for u, grp in tail_likes.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        w = grp[\"weight\"].values\n        mat_likes[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        w_likes[u, -len(w):] = w\n        \n    tail_org = org_listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_ORG)\n    for u, grp in tail_org.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        w = grp[\"weight\"].values\n        mat_org[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        w_org[u, -len(w):] = w\n        \n    tail_all = listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_ALL)\n    for u, grp in tail_all.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        w = grp[\"weight\"].values\n        mat_all[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        w_all[u, -len(w):] = w\n        \n    tail_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").tail(MAX_LEN_DIS)\n    for u, grp in tail_dis.groupby(\"u_idx\"):\n        itms = grp[\"i_idx\"].values\n        mat_dis[u, -len(itms):] = itms\n        \n    c_likes = likes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_org = org_listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    c_all = listens_sub.groupby(\"u_idx\").size()\n    \n    stats[c_likes.index, 0] = np.log1p(c_likes.values)\n    stats[c_dis.index, 1] = np.log1p(c_dis.values)\n    stats[c_org.index, 2] = np.log1p(c_org.values)\n    stats[c_all.index, 3] = np.log1p(c_all.values)\n    stats[:, 4] = (stats[:, 2] + 1.0) / (stats[:, 3] + 1.0)\n    stats[:, 5] = user_recent_pos\n    stats[:, 6] = user_hist_pos\n    \n    return {\n        \"likes\": torch.from_numpy(mat_likes).long(),\n        \"w_likes\": torch.from_numpy(w_likes).float(),\n        \"org\": torch.from_numpy(mat_org).long(),\n        \"w_org\": torch.from_numpy(w_org).float(),\n        \"all\": torch.from_numpy(mat_all).long(),\n        \"w_all\": torch.from_numpy(w_all).float(),\n        \"dis\": torch.from_numpy(mat_dis).long(),\n        \"stats\": torch.from_numpy(stats).float()\n    }\n\n# Build training windows\nwindow_histories = []\nall_pairs = []\n\nfor w in range(NUM_WEEKS):\n    w_cut = CUTOFF - (w + 1) * WEEK\n    w_end = w_cut + WEEK\n    w_hist = build_user_history(w_cut)\n    window_histories.append(w_hist)\n    \n    w_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= w_cut) & (likes.timestamp < w_end) & (likes.is_organic == 1)][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]]\n    w_listens = listens[(listens.timestamp >= w_cut) & (listens.timestamp < w_end) & (listens.is_organic == 1) & (listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]]\n    \n    w_likes = w_likes.merge(first_seen, on=[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], how=\"inner\")\n    w_likes = w_likes[w_likes.first_ts >= w_cut][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]].drop_duplicates()\n    w_likes[\"grade\"] = 3\n    \n    w_listens = w_listens.merge(first_seen, on=[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], how=\"inner\")\n    w_listens = w_listens[w_listens.first_ts >= w_cut][[\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"]].drop_duplicates()\n    w_listens[\"grade\"] = 1\n    \n    combined = pd.concat([w_listens, w_likes], ignore_index=True)\n    combined = combined.sort_values(\"grade\").drop_duplicates([\"u_idx\", \"i_idx\"], keep=\"last\")\n    combined[\"w_idx\"] = w\n    \n    for u, i, g in zip(combined.u_idx, combined.i_idx, combined.grade):\n        all_pairs.append((u, w, i, g))\n\nall_pairs = np.array(all_pairs, dtype=np.int32)\nval_user_history = build_user_history(CUTOFF, pref_df=val_pref)\n\n# User Tower\nclass UserTower(nn.Module):\n    def __init__(self, item_emb, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM, stats_dim=7, dropout=DROPOUT):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.item_emb = item_emb\n        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(\n            nn.Linear(emb_dim * 4 + stats_dim, hidden_dim),\n            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),\n            nn.GELU(),\n            nn.Dropout(dropout),\n            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)\n        )\n\n    def pool(self, item_ids, weights=None):\n        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, L, D)\n        mask = (item_ids > 0).float()  # (B, L)\n        if weights is not None:\n            mask = mask * weights\n        denom = mask.sum(dim=1, keepdim=True).clamp(min=1e-5)\n        return (emb * mask.unsqueeze(-1)).sum(dim=1) / denom\n\n    def forward(self, likes, w_likes, org, w_org, all_l, w_all, dis, stats):\n        h1 = self.pool(likes, w_likes)\n        h2 = self.pool(org, w_org)\n        h3 = self.pool(all_l, w_all)\n        h4 = self.pool(dis, None)\n        h = torch.cat([h1, h2, h3, h4, stats], dim=-1)\n        raw = self.mlp(h)\n        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)\n\nclass ItemTower(nn.Module):\n    def __init__(self, item_emb, feat_dim=ITEM_FEAT_DIM, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM, dropout=DROPOUT):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.item_emb = item_emb\n        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(\n            nn.Linear(emb_dim + feat_dim, hidden_dim),\n            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),\n            nn.GELU(),\n            nn.Dropout(dropout),\n            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)\n        )\n\n    def forward(self, item_ids, item_feats):\n        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, D)\n        h = torch.cat([emb, item_feats], dim=-1)\n        raw = self.mlp(h)\n        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)\n\n# Initialize\nshared_item_emb = nn.Embedding(N_ITEMS + 1, EMB_DIM, padding_idx=0)\nnn.init.normal_(shared_item_emb.weight, std=0.02)\nwith torch.no_grad():\n    shared_item_emb.weight[0].fill_(0.0)\n\nuser_tower = UserTower(shared_item_emb, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM, stats_dim=7, dropout=DROPOUT)\nitem_tower = ItemTower(shared_item_emb, ITEM_FEAT_DIM, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM, dropout=DROPOUT)\n\nall_params = list(user_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(item_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(shared_item_emb.parameters())\noptimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(all_params, lr=LR, weight_decay=WEIGHT_DECAY)\nscheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=NUM_EPOCHS)\n\nval_npz = np.load(DATA_DIR / \"validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nval_packed = val_npz[\"packed_eligible\"]\nval_item_ids = val_npz[\"item_ids\"]\nval_unpacked = np.unpackbits(val_packed, axis=1, count=N_ITEMS, bitorder=\"little\")\n\ntargets_set = set(target_uids)\neligibility_service = CandidateSet(DATA_DIR / \"validation_eligible_candidates.npz\")\nimport evaluate_public\nval_gold = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility_service, targets_set)\n\ndef evaluate_ranker():\n    user_tower.eval()\n    item_tower.eval()\n    with torch.no_grad():\n        all_ids = torch.arange(1, N_ITEMS + 1, dtype=torch.long)\n        all_feats = item_features_tensor[1:]\n        V = item_tower(all_ids, all_feats)\n        \n        U = user_tower(\n            val_user_history[\"likes\"],\n            val_user_history[\"w_likes\"],\n            val_user_history[\"org\"],\n            val_user_history[\"w_org\"],\n            val_user_history[\"all\"],\n            val_user_history[\"w_all\"],\n            val_user_history[\"dis\"],\n            val_user_history[\"stats\"]\n        )\n        \n        scores = torch.matmul(U, V.t()).numpy()\n        scores[val_unpacked == 0] = -1e9\n        \n        top100_idx = np.argsort(-scores, axis=1)[:, :100]\n        \n        ranked = {}\n        for r, uid in enumerate(target_uids):\n            ranked[int(uid)] = list(map(int, val_item_ids[top100_idx[r]]))\n            \n        return score_rankings(ranked, val_gold)\n\ninit_scores = evaluate_ranker()\nprint(f\"Initial score: {init_scores}\")\n\nN_PAIRS = len(all_pairs)\nSTEPS_PER_EPOCH = N_PAIRS // BATCH_SIZE\n\nbest_score = 0.0\n\nfor epoch in range(1, NUM_EPOCHS + 1):\n    t_epoch = time.time()\n    user_tower.train()\n    item_tower.train()\n    \n    perm = np.random.permutation(N_PAIRS)\n    total_loss = 0.0\n    \n    for step in range(STEPS_PER_EPOCH):\n        batch_idx = perm[step * BATCH_SIZE : (step + 1) * BATCH_SIZE]\n        batch = all_pairs[batch_idx]\n        b_u = batch[:, 0]\n        b_w = batch[:, 1]\n        b_i = batch[:, 2]\n        b_g = batch[:, 3]\n        \n        u_likes = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_w_likes = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=torch.float32)\n        u_org = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_w_org = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=torch.float32)\n        u_all = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_w_all = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=torch.float32)\n        u_dis = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=torch.long)\n        u_stats = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, 7), dtype=torch.float32)\n        \n        for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):\n            mask = (b_w == w)\n            if not np.any(mask):\n                continue\n            u_indices = torch.from_numpy(b_u[mask]).long()\n            w_h = window_histories[w]\n            u_likes[mask] = w_h[\"likes\"][u_indices]\n            u_w_likes[mask] = w_h[\"w_likes\"][u_indices]\n            u_org[mask] = w_h[\"org\"][u_indices]\n            u_w_org[mask] = w_h[\"w_org\"][u_indices]\n            u_all[mask] = w_h[\"all\"][u_indices]\n            u_w_all[mask] = w_h[\"w_all\"][u_indices]\n            u_dis[mask] = w_h[\"dis\"][u_indices]\n            u_stats[mask] = w_h[\"stats\"][u_indices]\n            \n        pos_ids = torch.from_numpy(b_i).long()\n        pos_feats = item_features_tensor[pos_ids]\n        \n        neg_ids = torch.randint(1, N_ITEMS + 1, (NUM_NEGATIVES,), dtype=torch.long)\n        neg_feats = item_features_tensor[neg_ids]\n        \n        u_vec = user_tower(u_likes, u_w_likes, u_org, u_w_org, u_all, u_w_all, u_dis, u_stats)\n        pos_vec = item_tower(pos_ids, pos_feats)\n        neg_vec = item_tower(neg_ids, neg_feats)\n        \n        # Diagonal positive scores with margin for Grade 3\n        margin = torch.from_numpy(np.where(b_g == 3, MARGIN_G3, 0.0)).float().unsqueeze(-1)\n        s_pos = ((u_vec * pos_vec).sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True) + margin) / TEMP\n        \n        # Sampled negative scores\n        s_neg = torch.matmul(u_vec, neg_vec.t()) / TEMP\n        \n        logits = torch.cat([s_pos, s_neg], dim=-1)\n        labels = torch.zeros(BATCH_SIZE, dtype=torch.long)\n        \n        weights = torch.from_numpy(np.where(b_g == 3, 7.0, 1.0)).float()\n        \n        loss_unweighted = F.cross_entropy(logits, labels, reduction=\"none\")\n        loss = (loss_unweighted * weights).mean()\n        \n        optimizer.zero_grad()\n        loss.backward()\n        nn.utils.clip_grad_norm_(all_params, 1.0)\n        optimizer.step()\n        \n        total_loss += loss.item()\n        \n    scheduler.step()\n    avg_loss = total_loss / STEPS_PER_EPOCH\n    val_scores = evaluate_ranker()\n    cur_score = val_scores['quality_ndcg@10']\n    if cur_score > best_score:\n        best_score = cur_score\n        marker = \" (BEST)\"\n        torch.save({\n            \"user_tower\": user_tower.state_dict(),\n            \"item_tower\": item_tower.state_dict(),\n            \"shared_item_emb\": shared_item_emb.state_dict()\n        }, \"/app/solution/best_model_val.pt\")\n    else:\n        marker = \"\"\n    print(f\"Epoch {epoch:2d}/{NUM_EPOCHS} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | Val NDCG@10: {cur_score:.6f}{marker} | Time: {time.time()-t_epoch:.1f}s\")\n\nprint(f\"\\nBest Val NDCG@10: {best_score:.6f}, Total elapsed: {time.time()-t_start:.1f}s\")\n",
  "instruction": "Create experiment_v5.py with dimension 128, margin for grade 3, and stronger regularization",
  "file_path": "/app/solution/experiment_v5.py"
}

Tool response 

Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/experiment_v5.py. Here is the updated code:
import os
import sys
import time
import math
import subprocess
from pathlib import Path

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F

sys.path.append("/task")
from ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, score_rankings

DATA_DIR = Path("/task/data")
CUTOFF = 24786800  # train cutoff
WEEK = 7 * 86400
NUM_WEEKS = 8
EMB_DIM = 128
OUT_DIM = 128
HIDDEN_DIM = 256
BATCH_SIZE = 512
NUM_NEGATIVES = 1024
NUM_EPOCHS = 6
LR = 5e-4
WEIGHT_DECAY = 5e-4
DROPOUT = 0.2
TEMP = 0.05
MARGIN_G3 = 0.15
MAX_LEN_LIKES = 128
MAX_LEN_ORG = 128
MAX_LEN_ALL = 64
MAX_LEN_DIS = 16
HALF_LIFE_DAYS = 45.0
LAMBDA_DECAY = math.log(2.0) / (HALF_LIFE_DAYS * 86400.0)

torch.set_num_threads(8)
device = torch.device("cpu")

print("--- Starting Two-Tower Experiment v5 (Dim 128, Margin, Stronger Reg) ---")
t_start = time.time()

# 1. Load catalog and target users
catalog = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "candidate_catalog.parquet")
item_ids = catalog.item_id.values
item2idx = {int(item): i + 1 for i, item in enumerate(item_ids)}
N_ITEMS = len(item_ids)

# 2. Load interaction logs
likes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "train_likes.parquet")
dislikes = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "train_dislikes.parquet")
val_pref = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "validation_preference_state.parquet")

targets_df = pd.read_parquet(DATA_DIR / "target_users.parquet")
target_uids = targets_df.uid.values.astype(np.int64)
uid2idx = {int(uid): i for i, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}
N_USERS = len(target_uids)

# Item features
catalog_likes = likes[likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].groupby("item_id").size().rename("likes_cnt")
catalog_dislikes = dislikes[dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].groupby("item_id").size().rename("dislikes_cnt")
cat_df = catalog.merge(catalog_likes, on="item_id", how="left").merge(catalog_dislikes, on="item_id", how="left").fillna(0)

pos_listens = cat_df.positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)
org_listens = cat_df.organic_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32)
pop_rank = cat_df.popularity_rank.values.astype(np.float32)
cnt_likes = cat_df.likes_cnt.values.astype(np.float32)
cnt_dislikes = cat_df.dislikes_cnt.values.astype(np.float32)

feat_pos = np.log1p(pos_listens) / np.log1p(pos_listens.max())
feat_org = np.log1p(org_listens) / np.log1p(org_listens.max())
feat_ratio = (org_listens + 1.0) / (pos_listens + 1.0)
feat_rank = 1.0 - (pop_rank / float(N_ITEMS))
feat_likes = np.log1p(cnt_likes) / np.log1p(cnt_likes.max())
feat_dis = np.log1p(cnt_dislikes) / (np.log1p(cnt_dislikes.max()) + 1e-5)
feat_like_dis_ratio = (cnt_likes + 1.0) / (cnt_likes + cnt_dislikes + 1.0)

ITEM_FEAT_DIM = 7
item_features = np.zeros((N_ITEMS + 1, ITEM_FEAT_DIM), dtype=np.float32)
item_features[1:, 0] = feat_pos
item_features[1:, 1] = feat_org
item_features[1:, 2] = feat_ratio
item_features[1:, 3] = feat_rank
item_features[1:, 4] = feat_likes
item_features[1:, 5] = feat_dis
item_features[1:, 6] = feat_like_dis_ratio
item_features_tensor = torch.from_numpy(item_features).float()

# Filter events for target users
likes = likes[likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
likes["u_idx"] = likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
likes["i_idx"] = likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)

dislikes = dislikes[dislikes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & dislikes.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
dislikes["u_idx"] = dislikes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
dislikes["i_idx"] = dislikes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)

t_history_start = CUTOFF - (NUM_WEEKS + 10) * WEEK
table = pq.read_table(
    DATA_DIR / "train_listens.parquet",
    columns=["uid", "item_id", "timestamp", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
    filters=[("timestamp", ">=", t_history_start)]
)
listens = table.to_pandas()
listens = listens[listens.uid.isin(uid2idx) & listens.item_id.isin(item2idx)].copy()
listens["u_idx"] = listens.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
listens["i_idx"] = listens.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)

user_recent_pos = np.log1p(targets_df.recent_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32))
user_recent_pos /= user_recent_pos.max()
user_hist_pos = np.log1p(targets_df.history_positive_listens.values.astype(np.float32))
user_hist_pos /= user_hist_pos.max()

# First seen ts
all_interactions = pd.concat([
    likes[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]],
    dislikes[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]],
    listens[["u_idx", "i_idx", "timestamp"]]
], ignore_index=True)
first_seen = all_interactions.groupby(["u_idx", "i_idx"])["timestamp"].min().reset_index()
first_seen.rename(columns={"timestamp": "first_ts"}, inplace=True)

# Helper to build user history
def build_user_history(at_ts, pref_df=None):
    likes_sub = likes[likes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"]).copy()
    dislikes_sub = dislikes[dislikes.timestamp < at_ts].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"]).copy()
    
    t_min = at_ts - 60 * 86400
    listens_sub = listens[(listens.timestamp >= t_min) & (listens.timestamp < at_ts)].sort_values(["u_idx", "timestamp"]).copy()
    org_listens_sub = listens_sub[(listens_sub.is_organic == 1) & (listens_sub.played_ratio_pct >= 80)].copy()
    
    if pref_df is not None:
        p_likes = pref_df[pref_df.state == "liked"][["uid", "item_id"]].copy()
        p_likes = p_likes[p_likes.uid.isin(uid2idx) & p_likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)]
        p_likes["u_idx"] = p_likes.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
        p_likes["i_idx"] = p_likes.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)
        p_likes["timestamp"] = at_ts
        
        p_dis = pref_df[pref_df.state == "disliked"][["uid", "item_id"]].copy()
        p_dis = p_dis[p_dis.uid.isin(uid2idx) & p_dis.item_id.isin(item2idx)]
        p_dis["u_idx"] = p_dis.uid.map(uid2idx).astype(np.int32)
        p_dis["i_idx"] = p_dis.item_id.map(item2idx).astype(np.int32)
        p_dis["timestamp"] = at_ts
        
        likes_sub = pd.concat([likes_sub, p_likes], ignore_index=True).drop_duplicates(["u_idx", "i_idx"], keep="last")
        dislikes_sub = pd.concat([dislikes_sub, p_dis], ignore_index=True).drop_duplicates(["u_idx", "i_idx"], keep="last")
    
    likes_sub["weight"] = np.exp(-LAMBDA_DECAY * (at_ts - likes_sub["timestamp"]).clip(lower=0)).astype(np.float32)
    org_listens_sub["weight"] = np.exp(-LAMBDA_DECAY * (at_ts - org_listens_sub["timestamp"]).clip(lower=0)).astype(np.float32)
    listens_sub["weight"] = np.exp(-LAMBDA_DECAY * (at_ts - listens_sub["timestamp"]).clip(lower=0)).astype(np.float32)
    
    mat_likes = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=np.int32)
    w_likes = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=np.float32)
    mat_org = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=np.int32)
    w_org = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=np.float32)
    mat_all = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=np.int32)
    w_all = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=np.float32)
    mat_dis = np.zeros((N_USERS, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=np.int32)
    stats = np.zeros((N_USERS, 7), dtype=np.float32)
    
    tail_likes = likes_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_LIKES)
    for u, grp in tail_likes.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        w = grp["weight"].values
        mat_likes[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        w_likes[u, -len(w):] = w
        
    tail_org = org_listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_ORG)
    for u, grp in tail_org.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        w = grp["weight"].values
        mat_org[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        w_org[u, -len(w):] = w
        
    tail_all = listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_ALL)
    for u, grp in tail_all.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        w = grp["weight"].values
        mat_all[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        w_all[u, -len(w):] = w
        
    tail_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby("u_idx").tail(MAX_LEN_DIS)
    for u, grp in tail_dis.groupby("u_idx"):
        itms = grp["i_idx"].values
        mat_dis[u, -len(itms):] = itms
        
    c_likes = likes_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_dis = dislikes_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_org = org_listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    c_all = listens_sub.groupby("u_idx").size()
    
    stats[c_likes.index, 0] = np.log1p(c_likes.values)
    stats[c_dis.index, 1] = np.log1p(c_dis.values)
    stats[c_org.index, 2] = np.log1p(c_org.values)
    stats[c_all.index, 3] = np.log1p(c_all.values)
    stats[:, 4] = (stats[:, 2] + 1.0) / (stats[:, 3] + 1.0)
    stats[:, 5] = user_recent_pos
    stats[:, 6] = user_hist_pos
    
    return {
        "likes": torch.from_numpy(mat_likes).long(),
        "w_likes": torch.from_numpy(w_likes).float(),
        "org": torch.from_numpy(mat_org).long(),
        "w_org": torch.from_numpy(w_org).float(),
        "all": torch.from_numpy(mat_all).long(),
        "w_all": torch.from_numpy(w_all).float(),
        "dis": torch.from_numpy(mat_dis).long(),
        "stats": torch.from_numpy(stats).float()
    }

# Build training windows
window_histories = []
all_pairs = []

for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):
    w_cut = CUTOFF - (w + 1) * WEEK
    w_end = w_cut + WEEK
    w_hist = build_user_history(w_cut)
    window_histories.append(w_hist)
    
    w_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= w_cut) & (likes.timestamp < w_end) & (likes.is_organic == 1)][["u_idx", "i_idx"]]
    w_listens = listens[(listens.timestamp >= w_cut) & (listens.timestamp < w_end) & (listens.is_organic == 1) & (listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)][["u_idx", "i_idx"]]
    
    w_likes = w_likes.merge(first_seen, on=["u_idx", "i_idx"], how="inner")
    w_likes = w_likes[w_likes.first_ts >= w_cut][["u_idx", "i_idx"]].drop_duplicates()
    w_likes["grade"] = 3
    
    w_listens = w_listens.merge(first_seen, on=["u_idx", "i_idx"], how="inner")
    w_listens = w_listens[w_listens.first_ts >= w_cut][["u_idx", "i_idx"]].drop_duplicates()
    w_listens["grade"] = 1
    
    combined = pd.concat([w_listens, w_likes], ignore_index=True)
    combined = combined.sort_values("grade").drop_duplicates(["u_idx", "i_idx"], keep="last")
    combined["w_idx"] = w
    
    for u, i, g in zip(combined.u_idx, combined.i_idx, combined.grade):
        all_pairs.append((u, w, i, g))

all_pairs = np.array(all_pairs, dtype=np.int32)
val_user_history = build_user_history(CUTOFF, pref_df=val_pref)

# User Tower
class UserTower(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, item_emb, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM, stats_dim=7, dropout=DROPOUT):
        super().__init__()
        self.item_emb = item_emb
        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(emb_dim * 4 + stats_dim, hidden_dim),
            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),
            nn.GELU(),
            nn.Dropout(dropout),
            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)
        )

    def pool(self, item_ids, weights=None):
        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, L, D)
        mask = (item_ids > 0).float()  # (B, L)
        if weights is not None:
            mask = mask * weights
        denom = mask.sum(dim=1, keepdim=True).clamp(min=1e-5)
        return (emb * mask.unsqueeze(-1)).sum(dim=1) / denom

    def forward(self, likes, w_likes, org, w_org, all_l, w_all, dis, stats):
        h1 = self.pool(likes, w_likes)
        h2 = self.pool(org, w_org)
        h3 = self.pool(all_l, w_all)
        h4 = self.pool(dis, None)
        h = torch.cat([h1, h2, h3, h4, stats], dim=-1)
        raw = self.mlp(h)
        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)

class ItemTower(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, item_emb, feat_dim=ITEM_FEAT_DIM, emb_dim=EMB_DIM, hidden_dim=HIDDEN_DIM, out_dim=OUT_DIM, dropout=DROPOUT):
        super().__init__()
        self.item_emb = item_emb
        self.mlp = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(emb_dim + feat_dim, hidden_dim),
            nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),
            nn.GELU(),
            nn.Dropout(dropout),
            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim)
        )

    def forward(self, item_ids, item_feats):
        emb = self.item_emb(item_ids)  # (B, D)
        h = torch.cat([emb, item_feats], dim=-1)
        raw = self.mlp(h)
        return F.normalize(raw, p=2, dim=-1)

# Initialize
shared_item_emb = nn.Embedding(N_ITEMS + 1, EMB_DIM, padding_idx=0)
nn.init.normal_(shared_item_emb.weight, std=0.02)
with torch.no_grad():
    shared_item_emb.weight[0].fill_(0.0)

user_tower = UserTower(shared_item_emb, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM, stats_dim=7, dropout=DROPOUT)
item_tower = ItemTower(shared_item_emb, ITEM_FEAT_DIM, EMB_DIM, HIDDEN_DIM, OUT_DIM, dropout=DROPOUT)

all_params = list(user_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(item_tower.mlp.parameters()) + list(shared_item_emb.parameters())
optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(all_params, lr=LR, weight_decay=WEIGHT_DECAY)
scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=NUM_EPOCHS)

val_npz = np.load(DATA_DIR / "validation_eligible_candidates.npz")
val_packed = val_npz["packed_eligible"]
val_item_ids = val_npz["item_ids"]
val_unpacked = np.unpackbits(val_packed, axis=1, count=N_ITEMS, bitorder="little")

targets_set = set(target_uids)
eligibility_service = CandidateSet(DATA_DIR / "validation_eligible_candidates.npz")
import evaluate_public
val_gold = evaluate_public.validation_truth(eligibility_service, targets_set)

def evaluate_ranker():
    user_tower.eval()
    item_tower.eval()
    with torch.no_grad():
        all_ids = torch.arange(1, N_ITEMS + 1, dtype=torch.long)
        all_feats = item_features_tensor[1:]
        V = item_tower(all_ids, all_feats)
        
        U = user_tower(
            val_user_history["likes"],
            val_user_history["w_likes"],
            val_user_history["org"],
            val_user_history["w_org"],
            val_user_history["all"],
            val_user_history["w_all"],
            val_user_history["dis"],
            val_user_history["stats"]
        )
        
        scores = torch.matmul(U, V.t()).numpy()
        scores[val_unpacked == 0] = -1e9
        
        top100_idx = np.argsort(-scores, axis=1)[:, :100]
        
        ranked = {}
        for r, uid in enumerate(target_uids):
            ranked[int(uid)] = list(map(int, val_item_ids[top100_idx[r]]))
            
        return score_rankings(ranked, val_gold)

init_scores = evaluate_ranker()
print(f"Initial score: {init_scores}")

N_PAIRS = len(all_pairs)
STEPS_PER_EPOCH = N_PAIRS // BATCH_SIZE

best_score = 0.0

for epoch in range(1, NUM_EPOCHS + 1):
    t_epoch = time.time()
    user_tower.train()
    item_tower.train()
    
    perm = np.random.permutation(N_PAIRS)
    total_loss = 0.0
    
    for step in range(STEPS_PER_EPOCH):
        batch_idx = perm[step * BATCH_SIZE : (step + 1) * BATCH_SIZE]
        batch = all_pairs[batch_idx]
        b_u = batch[:, 0]
        b_w = batch[:, 1]
        b_i = batch[:, 2]
        b_g = batch[:, 3]
        
        u_likes = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=torch.long)
        u_w_likes = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_LIKES), dtype=torch.float32)
        u_org = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=torch.long)
        u_w_org = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ORG), dtype=torch.float32)
        u_all = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=torch.long)
        u_w_all = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_ALL), dtype=torch.float32)
        u_dis = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, MAX_LEN_DIS), dtype=torch.long)
        u_stats = torch.empty((BATCH_SIZE, 7), dtype=torch.float32)
        
        for w in range(NUM_WEEKS):
            mask = (b_w == w)
            if not np.any(mask):
                continue
            u_indices = torch.from_numpy(b_u[mask]).long()
            w_h = window_histories[w]
            u_likes[mask] = w_h["likes"][u_indices]
            u_w_likes[mask] = w_h["w_likes"][u_indices]
            u_org[mask] = w_h["org"][u_indices]
            u_w_org[mask] = w_h["w_org"][u_indices]
            u_all[mask] = w_h["all"][u_indices]
            u_w_all[mask] = w_h["w_all"][u_indices]
            u_dis[mask] = w_h["dis"][u_indices]
            u_stats[mask] = w_h["stats"][u_indices]
            
        pos_ids = torch.from_numpy(b_i).long()
        pos_feats = item_features_tensor[pos_ids]
        
        neg_ids = torch.randint(1, N_ITEMS + 1, (NUM_NEGATIVES,), dtype=torch.long)
        neg_feats = item_features_tensor[neg_ids]
        
        u_vec = user_tower(u_likes, u_w_likes, u_org, u_w_org, u_all, u_w_all, u_dis, u_stats)
        pos_vec = item_tower(pos_ids, pos_feats)
        neg_vec = item_tower(neg_ids, neg_feats)
        
        # Diagonal positive scores with margin for Grade 3
        margin = torch.from_numpy(np.where(b_g == 3, MARGIN_G3, 0.0)).float().unsqueeze(-1)
        s_pos = ((u_vec * pos_vec).sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True) + margin) / TEMP
        
        # Sampled negative scores
        s_neg = torch.matmul(u_vec, neg_vec.t()) / TEMP
        
        logits = torch.cat([s_pos, s_neg], dim=-1)
        labels = torch.zeros(BATCH_SIZE, dtype=torch.long)
        
        weights = torch.from_numpy(np.where(b_g == 3, 7.0, 1.0)).float()
        
        loss_unweighted = F.cross_entropy(logits, labels, reduction="none")
        loss = (loss_unweighted * weights).mean()
        
        optimizer.zero_grad()
        loss.backward()
        nn.utils.clip_grad_norm_(all_params, 1.0)
        optimizer.step()
        
        total_loss += loss.item()
        
    scheduler.step()
    avg_loss = total_loss / STEPS_PER_EPOCH
    val_scores = evaluate_ranker()
    cur_score = val_scores['quality_ndcg@10']
    if cur_score > best_score:
        best_score = cur_score
        marker = " (BEST)"
        torch.save({
            "user_tower": user_tower.state_dict(),
            "item_tower": item_tower.state_dict(),
            "shared_item_emb": shared_item_emb.state_dict()
        }, "/app/solution/best_model_val.pt")
    else:
        marker = ""
    print(f"Epoch {epoch:2d}/{NUM_EPOCHS} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | Val NDCG@10: {cur_score:.6f}{marker} | Time: {time.time()-t_epoch:.1f}s")

print(f"\nBest Val NDCG@10: {best_score:.6f}, Total elapsed: {time.time()-t_start:.1f}s")
Recorded session usage
[
  {
    "messageId": "43fbe692-2738-46cf-b2a5-1f87500995a0",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:48:14.818Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 10136,
      "output": 73,
      "cached": 7656,
      "thoughts": 864,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 11073
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "979ad749-5af5-449b-bb19-940a4fd4e8c8",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:48:16.915Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 11125,
      "output": 94,
      "cached": 7681,
      "thoughts": 47,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 11266
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "f746922a-e495-4846-9454-e53e9952107c",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:48:19.670Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 15692,
      "output": 54,
      "cached": 7787,
      "thoughts": 34,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 15780
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "d4394c11-9722-43dc-81c5-2b8374f7def3",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:48:21.258Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 15893,
      "output": 42,
      "cached": 11670,
      "thoughts": 14,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 15949
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "e18c5a2d-e8fa-48c3-a2e5-afe94d8af1dd",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:48:24.333Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 16002,
      "output": 216,
      "cached": 11656,
      "thoughts": 70,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 16288
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "cd42439b-2d1a-4a18-9283-993a3ccd011e",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:48:26.699Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 16410,
      "output": 227,
      "cached": 11653,
      "thoughts": 18,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 16655
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "97a7de7a-fe7b-48fe-b611-02281bab44b4",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:48:29.622Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 16792,
      "output": 231,
      "cached": 11650,
      "thoughts": 19,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 17042
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "8e9e89f5-9b6a-44e6-af0e-469930288bb7",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:48:37.966Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 17731,
      "output": 279,
      "cached": 15554,
      "thoughts": 449,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 18459
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "e94dccab-8e1c-46e7-8366-a80b729411df",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:48:48.819Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 18638,
      "output": 131,
      "cached": 15572,
      "thoughts": 63,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 18832
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "ca4dd060-abab-424e-b217-9f704815cc06",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:48:59.022Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 18952,
      "output": 414,
      "cached": 7782,
      "thoughts": 1028,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 20394
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "331b0386-40c6-49be-9086-097067163f4c",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:49:04.163Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 20691,
      "output": 198,
      "cached": 15612,
      "thoughts": 118,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 21007
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "b3edf355-4342-48d1-a369-5eb8dd160928",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:49:09.490Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 21046,
      "output": 351,
      "cached": 15606,
      "thoughts": 106,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 21503
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "3b878d39-3e14-43a5-98ee-251e8f1359ee",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:49:20.600Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 21614,
      "output": 384,
      "cached": 19509,
      "thoughts": 124,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 22122
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "6934dad3-aa29-4ef1-94dd-122b449883cd",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:49:26.768Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 22182,
      "output": 427,
      "cached": 19511,
      "thoughts": 47,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 22656
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "7c442db6-b4ab-47eb-bfd1-7b3b22c650f7",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:50:58.188Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 22717,
      "output": 78,
      "cached": 19512,
      "thoughts": 1366,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 24161
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "672f4384-6fce-4aef-a248-f7d75d6e2220",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:51:06.047Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 24706,
      "output": 266,
      "cached": 19566,
      "thoughts": 43,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 25015
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "285de96c-9b97-4334-a913-ed6784b57677",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:51:22.618Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 25184,
      "output": 170,
      "cached": 19564,
      "thoughts": 1059,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 26413
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "97664034-e074-4410-b9c7-099cbdd073df",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:51:37.139Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 26462,
      "output": 126,
      "cached": 23505,
      "thoughts": 564,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 27152
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "df68c44f-2c28-46c4-b1e1-8d3f0c478af9",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:51:46.203Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 27207,
      "output": 240,
      "cached": 23512,
      "thoughts": 39,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 27486
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "706370a1-671b-4526-a94e-a86cbb4df7b2",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:51:50.293Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 27914,
      "output": 140,
      "cached": 23517,
      "thoughts": 51,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 28105
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "02193a96-cbf9-4c69-b3e6-3cdf243b6651",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:51:54.512Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 28234,
      "output": 108,
      "cached": 0,
      "thoughts": 47,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 28389
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "a81295c2-9214-4a16-adbc-349c37128711",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:52:04.108Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 28574,
      "output": 171,
      "cached": 23499,
      "thoughts": 487,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 29232
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "f49d853b-f73c-4cfd-9924-ca0eeccfe594",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:52:33.859Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 29338,
      "output": 76,
      "cached": 23506,
      "thoughts": 89,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 29503
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "2bb15117-e0d9-4652-8edd-a3e1934aff22",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:52:41.025Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 29867,
      "output": 255,
      "cached": 27422,
      "thoughts": 208,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 30330
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "3e069acb-4985-4853-957d-f86ff09a1aa8",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:52:53.119Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 30423,
      "output": 451,
      "cached": 27421,
      "thoughts": 291,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 31165
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "551c32b4-cb19-415d-8763-6d4b1d432d4f",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:53:02.210Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 31235,
      "output": 177,
      "cached": 27431,
      "thoughts": 84,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 31496
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "905b64e5-916c-4451-a871-6f38cf48308c",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:53:07.834Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 31562,
      "output": 189,
      "cached": 27421,
      "thoughts": 18,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 31769
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "b71f2fc4-e526-4916-9d8e-1f7be350f9c2",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:53:21.043Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 31809,
      "output": 412,
      "cached": 27409,
      "thoughts": 94,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 32315
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "d0e91872-e38f-4bbc-b3e4-79e49b0bf2ef",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:53:28.579Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 32658,
      "output": 444,
      "cached": 27420,
      "thoughts": 69,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 33171
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "91ed1243-c81e-4ec2-84e8-e21c84b06154",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:53:43.658Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 33237,
      "output": 463,
      "cached": 27420,
      "thoughts": 284,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 33984
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "937b0967-8a27-40c1-ab1a-c29dce05d453",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:54:03.671Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 34057,
      "output": 172,
      "cached": 31347,
      "thoughts": 1278,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 35507
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "16e765e6-39ce-4fac-8d9b-029ed9e06cea",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:54:18.140Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 35883,
      "output": 304,
      "cached": 31395,
      "thoughts": 84,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 36271
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "2a28f556-01bc-4078-882f-1758b955b2b9",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:54:29.836Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 36464,
      "output": 143,
      "cached": 31394,
      "thoughts": 447,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 37054
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "b716e0a1-9aaa-4948-9328-3ab6d3f33791",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:54:58.091Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 37095,
      "output": 238,
      "cached": 31396,
      "thoughts": 3176,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 40509
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "712cb3f7-4aac-4f04-9caf-3a97d25c0de4",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:55:15.741Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 40592,
      "output": 177,
      "cached": 0,
      "thoughts": 450,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 41219
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "08caeecd-5e92-45b9-9ce3-3cbbd64fb9ac",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:55:22.953Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 41268,
      "output": 330,
      "cached": 35427,
      "thoughts": 160,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 41758
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "cd271dbd-bfe4-454e-b1d8-05a677bdddd8",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:55:36.982Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 41836,
      "output": 296,
      "cached": 39361,
      "thoughts": 1236,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 43368
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "dbd51f6c-5362-4213-be9d-0fe9e18c038f",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:57:40.978Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 43444,
      "output": 187,
      "cached": 39395,
      "thoughts": 47,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 43678
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "44c17c46-5a65-4734-952c-63f9a3e2eeeb",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:58:03.169Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 43731,
      "output": 491,
      "cached": 39383,
      "thoughts": 1602,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 45824
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "dabdd759-2bf1-4749-b3d6-30f3bc940807",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:58:13.380Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 45935,
      "output": 469,
      "cached": 0,
      "thoughts": 144,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 46548
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "7e349514-3069-41b5-87c6-355402e03b4f",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:58:33.147Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 46636,
      "output": 530,
      "cached": 43378,
      "thoughts": 213,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 47379
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "5ce14d1b-b4e1-42e3-b0bf-7f77367271c0",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T05:59:05.935Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 47427,
      "output": 95,
      "cached": 43382,
      "thoughts": 43,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 47565
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "aedc250c-0044-41ad-9776-091b518963f7",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:00:02.181Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 47639,
      "output": 571,
      "cached": 0,
      "thoughts": 3139,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 51349
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "08bd845f-70c6-4cd7-b9ca-b8500478c685",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:00:57.552Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 51691,
      "output": 454,
      "cached": 47422,
      "thoughts": 204,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 52349
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "1977d976-1cf4-4d87-9fa2-bca8df047cd2",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:01:07.918Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 52412,
      "output": 375,
      "cached": 47422,
      "thoughts": 86,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 52873
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "69ea240e-ab49-4ed5-b04d-19f74a70a6aa",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:01:28.375Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 52930,
      "output": 257,
      "cached": 47416,
      "thoughts": 2065,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 55252
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "69ed6f8d-b4c4-4ad9-8cd0-438fbfbf90c9",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:07:54.850Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 55734,
      "output": 350,
      "cached": 0,
      "thoughts": 1462,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 57546
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "d63acfa3-c78b-41e7-b2c6-11493243f193",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:10:28.784Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 57581,
      "output": 846,
      "cached": 0,
      "thoughts": 45,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 58472
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "61f3707f-5d40-4714-8c9a-a5f8d235477a",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:11:49.858Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 58852,
      "output": 720,
      "cached": 55445,
      "thoughts": 886,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 60458
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "228d51a2-44c2-49dc-8332-d4c74a1e00eb",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:11:59.929Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 60515,
      "output": 393,
      "cached": 55473,
      "thoughts": 469,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 61377
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "e08d85d2-7a07-4ed0-9833-dc6cffaf7122",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:12:41.356Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 61443,
      "output": 677,
      "cached": 59440,
      "thoughts": 1844,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 63964
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "aa1e2df9-dafc-44c2-a414-0d1bb15cd4b6",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:15:10.767Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 64077,
      "output": 479,
      "cached": 0,
      "thoughts": 170,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 64726
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "aaf48a60-3624-4dc8-94cf-ec627e966a46",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:15:48.938Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 64774,
      "output": 132,
      "cached": 59493,
      "thoughts": 134,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 65040
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "9b9127c2-5370-400a-90fd-09880898585c",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:16:01.256Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 65085,
      "output": 526,
      "cached": 7930,
      "thoughts": 657,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 66268
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "44980553-3a70-419b-83cb-4ce018603598",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:16:20.861Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 66303,
      "output": 109,
      "cached": 63458,
      "thoughts": 1433,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 67845
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "c852b97d-c40b-44cf-a73d-14b6c5db8d8d",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:16:40.102Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 67886,
      "output": 933,
      "cached": 63481,
      "thoughts": 1014,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 69833
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "7aa4feb7-5d1b-49e3-bef8-38d39f1d7dc6",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:16:57.596Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 69944,
      "output": 668,
      "cached": 67487,
      "thoughts": 1095,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 71707
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "02d771e3-84c7-4c90-8e3d-13157850cfe9",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:17:16.889Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 71789,
      "output": 646,
      "cached": 67516,
      "thoughts": 763,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 73198
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "85fffb71-25e8-4682-bd1f-3e60f8767725",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:17:32.026Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 73270,
      "output": 360,
      "cached": 67535,
      "thoughts": 339,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 73969
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "7a624dc4-bce4-49c2-8617-31e1a6478d20",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:18:14.347Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 74015,
      "output": 5842,
      "cached": 71505,
      "thoughts": 542,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 80399
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "4149cd08-6f1c-4e0b-a34e-278daee62b5b",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:19:35.070Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 86205,
      "output": 52,
      "cached": 83751,
      "thoughts": 46,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 86303
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "c2adfbb9-cb6b-4868-abe9-7946579a2b99",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:24:50.289Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 87233,
      "output": 128,
      "cached": 83753,
      "thoughts": 921,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 88282
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "2bbeb12f-a425-4693-b917-a1babd6259cc",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:24:54.440Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 88388,
      "output": 322,
      "cached": 83754,
      "thoughts": 132,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 88842
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "0eaf48db-37b6-40d3-83b8-d5e57dee0dee",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:25:59.956Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 88948,
      "output": 5114,
      "cached": 7975,
      "thoughts": 1389,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 95451
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "d225d482-ae99-4694-93d4-40f1429066af",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:26:03.911Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 100528,
      "output": 49,
      "cached": 87974,
      "thoughts": 13,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 100590
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "2d2b7477-4f60-453e-822c-5118bd067940",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:30:42.472Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 101128,
      "output": 124,
      "cached": 7996,
      "thoughts": 584,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 101836
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "627a502f-a10a-42dc-bf6a-3bede1b58d8c",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:30:53.188Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 101879,
      "output": 336,
      "cached": 95954,
      "thoughts": 977,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 103192
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "71f74a79-b425-4417-b002-0f1277646a5c",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:31:01.329Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 103290,
      "output": 221,
      "cached": 99960,
      "thoughts": 359,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 103870
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "33888ca3-a703-43c0-967d-34b5ed23b734",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:31:18.801Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 104280,
      "output": 306,
      "cached": 99958,
      "thoughts": 1359,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 105945
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "218744d8-dd31-4258-9663-d6d45ac5682a",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:34:22.034Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 106019,
      "output": 6155,
      "cached": 7997,
      "thoughts": 912,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 113086
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "d5a0aba8-4829-4cb7-b15a-4064be7fa013",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:35:40.600Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 119210,
      "output": 49,
      "cached": 116245,
      "thoughts": 20,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 119279
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "1032789a-d1cc-467f-8a88-853352cf2e44",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:40:06.274Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 119832,
      "output": 122,
      "cached": 8016,
      "thoughts": 1478,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 121432
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "a321ecb2-6958-4374-869b-5f608ba6673b",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:40:40.643Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 121533,
      "output": 6849,
      "cached": 116240,
      "thoughts": 683,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 129065
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "e0ec631b-98f9-4fae-b8e5-2d7187a1b21e",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:40:54.647Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 135879,
      "output": 51,
      "cached": 120495,
      "thoughts": 14,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 135944
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "2ee41e67-0b55-49ae-9ebf-d4ad6153f804",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:46:12.499Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 136397,
      "output": 6881,
      "cached": 8032,
      "thoughts": 984,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 144262
    }
  },
  {
    "messageId": "8adb3c70-0c17-442b-9171-5cfa394cb99e",
    "timestamp": "2026-09-29T06:46:20.416Z",
    "model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
    "tokens": {
      "input": 151102,
      "output": 55,
      "cached": 8045,
      "thoughts": 29,
      "tool": 0,
      "total": 151186
    }
  }
]
About this recording

The full recorded conversation: task prompt, agent messages, thinking text when available, tool inputs and outputs, and harness context. Empty thinking entries are labeled unavailable, not reconstructed from tool calls. Disclosures change the view; they do not shorten the content. Any truncation already present in tool output is preserved.

Steps follow the recorded model messages and reasoning events. Tool results appear with their originating call. Elapsed time starts with the first recorded event and excludes verification.

Attempt
gemini-3-8-flash-high-base-fixed-r04-3d6fca60
Recorded model
gemini-3.8-flash
Harness version
0.61.0
Session
dba0c597-be5e-4d21-9528-8f7e6113aaef
Source SHA-256
f2036f137b5489d3e8289b431ec8524b1bd82caffcb585f2800fe1f0a621d0e0

Session bookkeeping and encrypted reasoning or signatures are excluded from the reading export. The harness’s system prompt is not present in this session archive.

Download textDownload JSON