Two-tower retriever gemini-3-8-flash-high-10
The full recorded conversation, expanded from start to finish: instructions, agent messages, and tool inputs and responses.
This recording includes 171 readable reasoning summaries, shown in full below.
No steps match this search. Try a different term or clear the search.
<session_context> This is the Gemini CLI. We are setting up the context for our chat. Today's date is Tuesday, September 29, 2026 (formatted according to the user's locale). My operating system is: linux The project's temporary directory is: /home/agent/.gemini/tmp/app
Showing up to 200 items (files + folders).
/app/ └───solution/
</session_context>
Build a two-tower neural network in CPU PyTorch for the "Made for You" shelf of a music streaming service. Although the supplied benchmark is small, it represents a production system with millions of users and millions of items; the training approach must scale to that setting and therefore must not construct or decompose a global user-item interaction matrix. The production shelf has a strict request-time latency budget. Candidate item embeddings are computed offline and stored in a nearest-neighbor index. At request time, the system computes one user embedding and retrieves items by maximum inner-product search.
The model must therefore decompose exactly into a user vector and an independently precomputable item vector of the same dimensionality, with the final relevance score equal to their dot product. Both vectors must be produced by separate trainable user and item towers implemented as PyTorch neural networks. The user tower must derive its representation from interaction history rather than a user-ID lookup. Per-user candidate eligibility, cutoff-specific explicit preference state, and a temporal backtest are provided. Candidate eligibility is platform-owned; all modeling within that candidate boundary is in scope.
All inputs are under /task/data/. Training data ends at timestamp 24786800. A 30-minute gap precedes a seven-day public validation window. The hidden test is the following seven-day window after another 30-minute gap.
For each event family there is a train_*.parquet and val_*.parquet file:
| Family | Meaning | Columns |
|---|---|---|
listens | Playback events | uid, timestamp, item_id, is_organic, played_ratio_pct, track_length_seconds |
likes | Explicit positive actions | uid, timestamp, item_id, is_organic |
dislikes | Explicit negative actions | uid, timestamp, item_id, is_organic |
unlikes | Reversal of a prior like | uid, timestamp, item_id, is_organic |
undislikes | Reversal of a prior dislike | uid, timestamp, item_id, is_organic |
is_organic=1 means the listener sought out the track; 0 means the action came through a recommendation surface. A listen is a conventional positive at 50% completion. The discovery-quality objective below uses the stronger 80% threshold.
The two public windows have different roles:
train_* as history and val_* as subsequent outcomes.train_* + val_*. At hidden-test time the validation events are observed history, not recommendable outcomes.Do not use val_* events as features when measuring a validation ranking. They may and should be used when refitting the final hidden-test ranker.
Additional files under /task/data/:
candidate_catalog.parquet: the 30,000 retrieval-catalog tracks, ordered by training positive-listen popularity.target_users.parquet: users with at least 20 positive listens in the 90 days before the training cutoff, selected without future labels.validation_preference_state.parquet: active explicit state at the training cutoff, for validation ranking.test_preference_state.parquet: active explicit state after validation, for the final hidden-test ranking. State is liked or disliked; a pair may have both active channels.validation_eligible_candidates.npz and test_eligible_candidates.npz: cutoff-correct candidate sets for every target user. Each contains aligned arrays uids, item_ids, and packed_eligible. For user row r, recover the Boolean item mask with np.unpackbits(packed_eligible[r], count=len(item_ids), bitorder="little").The exact available Python distribution inventory is listed in /task/requirements.txt. Future test interactions are hidden and used only by the separate Harbor verifier.
Rank only the candidates returned for the relevant cutoff. Relevance is based on organic behavior in the immediately following window:
If both positive events occur, grade 3 wins. Ranking quality is measured with graded NDCG@10. DCG uses gain 2^grade - 1 and discount 1/log2(rank + 1), then averages per-user NDCG over users with at least one relevant item.
The public evaluator reports this objective for development, but its score is not a separate acceptance stage. Final acceptance is determined on the hidden test using the same objective.
The Yambda logs contain interactions, not impression propensities. Treat the organic objective as a robust offline target, not as a causal estimate of online lift.
/task/evaluate_public.py scores a validation-stage ranking against the public window. Pass the path to a ranking with the same schema as the final deliverable:
python /task/evaluate_public.py solution/validation.parquetStage-independent evaluation helpers are available in /task/ranking_evaluation.py. The builder installs the same checked-in module in the public agent image and private verifier image so scoring mechanics cannot drift. The public copy contains no hidden labels, evaluator-owned data paths, or pass thresholds.
The public evaluator uses validation_eligible_candidates.npz; it is not a validator for the final artifact. No model implementation, fitted representation, or example submission is supplied. Design and tune the required PyTorch neural two-tower model, then refit the selected approach as described above.
Write /app/solution/submission.parquet or /app/solution/submission.csv, with exactly 100 rows for every target user and columns uid, item_id, rank. Ranks must be the integers 1-100 with no ties or duplicate items. Every submitted item must be present in that user's test_eligible_candidates.npz candidate set.
Leave the code that defines, trains, and applies both towers, along with a concise /app/solution/README.md, in /app/solution/. The README should state the model architecture, training objective, public validation score, and final submission command. Keep the best valid submission saved throughout the attempt so it survives the deadline.
/app/solution/./task/ and the installed Python environment as read-only.Analyzing Task Requirements
I'm now focusing on dissecting the prompt and evaluating the specifics of the task, ensuring I fully grasp the data schema and the intended evaluation metrics to guide my subsequent actions.
{
"strategic_intent": "Explore task files, understand data schema, evaluation logic, and environment constraints."
}Strategic Intent: Explore task files, understand data schema, evaluation logic, and environment constraints.{
"dir_path": "/task"
}Path not in workspace: Attempted path "/task" resolves outside the allowed workspace directories: /app or the project temp directory: /home/agent/.gemini/tmp/app{
"dir_path": "/task/data"
}Path not in workspace: Attempted path "/task/data" resolves outside the allowed workspace directories: /app or the project temp directory: /home/agent/.gemini/tmp/app{
"description": "List files in /task and /task/data",
"command": "ls -la /task && ls -la /task/data"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: total 36
dr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Sep 29 00:27 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Sep 29 00:30 ..
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 29 00:13 .keep
dr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Sep 29 00:14 data
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 5774 Sep 29 00:13 evaluate_public.py
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 8265 Sep 29 00:13 ranking_evaluation.py
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 1295 Sep 29 00:13 requirements.txt
total 347392
dr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Sep 29 00:14 .
dr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Sep 29 00:27 ..
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 349352 Sep 29 00:13 candidate_catalog.parquet
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 84127 Sep 29 00:13 target_users.parquet
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 7736341 Sep 29 00:13 test_eligible_candidates.npz
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 1092329 Sep 29 00:14 test_preference_state.parquet
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 857213 Sep 29 00:13 train_dislikes.parquet
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 5374652 Sep 29 00:13 train_likes.parquet
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 319183255 Sep 29 00:13 train_listens.parquet
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 155988 Sep 29 00:13 train_undislikes.parquet
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 1855885 Sep 29 00:13 train_unlikes.parquet
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 36571 Sep 29 00:13 val_dislikes.parquet
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 298484 Sep 29 00:13 val_likes.parquet
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 9947609 Sep 29 00:13 val_listens.parquet
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 7845 Sep 29 00:13 val_undislikes.parquet
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 72536 Sep 29 00:13 val_unlikes.parquet
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 7573821 Sep 29 00:13 validation_eligible_candidates.npz
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 1061761 Sep 29 00:14 validation_preference_state.parquet
Process Group PGID: 1612
</untrusted_context>{
"command": "cat /task/evaluate_public.py",
"description": "View evaluate_public.py"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: #!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Score a validation-stage ranking against public discovery labels.
``build_task.py`` publishes this module with the solver-visible task files. It
loads target users, validation eligibility, and validation-window events from
the adjacent ``data`` directory, then evaluates one ranking supplied on the
command line. Stage-independent mechanics come from the adjacent public
``ranking_evaluation.py`` module. The builder installs the same checked-in
module in the private judge, so public and private scoring mechanics cannot
drift. A relevant candidate receives grade 3 for an organic like or grade 1 for
an organic listen with at least 80 percent completion; a like takes precedence
when both events exist.
Before scoring, the ranking must contain exactly 100 distinct eligible items
for every target user, with integer-valued ``uid``, ``item_id``, and ``rank``
columns and ranks 1 through 100 exactly once per user. Extra columns are
ignored. Quality is graded NDCG@10, averaged only over users who have at least
one eligible relevant item in the validation window.
The evaluator prints a JSON object containing the model path and scores. It
does not apply the task's pass threshold; its purpose is model development and
selection. The private judge applies the threshold to the final submission.
Usage::
python evaluate_public.py <validation-ranking.parquet|csv>
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
import sys
from pathlib import Path
import pandas as pd
from ranking_evaluation import (
CandidateSet,
RankingValidationError,
ranked_items,
read_ranking,
score_rankings,
validate_ranking,
)
HERE = Path(__file__).resolve().parent
DATA = HERE / "data"
LISTEN_STRONG = 80
def validation_truth(
eligibility: CandidateSet, targets: set[int]
) -> dict[int, dict[int, int]]:
"""Build cutoff-correct graded relevance from public validation events.
Only target-user events for eligible candidates are retained. Organic
listens completed to at least 80 percent receive grade 1, and organic likes
receive grade 3. Repeated user-item events are collapsed, and processing
likes second ensures that grade 3 wins over grade 1.
Args:
eligibility: Validation-cutoff candidate membership service.
targets: Complete set of target user IDs.
Returns:
A nested ``uid -> item_id -> grade`` mapping. Users without an eligible
relevant event are omitted.
"""
listens = pd.read_parquet(DATA / "val_listens.parquet")
likes = pd.read_parquet(DATA / "val_likes.parquet")
strong = listens[
listens.uid.isin(targets)
& (listens.is_organic == 1)
& (listens.played_ratio_pct >= LISTEN_STRONG)
][["uid", "item_id"]].drop_duplicates()
organic_likes = likes[
likes.uid.isin(targets) & (likes.is_organic == 1)
][["uid", "item_id"]].drop_duplicates()
graded: dict[int, dict[int, int]] = {}
for raw_uid, raw_item in strong.itertuples(index=False, name=None):
uid, item = int(raw_uid), int(raw_item)
if eligibility.is_eligible(uid, item):
graded.setdefault(uid, {})[item] = 1
for raw_uid, raw_item in organic_likes.itertuples(index=False, name=None):
uid, item = int(raw_uid), int(raw_item)
if eligibility.is_eligible(uid, item):
graded.setdefault(uid, {})[item] = 3
return graded
def load_submission(
path: Path, eligibility: CandidateSet, targets: set[int]
) -> dict[int, list[int]]:
"""Load and validate a public validation ranking.
Files ending in ``.parquet`` are read as parquet; every other suffix is
read as CSV. The required columns must be integer-valued, cover exactly the
target-user set, contain 100 rows and ranks 1 through 100 per user, avoid
duplicate user-item pairs, and contain only cutoff-eligible items.
Args:
path: Ranking file to read.
eligibility: Validation-cutoff candidate membership service.
targets: Exact set of users the ranking must cover.
Returns:
A ``uid -> ranked item IDs`` mapping ordered by ascending rank.
Raises:
ValueError: If the ranking violates the required schema or invariants.
"""
frame = validate_ranking(read_ranking(path), targets)
if not all(
eligibility.is_eligible(uid, item)
for uid, item in frame[["uid", "item_id"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None)
):
raise RankingValidationError(
"submission contains an item rejected by eligibility service"
)
return ranked_items(frame)
def score(
ranked: dict[int, list[int]],
graded: dict[int, dict[int, int]],
) -> dict[str, float | int]:
"""Aggregate per-user NDCG@10 over users with public relevance labels.
Args:
ranked: Ranked item IDs for every target user.
graded: Eligible validation relevance keyed by user and item.
Returns:
The six-decimal ``quality_ndcg@10`` value and number of scored users.
"""
return score_rankings(ranked, graded)
def main() -> None:
"""Run the public evaluator CLI and print its JSON score report."""
targets_frame = pd.read_parquet(DATA / "target_users.parquet")
targets = set(targets_frame.uid.astype(int))
eligibility = CandidateSet(DATA / "validation_eligible_candidates.npz")
graded = validation_truth(eligibility, targets)
if len(sys.argv) != 2:
raise SystemExit(
"usage: evaluate_public.py <validation-ranking.parquet|csv>"
)
path = Path(sys.argv[1])
ranked = load_submission(path, eligibility, targets)
print(json.dumps({"model": str(path), "scores": score(ranked, graded)}, indent=2))
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Process Group PGID: 1625
</untrusted_context>{
"command": "cat /task/ranking_evaluation.py",
"description": "View ranking_evaluation.py"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: """Shared public primitives for Yambda discovery-ranking evaluation.
Both the solver-visible validation evaluator and the private submission judge
import this module from the generated task's ``public`` directory. It owns the
stage-independent contract: reading a ranking, validating its shape, converting
it to per-user rank order, looking up packed candidate eligibility, and
computing graded NDCG@10.
The module deliberately contains no event-derived labels, private artifact
paths, or pass thresholds. Each evaluator supplies its own relevance data and
per-cutoff eligibility checks around these common operations.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
__all__ = [
"CandidateSet",
"QUALITY_K",
"RankingValidationError",
"REQUIRED_COLUMNS",
"TOP_N",
"ndcg_at_k",
"ranked_items",
"read_ranking",
"score_rankings",
"validate_ranking",
]
TOP_N = 100
QUALITY_K = 10
REQUIRED_COLUMNS = ("uid", "item_id", "rank")
class RankingValidationError(ValueError):
"""Report a ranking-schema or structural-contract violation."""
class CandidateSet:
"""Provide membership lookups over one packed candidate-set archive.
The archive contains aligned ``uids``, ``item_ids``, and
``packed_eligible`` arrays. Candidate column ``c`` is represented by bit
``c % 8`` of byte ``c // 8`` using little-endian bit order. Arrays are
copied into memory so they remain valid after the archive is closed.
"""
def __init__(self, path: Path):
"""Load an eligibility archive and build ID-to-position indexes.
Args:
path: Path to a ``.npz`` archive with the candidate-set schema.
"""
with np.load(path, allow_pickle=False) as artifact:
self.uids = artifact["uids"].astype(np.int64, copy=True)
self.item_ids = artifact["item_ids"].astype(np.int64, copy=True)
self.packed = artifact["packed_eligible"].astype(np.uint8, copy=True)
self.uid_row = {int(uid): row for row, uid in enumerate(self.uids)}
self.item_column = {
int(item): column for column, item in enumerate(self.item_ids)
}
def is_eligible(self, uid: int, item_id: int) -> bool:
"""Return whether ``item_id`` is eligible for ``uid``.
IDs absent from the target-user or candidate-item arrays are treated as
ineligible rather than raising an exception.
Args:
uid: Target user ID to query.
item_id: Candidate item ID to query.
Returns:
``True`` only when the corresponding packed eligibility bit is set.
"""
row = self.uid_row.get(int(uid))
column = self.item_column.get(int(item_id))
if row is None or column is None:
return False
byte, bit = divmod(column, 8)
return bool((int(self.packed[row, byte]) >> bit) & 1)
def read_ranking(path: Path) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Read a parquet or CSV ranking into a pandas frame.
Args:
path: Input path. A ``.parquet`` suffix selects parquet; every other
suffix is interpreted as CSV.
Returns:
The ranking frame as loaded by pandas.
"""
return pd.read_parquet(path) if path.suffix == ".parquet" else pd.read_csv(path)
def validate_ranking(
frame: pd.DataFrame,
targets: set[int],
) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Normalize and validate the stage-independent ranking contract.
Required values must be finite integers. The user set must exactly match
``targets``; every user must have 100 rows, distinct items, and each rank
from 1 through 100 exactly once. Cutoff-specific candidate eligibility is
intentionally left to the calling evaluator.
Args:
frame: Raw ranking frame. Extra columns are discarded from an internal
copy; the caller's frame is not modified.
targets: Exact set of target user IDs the ranking must cover.
Returns:
A normalized frame containing only the required ``int64`` columns.
Raises:
RankingValidationError: If the ranking violates the shared contract.
"""
required = list(REQUIRED_COLUMNS)
if not all(column in frame for column in required):
raise RankingValidationError(f"submission requires columns {required}")
normalized = frame[required].copy()
for column in required:
numeric = pd.to_numeric(normalized[column], errors="coerce")
values = numeric.to_numpy(dtype=float)
if numeric.isna().any() or not np.isfinite(values).all():
raise RankingValidationError(
f"submission {column} must be finite numeric values"
)
if not np.equal(numeric, np.floor(numeric)).all():
raise RankingValidationError(
f"submission {column} must contain integers"
)
normalized[column] = numeric.astype(np.int64)
submitted_users = set(map(int, normalized.uid.unique()))
if submitted_users != targets:
raise RankingValidationError(
f"submission user set mismatch: missing={len(targets - submitted_users)} "
f"extra={len(submitted_users - targets)}"
)
counts = normalized.groupby("uid").size()
if not (counts == TOP_N).all():
raise RankingValidationError(
f"submission must contain exactly {TOP_N} rows for every target user"
)
if normalized.duplicated(["uid", "item_id"]).any():
raise RankingValidationError(
"submission contains duplicate (uid, item_id) pairs"
)
valid_ranks = set(range(1, TOP_N + 1))
ranks_are_valid = normalized.groupby("uid")["rank"].apply(
lambda values: set(map(int, values)) == valid_ranks
)
if not ranks_are_valid.all():
raise RankingValidationError(
f"each user must have every rank from 1 through {TOP_N} exactly once"
)
return normalized
def ranked_items(frame: pd.DataFrame) -> dict[int, list[int]]:
"""Convert a validated ranking frame to ordered items keyed by user.
Args:
frame: Frame that has passed :func:`validate_ranking`.
Returns:
A ``uid -> item IDs`` mapping ordered by ascending rank.
"""
ordered = frame.sort_values(["uid", "rank"])
return {
int(uid): list(map(int, values))
for uid, values in ordered.groupby("uid").item_id
}
def ndcg_at_k(ranked: list[int], gold: dict[int, int], k: int) -> float:
"""Compute graded normalized discounted cumulative gain at ``k``.
Relevance gain is ``2**grade - 1`` and the discount at one-based rank
``r`` is ``1 / log2(r + 1)``. Items absent from ``gold`` have grade zero.
Args:
ranked: Item IDs in predicted rank order.
gold: Mapping from relevant item IDs to integer relevance grades.
k: Maximum number of predicted positions to score.
Returns:
For a valid duplicate-free ranking, NDCG in ``[0, 1]``; returns
``0.0`` when the ideal gain is zero.
"""
gains = np.asarray([gold.get(item, 0) for item in ranked[:k]], dtype=np.float64)
discounts = 1.0 / np.log2(np.arange(2, len(gains) + 2))
dcg = float(np.sum((np.power(2.0, gains) - 1.0) * discounts))
ideal = np.asarray(sorted(gold.values(), reverse=True)[:k], dtype=np.float64)
ideal_discounts = 1.0 / np.log2(np.arange(2, len(ideal) + 2))
idcg = float(np.sum((np.power(2.0, ideal) - 1.0) * ideal_discounts))
return dcg / idcg if idcg else 0.0
def score_rankings(
ranked: dict[int, list[int]],
graded: dict[int, dict[int, int]],
) -> dict[str, float | int]:
"""Aggregate per-user NDCG@10 over users with relevance labels.
Args:
ranked: Ranked item IDs for every target user.
graded: Relevant item grades keyed by user and item.
Returns:
The six-decimal ``quality_ndcg@10`` value and number of scored users.
"""
quality = float(
np.mean(
[
ndcg_at_k(ranked[uid], gold, QUALITY_K)
for uid, gold in graded.items()
]
)
)
return {
"quality_ndcg@10": round(quality, 6),
"quality_users": len(graded),
}
Process Group PGID: 1628
</untrusted_context>{
"command": "cat /task/requirements.txt",
"description": "View requirements.txt"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: # Exact distribution inventory for the Yambda two-tower task family.
#
# This is an input to `uv pip sync`, not a list of minimum requirements. A
# conforming task environment contains exactly these third-party Python
# distributions and no others. Python itself is pinned by task.toml and both
# Harbor image Dockerfiles.
attrs==26.1.0
bleach==6.4.0
certifi==2026.7.22
chardet==7.6.0
charset-normalizer==3.5.1
fastjsonschema==2.22.2
filelock==3.32.3
fsspec==2026.7.0
idna==3.18
Jinja2==3.1.6
joblib==1.5.3
jsonschema==4.26.0
jsonschema-specifications==2025.9.1
jupyter-core==5.9.1
jupytext==1.19.5
kaggle==2.2.4
kagglesdk==0.1.37
markdown-it-py==4.2.0
MarkupSafe==3.0.3
mdit-py-plugins==0.6.1
mdurl==0.1.2
mpmath==1.3.0
nbformat==5.11.1
networkx==3.6.1
numpy==2.2.6
packaging==26.3
pandas==2.3.3
pillow==12.3.0
pip==26.0.1
platformdirs==4.11.3
protobuf==7.35.1
pyarrow==18.1.0
python-dateutil==2.9.0.post0
python-dotenv==1.2.3
python-slugify==8.0.4
pytz==2026.3.post1
PyYAML==6.0.3
referencing==0.37.0
reportlab==4.2.5
requests==2.34.2
rpds-py==2026.6.3
scikit-learn==1.7.2
scipy==1.15.3
setuptools==84.0.0
six==1.17.0
sympy==1.14.0
text-unidecode==1.3
threadpoolctl==3.6.0
torch==2.8.0
tqdm==4.70.0
traitlets==5.16.1
typing-extensions==4.16.0
tzdata==2026.3
urllib3==2.7.0
webencodings==0.6.1
Process Group PGID: 1631
</untrusted_context>{
"command": "lscpu && free -h && df -h",
"description": "Check CPU and memory resources"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Address sizes: 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 8
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-7
Vendor ID: AuthenticAMD
Model name: AMD EPYC 7R13 Processor
CPU family: 25
Model: 1
Thread(s) per core: 2
Core(s) per socket: 4
Socket(s): 1
Stepping: 1
BogoMIPS: 5299.99
Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid extd_apicid aperfmperf tsc_known_freq pni pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm cmp_legacy cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch topoext ssbd ibrs ibpb stibp vmmcall fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 invpcid rdseed adx smap clflushopt clwb sha_ni xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 clzero xsaveerptr rdpru wbnoinvd arat npt nrip_save vaes vpclmulqdq rdpid
Hypervisor vendor: KVM
Virtualization type: full
L1d cache: 128 KiB (4 instances)
L1i cache: 128 KiB (4 instances)
L2 cache: 2 MiB (4 instances)
L3 cache: 16 MiB (1 instance)
NUMA node(s): 1
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-7
Vulnerability Gather data sampling: Not affected
Vulnerability Ghostwrite: Not affected
Vulnerability Indirect target selection: Not affected
Vulnerability Itlb multihit: Not affected
Vulnerability L1tf: Not affected
Vulnerability Mds: Not affected
Vulnerability Meltdown: Not affected
Vulnerability Mmio stale data: Not affected
Vulnerability Old microcode: Not affected
Vulnerability Reg file data sampling: Not affected
Vulnerability Retbleed: Not affected
Vulnerability Spec rstack overflow: Mitigation; Safe RET
Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Mitigation; Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl
Vulnerability Spectre v1: Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
Vulnerability Spectre v2: Mitigation; Retpolines; IBPB conditional; IBRS_FW; STIBP always-on; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS Not affected; BHI Not affected
Vulnerability Srbds: Not affected
Vulnerability Tsa: Mitigation; Clear CPU buffers
Vulnerability Tsx async abort: Not affected
Vulnerability Vmscape: Not affected
/usr/bin/bash: line 4: free: command not found
Exit Code: 127
Process Group PGID: 1634
</untrusted_context>{
"command": "cat /proc/meminfo | head -n 5 && df -h",
"description": "Check memory and disk space"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: MemTotal: 15988972 kB
MemFree: 1272528 kB
MemAvailable: 14362104 kB
Buffers: 249500 kB
Cached: 12512984 kB
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
overlay 96G 14G 83G 15% /
tmpfs 64M 0 64M 0% /dev
shm 64M 0 64M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/root 96G 14G 83G 15% /etc/hosts
tmpfs 7.7G 0 7.7G 0% /proc/acpi
tmpfs 7.7G 0 7.7G 0% /proc/scsi
tmpfs 7.7G 0 7.7G 0% /sys/firmware
Process Group PGID: 1638
</untrusted_context>{
"description": "Check python version and path",
"command": "python3 --version && which python3"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Python 3.12.13
/opt/task-venv/bin/python3
Process Group PGID: 1655
</untrusted_context>{
"description": "Check /app/solution contents",
"command": "ls -la /app/solution"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: total 8
drwxr-xr-x 2 agent agent 4096 Sep 29 00:27 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 agent agent 4096 Sep 29 00:27 ..
Process Group PGID: 1659
</untrusted_context>Analyzing Prompt Requirements
I'm focusing on understanding the core prompt, particularly the need to construct a two-tower neural network. My immediate next step involves a thorough examination of the provided data files, including their dimensions and content, to inform this architectural decision.
Designing User & Item Towers
I'm now focused on designing separate PyTorch user and item towers. The user tower will process interaction history to generate embeddings, ensuring scalability and avoiding global matrices. The item tower will also produce independent embeddings.
Processing Data Features
I'm now detailing the features within the training data, distinguishing between sequential event types like listens and explicit feedback such as likes/dislikes. I am also noting the candidate catalog and user targeting parameters.
Defining Evaluation Metrics
I am now clearly defining the discovery objective and evaluation metrics. The focus is on ranking candidates based on immediate organic behavior, grading relevance by likes and listen percentages. I will implement the DCG gain and discount calculations for NDCG@10.
{
"description": "Explore catalog, targets, pref states, and eligibility",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd, numpy as np\ntargets = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')\nprint('Target users count:', len(targets), targets.columns.tolist())\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\nprint('Catalog count:', len(catalog), catalog.columns.tolist())\nval_pref = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet')\nprint('Val pref state count:', len(val_pref), val_pref.columns.tolist(), val_pref.head(3))\ntest_pref = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/test_preference_state.parquet')\nprint('Test pref state count:', len(test_pref), test_pref.columns.tolist(), test_pref.head(3))\nval_elig = np.load('/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz')\nprint('Val elig keys:', val_elig.files, 'uids:', len(val_elig['uids']), 'items:', len(val_elig['item_ids']), 'packed shape:', val_elig['packed_eligible'].shape)\ntest_elig = np.load('/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz')\nprint('Test elig keys:', test_elig.files, 'uids:', len(test_elig['uids']), 'items:', len(test_elig['item_ids']), 'packed shape:', test_elig['packed_eligible'].shape)\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Target users count: 8456 ['uid', 'recent_positive_listens', 'history_positive_listens']
Catalog count: 30000 ['item_id', 'positive_listens', 'organic_positive_listens', 'popularity_rank']
Val pref state count: 469124 ['uid', 'item_id', 'state'] uid item_id state
0 100 410868 liked
1 100 732449 liked
2 100 982903 liked
Test pref state count: 484776 ['uid', 'item_id', 'state'] uid item_id state
0 100 410868 liked
1 100 732449 liked
2 100 982903 liked
Val elig keys: ['uids', 'item_ids', 'packed_eligible'] uids: 8456 items: 30000 packed shape: (8456, 3750)
Test elig keys: ['uids', 'item_ids', 'packed_eligible'] uids: 8456 items: 30000 packed shape: (8456, 3750)
Process Group PGID: 1662
</untrusted_context>Analyzing Data Loads
I'm currently examining the event data within the train_*.parquet and val_*.parquet files to determine row counts. This is to better understand the scale of our dataset beyond the initial catalog and user estimates, aiming for a comprehensive view of the incoming information.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\nfor name in ['train_listens', 'train_likes', 'train_dislikes', 'train_unlikes', 'train_undislikes',\n 'val_listens', 'val_likes', 'val_dislikes', 'val_unlikes', 'val_undislikes']:\n df = pd.read_parquet(f'/task/data/{name}.parquet')\n print(f'{name}: shape={df.shape}, cols={list(df.columns)}')\n\"",
"description": "Inspect row counts of all event tables"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: train_listens: shape=(43484159, 6), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct', 'track_length_seconds']
train_likes: shape=(814831, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
train_dislikes: shape=(101075, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
train_unlikes: shape=(292665, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
train_undislikes: shape=(19960, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
val_listens: shape=(1501697, 6), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct', 'track_length_seconds']
val_likes: shape=(37795, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
val_dislikes: shape=(3563, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
val_unlikes: shape=(9346, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
val_undislikes: shape=(606, 4), cols=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic']
Process Group PGID: 1685
</untrusted_context>Assessing Data Scale
I'm currently evaluating the sheer volume of our training data, train_listens, which is an immense 43 million records. My focus is on understanding its memory footprint and load time, and I'm beginning to investigate the distribution of distinct users within this dataset.
{
"description": "Check target users range and content",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\nt = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')\nprint('target users min max:', t.uid.min(), t.uid.max(), len(t))\nprint(t.head(5))\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: target users min max: 100 1000000 8456
uid recent_positive_listens history_positive_listens
0 100 844.0 2604
1 200 50.0 286
2 300 168.0 359
3 600 1985.0 2423
4 700 1776.0 6114
Process Group PGID: 1705
</untrusted_context>Investigating User Diversity
I'm currently exploring the composition of the train_listens dataset. My focus is on determining if non-target users are present and quantifying their proportion relative to the target user subset. I'm aiming for an efficient method to assess this without necessarily loading the entire dataset into memory.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nschema = pq.read_schema('/task/data/train_listens.parquet')\nprint('Schema:', schema)\ntable_meta = pq.read_metadata('/task/data/train_listens.parquet')\nprint('Num row groups:', table_meta.num_row_groups)\nprint('Num rows:', table_meta.num_rows)\n\"",
"description": "Check parquet metadata for train_listens"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Schema: uid: uint32
timestamp: uint32
item_id: uint32
is_organic: uint8
played_ratio_pct: uint16
track_length_seconds: uint32
-- schema metadata --
pandas: '{"index_columns": [], "column_indexes": [], "columns": [{"name":' + 797
Num row groups: 42
Num rows: 43484159
Process Group PGID: 1721
</untrusted_context>Checking User Counts
I'm currently investigating the cardinality of train_listens and target_users. My next step is to execute a test query using either pyarrow or duckdb/pandas to obtain these counts. I'll first verify which of these libraries is readily available.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport time\n\nt0 = time.time()\ntargets = set(pq.read_table('/task/data/target_users.parquet', columns=['uid'])['uid'].to_pylist())\nprint(f'Loaded {len(targets)} targets in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s')\n\nt0 = time.time()\n# Check unique users in a few row groups\nrg0 = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid'], row_groups=[0])\nuids = set(rg0['uid'].to_pylist())\nprint(f'RG 0 num rows: {len(rg0)}, unique uids: {len(uids)}, overlap with targets: {len(uids & targets)}')\n\"",
"description": "Check user distribution in train_listens row group 0"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 12, in <module>
TypeError: read_table() got an unexpected keyword argument 'row_groups'
Loaded 8456 targets in 1.03s
Exit Code: 1
Process Group PGID: 1732
</untrusted_context>{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport time\n\nt0 = time.time()\ntargets = set(pq.read_table('/task/data/target_users.parquet', columns=['uid'])['uid'].to_pylist())\n\npf = pq.ParquetFile('/task/data/train_listens.parquet')\nprint('Num row groups:', pf.num_row_groups)\nrg0 = pf.read_row_group(0, columns=['uid'])\nuids = set(rg0['uid'].to_pylist())\nprint(f'RG 0 num rows: {len(rg0)}, unique uids: {len(uids)}, overlap with targets: {len(uids & targets)}')\n\"",
"description": "Check user overlap in train_listens row group 0"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Num row groups: 42
RG 0 num rows: 1048576, unique uids: 242, overlap with targets: 221
Process Group PGID: 1748
</untrusted_context>Investigating uid distribution
I've noticed an incredibly low number of unique UIDs within row group 0, with a significant majority identified as targets. This strongly suggests the file is either sorted or grouped by UID. I'll now proceed to verify the sorting of train_listens to confirm this hypothesis.
{
"description": "Check if train_listens is sorted by uid",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\npf = pq.ParquetFile('/task/data/train_listens.parquet')\nfor i in range(min(5, pf.num_row_groups)):\n rg = pf.read_row_group(i, columns=['uid', 'timestamp'])\n u = rg['uid'].to_numpy()\n ts = rg['timestamp'].to_numpy()\n print(f'RG {i}: rows={len(u)}, uid_min={u.min()}, uid_max={u.max()}, sorted_uid={(u[:-1] <= u[1:]).all()}')\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: RG 0: rows=1048576, uid_min=100, uid_max=26500, sorted_uid=True
RG 1: rows=1048576, uid_min=26500, uid_max=50300, sorted_uid=True
RG 2: rows=1048576, uid_min=50300, uid_max=73100, sorted_uid=True
RG 3: rows=1048576, uid_min=73100, uid_max=98200, sorted_uid=True
RG 4: rows=1048576, uid_min=98200, uid_max=122600, sorted_uid=True
Process Group PGID: 1770
</untrusted_context>{
"description": "Count total unique uids in train_listens",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\npf = pq.ParquetFile('/task/data/train_listens.parquet')\ntotal_uids = set()\nfor i in range(pf.num_row_groups):\n rg = pf.read_row_group(i, columns=['uid'])\n total_uids.update(rg['uid'].to_pylist())\nprint(f'Total unique uids in train_listens: {len(total_uids)}')\ntargets = set(pq.read_table('/task/data/target_users.parquet', columns=['uid'])['uid'].to_pylist())\nprint(f'Targets in train_listens: {len(targets & total_uids)} / {len(targets)}')\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Total unique uids in train_listens: 9238
Targets in train_listens: 8456 / 8456
Process Group PGID: 1783
</untrusted_context>Analyzing User and Target Data
I'm observing a surprisingly small number of unique users and that all targets are contained within the training set. I'm now curious about the total number of items in the catalog and need to identify their specific IDs.
{
"description": "Inspect candidate catalog details",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\nprint('Catalog item_id min/max/count:', catalog.item_id.min(), catalog.item_id.max(), len(catalog))\nprint('Popularity rank min/max:', catalog.popularity_rank.min(), catalog.popularity_rank.max())\nprint(catalog.head(10))\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Catalog item_id min/max/count: 206 9390294 30000
Popularity rank min/max: 1 30000
item_id positive_listens organic_positive_listens popularity_rank
0 5862961 26615 20620 1
1 6901374 25536 17347 2
2 5635052 24691 17194 3
3 3542184 24075 17699 4
4 9378983 24036 18195 5
5 5463340 22746 17398 6
6 8213481 22505 17071 7
7 906358 22238 17183 8
8 2859641 18380 13704 9
9 3033749 16682 12267 10
Process Group PGID: 1799
</untrusted_context>{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport numpy as np\n\nfor name in ['validation_eligible_candidates.npz', 'test_eligible_candidates.npz']:\n data = np.load(f'/task/data/{name}')\n packed = data['packed_eligible']\n item_ids = data['item_ids']\n uids = data['uids']\n # compute number of 1 bits per row\n counts = np.unpackbits(packed, axis=1, count=len(item_ids), bitorder='little').sum(axis=1)\n print(f'{name}: min_eligible={counts.min()}, max_eligible={counts.max()}, mean_eligible={counts.mean():.1f}, total_users={len(uids)}')\n\"",
"description": "Check eligible count per user"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: validation_eligible_candidates.npz: min_eligible=24657, max_eligible=30000, mean_eligible=29067.3, total_users=8456
test_eligible_candidates.npz: min_eligible=24552, max_eligible=30000, mean_eligible=29041.3, total_users=8456
Process Group PGID: 1816
</untrusted_context>Investigating Ineligibility
I'm currently examining the factors contributing to item ineligibility for users. The initial data suggests a consistent pattern, with a small but significant portion of items being excluded. My next step is to delve into the validation_ logs to pinpoint the exact reasons behind this exclusion.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\npref = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet')\nprint('Preference state shape:', pref.shape)\nprint('States:', pref.state.value_counts())\nprint(pref.head(10))\n\"",
"description": "Inspect validation_preference_state"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Preference state shape: (469124, 3)
States: state
liked 418435
disliked 50689
Name: count, dtype: int64
uid item_id state
0 100 410868 liked
1 100 732449 liked
2 100 982903 liked
3 100 1730273 liked
4 100 2621343 liked
5 100 3535902 liked
6 100 3633039 liked
7 100 4099299 liked
8 100 4221787 liked
9 100 4927727 disliked
Process Group PGID: 1826
</untrusted_context>Testing Popularity Baselines
I'm currently focused on establishing a baseline using a simple popularity metric. My next step is to code a small script to generate this baseline and then evaluate its validation performance.
{
"description": "Check catalog sorting and item id alignment",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\ntargets_frame = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\nelig = np.load('/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz')\n\n# Catalog items are already sorted by popularity rank (1 to 30000)\n# Let's check catalog order\nprint('Catalog sorted by popularity_rank?', (catalog.popularity_rank.to_numpy() == np.arange(1, len(catalog)+1)).all())\n\n# Check alignment of elig['item_ids'] with catalog['item_id']\ncatalog_items = catalog['item_id'].to_numpy()\nelig_items = elig['item_ids']\nprint('Catalog item_ids match elig item_ids?', np.array_equal(catalog_items, elig_items))\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Catalog sorted by popularity_rank? True
Catalog item_ids match elig item_ids? True
Process Group PGID: 1844
</untrusted_context>Testing Popularity Rankings
I'm currently exploring the impact of aligning popularity rankings between my catalog and eligibility datasets. I've confirmed their identical ordering and sorting by rank. Next, I'll generate a popularity ranking for validation purposes and proceed to run evaluate_public.py to observe the results.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\ntargets_frame = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')\nelig = np.load('/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz')\nuids = elig['uids']\nitem_ids = elig['item_ids']\npacked = elig['packed_eligible']\n\nrows = []\nfor r in range(len(uids)):\n uid = uids[r]\n mask = np.unpackbits(packed[r], count=len(item_ids), bitorder='little')\n top_items = item_ids[mask == 1][:100]\n for rank, item in enumerate(top_items, 1):\n rows.append((uid, item, rank))\n\ndf = pd.DataFrame(rows, columns=['uid', 'item_id', 'rank'])\ndf.to_parquet('/app/solution/validation_pop.parquet')\nprint('Saved validation_pop.parquet, shape:', df.shape)\n\" && python3 /task/evaluate_public.py /app/solution/validation_pop.parquet",
"description": "Evaluate popularity baseline on validation set"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Saved validation_pop.parquet, shape: (845600, 3)
{
"model": "/app/solution/validation_pop.parquet",
"scores": {
"quality_ndcg@10": 0.01071,
"quality_users": 4263
}
}
Process Group PGID: 1861
</untrusted_context>Establishing Quality Baseline
My current focus is on validating the quality baseline. I've successfully established the quality_ndcg@10 metric at 0.01071 for 4,263 users. The system is running and validating as expected. Next, I'll confirm the alignment of item IDs within the test eligibility set.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\ntest_elig = np.load('/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz')\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\nprint('Test elig item_ids match catalog?', np.array_equal(test_elig['item_ids'], catalog['item_id'].to_numpy()))\nprint('Test elig uids match target uids?', np.array_equal(test_elig['uids'], pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'].to_numpy()))\n\"",
"description": "Check test eligibility array alignment"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Test elig item_ids match catalog? True
Test elig uids match target uids? True
Process Group PGID: 1895
</untrusted_context>Confirming Data Integrity
My recent analysis confirms that test_elig['item_ids'] perfectly aligns with both catalog['item_id'] and validation_eligible_candidates.npz['item_ids']. Furthermore, test_elig['uids'] has been validated against target_users.parquet. With these checks complete, I am proceeding to generate a baseline submission.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\n\ntest_elig = np.load('/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz')\nuids = test_elig['uids']\nitem_ids = test_elig['item_ids']\npacked = test_elig['packed_eligible']\n\nrows = []\nfor r in range(len(uids)):\n uid = uids[r]\n mask = np.unpackbits(packed[r], count=len(item_ids), bitorder='little')\n top_items = item_ids[mask == 1][:100]\n for rank, item in enumerate(top_items, 1):\n rows.append((uid, item, rank))\n\ndf = pd.DataFrame(rows, columns=['uid', 'item_id', 'rank'])\ndf.to_parquet('/app/solution/submission.parquet')\nprint('Initial valid baseline submission saved:', df.shape)\n\"",
"description": "Save initial valid baseline submission"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Initial valid baseline submission saved: (845600, 3)
Process Group PGID: 1912
</untrusted_context>{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\nfrom ranking_evaluation import validate_ranking, CandidateSet, read_ranking, RankingValidationError\n\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'].astype(int))\nelig = CandidateSet('/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz')\nsub = read_ranking('/app/solution/submission.parquet')\nframe = validate_ranking(sub, targets)\nprint('Structural validation passed! Checking eligibility...')\nfor uid, item in frame[['uid', 'item_id']].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n if not elig.is_eligible(uid, item):\n raise RankingValidationError(f'Ineligible item {item} for user {uid}')\nprint('All 845,600 user-item pairs are eligible!')\n\"",
"description": "Validate initial baseline submission"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 3, in <module>
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ranking_evaluation'
Exit Code: 1
Process Group PGID: 1923
</untrusted_context>{
"description": "Validate initial submission with PYTHONPATH=/task",
"command": "PYTHONPATH=/task python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\nfrom ranking_evaluation import validate_ranking, CandidateSet, read_ranking, RankingValidationError\n\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'].astype(int))\nelig = CandidateSet('/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz')\nsub = read_ranking('/app/solution/submission.parquet')\nframe = validate_ranking(sub, targets)\nprint('Structural validation passed! Checking eligibility...')\nfor uid, item in frame[['uid', 'item_id']].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n if not elig.is_eligible(uid, item):\n raise RankingValidationError(f'Ineligible item {item} for user {uid}')\nprint('All 845,600 user-item pairs are eligible!')\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 7, in <module>
File "/task/ranking_evaluation.py", line 98, in read_ranking
return pd.read_parquet(path) if path.suffix == ".parquet" else pd.read_csv(path)
^^^^^^^^^^^
AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'suffix'
Exit Code: 1
Process Group PGID: 1934
</untrusted_context>{
"command": "PYTHONPATH=/task python3 -c \"\nfrom pathlib import Path\nimport pandas as pd\nfrom ranking_evaluation import validate_ranking, CandidateSet, read_ranking, RankingValidationError\n\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'].astype(int))\nelig = CandidateSet(Path('/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz'))\nsub = read_ranking(Path('/app/solution/submission.parquet'))\nframe = validate_ranking(sub, targets)\nprint('Structural validation passed! Checking eligibility...')\nfor uid, item in frame[['uid', 'item_id']].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n if not elig.is_eligible(uid, item):\n raise RankingValidationError(f'Ineligible item {item} for user {uid}')\nprint('All 845,600 user-item pairs are eligible!')\n\"",
"description": "Validate initial submission with Path object"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Structural validation passed! Checking eligibility...
All 845,600 user-item pairs are eligible!
Process Group PGID: 1950
</untrusted_context>Creating README file
I've confirmed the submission file meets all validator requirements. My current focus is on generating a minimal README.md within /app/solution/, ensuring it adheres to the specified content and structure from the outset.
{
"file_path": "/app/solution/README.md",
"content": "# Two-Tower Neural Ranker\n\n## Architecture\nTwo-tower PyTorch neural network ranker with user tower and item tower.\nRelevance score = dot product between user vector and item vector.\n\n## Training Objective\nIn-progress baseline.\n\n## Public Validation Score\nBaseline popularity: 0.010710\n\n## Final Submission Command\n`python /app/solution/train_and_predict.py`\n"
}Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/README.md. Here is the updated code:
# Two-Tower Neural Ranker
## Architecture
Two-tower PyTorch neural network ranker with user tower and item tower.
Relevance score = dot product between user vector and item vector.
## Training Objective
In-progress baseline.
## Public Validation Score
Baseline popularity: 0.010710
## Final Submission Command
`python /app/solution/train_and_predict.py`
Model text
I have initialized the fallback baseline submission (submission.parquet) and a preliminary README.md.
Now let's proceed with research and system design for the two-tower model. Let's enter Plan Mode to carefully analyze:
Let's call enter_plan_mode.
{
"reason": "Formulate comprehensive architectural design and implementation plan for the two-tower PyTorch neural ranker."
}Switching to Plan mode.{
"strategic_intent": "Deep dive into data statistics, feature extraction, two-tower neural architecture, and training pipeline."
}Strategic Intent: Deep dive into data statistics, feature extraction, two-tower neural architecture, and training pipeline.Analyzing System Constraints
I'm currently dissecting the core requirements, specifically focusing on building a two-tower neural network within a CPU PyTorch environment for a music streaming service's 'Made for You' shelf, while also considering the implications of the provided benchmark representing a production system.
Refining Two-Tower Architecture
I'm zeroing in on how to scale training for millions of users and items without a global matrix, ensuring request-time latency by precomputing item embeddings and only computing user embeddings on the fly. The model needs independent user and item towers, each outputting vectors of the same dimensionality for dot product scoring. The user tower will rely on interaction history, not just IDs.
Defining Data Splits
I'm now solidifying the data splits. Training will use data up to 24786800, followed by a 30-minute gap and a 7-day validation window. The hidden test set will follow a similar pattern, utilizing observed validation events as history. I'm also noting the candidate catalog size and target user count.
Evaluating Item Features
I'm now examining the available item features within the candidate catalog, specifically positive_listens, organic_positive_listens, and popularity_rank. I'm also investigating if track lengths are present in the listens data, as this could inform how item embeddings are learned alongside track IDs and other item attributes.
Implementing Item Embeddings
I'm confirming that the item tower can indeed leverage nn.Embedding for the 30,000 catalog items. Precomputing these item vectors offline is highly efficient, allowing for rapid retrieval during inference. I'm now shifting focus to how the user tower will derive its representation from interaction history.
{
"description": "Analyze preference state and likes/dislikes distributions",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\npref = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet')\nprint('Val pref stats per user:')\npref_user_counts = pref.groupby(['uid', 'state']).size().unstack(fill_value=0)\nprint(pref_user_counts.describe())\n\nlikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_likes.parquet')\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_dislikes.parquet')\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'])\n\nt_likes = likes[likes.uid.isin(targets)]\nt_dislikes = dislikes[dislikes.uid.isin(targets)]\nprint(f'Train likes for targets: {len(t_likes)}, unique users: {t_likes.uid.nunique()}')\nprint(f'Train dislikes for targets: {len(t_dislikes)}, unique users: {t_dislikes.uid.nunique()}')\n\""
}Tool "run_shell_command" not found. Did you mean one of: "update_topic", "grep_search", "replace"?Exploring Plan Mode
I've identified that run_shell_command is currently absent from the available tools within Plan Mode. My current focus is on understanding the full scope of what is accessible, noting replace, exit_plan_mode, glob, invoke_agent, read_file, and list_directory as present options.
Discovering Missing Tools
My exploration of Plan Mode continues. I've noted the addition of grep_search, update_topic, and write_file to the available tools. This is particularly important as I've also realized that interactive ask_user functionality, which is crucial for the "Consult" phase outlined in the rules, is explicitly unavailable in this non-interactive environment.
Identifying Plan Mode Capabilities
I've confirmed the following tools are accessible within Plan Mode: replace, exit_plan_mode, glob, invoke_agent, read_file, list_directory, grep_search, update_topic, and write_file. Notably, run_shell_command is absent, and interactive ask_user functionality is unavailable, necessitating independent judgment.
{
"dir_path": "/home/agent/.gemini/tmp/app/c8321455-c473-4e52-a372-e5d48d82e44e/plans"
}Directory /home/agent/.gemini/tmp/app/c8321455-c473-4e52-a372-e5d48d82e44e/plans is empty.Analyzing Target Users
I'm currently examining the target_users.parquet dataset, which contains 8,456 users, each with a minimum of 20 positive listens in the 90 days prior to the training cutoff. This data will be crucial for understanding the user base.
Processing Training Data
I'm now integrating the various training interaction datasets. Specifically, I'm analyzing the train_listens.parquet with over 43 million entries, and combining it with the likes, dislikes, unlikes, and undislikes data to build a comprehensive user interaction profile.
Refining Evaluation Metrics
My focus has shifted to refining evaluation. I'm noting that listens with >= 80% completion will be graded 1, while organic likes receive a grade 3. Likes will supersede listens, and NDCG@10 is now being calculated specifically for target users with at least one relevant candidate in the window.
Developing Model Architecture
I'm now focusing on architectural design. This involves mapping item IDs and building the item tower as a PyTorch neural network. The user tower will also be a separate trainable network, deriving its representation from interaction history rather than a simple user ID lookup, with scores computed via dot product.
Designing Item Tower
I'm mapping item IDs and building the item tower. The plan is to normalize item embeddings, potentially using L2 normalization or a learnable temperature scaling, as this approach works well for two-tower retrieval models and aligns with the dot product scoring mechanism.
Incorporating User History
I'm now exploring how to represent user history for the user tower, focusing on explicit preferences like likes and dislikes, along with detailed listen history including played ratio, organic status, and recency. The goal is to process this rich data into a single, effective user embedding.
Synthesizing User Representations
I'm now combining various interaction signals to form the user embedding. This involves a weighted average of item embeddings from recent positive interactions and a representation of negative preferences, followed by a multi-layer perceptron to integrate these features with user statistics.
Optimizing User Vector Computation
I'm finalizing the user vector generation process. The chosen architecture, utilizing ReLU, Linear, and LayerNorm followed by L2 normalization, efficiently derives user representations solely from interaction history, ensuring effective handling of cold-start scenarios and rapid evaluation.
Generating Training Pairs
I'm now defining the core training examples. For each user, I'm temporally splitting their interaction history to create user-history/positive-item pairs, using recent interactions as targets to mimic future predictions. I'm also considering including hard or explicit negatives to enrich the training process.
Organizing Training Data
I'm now focused on organizing the interaction data for training and validation. This involves checking timestamp ranges within train_listens and train_likes to ensure proper temporal splitting of user histories, accounting for interactions spanning multiple months.
{
"content": "# Plan: Latency-Efficient PyTorch Two-Tower Neural Ranker\n\n## Objective\nBuild, tune, and deploy a latency-efficient two-tower PyTorch neural ranker for music track retrieval and ranking.\nThe ranker must:\n1. Decompose strictly into independent user and item towers producing embeddings of identical dimensionality $d$.\n2. Compute relevance scores via the dot product: $s(u, i) = \\mathbf{u}^\\top \\mathbf{v}_i$.\n3. Compute item embeddings $\\mathbf{v}_i$ offline and compute the user embedding $\\mathbf{u}$ from interaction history (not a user-ID lookup).\n4. Rank cutoff-eligible candidates for each target user to maximize graded NDCG@10 on the discovery objective (grade 3 for organic like, grade 1 for organic listen $\\ge 80\\%$).\n5. Validate on the public validation window using `train_*` as history and tuning hyperparameters to maximize public NDCG@10.\n6. Refit the tuned model on `train_* + val_*` with updated `test_preference_state.parquet` to produce the final `/app/solution/submission.parquet`.\n7. Deliver clean code and `/app/solution/README.md`.\n\n---\n\n## Key Files & Context\n- `/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet`: 30,000 retrieval-catalog items with popularity ranks.\n- `/task/data/target_users.parquet`: 8,456 target users.\n- `/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz`: packed eligibility bitmasks for validation.\n- `/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz`: packed eligibility bitmasks for test.\n- `/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet` / `test_preference_state.parquet`: active liked/disliked items.\n- `/task/data/train_*.parquet` and `val_*.parquet`: listens, likes, dislikes, unlikes, undislikes.\n- `/task/evaluate_public.py` & `/task/ranking_evaluation.py`: ground truth metric calculation (graded NDCG@10).\n- Final deliverable: `/app/solution/submission.parquet` (columns: `uid`, `item_id`, `rank` 1..100) and `/app/solution/README.md`.\n\n---\n\n## Technical Architecture & Modeling Design\n\n### 1. Item Tower\n- **Input:** Catalog item index $i \\in \\{0, \\dots, 29999\\}$ and item features (log popularity, organic ratio).\n- **Network:**\n - Item embedding layer: `nn.Embedding(num_items, embed_dim)`.\n - Item feature projection: `nn.Linear(num_item_features, feature_dim)`.\n - Fusion MLP: `Linear -> LayerNorm -> GELU -> Linear -> LayerNorm`.\n - L2-normalization (or learned scale) so that inner product represents normalized cosine similarity with temperature.\n- **Offline Precomputation:**\n - Precompute all 30,000 item vectors in a single tensor $\\mathbf{V} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{30000 \\times d}$.\n\n### 2. User Tower\n- **Input:**\n - Derived entirely from user interaction history (no `nn.Embedding(num_users, ...)`):\n 1. **Liked items:** List of item IDs from active preference state and organic likes.\n 2. **Disliked items:** List of item IDs from active preference state and dislikes.\n 3. **Recent listens:** Sequence / bag of recently listened items, with completion weights ($w = \\text{played\\_ratio\\_pct} / 100 \\times (1 + \\text{is\\_organic})$) and exponential recency time decay $\\exp(-\\lambda \\Delta t)$.\n 4. **Aggregate user features:** Number of listens, liked count, disliked count, mean played ratio, organic listen proportion.\n- **Network:**\n - Shared or projected item embedding table to embed history items.\n - Attentive / weighted average pooling:\n - $\\mathbf{h}_{\\text{liked}} = \\text{WeightedMean}(\\mathbf{E}[\\text{liked}])$\n - $\\mathbf{h}_{\\text{listens}} = \\sum_k w_k \\mathbf{E}[\\text{listen}_k] / \\sum_k w_k$\n - $\\mathbf{h}_{\\text{disliked}} = \\text{Mean}(\\mathbf{E}[\\text{disliked}])$\n - User projection MLP:\n - Input: $[\\mathbf{h}_{\\text{liked}}, \\mathbf{h}_{\\text{listens}}, \\mathbf{h}_{\\text{disliked}}, \\mathbf{x}_{\\text{user\\_stats}}]$\n - MLP: `Linear -> LayerNorm -> GELU -> Dropout -> Linear -> LayerNorm -> L2-normalize`.\n - Output: User vector $\\mathbf{u} \\in \\mathbb{R}^d$.\n\n### 3. Training Strategy & Loss Function\n- **Sample Construction:**\n - Temporal training split:\n - Split training history before timestamp $T_{\\text{train\\_split}} = 24786800 - 604800$ (7 days before train cutoff).\n - Features are computed from events before $T_{\\text{train\\_split}}$.\n - Positive labels are organic likes (grade 3) and organic listens $\\ge 80\\%$ (grade 1) occurring between $T_{\\text{train\\_split}}$ and $24786800$.\n - Can also use multiple sliding window slices or positive pairs weighted by discovery grade.\n- **Loss:**\n - Graded sampled softmax / InfoNCE loss with temperature $\\tau$:\n $$\\mathcal{L} = -\\sum_{i \\in \\mathcal{P}_u} w_i \\log \\frac{\\exp(\\mathbf{u}^\\top \\mathbf{v}_i / \\tau)}{\\sum_{j \\in \\mathcal{N}_u \\cup \\{i\\}} \\exp(\\mathbf{u}^\\top \\mathbf{v}_j / \\tau)}$$\n where $w_i = 3.0$ for likes and $1.0$ for strong listens.\n - In-batch negatives + sampled catalog negatives (popularity-aware) + user's explicit dislikes as hard negatives (with negative margin or penalty).\n - Temperature $\\tau \\approx 0.07 - 0.1$.\n - Optimizer: AdamW with cosine learning rate schedule, weight decay for regularization.\n\n---\n\n## Implementation Steps\n\n### Step 1: Fast Feature Extraction & Dataset Builder\n- Create `data_prep.py`:\n - Efficiently parse target users, catalog, preference states.\n - Extract user interaction histories (listens, likes, dislikes) before a specified cutoff timestamp.\n - Weight interactions by recency and completion ratio.\n - Build train dataset (pre-cutoff history $\\rightarrow$ target window organic actions).\n\n### Step 2: Two-Tower PyTorch Model Definition\n- Create `model.py`:\n - `ItemTower(num_items, embed_dim, out_dim)`\n - `UserTower(num_items, embed_dim, out_dim, ...)`\n - `TwoTowerModel` wrapping both towers, ensuring strict decomposition.\n - Forward methods for training (batch loss) and inference (compute user vectors, precompute item vectors).\n\n### Step 3: Retrieval, Eligibility Filtering & Evaluation Script\n- Create `retrieval.py`:\n - Input: User embeddings $\\mathbf{U} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{N \\times d}$, precomputed item embeddings $\\mathbf{V} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{M \\times d}$, candidate eligibility bitmasks.\n - Fast matrix multiplication $\\mathbf{S} = \\mathbf{U} \\mathbf{V}^\\top \\in \\mathbb{R}^{N \\times M}$.\n - Mask out ineligible items ($S_{u, i} = -\\infty$ for ineligible bits).\n - Efficiently extract top 100 items per user using `torch.topk` or `np.argpartition`.\n - Format into pandas DataFrame `(uid, item_id, rank)`.\n - Score using `/task/evaluate_public.py`.\n\n### Step 4: Model Training & Validation Tuning\n- Train model on `train_*` with validation on `val_*` outcomes.\n- Track NDCG@10 progression against baseline (0.010710).\n- Iterate and tune:\n - Dimensionality $d$ (e.g. 64, 128), temperature $\\tau$.\n - Feature weights (organic vs explicit likes, recency decay factor $\\lambda$).\n - Negative sampling strategy (in-batch + catalog negatives).\n - Training epochs and learning rates.\n\n### Step 5: Full Refit on Train + Val for Hidden Test\n- Once optimal architecture and hyperparameters are verified on public validation:\n - Re-extract user histories combining `train_* + val_*` up to the validation cutoff timestamp.\n - Use `test_preference_state.parquet`.\n - Train model on the full historical dataset.\n - Compute test user embeddings and item embeddings.\n - Retrieve top 100 items per user masked by `test_eligible_candidates.npz`.\n - Save `/app/solution/submission.parquet`.\n - Verify formatting, candidate eligibility, and lack of duplicate/invalid entries.\n\n### Step 6: Documentation & Artifact Preservation\n- Ensure complete, standalone pipeline scripts in `/app/solution/`:\n - `model.py`, `dataset.py`, `train_and_predict.py`.\n- Update `/app/solution/README.md` with:\n - Architecture description\n - Training objective and loss formulation\n - Public validation NDCG@10 score\n - Final submission command\n\n---\n\n## Verification & Acceptance\n- Structural checks:\n - Exact target users present (8,456).\n - Exactly 100 rows per user, ranks 1..100 without duplicates.\n - 100% of ranked items are present in `test_eligible_candidates.npz`.\n - Code runs end-to-end on CPU PyTorch within resource limits.\n- Metric check:\n - Validation NDCG@10 improves significantly over the popularity baseline (0.010710).\n",
"file_path": "/home/agent/.gemini/tmp/app/c8321455-c473-4e52-a372-e5d48d82e44e/plans/two_tower_ranker_plan.md"
}Successfully created and wrote to new file: /home/agent/.gemini/tmp/app/c8321455-c473-4e52-a372-e5d48d82e44e/plans/two_tower_ranker_plan.md. Here is the updated code:
# Plan: Latency-Efficient PyTorch Two-Tower Neural Ranker
## Objective
Build, tune, and deploy a latency-efficient two-tower PyTorch neural ranker for music track retrieval and ranking.
The ranker must:
1. Decompose strictly into independent user and item towers producing embeddings of identical dimensionality $d$.
2. Compute relevance scores via the dot product: $s(u, i) = \mathbf{u}^\top \mathbf{v}_i$.
3. Compute item embeddings $\mathbf{v}_i$ offline and compute the user embedding $\mathbf{u}$ from interaction history (not a user-ID lookup).
4. Rank cutoff-eligible candidates for each target user to maximize graded NDCG@10 on the discovery objective (grade 3 for organic like, grade 1 for organic listen $\ge 80\%$).
5. Validate on the public validation window using `train_*` as history and tuning hyperparameters to maximize public NDCG@10.
6. Refit the tuned model on `train_* + val_*` with updated `test_preference_state.parquet` to produce the final `/app/solution/submission.parquet`.
7. Deliver clean code and `/app/solution/README.md`.
---
## Key Files & Context
- `/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet`: 30,000 retrieval-catalog items with popularity ranks.
- `/task/data/target_users.parquet`: 8,456 target users.
- `/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz`: packed eligibility bitmasks for validation.
- `/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz`: packed eligibility bitmasks for test.
- `/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet` / `test_preference_state.parquet`: active liked/disliked items.
- `/task/data/train_*.parquet` and `val_*.parquet`: listens, likes, dislikes, unlikes, undislikes.
- `/task/evaluate_public.py` & `/task/ranking_evaluation.py`: ground truth metric calculation (graded NDCG@10).
- Final deliverable: `/app/solution/submission.parquet` (columns: `uid`, `item_id`, `rank` 1..100) and `/app/solution/README.md`.
---
## Technical Architecture & Modeling Design
### 1. Item Tower
- **Input:** Catalog item index $i \in \{0, \dots, 29999\}$ and item features (log popularity, organic ratio).
- **Network:**
- Item embedding layer: `nn.Embedding(num_items, embed_dim)`.
- Item feature projection: `nn.Linear(num_item_features, feature_dim)`.
- Fusion MLP: `Linear -> LayerNorm -> GELU -> Linear -> LayerNorm`.
- L2-normalization (or learned scale) so that inner product represents normalized cosine similarity with temperature.
- **Offline Precomputation:**
- Precompute all 30,000 item vectors in a single tensor $\mathbf{V} \in \mathbb{R}^{30000 \times d}$.
### 2. User Tower
- **Input:**
- Derived entirely from user interaction history (no `nn.Embedding(num_users, ...)`):
1. **Liked items:** List of item IDs from active preference state and organic likes.
2. **Disliked items:** List of item IDs from active preference state and dislikes.
3. **Recent listens:** Sequence / bag of recently listened items, with completion weights ($w = \text{played\_ratio\_pct} / 100 \times (1 + \text{is\_organic})$) and exponential recency time decay $\exp(-\lambda \Delta t)$.
4. **Aggregate user features:** Number of listens, liked count, disliked count, mean played ratio, organic listen proportion.
- **Network:**
- Shared or projected item embedding table to embed history items.
- Attentive / weighted average pooling:
- $\mathbf{h}_{\text{liked}} = \text{WeightedMean}(\mathbf{E}[\text{liked}])$
- $\mathbf{h}_{\text{listens}} = \sum_k w_k \mathbf{E}[\text{listen}_k] / \sum_k w_k$
- $\mathbf{h}_{\text{disliked}} = \text{Mean}(\mathbf{E}[\text{disliked}])$
- User projection MLP:
- Input: $[\mathbf{h}_{\text{liked}}, \mathbf{h}_{\text{listens}}, \mathbf{h}_{\text{disliked}}, \mathbf{x}_{\text{user\_stats}}]$
- MLP: `Linear -> LayerNorm -> GELU -> Dropout -> Linear -> LayerNorm -> L2-normalize`.
- Output: User vector $\mathbf{u} \in \mathbb{R}^d$.
### 3. Training Strategy & Loss Function
- **Sample Construction:**
- Temporal training split:
- Split training history before timestamp $T_{\text{train\_split}} = 24786800 - 604800$ (7 days before train cutoff).
- Features are computed from events before $T_{\text{train\_split}}$.
- Positive labels are organic likes (grade 3) and organic listens $\ge 80\%$ (grade 1) occurring between $T_{\text{train\_split}}$ and $24786800$.
- Can also use multiple sliding window slices or positive pairs weighted by discovery grade.
- **Loss:**
- Graded sampled softmax / InfoNCE loss with temperature $\tau$:
$$\mathcal{L} = -\sum_{i \in \mathcal{P}_u} w_i \log \frac{\exp(\mathbf{u}^\top \mathbf{v}_i / \tau)}{\sum_{j \in \mathcal{N}_u \cup \{i\}} \exp(\mathbf{u}^\top \mathbf{v}_j / \tau)}$$
where $w_i = 3.0$ for likes and $1.0$ for strong listens.
- In-batch negatives + sampled catalog negatives (popularity-aware) + user's explicit dislikes as hard negatives (with negative margin or penalty).
- Temperature $\tau \approx 0.07 - 0.1$.
- Optimizer: AdamW with cosine learning rate schedule, weight decay for regularization.
---
## Implementation Steps
### Step 1: Fast Feature Extraction & Dataset Builder
- Create `data_prep.py`:
- Efficiently parse target users, catalog, preference states.
- Extract user interaction histories (listens, likes, dislikes) before a specified cutoff timestamp.
- Weight interactions by recency and completion ratio.
- Build train dataset (pre-cutoff history $\rightarrow$ target window organic actions).
### Step 2: Two-Tower PyTorch Model Definition
- Create `model.py`:
- `ItemTower(num_items, embed_dim, out_dim)`
- `UserTower(num_items, embed_dim, out_dim, ...)`
- `TwoTowerModel` wrapping both towers, ensuring strict decomposition.
- Forward methods for training (batch loss) and inference (compute user vectors, precompute item vectors).
### Step 3: Retrieval, Eligibility Filtering & Evaluation Script
- Create `retrieval.py`:
- Input: User embeddings $\mathbf{U} \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times d}$, precomputed item embeddings $\mathbf{V} \in \mathbb{R}^{M \times d}$, candidate eligibility bitmasks.
- Fast matrix multiplication $\mathbf{S} = \mathbf{U} \mathbf{V}^\top \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times M}$.
- Mask out ineligible items ($S_{u, i} = -\infty$ for ineligible bits).
- Efficiently extract top 100 items per user using `torch.topk` or `np.argpartition`.
- Format into pandas DataFrame `(uid, item_id, rank)`.
- Score using `/task/evaluate_public.py`.
### Step 4: Model Training & Validation Tuning
- Train model on `train_*` with validation on `val_*` outcomes.
- Track NDCG@10 progression against baseline (0.010710).
- Iterate and tune:
- Dimensionality $d$ (e.g. 64, 128), temperature $\tau$.
- Feature weights (organic vs explicit likes, recency decay factor $\lambda$).
- Negative sampling strategy (in-batch + catalog negatives).
- Training epochs and learning rates.
### Step 5: Full Refit on Train + Val for Hidden Test
- Once optimal architecture and hyperparameters are verified on public validation:
- Re-extract user histories combining `train_* + val_*` up to the validation cutoff timestamp.
- Use `test_preference_state.parquet`.
- Train model on the full historical dataset.
- Compute test user embeddings and item embeddings.
- Retrieve top 100 items per user masked by `test_eligible_candidates.npz`.
- Save `/app/solution/submission.parquet`.
- Verify formatting, candidate eligibility, and lack of duplicate/invalid entries.
### Step 6: Documentation & Artifact Preservation
- Ensure complete, standalone pipeline scripts in `/app/solution/`:
- `model.py`, `dataset.py`, `train_and_predict.py`.
- Update `/app/solution/README.md` with:
- Architecture description
- Training objective and loss formulation
- Public validation NDCG@10 score
- Final submission command
---
## Verification & Acceptance
- Structural checks:
- Exact target users present (8,456).
- Exactly 100 rows per user, ranks 1..100 without duplicates.
- 100% of ranked items are present in `test_eligible_candidates.npz`.
- Code runs end-to-end on CPU PyTorch within resource limits.
- Metric check:
- Validation NDCG@10 improves significantly over the popularity baseline (0.010710).
Analyzing Exit Conditions
I am currently focused on understanding the precise conditions that trigger the exit from plan mode. My current analysis is centered on the specific rule that mandates reaching an informal user agreement before utilizing the exit_plan_mode tool for formal approval, and crucially, avoiding its invocation via run_shell_command.
{
"plan_filename": "two_tower_ranker_plan.md"
}Plan approved. Switching to YOLO mode (all tool calls auto-approved).
The approved implementation plan is stored at: /home/agent/.gemini/tmp/app/c8321455-c473-4e52-a372-e5d48d82e44e/plans/two_tower_ranker_plan.md
Read and follow the plan strictly during implementation.{
"strategic_intent": "Develop and benchmark fast feature extraction and dataset preparation pipeline."
}Strategic Intent: Develop and benchmark fast feature extraction and dataset preparation pipeline.Analyzing Data Extraction
I'm currently assessing the performance of data extraction, specifically focusing on the train_listens.parquet file and its substantial row count. My priority is to understand the time implications of loading this dataset to ensure efficient processing.
{
"description": "Benchmark reading train_listens.parquet",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport time\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\n\nt0 = time.time()\ntable = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\nprint(f'Read full table in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s, num rows: {len(table)}')\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Read full table in 1.41s, num rows: 43484159
Process Group PGID: 1970
</untrusted_context>Analyzing Timestamps Quickly
I'm impressed by how fast loading the data was! Now I'm zeroing in on the timestamps within train_listens. My next step is to find the minimum and maximum timestamps for both train_listens and val_listens.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\n\nt_listens = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['timestamp'])\nmin_ts = pc.min(t_listens['timestamp']).as_py()\nmax_ts = pc.max(t_listens['timestamp']).as_py()\nprint(f'Train listens timestamp range: {min_ts} to {max_ts} (span: {(max_ts - min_ts) / 86400:.1f} days)')\n\nv_listens = pq.read_table('/task/data/val_listens.parquet', columns=['timestamp'])\nmin_vts = pc.min(v_listens['timestamp']).as_py()\nmax_vts = pc.max(v_listens['timestamp']).as_py()\nprint(f'Val listens timestamp range: {min_vts} to {max_vts} (span: {(max_vts - min_vts) / 86400:.1f} days)')\nprint(f'Gap between train and val: {min_vts - max_ts} seconds ({(min_vts - max_ts) / 60:.1f} minutes)')\n\"",
"description": "Check timestamp ranges of train and val listens"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Train listens timestamp range: 0 to 24786795 (span: 286.9 days)
Val listens timestamp range: 24788600 to 25393395 (span: 7.0 days)
Gap between train and val: 1805 seconds (30.1 minutes)
Process Group PGID: 1992
</untrusted_context>Analyzing Data Segmentation
My focus has shifted to the data split. I'm evaluating a 286-day training span concluding at epoch 24786795. The validation set is precisely 7 days, beginning 30 minutes after training ends, and covers the user base with at least 20 positive listens in the 90 days preceding the training cutoff.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport numpy as np\n\ntargets = set(pq.read_table('/task/data/target_users.parquet', columns=['uid'])['uid'].to_pylist())\ntable = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\n\n# Filter by timestamp >= 17010800 (last 90 days)\nmask_90d = pc.greater_equal(table['timestamp'], 17010800)\nt_90d = table.filter(mask_90d)\nprint(f'Rows in last 90 days: {len(t_90d)}')\n\n# Also filter by timestamp >= 24786800 - 30 * 86400 (last 30 days: >= 22194800)\nmask_30d = pc.greater_equal(table['timestamp'], 22194800)\nt_30d = table.filter(mask_30d)\nprint(f'Rows in last 30 days: {len(t_30d)}')\n\n# Also filter by timestamp >= 24786800 - 7 * 86400 (last 7 days: >= 24182000)\nmask_7d = pc.greater_equal(table['timestamp'], 24182000)\nt_7d = table.filter(mask_7d)\nprint(f'Rows in last 7 days: {len(t_7d)}')\n\"",
"description": "Count rows in recent training windows"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Rows in last 90 days: 16769274
Rows in last 30 days: 6126103
Rows in last 7 days: 1491699
Process Group PGID: 2013
</untrusted_context>Observing Model Behavior
My analysis shows a near-identical number of listens between training and validation datasets over the last week, which is an interesting temporal simulation outcome. I'm now verifying that all catalog items are accounted for in the current iteration.
{
"description": "Check catalog items mapping",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\ncatalog_item_set = set(catalog['item_id'])\nprint('Catalog size:', len(catalog_item_set))\n\n# Check item_ids in candidate_catalog\ncatalog_items = catalog['item_id'].to_numpy()\nprint('Item ID min and max:', catalog_items.min(), catalog_items.max())\n\n# Let's map each item_id to an index 0..29999\nitem2idx = {item: idx for idx, item in enumerate(catalog_items)}\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Catalog size: 30000
Item ID min and max: 206 9390294
Process Group PGID: 2035
</untrusted_context>{
"description": "Check catalog overlap with interactions",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pandas as pd\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\ncatalog_item_set = set(catalog['item_id'])\n\nlikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_likes.parquet')\nprint('Likes item in catalog pct:', likes['item_id'].isin(catalog_item_set).mean())\n\npref = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet')\nprint('Val pref item in catalog pct:', pref['item_id'].isin(catalog_item_set).mean())\n\nval_likes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/val_likes.parquet')\nprint('Val likes item in catalog pct:', val_likes['item_id'].isin(catalog_item_set).mean())\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Likes item in catalog pct: 0.6809068383505291
Val pref item in catalog pct: 1.0
Val likes item in catalog pct: 0.5570842704061384
Process Group PGID: 2052
</untrusted_context>{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\ncatalog_item_set = set(catalog['item_id'])\npref = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/test_preference_state.parquet')\nprint('Test pref item in catalog pct:', pref['item_id'].isin(catalog_item_set).mean())\n\"",
"description": "Check test preference state overlap with catalog"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Test pref item in catalog pct: 1.0
Process Group PGID: 2069
</untrusted_context>Cataloging Preference State
I've successfully cataloged all preference state items. My current focus shifts to the items designated for ranking, specifically ensuring only the 30,000 items from candidate_catalog.parquet are considered as per the cutoff directive.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\nval_pref = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet')\nelig = np.load('/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz')\nuids = elig['uids']\nitem_ids = elig['item_ids']\npacked = elig['packed_eligible']\nuid_to_row = {uid: r for r, uid in enumerate(uids)}\nitem_to_col = {item: c for c, item in enumerate(item_ids)}\n\n# Check if liked items in val_pref are eligible\nliked_eligible = 0\nliked_total = 0\ndisliked_eligible = 0\ndisliked_total = 0\n\nfor uid, item, state in val_pref.itertuples(index=False):\n r = uid_to_row.get(uid)\n c = item_to_col.get(item)\n if r is not None and c is not None:\n byte, bit = divmod(c, 8)\n is_elig = bool((int(packed[r, byte]) >> bit) & 1)\n if state == 'liked':\n liked_total += 1\n if is_elig: liked_eligible += 1\n elif state == 'disliked':\n disliked_total += 1\n if is_elig: disliked_eligible += 1\n\nprint(f'Liked items: total={liked_total}, eligible={liked_eligible} ({liked_eligible/liked_total*100:.1f}%)')\nprint(f'Disliked items: total={disliked_total}, eligible={disliked_eligible} ({disliked_eligible/disliked_total*100:.1f}%)')\n\"",
"description": "Check if liked and disliked items are eligible"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Liked items: total=418435, eligible=0 (0.0%)
Disliked items: total=50689, eligible=0 (0.0%)
Process Group PGID: 2086
</untrusted_context>Analyzing Eligibility Filters
I've discovered that all liked and disliked items are deemed ineligible. The service specifically excludes items the user has already explicitly interacted with. I'm now investigating what other criteria might be at play for eligibility.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\nelig = np.load('/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz')\nuids = elig['uids']\nitem_ids = elig['item_ids']\npacked = elig['packed_eligible']\nval_pref = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet')\n\n# Let's inspect user 100\nuid = 100\nr = list(uids).index(uid)\nmask = np.unpackbits(packed[r], count=len(item_ids), bitorder='little')\ninelig_items = set(item_ids[mask == 0])\nprint(f'User {uid} has {len(inelig_items)} ineligible items.')\n\npref_user = val_pref[val_pref.uid == uid]\npref_items = set(pref_user.item_id)\nprint(f'User {uid} pref items: {len(pref_items)}, all in inelig_items? {pref_items.issubset(inelig_items)}')\ndiff = inelig_items - pref_items\nprint(f'Remaining {len(diff)} ineligible items. Let us check if they are in train_listens...')\n\ntrain_listens = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'item_id'])\nu_listens = set(train_listens[train_listens.uid == uid]['item_id'])\nprint(f'How many of remaining diff are in train_listens: {len(diff & u_listens)} / {len(diff)}')\n\"",
"description": "Analyze ineligible items composition for user 100"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: User 100 has 682 ineligible items.
User 100 pref items: 15, all in inelig_items? True
Remaining 667 ineligible items. Let us check if they are in train_listens...
How many of remaining diff are in train_listens: 667 / 667
Process Group PGID: 2104
</untrusted_context>Discovering eligibility logic
I'm noticing a clear pattern: user 100's ineligible items are solely due to explicit preferences or prior listens in their training data. This reinforces my understanding of the "Made for You" discovery shelf's intent.
Refining recommendation signals
My analysis indicates that "Made for You" filtering is primarily driven by explicit user feedback and historical listening habits. I'm now exploring how the 80% listening threshold and organic engagement signals in the validation window contribute to this relevance scoring, especially within the context of unseen tracks.
Developing user tower architecture
I'm focusing on the user tower, ensuring it derives representations solely from interaction history. This is crucial for generating user embeddings independently of item embeddings, aligning with the two-tower architecture's requirements for precomputation and efficient retrieval.
Optimizing discovery shelf logic
I'm diving into the specifics of candidate eligibility, noting how platform-owned logic dictates what's even considered. My current focus is on how explicit preferences and temporal backtesting within this boundary influence the final recommendations, ensuring efficient use of the 60-minute constraint.
Structuring two-tower model
I'm investigating the optimal two-tower model architecture. My current focus is on the item tower, exploring its potential features like Item ID embeddings, catalog metadata, and derived listening statistics. I'm also considering a suitable neural network structure for processing these inputs efficiently.
Processing item tower outputs
I'm looking at how to compute item vectors offline, precomputing a tensor of (30000, out_dim). This will be crucial for efficiently retrieving user recommendations later on.
Learning user preferences
I'm now understanding how user interactions, especially recent listens and explicit dislikes, are weighted to form user representations. My current focus is on leveraging these signals to accurately capture a user's evolving musical taste within the two-tower model.
Integrating user statistical features
I'm now incorporating user statistical features like like counts and completion ratios into the user tower. This involves projecting these statistics and concatenating them with pooled embeddings before feeding them into the MLP for final user representation.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\ncat_set = set(catalog['item_id'])\nt_listens = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['item_id'])\nitems = t_listens['item_id'].to_numpy()\nin_cat = np.isin(items, list(cat_set))\nprint(f'Train listens in catalog: {in_cat.mean():.4f} ({in_cat.sum()} / {len(items)})')\n\"",
"description": "Check fraction of train listens in catalog"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Train listens in catalog: 0.7186 (31249613 / 43484159)
Process Group PGID: 2133
</untrusted_context>Analyzing Catalog Performance
My focus has shifted to understanding the performance of items within and outside our catalog for training. It's fascinating that over 70% of listens are already cataloged. Now, I'm exploring strategies for handling those out-of-catalog items, considering options like a dedicated OOV index or simply ignoring them.
Refining Training Objectives
I'm now considering the specific training task. The goal is to predict high dot products for items a user will like or strongly engage with within a 7-day window. I'm evaluating whether to use historical 7-day windows for training, including likes and strong listens as positive examples.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport pandas as pd\n\nT_cut = 24786800\nT_start = T_cut - 7 * 86400\n\n# Train listens in [T_start, T_cut]\nt_listens = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\nmask = pc.and_(pc.greater_equal(t_listens['timestamp'], T_start), pc.less_equal(t_listens['timestamp'], T_cut))\nrecent_listens = t_listens.filter(mask)\ndf_listens = recent_listens.to_pandas()\n\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'])\nstrong = df_listens[df_listens.uid.isin(targets) & (df_listens.is_organic == 1) & (df_listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]\nprint('Strong organic listens in last 7 days:', len(strong), 'unique users:', strong.uid.nunique(), 'unique items:', strong.item_id.nunique())\n\nlikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_likes.parquet')\nrecent_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= T_start) & (likes.timestamp <= T_cut) & likes.uid.isin(targets) & (likes.is_organic == 1)]\nprint('Organic likes in last 7 days:', len(recent_likes), 'unique users:', recent_likes.uid.nunique(), 'unique items:', recent_likes.item_id.nunique())\n\"",
"description": "Check positive interactions in last 7 days of training"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Strong organic listens in last 7 days: 428209 unique users: 6084 unique items: 86275
Organic likes in last 7 days: 12022 unique users: 2700 unique items: 8912
Process Group PGID: 2159
</untrusted_context>{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport pandas as pd\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\ncat_set = set(catalog['item_id'])\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'])\n\nT_cut = 24786800\nT_start = T_cut - 7 * 86400\n\nt_listens = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\nmask = pc.and_(pc.greater_equal(t_listens['timestamp'], T_start), pc.less_equal(t_listens['timestamp'], T_cut))\nrecent_listens = t_listens.filter(mask)\ndf_listens = recent_listens.to_pandas()\nstrong = df_listens[df_listens.uid.isin(targets) & (df_listens.is_organic == 1) & (df_listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]\nstrong_cat = strong[strong.item_id.isin(cat_set)]\nprint('Strong organic catalog listens in last 7 days:', len(strong_cat), 'unique users:', strong_cat.uid.nunique(), 'unique items:', strong_cat.item_id.nunique())\n\nlikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_likes.parquet')\nrecent_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= T_start) & (likes.timestamp <= T_cut) & likes.uid.isin(targets) & (likes.is_organic == 1)]\nlikes_cat = recent_likes[recent_likes.item_id.isin(cat_set)]\nprint('Organic catalog likes in last 7 days:', len(likes_cat), 'unique users:', likes_cat.uid.nunique(), 'unique items:', likes_cat.item_id.nunique())\n\"",
"description": "Check catalog overlap with last 7 days interactions"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Strong organic catalog listens in last 7 days: 304885 unique users: 5842 unique items: 25540
Organic catalog likes in last 7 days: 7774 unique users: 2185 unique items: 4896
Process Group PGID: 2181
</untrusted_context>Analyzing Recent Performance
I'm pleased to report substantial growth in organic catalog engagement, with over 300,000 listens and 7,774 likes in the last week, covering 25,540 unique tracks. This surge indicates a strong positive trend.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'])\nT_cut = 24786800\nT_30d = T_cut - 30 * 86400\n\nt_listens = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\nmask = pc.and_(pc.greater_equal(t_listens['timestamp'], T_30d), pc.less_equal(t_listens['timestamp'], T_cut))\nrecent = t_listens.filter(mask).to_pandas()\nrecent = recent[recent.uid.isin(targets)]\n\ncounts = recent.groupby('uid').size()\nprint('30-day listen count per user summary:')\nprint(counts.describe())\n\"",
"description": "Summary of 30-day listen counts per target user"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: 30-day listen count per user summary:
count 8237.000000
mean 742.178827
std 794.447442
min 1.000000
25% 185.000000
50% 493.000000
75% 1021.000000
max 9660.000000
dtype: float64
Process Group PGID: 2203
</untrusted_context>Analyzing User Interaction
I'm currently exploring how to best represent user history, specifically looking at recent interactions like the last 50 or 100 listens, or a weighted bag of items. This is in light of understanding average listener engagement, where the typical user has around 742 listens in the 30 days prior to cutoff.
Implementing Embedding Bags
I've decided to proceed with nn.EmbeddingBag for handling user interaction data. Its efficiency with variable-length sequences and bags of items, especially on CPU, is compelling. I'm currently exploring the specifics of its implementation, including potential weighted summation.
{
"description": "Benchmark EmbeddingBag on CPU",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport time\n\nemb_bag = nn.EmbeddingBag(30001, 64, mode='mean')\n# 8456 users, each having ~50 items on average = ~400,000 items total\nindices = torch.randint(0, 30000, (400000,))\noffsets = torch.arange(0, 400000, 50)\n\nt0 = time.time()\nfor _ in range(10):\n out = emb_bag(indices, offsets)\nprint(f'EmbeddingBag output shape: {out.shape}, time per forward pass: {(time.time()-t0)/10*1000:.2f} ms')\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: EmbeddingBag output shape: torch.Size([8000, 64]), time per forward pass: 2.76 ms
Process Group PGID: 2225
</untrusted_context>Optimizing inference latency
My focus is now on refining the inference speed. I've confirmed that processing all target users takes approximately 3 milliseconds per forward pass, a significant improvement. Next, I'm investigating how nn.EmbeddingBag behaves with empty sequences, a crucial edge case for user histories.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\n\nemb_bag = nn.EmbeddingBag(30002, 64, mode='mean', padding_idx=30001)\n# Suppose user 0 has [1, 2], user 1 has empty (put padding index 30001), user 2 has [3]\nindices = torch.tensor([1, 2, 30001, 3], dtype=torch.long)\noffsets = torch.tensor([0, 2, 3], dtype=torch.long)\nout = emb_bag(indices, offsets)\nprint(out.shape)\nprint('User 1 (empty with pad) norm:', torch.norm(out[1]).item())\n\"",
"description": "Test empty sequence with padding_idx in EmbeddingBag"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: torch.Size([3, 64])
User 1 (empty with pad) norm: 0.0
Process Group PGID: 2244
</untrusted_context>{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\n\nemb_bag = nn.EmbeddingBag(30002, 64, mode='sum', padding_idx=30001)\nindices = torch.tensor([1, 2, 30001, 3], dtype=torch.long)\nweights = torch.tensor([0.8, 0.2, 0.0, 1.0], dtype=torch.float)\noffsets = torch.tensor([0, 2, 3], dtype=torch.long)\nout = emb_bag(indices, offsets, per_sample_weights=weights)\nprint('out shape:', out.shape)\nprint('User 1 norm:', torch.norm(out[1]).item())\n\"",
"description": "Test per-sample weights in EmbeddingBag"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: out shape: torch.Size([3, 64])
User 1 norm: 0.0
Process Group PGID: 2254
</untrusted_context>Exploring Weight Normalization
I've confirmed EmbeddingBag with per_sample_weights functions as expected. My current focus is on investigating normalization strategies for these weights, specifically if they can be adjusted to sum to 1.0 or undergo softmax/L2 normalization.
{
"description": "Inspect candidate catalog features stats",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\nprint(catalog.head())\nprint('Catalog features stats:')\nprint(catalog[['positive_listens', 'organic_positive_listens', 'popularity_rank']].describe())\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: item_id positive_listens organic_positive_listens popularity_rank
0 5862961 26615 20620 1
1 6901374 25536 17347 2
2 5635052 24691 17194 3
3 3542184 24075 17699 4
4 9378983 24036 18195 5
Catalog features stats:
positive_listens organic_positive_listens popularity_rank
count 30000.000000 30000.000000 30000.000000
mean 668.544300 313.926433 15000.500000
std 1053.389553 636.039902 8660.398374
min 163.000000 0.000000 1.000000
25% 228.000000 93.000000 7500.750000
50% 354.000000 162.000000 15000.500000
75% 669.250000 309.000000 22500.250000
max 26615.000000 20620.000000 30000.000000
Process Group PGID: 2264
</untrusted_context>Analyzing Item Popularity
I'm currently exploring the relationship between the sheer volume of positive listens per catalog item and its overall popularity rank. My focus is on identifying the organic factors that drive user preference and engagement.
Refining Recommendation Signals
I'm delving into item co-occurrence as a primary signal, recognizing its power in inferring artist and genre relationships. The goal is to leverage this for a more robust user vector representation within the two-tower model, aligning user preferences with similar item clusters.
Implementing Two-Tower Model
I'm now focused on implementing a two-tower neural network architecture for recommendation. Specifically, I'm designing the user tower to learn representations directly from interaction history, avoiding user ID lookups, and ensuring the item tower generates compatible item embeddings for dot product scoring.
Training Two-Tower Networks
I'm now focusing on the specifics of training the two-tower model, particularly exploring in-batch negative sampling. My current thinking involves utilizing the mini-batch itself to generate negative signals for positive user-item interactions, aiming to optimize the model through a cross-entropy loss.
Addressing Popularity Bias
I'm currently re-evaluating in-batch negative sampling due to its known popularity bias. My latest thoughts involve augmenting this with explicit catalog negatives, potentially sampled by popularity or uniformly, and even considering explicit user dislikes as negative signals.
Weighting Interaction Gradients
I'm now focused on how to best assign weights to different interaction types within the loss function. My current thinking is to leverage NDCG gain values, effectively giving "organic likes" significantly more weight than "organic listens," thereby aligning training gradients directly with our evaluation metric.
Sampling Training Data
I'm exploring strategies for constructing training samples from our available listen and like data. My current focus is on defining appropriate time horizons for sampling, considering recent history like the last 90 days, and how this intersects with validation windows.
Defining Training Windows
I am currently defining multiple training windows, each comprising a target window of 7 days and the preceding user history. This approach generates thousands of user histories and their subsequent positive items, providing rich data for training. I am also refining how user history and target items are constructed for validation and testing.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\n\nval_pref = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet')\nprint('Val pref shape:', val_pref.shape)\n\n# Let's check a user\nu = 100\nu_pref = val_pref[val_pref.uid == u].sort_values('item_id')\nprint(f'User {u} val_pref:')\nprint(u_pref)\n\nlikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_likes.parquet')\nunlikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_unlikes.parquet')\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_dislikes.parquet')\nundislikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_undislikes.parquet')\n\nu_l = likes[likes.uid == u].assign(event='like')\nu_u = unlikes[unlikes.uid == u].assign(event='unlike')\nu_d = dislikes[dislikes.uid == u].assign(event='dislike')\nu_ud = undislikes[undislikes.uid == u].assign(event='undislike')\n\nall_events = pd.concat([u_l, u_u, u_d, u_ud]).sort_values('timestamp')\nprint(f'User {u} explicit events count: {len(all_events)}')\n\"",
"description": "Verify preference state generation logic"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Val pref shape: (469124, 3)
User 100 val_pref:
uid item_id state
0 100 410868 liked
1 100 732449 liked
2 100 982903 liked
3 100 1730273 liked
4 100 2621343 liked
5 100 3535902 liked
6 100 3633039 liked
7 100 4099299 liked
8 100 4221787 liked
9 100 4927727 disliked
10 100 4943655 liked
11 100 5590855 liked
12 100 6568592 liked
13 100 8200811 liked
14 100 8661238 disliked
User 100 explicit events count: 29
Process Group PGID: 2281
</untrusted_context>Confirming Data Integrity
My analysis confirms the complete loading of all preference states for both training and testing sets. The training data, with 469,124 entries, aligns with the 24786800 timestamp cutoff. Similarly, the test set contains its full 484,776 records, correctly timestamped at 25393400.
Leveraging Provided States
It seems I can skip reconstructing the preference states for validation and testing, as they're conveniently provided by the platform. My current focus is on identifying the most valuable user features to extract from their history, considering liked/disliked items and recent listening patterns.
Exploring Training Regimes
I'm currently investigating two distinct training approaches. The first involves window-based pairs, utilizing historical interactions as features to predict organic likes and listens within a defined recent period. The second explores item-item co-occurrence and session-based predictions, aiming to discern patterns in subsequent track selections.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\ncat_set = set(catalog['item_id'])\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'])\n\nT_train_end = 24786800\nwindow_len = 7 * 86400\ngap = 1800\n\n# Let's test 3 training windows:\n# Window 0: Target = [T_train_end - window_len, T_train_end]\n# Window 1: Target = [T_train_end - 2*window_len, T_train_end - window_len]\n# Window 2: Target = [T_train_end - 3*window_len, T_train_end - 2*window_len]\n\nt_listens = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\nt_likes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_likes.parquet')\n\nfor w in range(3):\n w_end = T_train_end - w * window_len\n w_start = w_end - window_len\n \n # filter listens\n mask = pc.and_(pc.greater_equal(t_listens['timestamp'], w_start), pc.less_equal(t_listens['timestamp'], w_end))\n w_listens = t_listens.filter(mask).to_pandas()\n w_listens = w_listens[w_listens.uid.isin(targets) & (w_listens.is_organic == 1) & (w_listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80) & w_listens.item_id.isin(cat_set)]\n \n # filter likes\n w_likes = t_likes[(t_likes.timestamp >= w_start) & (t_likes.timestamp <= w_end) & t_likes.uid.isin(targets) & (t_likes.is_organic == 1) & t_likes.item_id.isin(cat_set)]\n \n print(f'Window {w} ({w_start} to {w_end}): strong listens={len(w_listens)} (unique uids={w_listens.uid.nunique()}), likes={len(w_likes)} (unique uids={w_likes.uid.nunique()})')\n\"",
"description": "Check positive pairs across 3 historical windows"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Window 0 (24182000 to 24786800): strong listens=304885 (unique uids=5842), likes=7774 (unique uids=2185)
Window 1 (23577200 to 24182000): strong listens=289063 (unique uids=5660), likes=7129 (unique uids=2119)
Window 2 (22972400 to 23577200): strong listens=287016 (unique uids=5593), likes=7451 (unique uids=2026)
Process Group PGID: 2298
</untrusted_context>Analyzing User Interactions
My current thoughts are focused on the impressive volume of user engagement observed. Across three distinct windows, I've recorded approximately 1 million positive interactions, comprising strong listens and organic likes. It's noteworthy that the user's historical actions appear to directly precede and potentially influence these interactions within each window.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nimport time\n\nt0 = time.time()\nT_cut = 24786800\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\nitem2idx = {int(item): idx for idx, item in enumerate(catalog['item_id'])}\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'])\n\n# Load validation preference state\nval_pref = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet')\npref_likes = val_pref[val_pref.state == 'liked'].groupby('uid')['item_id'].apply(list).to_dict()\npref_dislikes = val_pref[val_pref.state == 'disliked'].groupby('uid')['item_id'].apply(list).to_dict()\nprint(f'Preference state processed in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s')\n\n# Load recent listens in last 30 days before T_cut\nt0 = time.time()\nt_listens = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\nmask = pc.and_(pc.greater_equal(t_listens['timestamp'], T_cut - 30 * 86400), pc.less_equal(t_listens['timestamp'], T_cut))\nrecent = t_listens.filter(mask).to_pandas()\nrecent = recent[recent.uid.isin(targets)]\nprint(f'Filtered 30-day listens in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s, rows: {len(recent)}')\n\"",
"description": "Benchmark filtering and grouping user history"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Preference state processed in 0.34s
Filtered 30-day listens in 1.44s, rows: 6113327
Process Group PGID: 2320
</untrusted_context>Processing Recent Activity
My focus has shifted to efficiently processing recent user activity into per-user arrays, aiming to optimize speed after noting performance metrics for preference states and 30-day listens. I'm now analyzing how to make user embeddings as informative as possible.
{
"description": "Check unique catalog items per user in 30 days",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\ncat_set = set(catalog['item_id'])\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'])\n\nT_cut = 24786800\nt_listens = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\nmask = pc.and_(pc.greater_equal(t_listens['timestamp'], T_cut - 30 * 86400), pc.less_equal(t_listens['timestamp'], T_cut))\nrecent = t_listens.filter(mask).to_pandas()\nrecent = recent[recent.uid.isin(targets) & recent.item_id.isin(cat_set)]\n\nunique_items_per_user = recent.groupby('uid')['item_id'].nunique()\nprint('Unique catalog items per user in 30 days:')\nprint(unique_items_per_user.describe())\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Unique catalog items per user in 30 days:
count 8196.000000
mean 262.256589
std 239.717776
min 1.000000
25% 79.000000
50% 195.000000
75% 379.250000
max 1913.000000
Name: item_id, dtype: float64
Process Group PGID: 2348
</untrusted_context>Processing User Listening Habits
My current focus is on leveraging the extensive listening data per user, specifically around 262 unique tracks monthly. I'm exploring methods to efficiently incorporate liked, disliked, and top-streamed tracks into our models, considering options like PyTorch's nn.EmbeddingBag for optimal processing.
Optimizing User Embeddings
I've confirmed nn.EmbeddingBag efficiently computes weighted averages across user interactions in milliseconds, regardless of the number of items. This allows me to combine liked, disliked, and weighted listened tracks with user stats into a unified user representation $\mathbf{h}_u$, ready for an MLP and normalization.
Refining Interaction Scoring
I've confirmed the model structure supports a dot product score $s(u, i) = \mathbf{u}^\top \mathbf{v}_i$, utilizing L2 normalized item vectors $\mathbf{v}_i$. This aligns perfectly with the requirement for independently precomputable user and item vectors derived from interaction history, not just IDs, through separate PyTorch towers.
{
"description": "Benchmark MIPS dot-product and topk on CPU",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport torch\nimport time\n\nU = torch.randn(8456, 128)\nV = torch.randn(30000, 128)\n\nt0 = time.time()\nscores = torch.matmul(U, V.T)\nprint(f'Matrix multiplication 8456 x 30000 took {time.time()-t0:.4f}s')\n\nt0 = time.time()\ntopk = torch.topk(scores, 100, dim=1)\nprint(f'Top-100 selection for 8456 users took {time.time()-t0:.4f}s')\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Matrix multiplication 8456 x 30000 took 0.3486s
Top-100 selection for 8456 users took 0.1660s
Process Group PGID: 2370
</untrusted_context>Optimizing Retrieval Speed
The retrieval process for all 8,456 users and 30,000 items is exceptionally fast, clocking in at approximately 0.5 seconds. This performance comfortably exceeds any latency requirements. My current focus is on analyzing the training process to ensure dot products yield a high NDCG@10.
Refining Loss Calculation
I'm now scrutinizing the training loss, specifically the cross-entropy formulation. I'm considering how to incorporate sample weights to better distinguish between organic likes and listens, aiming for improved NDCG@10. I'm also beginning to explore potential issues with false negatives arising from in-batch sampling.
Addressing Popularity Bias
I'm now considering popularity bias. While explicit negatives are useful for embedding dislikes, they are already excluded at inference. I'm examining how to leverage disliked items to push user embeddings away from what they dislike, indirectly addressing potential popularity bias issues during training.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\nitem_pop = dict(zip(catalog.item_id, catalog.popularity_rank))\n\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'])\nval_listens = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/val_listens.parquet')\nval_likes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/val_likes.parquet')\n\n# Validation ground truth\nstrong = val_listens[val_listens.uid.isin(targets) & (val_listens.is_organic == 1) & (val_listens.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]\nlikes = val_likes[val_likes.uid.isin(targets) & (val_likes.is_organic == 1)]\n\nprint('Total strong listens in val:', len(strong))\nprint('Total likes in val:', len(likes))\n\nstrong_cat = strong[strong.item_id.isin(item_pop)]\nlikes_cat = likes[likes.item_id.isin(item_pop)]\n\npop_strong = [item_pop[i] for i in strong_cat.item_id]\npop_likes = [item_pop[i] for i in likes_cat.item_id]\n\nprint('Popularity rank of strong listens: median=', np.median(pop_strong), 'mean=', np.mean(pop_strong), 'p25=', np.percentile(pop_strong, 25), 'p75=', np.percentile(pop_strong, 75))\nprint('Popularity rank of likes: median=', np.median(pop_likes), 'mean=', np.mean(pop_likes), 'p25=', np.percentile(pop_likes, 25), 'p75=', np.percentile(pop_likes, 75))\n\"",
"description": "Check popularity rank distribution of validation ground truth"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Total strong listens in val: 421615
Total likes in val: 20702
Popularity rank of strong listens: median= 4263.0 mean= 7288.4264337252625 p25= 1059.0 p75= 11431.0
Popularity rank of likes: median= 5377.0 mean= 8370.323947722467 p25= 1584.0 p75= 13568.0
Process Group PGID: 2383
</untrusted_context>Observing Distribution Trends
I'm currently analyzing the distribution of popular positive items in validation, noting medians around 4,200-5,300 and percentiles suggesting relevant items extend well beyond the top 100 global rankings.
Learning Collaborative Signals
I'm focusing on how users interact with tracks beyond the top global hits, finding personalized relevance is key. My current exploration centers on learning track embeddings that capture collaborative co-occurrence, and user embeddings that pool individual listening histories. I'm considering end-to-end training of item embeddings within a two-tower model.
Refining User Embeddings
I'm exploring how to effectively pool historical track embeddings for users. I've confirmed that using the same item embedding table $E$ in both user and item towers creates a shared space where co-occurring tracks are pulled closer. This mechanism mirrors successful architectures like YouTube DNN and Word2Vec, suggesting strong potential for accurate user representation.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nclass ItemTower(nn.Module):\n def __init__(self, num_items, embed_dim, feat_dim, out_dim):\n super().__init__()\n self.item_embed = nn.Embedding(num_items, embed_dim)\n self.feat_proj = nn.Linear(feat_dim, embed_dim)\n self.net = nn.Sequential(\n nn.Linear(embed_dim * 2, out_dim),\n nn.LayerNorm(out_dim),\n nn.GELU(),\n nn.Linear(out_dim, out_dim),\n )\n def forward(self, item_ids, item_feats):\n e = self.item_embed(item_ids)\n f = self.feat_proj(item_feats)\n x = torch.cat([e, f], dim=-1)\n out = self.net(x)\n return F.normalize(out, p=2, dim=-1)\n\nit = ItemTower(30000, 64, 4, 64)\nids = torch.randint(0, 30000, (1024,))\nfeats = torch.randn(1024, 4)\nout = it(ids, feats)\nprint('ItemTower out shape:', out.shape, 'norm:', torch.norm(out[0]).item())\n\"",
"description": "Test ItemTower architecture"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: ItemTower out shape: torch.Size([1024, 64]) norm: 1.0
Process Group PGID: 2403
</untrusted_context>Designing User Tower
I'm focusing on the UserTower design now. It will process liked items, starting with their indices and offsets from the ItemTower's output of normalized vectors in $\mathbb{R}^{64}$.
Developing User Tower Logic
I'm now concentrating on the UserTower's forward pass. This involves creating embeddings for liked, listened, and disliked items by leveraging the shared item_embed weights, and then concatenating these with projected user statistics to feed into the main network.
{
"description": "Test F.embedding_bag with shared embedding weight",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nitem_embed = nn.Embedding(30001, 64, padding_idx=30000)\n# Test F.embedding_bag with item_embed.weight\nindices = torch.tensor([1, 2, 30000, 3], dtype=torch.long)\noffsets = torch.tensor([0, 2, 3], dtype=torch.long)\nweights = torch.tensor([0.5, 0.5, 0.0, 1.0], dtype=torch.float)\n\nout = F.embedding_bag(indices, item_embed.weight, offsets=offsets, per_sample_weights=weights, mode='sum')\nprint('F.embedding_bag shape:', out.shape)\nprint('User 1 norm:', torch.norm(out[1]).item())\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: F.embedding_bag shape: torch.Size([3, 64])
User 1 norm: 0.0
Process Group PGID: 2422
</untrusted_context>Unifying Item Embeddings
I've realized F.embedding_bag can operate directly on item_embed.weight. This unification means updates to item embeddings from user history or retrieval loss will benefit both towers concurrently, a significant efficiency gain.
Refining Embeddings and Towers
I'm exploring how tying item embeddings, a common practice for reducing overfitting and parameter count, influences the system. Both user and item towers output normalized vectors, and relevance is determined by their dot product. This allows for independent computation of item embeddings offline, streamlining the process.
Optimizing Data Extraction
I'm focusing on accelerating data preparation. My current task is to extract necessary information for target users at the validation cutoff, specifically their liked, disliked items, and recent listens with their associated features, considering potential aggregation strategies for multiple listens.
Defining Training Data Windows
I'm considering temporal windows to generate training data. For each window preceding the validation cutoff, I'll use user engagement and likes/dislikes to construct positive training examples. This approach aims to capture evolving user preferences effectively for model training.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nimport time\n\nt0 = time.time()\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\nitem_map = {int(item): idx for idx, item in enumerate(catalog['item_id'])}\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'])\n\n# Read listens with pyarrow\ntable = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\nprint(f'Read parquet in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s')\n\nt0 = time.time()\n# Filter only target users and timestamp >= 24786800 - 60*86400\nt_min = 24786800 - 60 * 86400\nt_max = 24786800\nmask = pc.and_(pc.greater_equal(table['timestamp'], t_min), pc.less_equal(table['timestamp'], t_max))\nfiltered = table.filter(mask)\nprint(f'Filtered 60d in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s, rows={len(filtered)}')\n\nt0 = time.time()\ndf = filtered.to_pandas()\ndf = df[df.uid.isin(targets)]\n# Map items\ndf['item_idx'] = df['item_id'].map(item_map)\ndf = df.dropna(subset=['item_idx'])\ndf['item_idx'] = df['item_idx'].astype(np.int32)\nprint(f'Pandas prep in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s, remaining rows: {len(df)}')\n\"",
"description": "Benchmark filtering and item mapping"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Read parquet in 0.39s
Filtered 60d in 0.65s, rows=11718758
Pandas prep in 1.55s, remaining rows: 8403492
Process Group PGID: 2435
</untrusted_context>Measuring Initial Load
My initial data loading and preprocessing pipeline is quite performant, completing in under 3 seconds. Now, I'm focusing on the next step: efficiently aggregating user interaction histories to calculate track weights, specifically utilizing played ratio.
{
"description": "Benchmark user-item weight aggregation and top-k selection",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nimport time\n\nt0 = time.time()\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\nitem_map = {int(item): idx for idx, item in enumerate(catalog['item_id'])}\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'])\n\ntable = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\nt_min = 24786800 - 30 * 86400\nt_max = 24786800\nmask = pc.and_(pc.greater_equal(table['timestamp'], t_min), pc.less_equal(table['timestamp'], t_max))\nfiltered = table.filter(mask)\ndf = filtered.to_pandas()\ndf = df[df.uid.isin(targets)]\ndf['item_idx'] = df['item_id'].map(item_map)\ndf = df.dropna(subset=['item_idx'])\ndf['item_idx'] = df['item_idx'].astype(np.int32)\n\n# Compute weight\ndelta_days = (t_max - df['timestamp'].to_numpy()) / 86400.0\n# Half-life of 14 days: lambda = ln(2) / 14 = 0.0495\ndecay = np.exp(-0.0495 * delta_days)\nw = (df['played_ratio_pct'].to_numpy() / 100.0) * (1.0 + 0.5 * df['is_organic'].to_numpy()) * decay\ndf['w'] = w.astype(np.float32)\n\nt1 = time.time()\n# Groupby (uid, item_idx) and sum weights\nuser_item = df.groupby(['uid', 'item_idx'], as_index=False)['w'].sum()\nprint(f'Groupby (uid, item_idx) took {time.time()-t1:.2f}s, unique pairs: {len(user_item)}')\n\n# Sort and select top K items per user\nt2 = time.time()\nuser_item = user_item.sort_values(['uid', 'w'], ascending=[True, False])\ntop_k = user_item.groupby('uid').head(100)\nprint(f'Top-100 per user took {time.time()-t2:.2f}s, total rows: {len(top_k)}')\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Groupby (uid, item_idx) took 0.54s, unique pairs: 2149455
Top-100 per user took 0.71s, total rows: 687345
Process Group PGID: 2457
</untrusted_context>Optimizing Weighted Listens
My focus has shifted to the performance of weighted listen extraction. I've successfully benchmarked the groupby and top-100 selection, achieving approximately 3 seconds for 8,456 users. Next, I'll be analyzing the active preference state within validation_preference_state, specifically the liked items.
Analyzing Training Samples
I've been examining the construction of training samples across different temporal windows. Specifically, I'm analyzing how user history and positive items (organic likes and strong listens) are defined within each window to inform model training. My current focus is on window two's data preparation.
{
"description": "Benchmark computing active preference state at arbitrary timestamp",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nimport time\n\nt0 = time.time()\nlikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_likes.parquet')\nunlikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_unlikes.parquet')\ndislikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_dislikes.parquet')\nundislikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_undislikes.parquet')\n\nT = 24182000\n# Filter <= T\nl = likes[likes.timestamp <= T][['uid', 'item_id', 'timestamp']].assign(act=1, typ='like')\nu = unlikes[unlikes.timestamp <= T][['uid', 'item_id', 'timestamp']].assign(act=0, typ='like')\nd = dislikes[dislikes.timestamp <= T][['uid', 'item_id', 'timestamp']].assign(act=1, typ='dislike')\nud = undislikes[undislikes.timestamp <= T][['uid', 'item_id', 'timestamp']].assign(act=0, typ='dislike')\n\nevents = pd.concat([l, u, d, ud])\nevents = events.sort_values('timestamp')\n# latest action per (uid, item_id, typ)\nlatest = events.groupby(['uid', 'item_id', 'typ']).last().reset_index()\nactive = latest[latest.act == 1]\nprint(f'Computed active preference state at T={T} in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s, active count: {len(active)}')\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Computed active preference state at T=24182000 in 0.51s, active count: 791778
Process Group PGID: 2479
</untrusted_context>Optimizing Data Flow
The latest insights reveal an impressive 0.51-second processing time, indicating significant efficiency gains. My current focus is on optimizing the construction of training batches. I'm analyzing how user features, specifically liked_indices at cutoff $T$, should be integrated for optimal model performance.
Refining Batch Construction
I'm re-evaluating how to handle multiple positive items per user within a batch. My current thinking is to treat each positive item as a distinct sample for a given user's embedding, ensuring the loss computation accurately reflects all valid positive interactions.
Addressing User Sampling
I'm considering how to prevent penalizing correct items by ensuring each user is sampled at most once per batch. This approach, along with treating each positive item as a distinct sample, seems most aligned with standard two-tower model practices for efficient loss computation.
{
"strategic_intent": "Implement two-tower neural network, feature extraction, and validation pipeline."
}Strategic Intent: Implement two-tower neural network, feature extraction, and validation pipeline.Designing the Code
I'm focusing on structuring the code within /app/solution/ for optimal modularity. This involves creating distinct files for data utilities, model components, and evaluation logic.
Refining Item Tower Features
I'm currently detailing the specific features each model tower will utilize. For the item tower, this includes the catalog size with a designated padding index, alongside four normalized continuous features derived from popularity and listen counts.
Implementing Item Tower
I've implemented the item tower's structure, incorporating both embedding lookups and feature projections. The architecture utilizes an MLP with LayerNorm and GELU activations, culminating in normalized output vectors. I'm now defining the user tower's input, focusing on interaction history rather than direct user ID mapping.
Processing User Inputs
I'm now defining how the user tower will process its inputs. This involves calculating decay-weighted embeddings for listened, liked, and disliked items, alongside projecting continuous user statistics. These will then be concatenated and passed through an MLP for final representation.
Calculating Relevance Scores
I'm now calculating the relevance scores, which are essentially unit vector dot products. This means the candidate retrieval is an exact maximum inner product search. I'm also considering the discovery objective, specifically how to handle ineligible items and mitigate popularity bias.
Testing the Model
I'm now focusing on prototyping and testing. I've decided to build a prototype within /app/solution/ to validate the conceptual model on the public validation set. The initial step involves carefully defining the requirements for data_utils.py.
Processing User Data
I'm now refining the extraction of user interaction data. This involves loading recent listens, filtering for target users, and computing weighted interactions. I'm also generating user statistics and packaging them for efficient processing.
{
"file_path": "/app/solution/data_utils.py",
"content": "\"\"\"Data loading and preprocessing utilities for the two-tower ranker.\"\"\"\nfrom __future__ import annotations\n\nfrom pathlib import Path\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport torch\n\nCATALOG_SIZE = 30000\nPAD_IDX = 30000\n\n\ndef load_catalog(path: str | Path = \"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\"):\n \"\"\"Load candidate catalog and construct feature tensor.\"\"\"\n catalog = pd.read_parquet(path)\n catalog_items = catalog[\"item_id\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.int64)\n item2idx = {int(item): idx for idx, item in enumerate(catalog_items)}\n\n # Features: normalized rank, log positive listens, log organic positive listens, organic ratio\n rank_feat = catalog[\"popularity_rank\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32) / 30000.0\n pos_feat = np.log1p(catalog[\"positive_listens\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32)) / 10.0\n org_feat = np.log1p(catalog[\"organic_positive_listens\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32)) / 10.0\n ratio_feat = (\n catalog[\"organic_positive_listens\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32)\n / (catalog[\"positive_listens\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32) + 1.0)\n )\n\n feat_matrix = np.column_stack([rank_feat, pos_feat, org_feat, ratio_feat]).astype(np.float32)\n # Add a zero row for padding index\n feat_matrix = np.vstack([feat_matrix, np.zeros((1, feat_matrix.shape[1]), dtype=np.float32)])\n return catalog_items, item2idx, torch.from_numpy(feat_matrix)\n\n\ndef extract_user_histories(\n listens_path: str | Path,\n pref_df: pd.DataFrame,\n item2idx: dict[int, int],\n target_uids: list[int],\n cutoff_timestamp: int,\n window_days: int = 60,\n top_k_listens: int = 100,\n):\n \"\"\"Extract liked, disliked, and top listened items for each target user.\"\"\"\n target_set = set(target_uids)\n uid2row = {int(uid): idx for idx, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}\n num_users = len(target_uids)\n\n # 1. Preferences\n pref_df = pref_df[pref_df[\"uid\"].isin(target_set)]\n likes_grouped = (\n pref_df[pref_df[\"state\"] == \"liked\"].groupby(\"uid\")[\"item_id\"].apply(list).to_dict()\n )\n dislikes_grouped = (\n pref_df[pref_df[\"state\"] == \"disliked\"].groupby(\"uid\")[\"item_id\"].apply(list).to_dict()\n )\n\n # 2. Listens\n t_min = cutoff_timestamp - window_days * 86400\n t_max = cutoff_timestamp\n\n table = pq.read_table(\n listens_path,\n columns=[\"uid\", \"timestamp\", \"item_id\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n )\n mask = pc.and_(\n pc.greater_equal(table[\"timestamp\"], t_min),\n pc.less_equal(table[\"timestamp\"], t_max),\n )\n filtered = table.filter(mask).to_pandas()\n filtered = filtered[filtered[\"uid\"].isin(target_set)]\n\n # Compute listen stats for user features\n user_listen_counts = filtered.groupby(\"uid\").size().to_dict()\n user_listen_ratios = filtered.groupby(\"uid\")[\"played_ratio_pct\"].mean().to_dict()\n user_organic_ratios = filtered.groupby(\"uid\")[\"is_organic\"].mean().to_dict()\n\n # Map items to index\n filtered[\"item_idx\"] = filtered[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n filtered = filtered.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n filtered[\"item_idx\"] = filtered[\"item_idx\"].astype(np.int32)\n\n # Time decay and weight\n delta_days = (t_max - filtered[\"timestamp\"].to_numpy()) / 86400.0\n decay = np.exp(-0.05 * delta_days)\n filtered[\"w\"] = (\n (filtered[\"played_ratio_pct\"].to_numpy() / 100.0)\n * (1.0 + 0.5 * filtered[\"is_organic\"].to_numpy())\n * decay\n ).astype(np.float32)\n\n # Aggregate by (uid, item_idx)\n user_item = (\n filtered.groupby([\"uid\", \"item_idx\"], as_index=False)[\"w\"]\n .sum()\n .sort_values([\"uid\", \"w\"], ascending=[True, False])\n )\n top_user_item = user_item.groupby(\"uid\").head(top_k_listens)\n listens_grouped = top_user_item.groupby(\"uid\")[[\"item_idx\", \"w\"]].apply(\n lambda g: (g[\"item_idx\"].to_numpy(), g[\"w\"].to_numpy())\n ).to_dict()\n\n # Build flat arrays with offsets for EmbeddingBag\n liked_indices, liked_offsets = [], [0]\n disliked_indices, disliked_offsets = [], [0]\n listen_indices, listen_weights, listen_offsets = [], [], [0]\n stats_list = []\n\n for uid in target_uids:\n # Liked\n l_items = likes_grouped.get(uid, [])\n l_idx = [item2idx[i] for i in l_items if i in item2idx]\n if not l_idx:\n liked_indices.append(PAD_IDX)\n else:\n liked_indices.extend(l_idx)\n liked_offsets.append(len(liked_indices))\n\n # Disliked\n d_items = dislikes_grouped.get(uid, [])\n d_idx = [item2idx[i] for i in d_items if i in item2idx]\n if not d_idx:\n disliked_indices.append(PAD_IDX)\n else:\n disliked_indices.extend(d_idx)\n disliked_offsets.append(len(disliked_indices))\n\n # Listens\n if uid in listens_grouped:\n u_items, u_w = listens_grouped[uid]\n # normalize weights so sum is 1.0\n sum_w = u_w.sum()\n norm_w = u_w / (sum_w + 1e-6)\n listen_indices.extend(u_items)\n listen_weights.extend(norm_w)\n else:\n listen_indices.append(PAD_IDX)\n listen_weights.append(0.0)\n listen_offsets.append(len(listen_indices))\n\n # Stats\n num_likes = len(l_idx)\n num_dislikes = len(d_idx)\n num_listens = user_listen_counts.get(uid, 0)\n mean_ratio = user_listen_ratios.get(uid, 0.0) / 100.0\n org_ratio = user_organic_ratios.get(uid, 0.0)\n stats_list.append([\n np.log1p(num_likes) / 5.0,\n np.log1p(num_dislikes) / 3.0,\n np.log1p(num_listens) / 10.0,\n mean_ratio,\n org_ratio,\n ])\n\n return {\n \"liked_indices\": torch.tensor(liked_indices, dtype=torch.long),\n \"liked_offsets\": torch.tensor(liked_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),\n \"disliked_indices\": torch.tensor(disliked_indices, dtype=torch.long),\n \"disliked_offsets\": torch.tensor(disliked_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),\n \"listen_indices\": torch.tensor(listen_indices, dtype=torch.long),\n \"listen_weights\": torch.tensor(listen_weights, dtype=torch.float32),\n \"listen_offsets\": torch.tensor(listen_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),\n \"user_stats\": torch.tensor(stats_list, dtype=torch.float32),\n \"uid2row\": uid2row,\n }\n"
}Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/data_utils.py. Here is the updated code:
"""Data loading and preprocessing utilities for the two-tower ranker."""
from __future__ import annotations
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import pyarrow.compute as pc
import torch
CATALOG_SIZE = 30000
PAD_IDX = 30000
def load_catalog(path: str | Path = "/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet"):
"""Load candidate catalog and construct feature tensor."""
catalog = pd.read_parquet(path)
catalog_items = catalog["item_id"].to_numpy(dtype=np.int64)
item2idx = {int(item): idx for idx, item in enumerate(catalog_items)}
# Features: normalized rank, log positive listens, log organic positive listens, organic ratio
rank_feat = catalog["popularity_rank"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32) / 30000.0
pos_feat = np.log1p(catalog["positive_listens"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32)) / 10.0
org_feat = np.log1p(catalog["organic_positive_listens"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32)) / 10.0
ratio_feat = (
catalog["organic_positive_listens"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32)
/ (catalog["positive_listens"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32) + 1.0)
)
feat_matrix = np.column_stack([rank_feat, pos_feat, org_feat, ratio_feat]).astype(np.float32)
# Add a zero row for padding index
feat_matrix = np.vstack([feat_matrix, np.zeros((1, feat_matrix.shape[1]), dtype=np.float32)])
return catalog_items, item2idx, torch.from_numpy(feat_matrix)
def extract_user_histories(
listens_path: str | Path,
pref_df: pd.DataFrame,
item2idx: dict[int, int],
target_uids: list[int],
cutoff_timestamp: int,
window_days: int = 60,
top_k_listens: int = 100,
):
"""Extract liked, disliked, and top listened items for each target user."""
target_set = set(target_uids)
uid2row = {int(uid): idx for idx, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}
num_users = len(target_uids)
# 1. Preferences
pref_df = pref_df[pref_df["uid"].isin(target_set)]
likes_grouped = (
pref_df[pref_df["state"] == "liked"].groupby("uid")["item_id"].apply(list).to_dict()
)
dislikes_grouped = (
pref_df[pref_df["state"] == "disliked"].groupby("uid")["item_id"].apply(list).to_dict()
)
# 2. Listens
t_min = cutoff_timestamp - window_days * 86400
t_max = cutoff_timestamp
table = pq.read_table(
listens_path,
columns=["uid", "timestamp", "item_id", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
)
mask = pc.and_(
pc.greater_equal(table["timestamp"], t_min),
pc.less_equal(table["timestamp"], t_max),
)
filtered = table.filter(mask).to_pandas()
filtered = filtered[filtered["uid"].isin(target_set)]
# Compute listen stats for user features
user_listen_counts = filtered.groupby("uid").size().to_dict()
user_listen_ratios = filtered.groupby("uid")["played_ratio_pct"].mean().to_dict()
user_organic_ratios = filtered.groupby("uid")["is_organic"].mean().to_dict()
# Map items to index
filtered["item_idx"] = filtered["item_id"].map(item2idx)
filtered = filtered.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
filtered["item_idx"] = filtered["item_idx"].astype(np.int32)
# Time decay and weight
delta_days = (t_max - filtered["timestamp"].to_numpy()) / 86400.0
decay = np.exp(-0.05 * delta_days)
filtered["w"] = (
(filtered["played_ratio_pct"].to_numpy() / 100.0)
* (1.0 + 0.5 * filtered["is_organic"].to_numpy())
* decay
).astype(np.float32)
# Aggregate by (uid, item_idx)
user_item = (
filtered.groupby(["uid", "item_idx"], as_index=False)["w"]
.sum()
.sort_values(["uid", "w"], ascending=[True, False])
)
top_user_item = user_item.groupby("uid").head(top_k_listens)
listens_grouped = top_user_item.groupby("uid")[["item_idx", "w"]].apply(
lambda g: (g["item_idx"].to_numpy(), g["w"].to_numpy())
).to_dict()
# Build flat arrays with offsets for EmbeddingBag
liked_indices, liked_offsets = [], [0]
disliked_indices, disliked_offsets = [], [0]
listen_indices, listen_weights, listen_offsets = [], [], [0]
stats_list = []
for uid in target_uids:
# Liked
l_items = likes_grouped.get(uid, [])
l_idx = [item2idx[i] for i in l_items if i in item2idx]
if not l_idx:
liked_indices.append(PAD_IDX)
else:
liked_indices.extend(l_idx)
liked_offsets.append(len(liked_indices))
# Disliked
d_items = dislikes_grouped.get(uid, [])
d_idx = [item2idx[i] for i in d_items if i in item2idx]
if not d_idx:
disliked_indices.append(PAD_IDX)
else:
disliked_indices.extend(d_idx)
disliked_offsets.append(len(disliked_indices))
# Listens
if uid in listens_grouped:
u_items, u_w = listens_grouped[uid]
# normalize weights so sum is 1.0
sum_w = u_w.sum()
norm_w = u_w / (sum_w + 1e-6)
listen_indices.extend(u_items)
listen_weights.extend(norm_w)
else:
listen_indices.append(PAD_IDX)
listen_weights.append(0.0)
listen_offsets.append(len(listen_indices))
# Stats
num_likes = len(l_idx)
num_dislikes = len(d_idx)
num_listens = user_listen_counts.get(uid, 0)
mean_ratio = user_listen_ratios.get(uid, 0.0) / 100.0
org_ratio = user_organic_ratios.get(uid, 0.0)
stats_list.append([
np.log1p(num_likes) / 5.0,
np.log1p(num_dislikes) / 3.0,
np.log1p(num_listens) / 10.0,
mean_ratio,
org_ratio,
])
return {
"liked_indices": torch.tensor(liked_indices, dtype=torch.long),
"liked_offsets": torch.tensor(liked_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),
"disliked_indices": torch.tensor(disliked_indices, dtype=torch.long),
"disliked_offsets": torch.tensor(disliked_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),
"listen_indices": torch.tensor(listen_indices, dtype=torch.long),
"listen_weights": torch.tensor(listen_weights, dtype=torch.float32),
"listen_offsets": torch.tensor(listen_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),
"user_stats": torch.tensor(stats_list, dtype=torch.float32),
"uid2row": uid2row,
}
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport time\nimport pandas as pd\nfrom solution.data_utils import load_catalog, extract_user_histories\n\nt0 = time.time()\ncatalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()\nprint(f'Catalog loaded in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s, shape: {feat_matrix.shape}')\n\ntargets = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'].tolist()\npref = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet')\n\nt0 = time.time()\nhist = extract_user_histories('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', pref, item2idx, targets, 24786800, window_days=60)\nprint(f'User histories extracted in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s')\nprint('liked_indices:', hist['liked_indices'].shape)\nprint('disliked_indices:', hist['disliked_indices'].shape)\nprint('listen_indices:', hist['listen_indices'].shape)\nprint('user_stats:', hist['user_stats'].shape)\n\"",
"description": "Test load_catalog and extract_user_histories"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Catalog loaded in 0.03s, shape: torch.Size([30001, 4])
User histories extracted in 6.28s
liked_indices: torch.Size([420122])
disliked_indices: torch.Size([54868])
listen_indices: torch.Size([763372])
user_stats: torch.Size([8456, 5])
Process Group PGID: 2504
</untrusted_context>Processing User History
I've successfully extracted all historical listening features for 8,456 users over 60 days. My next step is to define the precise requirements for extract_training_targets, specifically how to generate (uid, item_idx) pairs within a given target window.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\nitem2idx = {int(item): idx for idx, item in enumerate(catalog['item_id'])}\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'])\n\nstart_ts = 24182000\nend_ts = 24786800\n\n# 1. listens\ntable = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\nmask = pc.and_(pc.greater_equal(table['timestamp'], start_ts), pc.less_equal(table['timestamp'], end_ts))\nfiltered = table.filter(mask).to_pandas()\nstrong = filtered[filtered.uid.isin(targets) & (filtered.is_organic == 1) & (filtered.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]\nstrong = strong.dropna(subset=['item_id'])\nstrong['item_idx'] = strong['item_id'].map(item2idx)\nstrong = strong.dropna(subset=['item_idx'])\nstrong['item_idx'] = strong['item_idx'].astype(int)\n\n# 2. likes\nlikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_likes.parquet')\norg_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= start_ts) & (likes.timestamp <= end_ts) & likes.uid.isin(targets) & (likes.is_organic == 1)]\norg_likes['item_idx'] = org_likes['item_id'].map(item2idx)\norg_likes = org_likes.dropna(subset=['item_idx'])\norg_likes['item_idx'] = org_likes['item_idx'].astype(int)\n\n# Combine\npairs = {}\nfor uid, idx in strong[['uid', 'item_idx']].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n pairs[(uid, idx)] = 1.0\nfor uid, idx in org_likes[['uid', 'item_idx']].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n pairs[(uid, idx)] = 3.0\n\nprint(f'Total unique (user, item) positive pairs in target window: {len(pairs)}')\nweights = list(pairs.values())\nprint(f'Grade 3 count: {weights.count(3.0)}, Grade 1 count: {weights.count(1.0)}')\n\"",
"description": "Test extracting target positive pairs"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: <string>:27: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
Total unique (user, item) positive pairs in target window: 176193
Grade 3 count: 7645, Grade 1 count: 168548
Process Group PGID: 2532
</untrusted_context>Designing model.py
I'm focusing on refining model.py. The latest insights reveal a substantial dataset of 176,193 positive (user, item) pairs within the target window, comprising 7,645 Grade 3 organic likes and 168,548 Grade 1 strong listens. This forms a strong foundation for our model architecture.
Decomposing Model Architecture
I'm breaking down the model into distinct components: an ItemTower for generating item embeddings, and a UserTower that derives user representations from interaction history, not just IDs. The score function will be a simple dot product. Training will involve positive items and sampled negatives.
Sharing Item Embeddings
I'm reconsidering the shared item embedding table. It appears ItemTower and UserTower could leverage a common nn.Embedding layer, impacting how item and user features are processed. This could simplify feature interactions and potentially improve efficiency.
{
"content": "\"\"\"Two-tower neural network architecture in PyTorch.\"\"\"\nfrom __future__ import annotations\n\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nCATALOG_SIZE = 30000\nPAD_IDX = 30000\n\n\nclass ItemTower(nn.Module):\n \"\"\"Item tower neural network.\n\n Takes catalog item indices and precomputed continuous item features,\n and maps them to a normalized d-dimensional item embedding vector.\n \"\"\"\n\n def __init__(\n self,\n item_embed: nn.Embedding,\n embed_dim: int = 64,\n num_features: int = 4,\n out_dim: int = 64,\n hidden_dim: int = 128,\n ):\n super().__init__()\n self.item_embed = item_embed\n self.feat_proj = nn.Linear(num_features, embed_dim)\n self.mlp = nn.Sequential(\n nn.Linear(embed_dim * 2, hidden_dim),\n nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),\n nn.GELU(),\n nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim),\n nn.LayerNorm(out_dim),\n )\n\n def forward(\n self,\n item_indices: torch.Tensor,\n item_features: torch.Tensor,\n ) -> torch.Tensor:\n \"\"\"Compute normalized item embeddings.\n\n Args:\n item_indices: 1D tensor of item indices in [0, CATALOG_SIZE].\n item_features: 2D tensor of shape (len(item_indices), num_features).\n\n Returns:\n Normalized item embedding tensor of shape (len(item_indices), out_dim).\n \"\"\"\n e = self.item_embed(item_indices)\n f = self.feat_proj(item_features)\n x = torch.cat([e, f], dim=-1)\n out = self.mlp(x)\n return F.normalize(out, p=2, dim=-1)\n\n\nclass UserTower(nn.Module):\n \"\"\"User tower neural network.\n\n Derives user representation strictly from interaction history (liked items,\n listened items with recency/completion weights, disliked items, and aggregate\n interaction statistics). Uses NO user-ID lookup.\n \"\"\"\n\n def __init__(\n self,\n item_embed: nn.Embedding,\n embed_dim: int = 64,\n num_stats: int = 5,\n out_dim: int = 64,\n hidden_dim: int = 128,\n dropout: float = 0.1,\n ):\n super().__init__()\n self.item_embed = item_embed\n self.stat_proj = nn.Linear(num_stats, embed_dim)\n self.mlp = nn.Sequential(\n nn.Linear(embed_dim * 4, hidden_dim),\n nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),\n nn.GELU(),\n nn.Dropout(dropout),\n nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim),\n nn.LayerNorm(out_dim),\n )\n\n def forward(\n self,\n liked_indices: torch.Tensor,\n liked_offsets: torch.Tensor,\n disliked_indices: torch.Tensor,\n disliked_offsets: torch.Tensor,\n listen_indices: torch.Tensor,\n listen_weights: torch.Tensor,\n listen_offsets: torch.Tensor,\n user_stats: torch.Tensor,\n ) -> torch.Tensor:\n \"\"\"Compute normalized user embeddings from interaction history.\n\n Returns:\n Normalized user embedding tensor of shape (batch_size, out_dim).\n \"\"\"\n # Pool liked items\n e_like = F.embedding_bag(\n liked_indices,\n self.item_embed.weight,\n offsets=liked_offsets,\n mode=\"mean\",\n )\n # Pool listened items with weighted sum\n e_listen = F.embedding_bag(\n listen_indices,\n self.item_embed.weight,\n offsets=listen_offsets,\n per_sample_weights=listen_weights,\n mode=\"sum\",\n )\n # Pool disliked items\n e_dislike = F.embedding_bag(\n disliked_indices,\n self.item_embed.weight,\n offsets=disliked_offsets,\n mode=\"mean\",\n )\n # Project user statistical features\n s_proj = self.stat_proj(user_stats)\n\n # Concatenate history representations\n x = torch.cat([e_like, e_listen, e_dislike, s_proj], dim=-1)\n out = self.mlp(x)\n return F.normalize(out, p=2, dim=-1)\n\n\nclass TwoTowerModel(nn.Module):\n \"\"\"Complete two-tower recommendation model.\"\"\"\n\n def __init__(\n self,\n catalog_size: int = CATALOG_SIZE,\n embed_dim: int = 64,\n out_dim: int = 64,\n hidden_dim: int = 128,\n num_item_features: int = 4,\n num_user_stats: int = 5,\n temperature: float = 0.07,\n ):\n super().__init__()\n # Shared item embedding table (+1 for padding/OOV index)\n self.item_embed = nn.Embedding(\n catalog_size + 1,\n embed_dim,\n padding_idx=PAD_IDX,\n )\n # Initialize item embeddings with small normal weights\n nn.init.normal_(self.item_embed.weight, std=0.02)\n # Zero out padding vector\n with torch.no_grad():\n self.item_embed.weight[PAD_IDX].fill_(0.0)\n\n self.item_tower = ItemTower(\n item_embed=self.item_embed,\n embed_dim=embed_dim,\n num_features=num_item_features,\n out_dim=out_dim,\n hidden_dim=hidden_dim,\n )\n self.user_tower = UserTower(\n item_embed=self.item_embed,\n embed_dim=embed_dim,\n num_stats=num_user_stats,\n out_dim=out_dim,\n hidden_dim=hidden_dim,\n )\n self.temperature = nn.Parameter(torch.tensor(temperature))\n\n def precompute_item_vectors(\n self,\n all_item_features: torch.Tensor,\n ) -> torch.Tensor:\n \"\"\"Offline precomputation of item embeddings for all catalog items.\n\n Returns:\n Precomputed item embedding tensor of shape (CATALOG_SIZE, out_dim).\n \"\"\"\n device = all_item_features.device\n all_indices = torch.arange(CATALOG_SIZE, device=device, dtype=torch.long)\n catalog_feats = all_item_features[:CATALOG_SIZE]\n return self.item_tower(all_indices, catalog_feats)\n",
"file_path": "/app/solution/model.py"
}Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/model.py. Here is the updated code:
"""Two-tower neural network architecture in PyTorch."""
from __future__ import annotations
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F
CATALOG_SIZE = 30000
PAD_IDX = 30000
class ItemTower(nn.Module):
"""Item tower neural network.
Takes catalog item indices and precomputed continuous item features,
and maps them to a normalized d-dimensional item embedding vector.
"""
def __init__(
self,
item_embed: nn.Embedding,
embed_dim: int = 64,
num_features: int = 4,
out_dim: int = 64,
hidden_dim: int = 128,
):
super().__init__()
self.item_embed = item_embed
self.feat_proj = nn.Linear(num_features, embed_dim)
self.mlp = nn.Sequential(
nn.Linear(embed_dim * 2, hidden_dim),
nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),
nn.GELU(),
nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim),
nn.LayerNorm(out_dim),
)
def forward(
self,
item_indices: torch.Tensor,
item_features: torch.Tensor,
) -> torch.Tensor:
"""Compute normalized item embeddings.
Args:
item_indices: 1D tensor of item indices in [0, CATALOG_SIZE].
item_features: 2D tensor of shape (len(item_indices), num_features).
Returns:
Normalized item embedding tensor of shape (len(item_indices), out_dim).
"""
e = self.item_embed(item_indices)
f = self.feat_proj(item_features)
x = torch.cat([e, f], dim=-1)
out = self.mlp(x)
return F.normalize(out, p=2, dim=-1)
class UserTower(nn.Module):
"""User tower neural network.
Derives user representation strictly from interaction history (liked items,
listened items with recency/completion weights, disliked items, and aggregate
interaction statistics). Uses NO user-ID lookup.
"""
def __init__(
self,
item_embed: nn.Embedding,
embed_dim: int = 64,
num_stats: int = 5,
out_dim: int = 64,
hidden_dim: int = 128,
dropout: float = 0.1,
):
super().__init__()
self.item_embed = item_embed
self.stat_proj = nn.Linear(num_stats, embed_dim)
self.mlp = nn.Sequential(
nn.Linear(embed_dim * 4, hidden_dim),
nn.LayerNorm(hidden_dim),
nn.GELU(),
nn.Dropout(dropout),
nn.Linear(hidden_dim, out_dim),
nn.LayerNorm(out_dim),
)
def forward(
self,
liked_indices: torch.Tensor,
liked_offsets: torch.Tensor,
disliked_indices: torch.Tensor,
disliked_offsets: torch.Tensor,
listen_indices: torch.Tensor,
listen_weights: torch.Tensor,
listen_offsets: torch.Tensor,
user_stats: torch.Tensor,
) -> torch.Tensor:
"""Compute normalized user embeddings from interaction history.
Returns:
Normalized user embedding tensor of shape (batch_size, out_dim).
"""
# Pool liked items
e_like = F.embedding_bag(
liked_indices,
self.item_embed.weight,
offsets=liked_offsets,
mode="mean",
)
# Pool listened items with weighted sum
e_listen = F.embedding_bag(
listen_indices,
self.item_embed.weight,
offsets=listen_offsets,
per_sample_weights=listen_weights,
mode="sum",
)
# Pool disliked items
e_dislike = F.embedding_bag(
disliked_indices,
self.item_embed.weight,
offsets=disliked_offsets,
mode="mean",
)
# Project user statistical features
s_proj = self.stat_proj(user_stats)
# Concatenate history representations
x = torch.cat([e_like, e_listen, e_dislike, s_proj], dim=-1)
out = self.mlp(x)
return F.normalize(out, p=2, dim=-1)
class TwoTowerModel(nn.Module):
"""Complete two-tower recommendation model."""
def __init__(
self,
catalog_size: int = CATALOG_SIZE,
embed_dim: int = 64,
out_dim: int = 64,
hidden_dim: int = 128,
num_item_features: int = 4,
num_user_stats: int = 5,
temperature: float = 0.07,
):
super().__init__()
# Shared item embedding table (+1 for padding/OOV index)
self.item_embed = nn.Embedding(
catalog_size + 1,
embed_dim,
padding_idx=PAD_IDX,
)
# Initialize item embeddings with small normal weights
nn.init.normal_(self.item_embed.weight, std=0.02)
# Zero out padding vector
with torch.no_grad():
self.item_embed.weight[PAD_IDX].fill_(0.0)
self.item_tower = ItemTower(
item_embed=self.item_embed,
embed_dim=embed_dim,
num_features=num_item_features,
out_dim=out_dim,
hidden_dim=hidden_dim,
)
self.user_tower = UserTower(
item_embed=self.item_embed,
embed_dim=embed_dim,
num_stats=num_user_stats,
out_dim=out_dim,
hidden_dim=hidden_dim,
)
self.temperature = nn.Parameter(torch.tensor(temperature))
def precompute_item_vectors(
self,
all_item_features: torch.Tensor,
) -> torch.Tensor:
"""Offline precomputation of item embeddings for all catalog items.
Returns:
Precomputed item embedding tensor of shape (CATALOG_SIZE, out_dim).
"""
device = all_item_features.device
all_indices = torch.arange(CATALOG_SIZE, device=device, dtype=torch.long)
catalog_feats = all_item_features[:CATALOG_SIZE]
return self.item_tower(all_indices, catalog_feats)
Developing Retrieval Strategy
I've finalized the solution/model.py file. My current focus is on refining the retrieval and ranking process. I'm working through how to effectively map the user_vectors (8456, d) and item_vectors (30000, d) to generate the top 100 ranked items for each user, considering the provided tensor shapes U and V.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport numpy as np\nimport time\n\npacked = np.load('/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz')['packed_eligible']\nt0 = time.time()\nmasks = np.unpackbits(packed, axis=1, count=30000, bitorder='little')\nprint(f'Unpacked all 8456 rows in {time.time()-t0:.4f}s, shape: {masks.shape}')\n\"",
"description": "Benchmark unpacking all eligibility bitmasks"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Unpacked all 8456 rows in 0.0274s, shape: (8456, 30000)
Process Group PGID: 2554
</untrusted_context>Processing Masks and Scores
I've successfully unpacked all 8,456 masks and am now calculating the dot product between U and V. Transposing V and then performing the matrix multiplication is complete. I'm currently converting the resulting tensor to a NumPy array for efficient manipulation and masking out irrelevant areas with a very low score. The next step involves identifying the indices of the top 100 scores.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport numpy as np\nimport torch\nimport time\n\npacked = np.load('/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz')['packed_eligible']\nU = torch.randn(8456, 64)\nV = torch.randn(30000, 64)\n\nt0 = time.time()\nscores = torch.matmul(U, V.T).numpy()\nmasks = np.unpackbits(packed, axis=1, count=30000, bitorder='little')\nscores[masks == 0] = -1e9\n\n# Fast top-100 sort\npart = np.argpartition(-scores, 100, axis=1)[:, :100]\nrow_idx = np.arange(len(scores))[:, None]\npart_scores = scores[row_idx, part]\nsort_order = np.argsort(-part_scores, axis=1)\ntop100 = np.take_along_axis(part, sort_order, axis=1)\n\nprint(f'Full retrieval took {time.time()-t0:.4f}s, top100 shape: {top100.shape}')\n\"",
"description": "Benchmark end-to-end vector retrieval on CPU"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Full retrieval took 2.1679s, top100 shape: (8456, 100)
Process Group PGID: 2564
</untrusted_context>Achieving Peak Performance
My latest thoughts confirm that full retrieval, even with masking across all target users and items, now completes in a swift 2.16 seconds. I'm now exploring torch.topk for even greater speed, anticipating it will leverage multi-threading for a significant boost.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport numpy as np\nimport torch\nimport time\n\npacked = np.load('/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz')['packed_eligible']\nU = torch.randn(8456, 64)\nV = torch.randn(30000, 64)\n\nt0 = time.time()\nscores = torch.matmul(U, V.T)\nmasks = torch.from_numpy(np.unpackbits(packed, axis=1, count=30000, bitorder='little').astype(bool))\nscores[~masks] = -1e9\ntop100 = torch.topk(scores, 100, dim=1).indices\nprint(f'PyTorch topk retrieval took {time.time()-t0:.4f}s')\n\"",
"description": "Benchmark PyTorch topk retrieval"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: PyTorch topk retrieval took 0.5756s
Process Group PGID: 2577
</untrusted_context>Optimizing Data Formatting
I'm currently focused on the efficiency of transforming retrieved data into a pandas DataFrame. Initial benchmarks show the retrieval itself is remarkably swift. Now, I'm testing formatting speeds, particularly with large datasets like 845,600 rows, by optimizing the creation of repeated uid and item_id columns.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport time\n\nuids = np.arange(8456)\nitems = np.random.randint(0, 1000000, size=(8456, 100))\n\nt0 = time.time()\ndf = pd.DataFrame({\n 'uid': np.repeat(uids, 100),\n 'item_id': items.flatten(),\n 'rank': np.tile(np.arange(1, 101, dtype=np.int64), len(uids)),\n})\nprint(f'DataFrame created in {time.time()-t0:.4f}s, shape: {df.shape}')\nt0 = time.time()\ndf.to_parquet('/app/solution/temp_test.parquet')\nprint(f'Parquet written in {time.time()-t0:.4f}s')\n\"",
"description": "Benchmark DataFrame creation and parquet writing"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: DataFrame created in 0.0085s, shape: (845600, 3)
Parquet written in 0.1212s
Process Group PGID: 2590
</untrusted_context>{
"description": "Remove temp parquet test file",
"command": "rm -f /app/solution/temp_test.parquet"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: (empty)
Process Group PGID: 2607
</untrusted_context>{
"content": "\"\"\"Fast candidate retrieval, masking, and ranking export.\"\"\"\nfrom __future__ import annotations\n\nfrom pathlib import Path\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport torch\n\n\ndef generate_ranking(\n user_embeddings: torch.Tensor,\n item_embeddings: torch.Tensor,\n eligibility_npz_path: str | Path,\n output_path: str | Path | None = None,\n) -> pd.DataFrame:\n \"\"\"Perform MIPS retrieval, mask ineligible items, and generate top-100 ranking.\n\n Args:\n user_embeddings: (num_users, dim) tensor of user representations.\n item_embeddings: (num_items, dim) tensor of candidate representations.\n eligibility_npz_path: Path to eligibility archive (.npz).\n output_path: Optional path to save parquet ranking.\n\n Returns:\n DataFrame with columns ['uid', 'item_id', 'rank'].\n \"\"\"\n elig = np.load(eligibility_npz_path)\n uids = elig[\"uids\"].astype(np.int64)\n catalog_items = elig[\"item_ids\"].astype(np.int64)\n packed = elig[\"packed_eligible\"]\n\n num_users = len(uids)\n num_items = len(catalog_items)\n\n # Compute dot products\n scores = torch.matmul(user_embeddings, item_embeddings.T)\n\n # Unpack eligibility masks and apply\n masks = torch.from_numpy(\n np.unpackbits(packed, axis=1, count=num_items, bitorder=\"little\").astype(bool)\n )\n scores[~masks] = -1e9\n\n # Retrieve top 100 per user\n top100_indices = torch.topk(scores, 100, dim=1).indices.cpu().numpy()\n top100_items = catalog_items[top100_indices]\n\n df = pd.DataFrame({\n \"uid\": np.repeat(uids, 100),\n \"item_id\": top100_items.flatten(),\n \"rank\": np.tile(np.arange(1, 101, dtype=np.int64), num_users),\n })\n\n if output_path is not None:\n df.to_parquet(output_path, index=False)\n\n return df\n",
"file_path": "/app/solution/retrieval.py"
}Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/retrieval.py. Here is the updated code:
"""Fast candidate retrieval, masking, and ranking export."""
from __future__ import annotations
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import torch
def generate_ranking(
user_embeddings: torch.Tensor,
item_embeddings: torch.Tensor,
eligibility_npz_path: str | Path,
output_path: str | Path | None = None,
) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Perform MIPS retrieval, mask ineligible items, and generate top-100 ranking.
Args:
user_embeddings: (num_users, dim) tensor of user representations.
item_embeddings: (num_items, dim) tensor of candidate representations.
eligibility_npz_path: Path to eligibility archive (.npz).
output_path: Optional path to save parquet ranking.
Returns:
DataFrame with columns ['uid', 'item_id', 'rank'].
"""
elig = np.load(eligibility_npz_path)
uids = elig["uids"].astype(np.int64)
catalog_items = elig["item_ids"].astype(np.int64)
packed = elig["packed_eligible"]
num_users = len(uids)
num_items = len(catalog_items)
# Compute dot products
scores = torch.matmul(user_embeddings, item_embeddings.T)
# Unpack eligibility masks and apply
masks = torch.from_numpy(
np.unpackbits(packed, axis=1, count=num_items, bitorder="little").astype(bool)
)
scores[~masks] = -1e9
# Retrieve top 100 per user
top100_indices = torch.topk(scores, 100, dim=1).indices.cpu().numpy()
top100_items = catalog_items[top100_indices]
df = pd.DataFrame({
"uid": np.repeat(uids, 100),
"item_id": top100_items.flatten(),
"rank": np.tile(np.arange(1, 101, dtype=np.int64), num_users),
})
if output_path is not None:
df.to_parquet(output_path, index=False)
return df
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport torch\nfrom solution.retrieval import generate_ranking\n\nU = torch.randn(8456, 64)\nV = torch.randn(30000, 64)\ndf = generate_ranking(U, V, '/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz', '/app/solution/val_test.parquet')\nprint('Generated test ranking:', df.shape)\n\" && python3 /task/evaluate_public.py /app/solution/val_test.parquet && rm -f /app/solution/val_test.parquet",
"description": "Test generate_ranking with evaluate_public.py"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Generated test ranking: (845600, 3)
{
"model": "/app/solution/val_test.parquet",
"scores": {
"quality_ndcg@10": 0.000315,
"quality_users": 4263
}
}
Process Group PGID: 2610
</untrusted_context>Completing Pipeline Testing
The retrieval, masking, ranking, and evaluation pipeline now runs without issue and passes validation with evaluate_public.py. My focus is shifting to the training dataset preparation and the training loop itself.
Refining Training Strategy
I'm now exploring how to best construct training data to boost NDCG@10 beyond the baseline. I'm analyzing the overlap in user history across different windows and considering extracting history at a single point to simplify the data generation process for the two-tower model.
Expanding Training Data
I've discovered a way to significantly expand my training data by incorporating more positive interactions. I can now combine target pairs from multiple time windows and also leverage individual user's organic listens and likes at a specific cutoff time for training, creating millions of new examples. This is a significant boost over the initial dataset size.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\nT_split = 24182000\nT_end = 24786800\n\n# Read listens before and after T_split\ntable = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'])\n\n# Prior history\nm_prior = pc.less(table['timestamp'], T_split)\nt_prior = table.filter(m_prior).to_pandas()\nt_prior = t_prior[t_prior.uid.isin(targets)]\nuser_prior_items = t_prior.groupby('uid')['item_id'].apply(set).to_dict()\n\n# Target window\nm_target = pc.and_(pc.greater_equal(table['timestamp'], T_split), pc.less_equal(table['timestamp'], T_end))\nt_target = table.filter(m_target).to_pandas()\nt_target = t_target[t_target.uid.isin(targets) & (t_target.is_organic == 1) & (t_target.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]\n\nis_new = []\nfor uid, item in t_target[['uid', 'item_id']].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n prior = user_prior_items.get(uid, set())\n is_new.append(item not in prior)\n\nprint(f'Total target strong listens: {len(is_new)}, fraction new: {np.mean(is_new):.4f}')\n\"",
"description": "Check fraction of new items in temporal target window"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Total target strong listens: 428209, fraction new: 0.2594
Process Group PGID: 2643
</untrusted_context>Discovering Fresh Music
I'm excited to report that a significant portion, over a quarter, of the strong listening activity consists of brand-new music the user hasn't encountered. My eligibility filter is ensuring we only consider unseen items from the candidate catalog for this analysis.
Training New Content
I'm refining the training data to focus solely on items the user has never heard before, along with their organic likes and strong listens. This approach aims to force the model to truly learn discovery preferences, and I'm testing with multiple historical windows to maximize the dataset size.
{
"description": "Benchmark training throughput on CPU",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\nimport time\nfrom solution.model import TwoTowerModel\n\nmodel = TwoTowerModel(catalog_size=30000, embed_dim=64, out_dim=64, hidden_dim=128)\noptimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=1e-3, weight_decay=1e-5)\n\n# Simulate 100 batches of size 512\nB = 512\nK_neg = 512\nt0 = time.time()\nfor b in range(50):\n optimizer.zero_grad()\n # Dummy user history inputs for batch\n num_liked = B * 30\n liked_idx = torch.randint(0, 30000, (num_liked,))\n liked_off = torch.arange(0, num_liked, 30)\n \n num_disliked = B * 5\n disliked_idx = torch.randint(0, 30000, (num_disliked,))\n disliked_off = torch.arange(0, num_disliked, 5)\n \n num_listens = B * 50\n listen_idx = torch.randint(0, 30000, (num_listens,))\n listen_w = torch.ones(num_listens, dtype=torch.float32) / 50.0\n listen_off = torch.arange(0, num_listens, 50)\n \n user_stats = torch.randn(B, 5)\n \n # Forward user tower\n u = model.user_tower(liked_idx, liked_off, disliked_idx, disliked_off, listen_idx, listen_w, listen_off, user_stats)\n \n # Forward item tower for positive items\n pos_items = torch.randint(0, 30000, (B,))\n pos_feats = torch.randn(B, 4)\n v_pos = model.item_tower(pos_items, pos_feats)\n \n # Forward item tower for catalog negatives\n neg_items = torch.randint(0, 30000, (K_neg,))\n neg_feats = torch.randn(K_neg, 4)\n v_neg = model.item_tower(neg_items, neg_feats)\n \n v_all = torch.cat([v_pos, v_neg], dim=0) # (B + K_neg, out_dim)\n \n # Scores\n scores = torch.matmul(u, v_all.T) / 0.07 # (B, B + K_neg)\n labels = torch.arange(B)\n loss = F.cross_entropy(scores, labels)\n \n loss.backward()\n optimizer.step()\n\nelapsed = time.time() - t0\nprint(f'50 batches of size {B} ({50 * B} samples) took {elapsed:.2f}s ({50 * B / elapsed:.1f} samples/sec)')\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: 50 batches of size 512 (25600 samples) took 1.11s (23009.5 samples/sec)
Process Group PGID: 2671
</untrusted_context>Achieving Incredible Speeds
I'm thrilled by the latest results. Processing 23,000 samples per second on the CPU means full epochs are now incredibly fast, with 10 epochs completing in under 1.5 minutes. This pace provides ample room for rapid experimentation.
Optimizing Batch Construction
My focus has shifted to efficiently building training batches. With only 8,456 target users, I'm exploring strategies like pre-indexing user representations or batching user histories to avoid overhead when creating real data batches.
Refining User Embedding Calculation
I've discovered that computing user embeddings for all 8,456 target users simultaneously takes a mere 5 milliseconds. This allows me to simply index pre-computed embeddings for any training pair, drastically reducing overhead for batch construction.
Improving Training Efficiency
I've refined the training process. With each epoch now taking a mere 0.2 seconds, thanks to efficient batching of distinct users and items, 10 epochs are completed swiftly. I'm now considering how to best leverage multiple positive items per user and adjust sampling probabilities.
{
"description": "Benchmark batch tensor construction on the fly",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\n# Test slicing user histories for a batch of user row indices\n# Suppose we have user_liked = {uid: [items]}, user_disliked = {uid: [items]}, etc.\n# For a batch of uids, we can construct the batch tensors on the fly in Python/NumPy!\nuids = list(range(1024))\nimport time\nt0 = time.time()\n\n# Dummy data\nuser_likes = {u: list(range(u % 20 + 1)) for u in uids}\nuser_listens = {u: (list(range(u % 50 + 1)), [1.0/(u%50+1)]*(u%50+1)) for u in uids}\n\nindices = []\noffsets = [0]\nfor u in uids:\n items = user_likes[u]\n indices.extend(items)\n offsets.append(len(indices))\n\nidx_t = torch.tensor(indices, dtype=torch.long)\noff_t = torch.tensor(offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\nprint(f'Batch tensor construction took {(time.time()-t0)*1000:.2f} ms, total items: {len(indices)}')\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Batch tensor construction took 2.78 ms, total items: 10720
Process Group PGID: 2684
</untrusted_context>Optimizing Batch Tensor Construction
I'm focusing on the performance of batch tensor construction, specifically reducing the 2.78ms overhead. My current line of inquiry involves precomputing user history tensors for all target users, leveraging the hist['liked_indices'] and hist['liked_offsets'] already generated by extract_user_histories.
Precomputing User Embeddings
I'm exploring precomputing embeddings for all target users at the epoch's start. Initial tests show the user tower handles all 8,456 users in roughly 5ms, significantly reducing overhead. This could allow direct loss computation on mini-batches of user and item embeddings.
{
"description": "Analyze target user coverage across historical windows",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\n# Let's inspect multiple historical windows:\n# Window 0: [24786800 - 7*86400, 24786800] = [24182000, 24786800]\n# Window 1: [24786800 - 14*86400, 24786800 - 7*86400] = [23577200, 24182000]\n# Window 2: [24786800 - 21*86400, 24786800 - 14*86400] = [22972400, 23577200]\n# Window 3: [24786800 - 28*86400, 24786800 - 21*86400] = [22367600, 22972400]\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\nitem2idx = {int(item): idx for idx, item in enumerate(catalog['item_id'])}\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'])\n\nt_listens = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\nt_likes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_likes.parquet')\n\n# Let's see how many target users have at least 1 positive item across these windows\nfor n_windows in [1, 2, 3, 4]:\n start_ts = 24786800 - n_windows * 7 * 86400\n mask = pc.and_(pc.greater_equal(t_listens['timestamp'], start_ts), pc.less_equal(t_listens['timestamp'], 24786800))\n filtered = t_listens.filter(mask).to_pandas()\n strong = filtered[filtered.uid.isin(targets) & (filtered.is_organic == 1) & (filtered.played_ratio_pct >= 80) & filtered.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\n \n likes = t_likes[(t_likes.timestamp >= start_ts) & (t_likes.timestamp <= 24786800) & t_likes.uid.isin(targets) & (t_likes.is_organic == 1) & t_likes.item_id.isin(item2idx)]\n \n uids_covered = set(strong.uid) | set(likes.uid)\n print(f'{n_windows} windows: strong listens={len(strong)}, likes={len(likes)}, active target users={len(uids_covered)} / {len(targets)} ({len(uids_covered)/len(targets)*100:.1f}%)')\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: 1 windows: strong listens=304885, likes=7774, active target users=5989 / 8456 (70.8%)
2 windows: strong listens=593945, likes=14903, active target users=6752 / 8456 (79.8%)
3 windows: strong listens=880960, likes=22354, active target users=7142 / 8456 (84.5%)
4 windows: strong listens=1170136, likes=29985, active target users=7374 / 8456 (87.2%)
Process Group PGID: 2694
</untrusted_context>Analyzing User Engagement
I've observed strong engagement metrics across 28 days, with over a million listens and nearly 30,000 organic likes, reaching 87.2% of our target users. I'm now focused on understanding the behavior of the remaining 12.8%, investigating their listening patterns in earlier timeframes to ensure comprehensive user coverage.
Structuring Training Data
I'm now organizing the training dataset. Each epoch will involve mapping user histories to relevant discovery tracks. I'm planning to use a (user, item, weight) structure, assigning a weight of 3.0 for organic likes and 1.0 for strong organic listens. This will allow for weighted sampling of positive items per user.
Testing Training Strategy
I've refined the batching and loss calculation, determining that approximately 14 batches per epoch will be generated. My focus is now on writing and executing a full Python prototype to test this strategy, specifically looking for decreases in training loss and improvements in public validation NDCG@10.
{
"file_path": "/app/solution/experiment_1.py",
"content": "\"\"\"Experiment 1: Train two-tower model and evaluate on public validation.\"\"\"\nfrom __future__ import annotations\n\nimport random\nimport time\nfrom pathlib import Path\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nfrom solution.data_utils import load_catalog, extract_user_histories, CATALOG_SIZE, PAD_IDX\nfrom solution.model import TwoTowerModel\nfrom solution.retrieval import generate_ranking\n\n\ndef set_seed(seed: int = 42):\n random.seed(seed)\n np.random.seed(seed)\n torch.manual_seed(seed)\n\n\ndef build_training_pairs(\n listens_path: str | Path,\n likes_path: str | Path,\n item2idx: dict[int, int],\n target_uids: set[int],\n start_ts: int,\n end_ts: int,\n):\n \"\"\"Extract (uid -> list of (item_idx, weight)) in target window.\"\"\"\n # 1. listens\n table = pq.read_table(\n listens_path,\n columns=[\"uid\", \"timestamp\", \"item_id\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n )\n mask = pc.and_(\n pc.greater_equal(table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts),\n pc.less_equal(table[\"timestamp\"], end_ts),\n )\n filtered = table.filter(mask).to_pandas()\n strong = filtered[\n filtered[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)\n & (filtered[\"is_organic\"] == 1)\n & (filtered[\"played_ratio_pct\"] >= 80)\n ]\n strong[\"item_idx\"] = strong[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n strong = strong.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n strong[\"item_idx\"] = strong[\"item_idx\"].astype(int)\n\n # 2. likes\n likes = pd.read_parquet(likes_path)\n org_likes = likes[\n (likes[\"timestamp\"] >= start_ts)\n & (likes[\"timestamp\"] <= end_ts)\n & likes[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)\n & (likes[\"is_organic\"] == 1)\n ]\n org_likes[\"item_idx\"] = org_likes[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n org_likes = org_likes.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n org_likes[\"item_idx\"] = org_likes[\"item_idx\"].astype(int)\n\n # Merge pairs: uid -> {item_idx: weight}\n user_positives: dict[int, dict[int, float]] = {}\n for uid, idx in strong[[\"uid\", \"item_idx\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = 1.0\n for uid, idx in org_likes[[\"uid\", \"item_idx\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = 3.0\n\n return user_positives\n\n\ndef main():\n set_seed(42)\n print(\"Loading catalog...\")\n catalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()\n\n targets_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\n target_uids = targets_df[\"uid\"].tolist()\n target_set = set(target_uids)\n\n T_val_cutoff = 24786800\n print(\"Extracting validation user histories at T =\", T_val_cutoff)\n val_pref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\n val_hist = extract_user_histories(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n val_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_val_cutoff,\n window_days=60,\n )\n\n print(\"Building training positive interactions (last 14 days of train)...\")\n train_positives = build_training_pairs(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n \"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\",\n item2idx,\n target_set,\n start_ts=T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400,\n end_ts=T_val_cutoff,\n )\n print(f\"Users with positive targets: {len(train_positives)}\")\n\n # Extract user histories at training split (T_val_cutoff - 14 days)\n T_train_split = T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400\n print(\"Extracting training user histories at T =\", T_train_split)\n train_hist = extract_user_histories(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n val_pref, # using val_pref or pre-split\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_train_split,\n window_days=60,\n )\n\n # Initialize model\n model = TwoTowerModel(\n catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,\n embed_dim=64,\n out_dim=64,\n hidden_dim=128,\n temperature=0.07,\n )\n optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=1e-3, weight_decay=1e-4)\n\n # Active training users\n active_uids = [u for u in target_uids if u in train_positives]\n uid2row = train_hist[\"uid2row\"]\n\n batch_size = 512\n num_negatives = 512\n epochs = 15\n\n print(f\"Training for {epochs} epochs...\")\n for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1):\n model.train()\n random.shuffle(active_uids)\n total_loss = 0.0\n num_batches = 0\n\n for b_start in range(0, len(active_uids), batch_size):\n b_uids = active_uids[b_start : b_start + batch_size]\n if len(b_uids) < 32:\n continue\n\n # For each user, sample 1 positive item proportional to weights\n b_pos_items = []\n b_weights = []\n for u in b_uids:\n items_dict = train_positives[u]\n items = list(items_dict.keys())\n weights = list(items_dict.values())\n # Sample proportional to weight\n chosen = random.choices(items, weights=weights, k=1)[0]\n b_pos_items.append(chosen)\n b_weights.append(items_dict[chosen])\n\n # Build batch user history tensors\n b_liked_idx, b_liked_off = [], [0]\n b_disliked_idx, b_disliked_off = [], [0]\n b_listen_idx, b_listen_w, b_listen_off = [], [], [0]\n b_stats = []\n\n for u in b_uids:\n r = uid2row[u]\n # liked\n l_start = train_hist[\"liked_offsets\"][r].item()\n l_end = (\n train_hist[\"liked_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(train_hist[\"liked_offsets\"])\n else len(train_hist[\"liked_indices\"])\n )\n b_liked_idx.extend(train_hist[\"liked_indices\"][l_start:l_end].tolist())\n b_liked_off.append(len(b_liked_idx))\n\n # disliked\n d_start = train_hist[\"disliked_offsets\"][r].item()\n d_end = (\n train_hist[\"disliked_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(train_hist[\"disliked_offsets\"])\n else len(train_hist[\"disliked_indices\"])\n )\n b_disliked_idx.extend(train_hist[\"disliked_indices\"][d_start:d_end].tolist())\n b_disliked_off.append(len(b_disliked_idx))\n\n # listens\n ls_start = train_hist[\"listen_offsets\"][r].item()\n ls_end = (\n train_hist[\"listen_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(train_hist[\"listen_offsets\"])\n else len(train_hist[\"listen_indices\"])\n )\n b_listen_idx.extend(train_hist[\"listen_indices\"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())\n b_listen_w.extend(train_hist[\"listen_weights\"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())\n b_listen_off.append(len(b_listen_idx))\n\n # stats\n b_stats.append(train_hist[\"user_stats\"][r])\n\n # Convert to tensors\n t_liked_idx = torch.tensor(b_liked_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_liked_off = torch.tensor(b_liked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_disliked_idx = torch.tensor(b_disliked_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_disliked_off = torch.tensor(b_disliked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_listen_idx = torch.tensor(b_listen_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_listen_w = torch.tensor(b_listen_w, dtype=torch.float32)\n t_listen_off = torch.tensor(b_listen_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_stats = torch.stack(b_stats, dim=0)\n\n t_pos_items = torch.tensor(b_pos_items, dtype=torch.long)\n t_pos_feats = feat_matrix[t_pos_items]\n t_weights = torch.tensor(b_weights, dtype=torch.float32)\n\n # Sample catalog negatives\n t_neg_items = torch.randint(0, CATALOG_SIZE, (num_negatives,))\n t_neg_feats = feat_matrix[t_neg_items]\n\n optimizer.zero_grad()\n # Forward towers\n u_emb = model.user_tower(\n t_liked_idx,\n t_liked_off,\n t_disliked_idx,\n t_disliked_off,\n t_listen_idx,\n t_listen_w,\n t_listen_off,\n t_stats,\n )\n v_pos = model.item_tower(t_pos_items, t_pos_feats)\n v_neg = model.item_tower(t_neg_items, t_neg_feats)\n\n v_all = torch.cat([v_pos, v_neg], dim=0)\n B = len(b_uids)\n scores = torch.matmul(u_emb, v_all.T) / model.temperature\n labels = torch.arange(B, device=scores.device)\n\n loss = F.cross_entropy(scores, labels, reduction=\"none\")\n weighted_loss = (loss * t_weights).sum() / t_weights.sum()\n\n weighted_loss.backward()\n optimizer.step()\n\n total_loss += weighted_loss.item()\n num_batches += 1\n\n avg_loss = total_loss / max(1, num_batches)\n if epoch % 3 == 0 or epoch == epochs:\n # Evaluate on validation\n model.eval()\n with torch.no_grad():\n val_u_emb = model.user_tower(\n val_hist[\"liked_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"liked_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"disliked_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"disliked_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_weights\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"user_stats\"],\n )\n val_v_emb = model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)\n\n val_ranking_path = \"/app/solution/val_exp1.parquet\"\n generate_ranking(\n val_u_emb,\n val_v_emb,\n \"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\",\n val_ranking_path,\n )\n\n print(f\"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | Evaluating validation ranking...\")\n import subprocess\n res = subprocess.run(\n [\"python3\", \"/task/evaluate_public.py\", val_ranking_path],\n capture_output=True,\n text=True,\n )\n print(res.stdout.strip())\n else:\n print(f\"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f}\")\n\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n main()\n"
}Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/experiment_1.py. Here is the updated code:
"""Experiment 1: Train two-tower model and evaluate on public validation."""
from __future__ import annotations
import random
import time
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import pyarrow.compute as pc
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F
from solution.data_utils import load_catalog, extract_user_histories, CATALOG_SIZE, PAD_IDX
from solution.model import TwoTowerModel
from solution.retrieval import generate_ranking
def set_seed(seed: int = 42):
random.seed(seed)
np.random.seed(seed)
torch.manual_seed(seed)
def build_training_pairs(
listens_path: str | Path,
likes_path: str | Path,
item2idx: dict[int, int],
target_uids: set[int],
start_ts: int,
end_ts: int,
):
"""Extract (uid -> list of (item_idx, weight)) in target window."""
# 1. listens
table = pq.read_table(
listens_path,
columns=["uid", "timestamp", "item_id", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
)
mask = pc.and_(
pc.greater_equal(table["timestamp"], start_ts),
pc.less_equal(table["timestamp"], end_ts),
)
filtered = table.filter(mask).to_pandas()
strong = filtered[
filtered["uid"].isin(target_uids)
& (filtered["is_organic"] == 1)
& (filtered["played_ratio_pct"] >= 80)
]
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
strong = strong.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_idx"].astype(int)
# 2. likes
likes = pd.read_parquet(likes_path)
org_likes = likes[
(likes["timestamp"] >= start_ts)
& (likes["timestamp"] <= end_ts)
& likes["uid"].isin(target_uids)
& (likes["is_organic"] == 1)
]
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
org_likes = org_likes.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_idx"].astype(int)
# Merge pairs: uid -> {item_idx: weight}
user_positives: dict[int, dict[int, float]] = {}
for uid, idx in strong[["uid", "item_idx"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):
user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = 1.0
for uid, idx in org_likes[["uid", "item_idx"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):
user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = 3.0
return user_positives
def main():
set_seed(42)
print("Loading catalog...")
catalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()
targets_df = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/target_users.parquet")
target_uids = targets_df["uid"].tolist()
target_set = set(target_uids)
T_val_cutoff = 24786800
print("Extracting validation user histories at T =", T_val_cutoff)
val_pref = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet")
val_hist = extract_user_histories(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
val_pref,
item2idx,
target_uids,
T_val_cutoff,
window_days=60,
)
print("Building training positive interactions (last 14 days of train)...")
train_positives = build_training_pairs(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
"/task/data/train_likes.parquet",
item2idx,
target_set,
start_ts=T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400,
end_ts=T_val_cutoff,
)
print(f"Users with positive targets: {len(train_positives)}")
# Extract user histories at training split (T_val_cutoff - 14 days)
T_train_split = T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400
print("Extracting training user histories at T =", T_train_split)
train_hist = extract_user_histories(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
val_pref, # using val_pref or pre-split
item2idx,
target_uids,
T_train_split,
window_days=60,
)
# Initialize model
model = TwoTowerModel(
catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,
embed_dim=64,
out_dim=64,
hidden_dim=128,
temperature=0.07,
)
optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=1e-3, weight_decay=1e-4)
# Active training users
active_uids = [u for u in target_uids if u in train_positives]
uid2row = train_hist["uid2row"]
batch_size = 512
num_negatives = 512
epochs = 15
print(f"Training for {epochs} epochs...")
for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1):
model.train()
random.shuffle(active_uids)
total_loss = 0.0
num_batches = 0
for b_start in range(0, len(active_uids), batch_size):
b_uids = active_uids[b_start : b_start + batch_size]
if len(b_uids) < 32:
continue
# For each user, sample 1 positive item proportional to weights
b_pos_items = []
b_weights = []
for u in b_uids:
items_dict = train_positives[u]
items = list(items_dict.keys())
weights = list(items_dict.values())
# Sample proportional to weight
chosen = random.choices(items, weights=weights, k=1)[0]
b_pos_items.append(chosen)
b_weights.append(items_dict[chosen])
# Build batch user history tensors
b_liked_idx, b_liked_off = [], [0]
b_disliked_idx, b_disliked_off = [], [0]
b_listen_idx, b_listen_w, b_listen_off = [], [], [0]
b_stats = []
for u in b_uids:
r = uid2row[u]
# liked
l_start = train_hist["liked_offsets"][r].item()
l_end = (
train_hist["liked_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(train_hist["liked_offsets"])
else len(train_hist["liked_indices"])
)
b_liked_idx.extend(train_hist["liked_indices"][l_start:l_end].tolist())
b_liked_off.append(len(b_liked_idx))
# disliked
d_start = train_hist["disliked_offsets"][r].item()
d_end = (
train_hist["disliked_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(train_hist["disliked_offsets"])
else len(train_hist["disliked_indices"])
)
b_disliked_idx.extend(train_hist["disliked_indices"][d_start:d_end].tolist())
b_disliked_off.append(len(b_disliked_idx))
# listens
ls_start = train_hist["listen_offsets"][r].item()
ls_end = (
train_hist["listen_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(train_hist["listen_offsets"])
else len(train_hist["listen_indices"])
)
b_listen_idx.extend(train_hist["listen_indices"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())
b_listen_w.extend(train_hist["listen_weights"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())
b_listen_off.append(len(b_listen_idx))
# stats
b_stats.append(train_hist["user_stats"][r])
# Convert to tensors
t_liked_idx = torch.tensor(b_liked_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_liked_off = torch.tensor(b_liked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_disliked_idx = torch.tensor(b_disliked_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_disliked_off = torch.tensor(b_disliked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_listen_idx = torch.tensor(b_listen_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_listen_w = torch.tensor(b_listen_w, dtype=torch.float32)
t_listen_off = torch.tensor(b_listen_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_stats = torch.stack(b_stats, dim=0)
t_pos_items = torch.tensor(b_pos_items, dtype=torch.long)
t_pos_feats = feat_matrix[t_pos_items]
t_weights = torch.tensor(b_weights, dtype=torch.float32)
# Sample catalog negatives
t_neg_items = torch.randint(0, CATALOG_SIZE, (num_negatives,))
t_neg_feats = feat_matrix[t_neg_items]
optimizer.zero_grad()
# Forward towers
u_emb = model.user_tower(
t_liked_idx,
t_liked_off,
t_disliked_idx,
t_disliked_off,
t_listen_idx,
t_listen_w,
t_listen_off,
t_stats,
)
v_pos = model.item_tower(t_pos_items, t_pos_feats)
v_neg = model.item_tower(t_neg_items, t_neg_feats)
v_all = torch.cat([v_pos, v_neg], dim=0)
B = len(b_uids)
scores = torch.matmul(u_emb, v_all.T) / model.temperature
labels = torch.arange(B, device=scores.device)
loss = F.cross_entropy(scores, labels, reduction="none")
weighted_loss = (loss * t_weights).sum() / t_weights.sum()
weighted_loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
total_loss += weighted_loss.item()
num_batches += 1
avg_loss = total_loss / max(1, num_batches)
if epoch % 3 == 0 or epoch == epochs:
# Evaluate on validation
model.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
val_u_emb = model.user_tower(
val_hist["liked_indices"],
val_hist["liked_offsets"],
val_hist["disliked_indices"],
val_hist["disliked_offsets"],
val_hist["listen_indices"],
val_hist["listen_weights"],
val_hist["listen_offsets"],
val_hist["user_stats"],
)
val_v_emb = model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)
val_ranking_path = "/app/solution/val_exp1.parquet"
generate_ranking(
val_u_emb,
val_v_emb,
"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz",
val_ranking_path,
)
print(f"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | Evaluating validation ranking...")
import subprocess
res = subprocess.run(
["python3", "/task/evaluate_public.py", val_ranking_path],
capture_output=True,
text=True,
)
print(res.stdout.strip())
else:
print(f"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
{
"command": "python3 /app/solution/experiment_1.py",
"description": "Run Experiment 1: Two-Tower model training and validation evaluation"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/app/solution/experiment_1.py", line 15, in <module>
from solution.data_utils import load_catalog, extract_user_histories, CATALOG_SIZE, PAD_IDX
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'solution'
Exit Code: 1
Process Group PGID: 2722
</untrusted_context>{
"description": "Run Experiment 1 with PYTHONPATH=/app",
"command": "PYTHONPATH=/app python3 /app/solution/experiment_1.py"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: /app/solution/experiment_1.py:50: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_1.py:62: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
Loading catalog...
Extracting validation user histories at T = 24786800
Building training positive interactions (last 14 days of train)...
Users with positive targets: 6752
Extracting training user histories at T = 23577200
Training for 15 epochs...
Epoch 01 | Loss: 6.8552
Epoch 02 | Loss: 6.7795
Epoch 03 | Loss: 6.7581 | Evaluating validation ranking...
{
"model": "/app/solution/val_exp1.parquet",
"scores": {
"quality_ndcg@10": 0.006681,
"quality_users": 4263
}
}
Epoch 04 | Loss: 6.7476
Epoch 05 | Loss: 6.7176
Epoch 06 | Loss: 6.6329 | Evaluating validation ranking...
{
"model": "/app/solution/val_exp1.parquet",
"scores": {
"quality_ndcg@10": 0.012545,
"quality_users": 4263
}
}
Epoch 07 | Loss: 6.5214
Epoch 08 | Loss: 6.4088
Epoch 09 | Loss: 6.3725 | Evaluating validation ranking...
{
"model": "/app/solution/val_exp1.parquet",
"scores": {
"quality_ndcg@10": 0.003572,
"quality_users": 4263
}
}
Epoch 10 | Loss: 6.2552
Epoch 11 | Loss: 6.1783
Epoch 12 | Loss: 6.1162 | Evaluating validation ranking...
{
"model": "/app/solution/val_exp1.parquet",
"scores": {
"quality_ndcg@10": 0.005431,
"quality_users": 4263
}
}
Epoch 13 | Loss: 6.0380
Epoch 14 | Loss: 6.0288
Epoch 15 | Loss: 5.9445 | Evaluating validation ranking...
{
"model": "/app/solution/val_exp1.parquet",
"scores": {
"quality_ndcg@10": 0.004166,
"quality_users": 4263
}
}
Process Group PGID: 2733
</untrusted_context>Investigating NDCG Drop
I'm noticing a concerning trend: while NDCG@10 saw an initial boost at Epoch 6, it has since declined. My current focus is on understanding why this happened, specifically examining the constant learning rate and potential overfitting or embedding drift that might be contributing to this performance degradation.
{
"description": "Analyze popularity rank of retrieved items from Experiment 1",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\ndf = pd.read_parquet('/app/solution/val_exp1.parquet')\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\nitem_pop = dict(zip(catalog.item_id, catalog.popularity_rank))\nranks = [item_pop[i] for i in df.item_id]\nimport numpy as np\nprint('Retrieved items popularity rank: mean=', np.mean(ranks), 'median=', np.median(ranks), 'min=', np.min(ranks), 'max=', np.max(ranks))\nprint('Top 10 most frequent items in ranking:')\nprint(df.item_id.value_counts().head(10))\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Retrieved items popularity rank: mean= 7988.541078524125 median= 5267.0 min= 1 max= 29992
Top 10 most frequent items in ranking:
item_id
3257008 1321
2966164 1312
1308225 1238
5111954 1221
8961797 1190
7340873 1130
2275849 1129
6694551 1117
641052 1115
7873233 1095
Name: count, dtype: int64
Process Group PGID: 2854
</untrusted_context>Analyzing Recommendation Performance
I've been examining the performance metrics, and the retrieved items show a strong median popularity rank mirroring the ground truth. It's interesting to note the significant reach of certain items, with some being recommended to over a thousand users. My next step is to delve into the specifics of these high-impact recommendations.
Investigating Model Drift
I'm scrutinizing the UserTower's embedding computations. A key observation: if a user has no dislikes, their dislike embedding becomes a zero vector due to padding. This disparity between zero and averaged/weighted embeddings could be a significant factor in model drift and overfitting.
Aligning Item and User Representations
I've identified a critical asymmetry: the UserTower was averaging raw item embeddings, while the ItemTower processes them through a non-linear MLP. This mismatch, where user history items aren't represented the same way as candidate items, is likely impacting performance. I'm now exploring how to align these representations correctly.
Revising Tower Architectures
I'm contemplating the internal mechanics of both towers. Specifically, whether the item tower employs a linear or shared projection. I'm also exploring the possibility of pooling item tower outputs within the user tower, allowing user representations to emerge from the same embedding space as item representations. This could significantly enhance the direct comparison of user preferences and candidate item similarities.
Refining User Preferences
I'm now incorporating dislike preferences, scaling them by $\alpha$ and subtracting from the like preferences. This refinement will also account for user engagement and organic ratios. I'm testing this updated mathematical formulation for user preference vector generation and relevance scoring against candidate items.
Adjusting Preference Scaling
I'm recalibrating how I combine like and dislike signals. Specifically, I'm experimenting with different scaling factors ($\alpha$) for dislikes and factoring in engagement ratios to create a more nuanced user preference vector. The goal is to improve the accuracy of the relevance scores.
Validating Representation Alignment
I've confirmed that the User Tower was indeed pooling untransformed item embeddings while the Item Tower used an MLP. This created an alignment issue, forcing an arbitrary cross-space mapping and contributing to instability. I'm now verifying that both towers operate on the same transformed item representations.
{
"description": "Test autograd through dynamically computed item vectors V",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\n# Test end-to-end autograd through dynamically computed item vectors V\nitem_embed = nn.Embedding(100, 32)\nfeat_proj = nn.Linear(4, 32)\nfeats = torch.randn(100, 4)\n\n# Item tower computes V\nidx = torch.arange(100)\nV = F.normalize(item_embed(idx) + feat_proj(feats), p=2, dim=-1)\n\n# User tower uses V in embedding_bag\nliked_idx = torch.tensor([1, 2, 5, 10], dtype=torch.long)\nliked_off = torch.tensor([0, 2], dtype=torch.long)\nu_like = F.embedding_bag(liked_idx, V, offsets=liked_off, mode='mean')\n\n# User MLP\nuser_mlp = nn.Linear(32, 32)\nu = F.normalize(user_mlp(u_like), p=2, dim=-1)\n\n# Loss: dot product with positive item 1 for user 0, item 5 for user 1\npos_items = torch.tensor([1, 5])\nv_pos = V[pos_items]\nscores = torch.sum(u * v_pos, dim=-1)\nloss = -scores.mean()\n\nloss.backward()\nprint('Autograd succeeded!')\nprint('item_embed grad norm:', item_embed.weight.grad.norm().item())\nprint('feat_proj grad norm:', feat_proj.weight.grad.norm().item())\nprint('user_mlp grad norm:', user_mlp.weight.grad.norm().item())\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Autograd succeeded!
item_embed grad norm: 0.12581439316272736
feat_proj grad norm: 0.165973499417305
user_mlp grad norm: 0.8690409064292908
Process Group PGID: 2872
</untrusted_context>Confirming gradient flow
The autograd system has successfully processed F.embedding_bag with my tensor V, ensuring all gradients are flowing as expected. This confirms a critical pathway for learning.
Now, I'm turning my attention to the challenges of effectively learning item embeddings given a large corpus of 30,000 items.
Exploring co-occurrence relationships
I'm delving into how track embeddings are learned in music recommendation, particularly focusing on the co-occurrence patterns within listening logs as a primary relationship. My training setup implicitly learns this co-occurrence structure by predicting the next item from a user's history, and I'm considering pre-training item embeddings using methods like Word2Vec.
Designing two-tower architecture
My focus is now on a two-tower neural network design, strictly avoiding global matrix factorization. The user tower will learn from interaction history, not just IDs, while item embeddings will be precomputed offline for low latency retrieval, ensuring relevance is the dot product of independently computed user and item vectors.
Investigating performance dip
My recent analysis reveals that Experiment 1's NDCG@10 score peaked and then declined due to a constant learning rate and insufficient regularization. I'm now prioritizing a cosine annealing schedule and increased weight decay, alongside implementing best checkpointing to prevent embedding drift and ensure sustained improvement.
Refining negative sampling
I'm realizing uniform negative sampling is inefficient. It trains me to distinguish popular from obscure, but not nuanced preferences within popular items. Industry best practices suggest sampling negatives proportionally to popularity, which will force me to discriminate between genuinely relevant high-quality candidates.
Refining negative sampling
I'm realizing uniform negative sampling is inefficient. It trains me to distinguish popular from obscure, but not nuanced preferences within popular items. Industry best practices suggest sampling negatives proportionally to popularity, which will force me to discriminate between genuinely relevant high-quality candidates.
Exploring multi-window data
I'm considering using multiple temporal or sliding windows, such as 28 days of history, to increase training data by three times and expose the model to more diverse listening contexts. This contrasts with the single 14-day window used previously.
Implementing discovery filtering
I'm realizing that training on all positive items, including repeats, might confuse the discovery tower. I will now focus on training with only eligible or new items for the user at the cutoff, to better align with the discovery shelf's purpose.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\nT_split = 24182000\nT_end = 24786800\n\ntable = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'])\n\n# Prior items up to T_split\nm_prior = pc.less(table['timestamp'], T_split)\nt_prior = table.filter(m_prior).to_pandas()\nt_prior = t_prior[t_prior.uid.isin(targets)]\nuser_prior = t_prior.groupby('uid')['item_id'].apply(set).to_dict()\n\n# Target items\nm_target = pc.and_(pc.greater_equal(table['timestamp'], T_split), pc.less_equal(table['timestamp'], T_end))\nt_target = table.filter(m_target).to_pandas()\nt_target = t_target[t_target.uid.isin(targets) & (t_target.is_organic == 1) & (t_target.played_ratio_pct >= 80)]\n\nlikes = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_likes.parquet')\nt_likes = likes[(likes.timestamp >= T_split) & (likes.timestamp <= T_end) & likes.uid.isin(targets) & (likes.is_organic == 1)]\n\n# Check how many are new\nnew_listens = 0\ntotal_listens = len(t_target)\nfor u, item in t_target[['uid', 'item_id']].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n if item not in user_prior.get(u, set()):\n new_listens += 1\n\nnew_likes = 0\ntotal_likes = len(t_likes)\nfor u, item in t_likes[['uid', 'item_id']].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n if item not in user_prior.get(u, set()):\n new_likes += 1\n\nprint(f'Listens: total={total_listens}, new={new_listens} ({new_listens/total_listens*100:.1f}%)')\nprint(f'Likes: total={total_likes}, new={new_likes} ({new_likes/total_likes*100:.1f}%)')\n\"",
"description": "Check new vs repeat items in training target window"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Listens: total=428209, new=111095 (25.9%)
Likes: total=12022, new=8901 (74.0%)
Process Group PGID: 2891
</untrusted_context>Analyzing New Engagement
My current focus is on the impressive influx of entirely novel engagement. Over the past week alone, I've recorded over 111,000 fresh listens and nearly 9,000 new likes, with a significant portion originating from new content. Extending this to a 14-day window reveals over 220,000 new listens and roughly 17,000 new likes. This trend appears to be holding steady as I continue to observe the discovery ranking task.
{
"description": "Test popularity-biased negative sampling probabilities",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\ncounts = catalog['positive_listens'].to_numpy(dtype=np.float64)\nprobs = np.power(counts, 0.6)\nprobs /= probs.sum()\n\nprint('Probs min:', probs.min(), 'max:', probs.max(), 'ratio max/min:', probs.max() / probs.min())\nsampled = np.random.choice(len(catalog), size=10000, p=probs)\nprint('Sampled indices min/median/max:', sampled.min(), np.median(sampled), sampled.max())\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Probs min: 1.6143685372072397e-05 max: 0.00034337289066762314 ratio max/min: 21.26979575937707
Sampled indices min/median/max: 0 8303.0 29982
Process Group PGID: 2913
</untrusted_context>Sampling Tracks Progress
My sampling strategy is proving effective, with the median index at 8,303. This range genuinely represents the diverse distribution of tracks, from popular to obscure, avoiding an overemphasis on noise.
Aligning Item-User Embeddings
I'm currently focused on ensuring geometric alignment between my Item and User tower representations. I've examined the Item Tower's architecture, noting its feature projection and concatenation steps. The next step involves analyzing how the User Tower pools item embeddings to establish this crucial alignment.
Refining User Representations
I'm exploring enhancements for the User Tower, considering attentive pooling and residual connections. The current approach concatenates aggregated liked, listened, and disliked item embeddings with user statistics. I'm evaluating how to better integrate positive preferences like liked and recent listens into the final user representation.
Implementing UserMLP
I'm now implementing the UserMLP in solution/model.py to better preserve positive taste while penalizing dislikes. I'm also configuring dimensions, temperature settings for InfoNCE loss, and evaluating AdamW with specific learning rates, weight decay, and a CosineAnnealingLR scheduler.
{
"file_path": "/app/solution/experiment_2.py",
"content": "\"\"\"Experiment 2: Multi-window training, popularity-based negatives, and cosine LR.\"\"\"\nfrom __future__ import annotations\n\nimport random\nimport time\nfrom pathlib import Path\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nfrom solution.data_utils import load_catalog, extract_user_histories, CATALOG_SIZE, PAD_IDX\nfrom solution.model import TwoTowerModel\nfrom solution.retrieval import generate_ranking\n\n\ndef set_seed(seed: int = 42):\n random.seed(seed)\n np.random.seed(seed)\n torch.manual_seed(seed)\n\n\ndef extract_window_positives(\n listens_table,\n likes_df: pd.DataFrame,\n item2idx: dict[int, int],\n target_uids: set[int],\n start_ts: int,\n end_ts: int,\n):\n \"\"\"Extract (uid -> list of (item_idx, weight)) in target window, marking new items.\"\"\"\n # Listens in window\n mask = pc.and_(\n pc.greater_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts),\n pc.less_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], end_ts),\n )\n t_listens = listens_table.filter(mask).to_pandas()\n strong = t_listens[\n t_listens[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)\n & (t_listens[\"is_organic\"] == 1)\n & (t_listens[\"played_ratio_pct\"] >= 80)\n ]\n strong[\"item_idx\"] = strong[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n strong = strong.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n strong[\"item_idx\"] = strong[\"item_idx\"].astype(int)\n\n # Likes in window\n org_likes = likes_df[\n (likes_df[\"timestamp\"] >= start_ts)\n & (likes_df[\"timestamp\"] <= end_ts)\n & likes_df[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)\n & (likes_df[\"is_organic\"] == 1)\n ]\n org_likes[\"item_idx\"] = org_likes[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n org_likes = org_likes.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n org_likes[\"item_idx\"] = org_likes[\"item_idx\"].astype(int)\n\n # User prior items (before start_ts) to identify new items\n m_prior = pc.and_(\n pc.greater_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts - 60 * 86400),\n pc.less(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts),\n )\n t_prior = listens_table.filter(m_prior).to_pandas()\n t_prior = t_prior[t_prior[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)]\n user_prior = t_prior.groupby(\"uid\")[\"item_id\"].apply(set).to_dict()\n\n user_positives: dict[int, dict[int, float]] = {}\n catalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\n idx2item = catalog[\"item_id\"].to_numpy()\n\n for uid, idx in strong[[\"uid\", \"item_idx\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n raw_item = idx2item[idx]\n is_new = raw_item not in user_prior.get(uid, set())\n # Weight: 2.0 for new strong listen, 1.0 for repeat\n w = 2.0 if is_new else 1.0\n user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = w\n\n for uid, idx in org_likes[[\"uid\", \"item_idx\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n # Weight: 4.0 for organic like (grade 3 discovery)\n user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = 4.0\n\n return user_positives\n\n\ndef main():\n set_seed(42)\n print(\"Loading catalog...\")\n catalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()\n\n # Precompute popularity sampling distribution for negatives\n catalog_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\n counts = catalog_df[\"positive_listens\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float64)\n neg_probs = np.power(counts, 0.6)\n neg_probs /= neg_probs.sum()\n\n targets_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\n target_uids = targets_df[\"uid\"].tolist()\n target_set = set(target_uids)\n\n T_val_cutoff = 24786800\n print(\"Extracting validation user histories at T =\", T_val_cutoff)\n val_pref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\n val_hist = extract_user_histories(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n val_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_val_cutoff,\n window_days=60,\n )\n\n print(\"Reading listens parquet...\")\n listens_table = pq.read_table(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n columns=[\"uid\", \"timestamp\", \"item_id\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n )\n likes_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\n\n # Build 2 training windows:\n # Window 0: Target = [T_val_cutoff - 7d, T_val_cutoff], History at T_val_cutoff - 7d\n # Window 1: Target = [T_val_cutoff - 14d, T_val_cutoff - 7d], History at T_val_cutoff - 14d\n T_w0_split = T_val_cutoff - 7 * 86400\n T_w1_split = T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400\n\n print(\"Building Window 0 positive targets...\")\n w0_pos = extract_window_positives(\n listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, T_w0_split, T_val_cutoff\n )\n print(\"Building Window 1 positive targets...\")\n w1_pos = extract_window_positives(\n listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, T_w1_split, T_w0_split\n )\n\n print(\"Extracting Window 0 history...\")\n w0_hist = extract_user_histories(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n val_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_w0_split,\n window_days=60,\n )\n\n print(\"Extracting Window 1 history...\")\n w1_hist = extract_user_histories(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n val_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_w1_split,\n window_days=60,\n )\n\n # Initialize model\n model = TwoTowerModel(\n catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,\n embed_dim=64,\n out_dim=64,\n hidden_dim=128,\n temperature=0.07,\n )\n optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=1e-3, weight_decay=1e-4)\n epochs = 12\n scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=epochs, eta_min=5e-5)\n\n batch_size = 512\n num_negatives = 512\n best_score = 0.0\n\n print(f\"Training for {epochs} epochs across 2 temporal windows...\")\n for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1):\n model.train()\n total_loss = 0.0\n num_batches = 0\n\n # Alternate or combine both windows\n windows = [(w0_hist, w0_pos), (w1_hist, w1_pos)]\n for hist, pos_dict in windows:\n active_uids = [u for u in target_uids if u in pos_dict]\n random.shuffle(active_uids)\n uid2row = hist[\"uid2row\"]\n\n for b_start in range(0, len(active_uids), batch_size):\n b_uids = active_uids[b_start : b_start + batch_size]\n if len(b_uids) < 32:\n continue\n\n b_pos_items = []\n b_weights = []\n for u in b_uids:\n items_dict = pos_dict[u]\n items = list(items_dict.keys())\n weights = list(items_dict.values())\n chosen = random.choices(items, weights=weights, k=1)[0]\n b_pos_items.append(chosen)\n b_weights.append(items_dict[chosen])\n\n # Build batch user history tensors\n b_liked_idx, b_liked_off = [], [0]\n b_disliked_idx, b_disliked_off = [], [0]\n b_listen_idx, b_listen_w, b_listen_off = [], [], [0]\n b_stats = []\n\n for u in b_uids:\n r = uid2row[u]\n # liked\n l_start = hist[\"liked_offsets\"][r].item()\n l_end = (\n hist[\"liked_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"liked_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"liked_indices\"])\n )\n b_liked_idx.extend(hist[\"liked_indices\"][l_start:l_end].tolist())\n b_liked_off.append(len(b_liked_idx))\n\n # disliked\n d_start = hist[\"disliked_offsets\"][r].item()\n d_end = (\n hist[\"disliked_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"disliked_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"disliked_indices\"])\n )\n b_disliked_idx.extend(hist[\"disliked_indices\"][d_start:d_end].tolist())\n b_disliked_off.append(len(b_disliked_idx))\n\n # listens\n ls_start = hist[\"listen_offsets\"][r].item()\n ls_end = (\n hist[\"listen_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"listen_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"listen_indices\"])\n )\n b_listen_idx.extend(hist[\"listen_indices\"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())\n b_listen_w.extend(hist[\"listen_weights\"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())\n b_listen_off.append(len(b_listen_idx))\n\n # stats\n b_stats.append(hist[\"user_stats\"][r])\n\n t_liked_idx = torch.tensor(b_liked_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_liked_off = torch.tensor(b_liked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_disliked_idx = torch.tensor(b_disliked_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_disliked_off = torch.tensor(b_disliked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_listen_idx = torch.tensor(b_listen_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_listen_w = torch.tensor(b_listen_w, dtype=torch.float32)\n t_listen_off = torch.tensor(b_listen_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_stats = torch.stack(b_stats, dim=0)\n\n t_pos_items = torch.tensor(b_pos_items, dtype=torch.long)\n t_pos_feats = feat_matrix[t_pos_items]\n t_weights = torch.tensor(b_weights, dtype=torch.float32)\n\n # Sample popularity-biased catalog negatives\n neg_indices = np.random.choice(CATALOG_SIZE, size=num_negatives, p=neg_probs)\n t_neg_items = torch.from_numpy(neg_indices).long()\n t_neg_feats = feat_matrix[t_neg_items]\n\n optimizer.zero_grad()\n u_emb = model.user_tower(\n t_liked_idx,\n t_liked_off,\n t_disliked_idx,\n t_disliked_off,\n t_listen_idx,\n t_listen_w,\n t_listen_off,\n t_stats,\n )\n v_pos = model.item_tower(t_pos_items, t_pos_feats)\n v_neg = model.item_tower(t_neg_items, t_neg_feats)\n\n v_all = torch.cat([v_pos, v_neg], dim=0)\n B = len(b_uids)\n scores = torch.matmul(u_emb, v_all.T) / model.temperature\n labels = torch.arange(B, device=scores.device)\n\n loss = F.cross_entropy(scores, labels, reduction=\"none\")\n weighted_loss = (loss * t_weights).sum() / t_weights.sum()\n\n weighted_loss.backward()\n optimizer.step()\n\n total_loss += weighted_loss.item()\n num_batches += 1\n\n scheduler.step()\n avg_loss = total_loss / max(1, num_batches)\n current_lr = scheduler.get_last_lr()[0]\n\n # Evaluate on validation every 2 epochs\n if epoch % 2 == 0 or epoch == epochs:\n model.eval()\n with torch.no_grad():\n val_u_emb = model.user_tower(\n val_hist[\"liked_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"liked_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"disliked_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"disliked_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_weights\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"user_stats\"],\n )\n val_v_emb = model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)\n\n val_ranking_path = f\"/app/solution/val_exp2_ep{epoch}.parquet\"\n generate_ranking(\n val_u_emb,\n val_v_emb,\n \"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\",\n val_ranking_path,\n )\n\n import subprocess, json\n res = subprocess.run(\n [\"python3\", \"/task/evaluate_public.py\", val_ranking_path],\n capture_output=True,\n text=True,\n )\n score_data = json.loads(res.stdout.strip())\n score = score_data[\"scores\"][\"quality_ndcg@10\"]\n print(f\"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f} | Val NDCG@10: {score:.6f}\")\n if score > best_score:\n best_score = score\n torch.save(model.state_dict(), \"/app/solution/best_model_exp2.pt\")\n print(f\" *** New best model saved! Score: {score:.6f} ***\")\n else:\n print(f\"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f}\")\n\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n main()\n"
}Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/experiment_2.py. Here is the updated code:
"""Experiment 2: Multi-window training, popularity-based negatives, and cosine LR."""
from __future__ import annotations
import random
import time
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import pyarrow.compute as pc
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F
from solution.data_utils import load_catalog, extract_user_histories, CATALOG_SIZE, PAD_IDX
from solution.model import TwoTowerModel
from solution.retrieval import generate_ranking
def set_seed(seed: int = 42):
random.seed(seed)
np.random.seed(seed)
torch.manual_seed(seed)
def extract_window_positives(
listens_table,
likes_df: pd.DataFrame,
item2idx: dict[int, int],
target_uids: set[int],
start_ts: int,
end_ts: int,
):
"""Extract (uid -> list of (item_idx, weight)) in target window, marking new items."""
# Listens in window
mask = pc.and_(
pc.greater_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts),
pc.less_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], end_ts),
)
t_listens = listens_table.filter(mask).to_pandas()
strong = t_listens[
t_listens["uid"].isin(target_uids)
& (t_listens["is_organic"] == 1)
& (t_listens["played_ratio_pct"] >= 80)
]
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
strong = strong.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_idx"].astype(int)
# Likes in window
org_likes = likes_df[
(likes_df["timestamp"] >= start_ts)
& (likes_df["timestamp"] <= end_ts)
& likes_df["uid"].isin(target_uids)
& (likes_df["is_organic"] == 1)
]
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
org_likes = org_likes.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_idx"].astype(int)
# User prior items (before start_ts) to identify new items
m_prior = pc.and_(
pc.greater_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts - 60 * 86400),
pc.less(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts),
)
t_prior = listens_table.filter(m_prior).to_pandas()
t_prior = t_prior[t_prior["uid"].isin(target_uids)]
user_prior = t_prior.groupby("uid")["item_id"].apply(set).to_dict()
user_positives: dict[int, dict[int, float]] = {}
catalog = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet")
idx2item = catalog["item_id"].to_numpy()
for uid, idx in strong[["uid", "item_idx"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):
raw_item = idx2item[idx]
is_new = raw_item not in user_prior.get(uid, set())
# Weight: 2.0 for new strong listen, 1.0 for repeat
w = 2.0 if is_new else 1.0
user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = w
for uid, idx in org_likes[["uid", "item_idx"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):
# Weight: 4.0 for organic like (grade 3 discovery)
user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = 4.0
return user_positives
def main():
set_seed(42)
print("Loading catalog...")
catalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()
# Precompute popularity sampling distribution for negatives
catalog_df = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet")
counts = catalog_df["positive_listens"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float64)
neg_probs = np.power(counts, 0.6)
neg_probs /= neg_probs.sum()
targets_df = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/target_users.parquet")
target_uids = targets_df["uid"].tolist()
target_set = set(target_uids)
T_val_cutoff = 24786800
print("Extracting validation user histories at T =", T_val_cutoff)
val_pref = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet")
val_hist = extract_user_histories(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
val_pref,
item2idx,
target_uids,
T_val_cutoff,
window_days=60,
)
print("Reading listens parquet...")
listens_table = pq.read_table(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
columns=["uid", "timestamp", "item_id", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
)
likes_df = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/train_likes.parquet")
# Build 2 training windows:
# Window 0: Target = [T_val_cutoff - 7d, T_val_cutoff], History at T_val_cutoff - 7d
# Window 1: Target = [T_val_cutoff - 14d, T_val_cutoff - 7d], History at T_val_cutoff - 14d
T_w0_split = T_val_cutoff - 7 * 86400
T_w1_split = T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400
print("Building Window 0 positive targets...")
w0_pos = extract_window_positives(
listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, T_w0_split, T_val_cutoff
)
print("Building Window 1 positive targets...")
w1_pos = extract_window_positives(
listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, T_w1_split, T_w0_split
)
print("Extracting Window 0 history...")
w0_hist = extract_user_histories(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
val_pref,
item2idx,
target_uids,
T_w0_split,
window_days=60,
)
print("Extracting Window 1 history...")
w1_hist = extract_user_histories(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
val_pref,
item2idx,
target_uids,
T_w1_split,
window_days=60,
)
# Initialize model
model = TwoTowerModel(
catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,
embed_dim=64,
out_dim=64,
hidden_dim=128,
temperature=0.07,
)
optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=1e-3, weight_decay=1e-4)
epochs = 12
scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=epochs, eta_min=5e-5)
batch_size = 512
num_negatives = 512
best_score = 0.0
print(f"Training for {epochs} epochs across 2 temporal windows...")
for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1):
model.train()
total_loss = 0.0
num_batches = 0
# Alternate or combine both windows
windows = [(w0_hist, w0_pos), (w1_hist, w1_pos)]
for hist, pos_dict in windows:
active_uids = [u for u in target_uids if u in pos_dict]
random.shuffle(active_uids)
uid2row = hist["uid2row"]
for b_start in range(0, len(active_uids), batch_size):
b_uids = active_uids[b_start : b_start + batch_size]
if len(b_uids) < 32:
continue
b_pos_items = []
b_weights = []
for u in b_uids:
items_dict = pos_dict[u]
items = list(items_dict.keys())
weights = list(items_dict.values())
chosen = random.choices(items, weights=weights, k=1)[0]
b_pos_items.append(chosen)
b_weights.append(items_dict[chosen])
# Build batch user history tensors
b_liked_idx, b_liked_off = [], [0]
b_disliked_idx, b_disliked_off = [], [0]
b_listen_idx, b_listen_w, b_listen_off = [], [], [0]
b_stats = []
for u in b_uids:
r = uid2row[u]
# liked
l_start = hist["liked_offsets"][r].item()
l_end = (
hist["liked_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["liked_offsets"])
else len(hist["liked_indices"])
)
b_liked_idx.extend(hist["liked_indices"][l_start:l_end].tolist())
b_liked_off.append(len(b_liked_idx))
# disliked
d_start = hist["disliked_offsets"][r].item()
d_end = (
hist["disliked_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["disliked_offsets"])
else len(hist["disliked_indices"])
)
b_disliked_idx.extend(hist["disliked_indices"][d_start:d_end].tolist())
b_disliked_off.append(len(b_disliked_idx))
# listens
ls_start = hist["listen_offsets"][r].item()
ls_end = (
hist["listen_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["listen_offsets"])
else len(hist["listen_indices"])
)
b_listen_idx.extend(hist["listen_indices"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())
b_listen_w.extend(hist["listen_weights"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())
b_listen_off.append(len(b_listen_idx))
# stats
b_stats.append(hist["user_stats"][r])
t_liked_idx = torch.tensor(b_liked_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_liked_off = torch.tensor(b_liked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_disliked_idx = torch.tensor(b_disliked_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_disliked_off = torch.tensor(b_disliked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_listen_idx = torch.tensor(b_listen_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_listen_w = torch.tensor(b_listen_w, dtype=torch.float32)
t_listen_off = torch.tensor(b_listen_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_stats = torch.stack(b_stats, dim=0)
t_pos_items = torch.tensor(b_pos_items, dtype=torch.long)
t_pos_feats = feat_matrix[t_pos_items]
t_weights = torch.tensor(b_weights, dtype=torch.float32)
# Sample popularity-biased catalog negatives
neg_indices = np.random.choice(CATALOG_SIZE, size=num_negatives, p=neg_probs)
t_neg_items = torch.from_numpy(neg_indices).long()
t_neg_feats = feat_matrix[t_neg_items]
optimizer.zero_grad()
u_emb = model.user_tower(
t_liked_idx,
t_liked_off,
t_disliked_idx,
t_disliked_off,
t_listen_idx,
t_listen_w,
t_listen_off,
t_stats,
)
v_pos = model.item_tower(t_pos_items, t_pos_feats)
v_neg = model.item_tower(t_neg_items, t_neg_feats)
v_all = torch.cat([v_pos, v_neg], dim=0)
B = len(b_uids)
scores = torch.matmul(u_emb, v_all.T) / model.temperature
labels = torch.arange(B, device=scores.device)
loss = F.cross_entropy(scores, labels, reduction="none")
weighted_loss = (loss * t_weights).sum() / t_weights.sum()
weighted_loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
total_loss += weighted_loss.item()
num_batches += 1
scheduler.step()
avg_loss = total_loss / max(1, num_batches)
current_lr = scheduler.get_last_lr()[0]
# Evaluate on validation every 2 epochs
if epoch % 2 == 0 or epoch == epochs:
model.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
val_u_emb = model.user_tower(
val_hist["liked_indices"],
val_hist["liked_offsets"],
val_hist["disliked_indices"],
val_hist["disliked_offsets"],
val_hist["listen_indices"],
val_hist["listen_weights"],
val_hist["listen_offsets"],
val_hist["user_stats"],
)
val_v_emb = model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)
val_ranking_path = f"/app/solution/val_exp2_ep{epoch}.parquet"
generate_ranking(
val_u_emb,
val_v_emb,
"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz",
val_ranking_path,
)
import subprocess, json
res = subprocess.run(
["python3", "/task/evaluate_public.py", val_ranking_path],
capture_output=True,
text=True,
)
score_data = json.loads(res.stdout.strip())
score = score_data["scores"]["quality_ndcg@10"]
print(f"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f} | Val NDCG@10: {score:.6f}")
if score > best_score:
best_score = score
torch.save(model.state_dict(), "/app/solution/best_model_exp2.pt")
print(f" *** New best model saved! Score: {score:.6f} ***")
else:
print(f"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
{
"command": "PYTHONPATH=/app python3 /app/solution/experiment_2.py",
"description": "Run Experiment 2"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: /app/solution/experiment_2.py:46: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_2.py:57: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_2.py:46: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_2.py:57: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
Loading catalog...
Extracting validation user histories at T = 24786800
Reading listens parquet...
Building Window 0 positive targets...
Building Window 1 positive targets...
Extracting Window 0 history...
Extracting Window 1 history...
Training for 12 epochs across 2 temporal windows...
Epoch 01 | Loss: 6.8993 | LR: 0.000984
Epoch 02 | Loss: 6.8558 | LR: 0.000936 | Val NDCG@10: 0.021558
*** New best model saved! Score: 0.021558 ***
Epoch 03 | Loss: 6.8083 | LR: 0.000861
Epoch 04 | Loss: 6.7082 | LR: 0.000762 | Val NDCG@10: 0.013508
Epoch 05 | Loss: 6.5531 | LR: 0.000648
Epoch 06 | Loss: 6.4403 | LR: 0.000525 | Val NDCG@10: 0.009593
Epoch 07 | Loss: 6.3174 | LR: 0.000402
Epoch 08 | Loss: 6.2112 | LR: 0.000288 | Val NDCG@10: 0.006897
Epoch 09 | Loss: 6.1415 | LR: 0.000189
Epoch 10 | Loss: 6.0488 | LR: 0.000114 | Val NDCG@10: 0.008065
Epoch 11 | Loss: 6.0350 | LR: 0.000066
Epoch 12 | Loss: 5.9916 | LR: 0.000050 | Val NDCG@10: 0.006739
Process Group PGID: 2936
</untrusted_context>Analyzing NDCG Dip
My NDCG@10 score has more than doubled, reaching 0.021558! It peaked at Epoch 2, but then surprisingly dropped as loss decreased. I'm now investigating why NDCG declined despite falling loss values from 6.85 to 5.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\n\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\nitem_pop = dict(zip(catalog.item_id, catalog.popularity_rank))\n\nfor name in ['val_exp2_ep2.parquet', 'val_exp2_ep12.parquet']:\n df = pd.read_parquet(f'/app/solution/{name}')\n ranks = [item_pop[i] for i in df.item_id]\n print(f'{name}:')\n print(' popularity rank: mean=', np.mean(ranks), 'median=', np.median(ranks), 'p25=', np.percentile(ranks, 25), 'p75=', np.percentile(ranks, 75))\n print(' unique items in top 100 across all users:', df.item_id.nunique())\n print(' top item max frequency:', df.item_id.value_counts().iloc[0])\n\"",
"description": "Compare retrieved item distributions at epoch 2 vs 12"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: val_exp2_ep2.parquet:
popularity rank: mean= 3155.7402459791865 median= 1683.0 p25= 291.0 p75= 4140.0
unique items in top 100 across all users: 1075
top item max frequency: 7786
val_exp2_ep12.parquet:
popularity rank: mean= 12472.392960028383 median= 11374.0 p25= 4341.0 p75= 20158.0
unique items in top 100 across all users: 8876
top item max frequency: 1638
Process Group PGID: 3075
</untrusted_context>Observing Significant Rank Degradation
I'm seeing a substantial shift in popularity ranks. Between Epoch 2 and Epoch 12, the median rank has worsened significantly, moving from 1,683 to 11,374. The 75th percentile experienced a similar decline, increasing from 4,140 to 20,158, indicating a drift towards less popular items.
Investigating Popularity Suppression
It appears my negative sampling strategy, specifically combining catalog negatives proportional to listens with in-batch negatives, inadvertently penalized popular items too aggressively. This led to a significant drift in rankings, pushing median popularity from 1,683 to over 11,000. I need to recalibrate to prevent this over-suppression.
Adjusting Negative Sampling Strategy
I'm considering that the in-batch negatives already have some popularity bias. Adding proportional catalog negatives on top might be overly penalizing popular items. I'm exploring alternatives like uniform catalog negatives or a lower learning rate with increased weight decay to mitigate this, alongside investigating temperature scaling and evaluating each epoch. I will test these in experiment_3.py.
{
"content": "\"\"\"Experiment 3: Calibrated negative sampling, moderate LR, and per-epoch evaluation.\"\"\"\nfrom __future__ import annotations\n\nimport json\nimport random\nimport subprocess\nimport time\nfrom pathlib import Path\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nfrom solution.data_utils import load_catalog, extract_user_histories, CATALOG_SIZE, PAD_IDX\nfrom solution.model import TwoTowerModel\nfrom solution.retrieval import generate_ranking\n\n\ndef set_seed(seed: int = 42):\n random.seed(seed)\n np.random.seed(seed)\n torch.manual_seed(seed)\n\n\ndef extract_window_positives(\n listens_table,\n likes_df: pd.DataFrame,\n item2idx: dict[int, int],\n target_uids: set[int],\n start_ts: int,\n end_ts: int,\n):\n \"\"\"Extract (uid -> list of (item_idx, weight)) in target window, marking new items.\"\"\"\n mask = pc.and_(\n pc.greater_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts),\n pc.less_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], end_ts),\n )\n t_listens = listens_table.filter(mask).to_pandas()\n strong = t_listens[\n t_listens[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)\n & (t_listens[\"is_organic\"] == 1)\n & (t_listens[\"played_ratio_pct\"] >= 80)\n ]\n strong[\"item_idx\"] = strong[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n strong = strong.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n strong[\"item_idx\"] = strong[\"item_idx\"].astype(int)\n\n org_likes = likes_df[\n (likes_df[\"timestamp\"] >= start_ts)\n & (likes_df[\"timestamp\"] <= end_ts)\n & likes_df[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)\n & (likes_df[\"is_organic\"] == 1)\n ]\n org_likes[\"item_idx\"] = org_likes[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n org_likes = org_likes.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n org_likes[\"item_idx\"] = org_likes[\"item_idx\"].astype(int)\n\n m_prior = pc.and_(\n pc.greater_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts - 60 * 86400),\n pc.less(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts),\n )\n t_prior = listens_table.filter(m_prior).to_pandas()\n t_prior = t_prior[t_prior[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)]\n user_prior = t_prior.groupby(\"uid\")[\"item_id\"].apply(set).to_dict()\n\n user_positives: dict[int, dict[int, float]] = {}\n catalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\n idx2item = catalog[\"item_id\"].to_numpy()\n\n for uid, idx in strong[[\"uid\", \"item_idx\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n raw_item = idx2item[idx]\n is_new = raw_item not in user_prior.get(uid, set())\n w = 2.0 if is_new else 1.0\n user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = w\n\n for uid, idx in org_likes[[\"uid\", \"item_idx\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = 4.0\n\n return user_positives\n\n\ndef main():\n set_seed(42)\n print(\"Loading catalog...\")\n catalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()\n\n targets_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\n target_uids = targets_df[\"uid\"].tolist()\n target_set = set(target_uids)\n\n T_val_cutoff = 24786800\n print(\"Extracting validation user histories at T =\", T_val_cutoff)\n val_pref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\n val_hist = extract_user_histories(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n val_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_val_cutoff,\n window_days=60,\n )\n\n print(\"Reading listens parquet...\")\n listens_table = pq.read_table(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n columns=[\"uid\", \"timestamp\", \"item_id\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n )\n likes_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\n\n T_w0_split = T_val_cutoff - 7 * 86400\n T_w1_split = T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400\n\n print(\"Building Window 0 & 1 targets and histories...\")\n w0_pos = extract_window_positives(\n listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, T_w0_split, T_val_cutoff\n )\n w1_pos = extract_window_positives(\n listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, T_w1_split, T_w0_split\n )\n\n w0_hist = extract_user_histories(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n val_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_w0_split,\n window_days=60,\n )\n w1_hist = extract_user_histories(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n val_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_w1_split,\n window_days=60,\n )\n\n model = TwoTowerModel(\n catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,\n embed_dim=64,\n out_dim=64,\n hidden_dim=128,\n temperature=0.08,\n )\n # Moderate learning rate and higher weight decay\n optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=3e-4, weight_decay=1e-3)\n epochs = 10\n scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=epochs, eta_min=1e-5)\n\n batch_size = 512\n num_negatives = 128 # moderate catalog negatives to avoid over-penalizing head items\n best_score = 0.0\n best_ranking_path = \"/app/solution/val_best.parquet\"\n\n print(f\"Training for {epochs} epochs...\")\n for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1):\n model.train()\n total_loss = 0.0\n num_batches = 0\n\n windows = [(w0_hist, w0_pos), (w1_hist, w1_pos)]\n for hist, pos_dict in windows:\n active_uids = [u for u in target_uids if u in pos_dict]\n random.shuffle(active_uids)\n uid2row = hist[\"uid2row\"]\n\n for b_start in range(0, len(active_uids), batch_size):\n b_uids = active_uids[b_start : b_start + batch_size]\n if len(b_uids) < 32:\n continue\n\n b_pos_items = []\n b_weights = []\n for u in b_uids:\n items_dict = pos_dict[u]\n items = list(items_dict.keys())\n weights = list(items_dict.values())\n chosen = random.choices(items, weights=weights, k=1)[0]\n b_pos_items.append(chosen)\n b_weights.append(items_dict[chosen])\n\n b_liked_idx, b_liked_off = [], [0]\n b_disliked_idx, b_disliked_off = [], [0]\n b_listen_idx, b_listen_w, b_listen_off = [], [], [0]\n b_stats = []\n\n for u in b_uids:\n r = uid2row[u]\n l_start = hist[\"liked_offsets\"][r].item()\n l_end = (\n hist[\"liked_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"liked_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"liked_indices\"])\n )\n b_liked_idx.extend(hist[\"liked_indices\"][l_start:l_end].tolist())\n b_liked_off.append(len(b_liked_idx))\n\n d_start = hist[\"disliked_offsets\"][r].item()\n d_end = (\n hist[\"disliked_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"disliked_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"disliked_indices\"])\n )\n b_disliked_idx.extend(hist[\"disliked_indices\"][d_start:d_end].tolist())\n b_disliked_off.append(len(b_disliked_idx))\n\n ls_start = hist[\"listen_offsets\"][r].item()\n ls_end = (\n hist[\"listen_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"listen_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"listen_indices\"])\n )\n b_listen_idx.extend(hist[\"listen_indices\"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())\n b_listen_w.extend(hist[\"listen_weights\"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())\n b_listen_off.append(len(b_listen_idx))\n\n b_stats.append(hist[\"user_stats\"][r])\n\n t_liked_idx = torch.tensor(b_liked_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_liked_off = torch.tensor(b_liked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_disliked_idx = torch.tensor(b_disliked_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_disliked_off = torch.tensor(b_disliked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_listen_idx = torch.tensor(b_listen_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_listen_w = torch.tensor(b_listen_w, dtype=torch.float32)\n t_listen_off = torch.tensor(b_listen_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_stats = torch.stack(b_stats, dim=0)\n\n t_pos_items = torch.tensor(b_pos_items, dtype=torch.long)\n t_pos_feats = feat_matrix[t_pos_items]\n t_weights = torch.tensor(b_weights, dtype=torch.float32)\n\n # Uniform catalog negatives\n t_neg_items = torch.randint(0, CATALOG_SIZE, (num_negatives,))\n t_neg_feats = feat_matrix[t_neg_items]\n\n optimizer.zero_grad()\n u_emb = model.user_tower(\n t_liked_idx,\n t_liked_off,\n t_disliked_idx,\n t_disliked_off,\n t_listen_idx,\n t_listen_w,\n t_listen_off,\n t_stats,\n )\n v_pos = model.item_tower(t_pos_items, t_pos_feats)\n v_neg = model.item_tower(t_neg_items, t_neg_feats)\n\n v_all = torch.cat([v_pos, v_neg], dim=0)\n B = len(b_uids)\n scores = torch.matmul(u_emb, v_all.T) / model.temperature\n labels = torch.arange(B, device=scores.device)\n\n loss = F.cross_entropy(scores, labels, reduction=\"none\")\n weighted_loss = (loss * t_weights).sum() / t_weights.sum()\n\n weighted_loss.backward()\n optimizer.step()\n\n total_loss += weighted_loss.item()\n num_batches += 1\n\n scheduler.step()\n avg_loss = total_loss / max(1, num_batches)\n current_lr = scheduler.get_last_lr()[0]\n\n # Evaluate on validation every single epoch\n model.eval()\n with torch.no_grad():\n val_u_emb = model.user_tower(\n val_hist[\"liked_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"liked_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"disliked_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"disliked_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_weights\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"user_stats\"],\n )\n val_v_emb = model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)\n\n val_ranking_path = f\"/app/solution/val_exp3_ep{epoch}.parquet\"\n generate_ranking(\n val_u_emb,\n val_v_emb,\n \"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\",\n val_ranking_path,\n )\n\n res = subprocess.run(\n [\"python3\", \"/task/evaluate_public.py\", val_ranking_path],\n capture_output=True,\n text=True,\n )\n score_data = json.loads(res.stdout.strip())\n score = score_data[\"scores\"][\"quality_ndcg@10\"]\n print(f\"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f} | Val NDCG@10: {score:.6f}\")\n if score > best_score:\n best_score = score\n torch.save(model.state_dict(), \"/app/solution/best_model_exp3.pt\")\n subprocess.run([\"cp\", val_ranking_path, best_ranking_path])\n print(f\" *** New best model saved! Score: {score:.6f} ***\")\n\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n main()\n",
"file_path": "/app/solution/experiment_3.py"
}Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/experiment_3.py. Here is the updated code:
"""Experiment 3: Calibrated negative sampling, moderate LR, and per-epoch evaluation."""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
import random
import subprocess
import time
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import pyarrow.compute as pc
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F
from solution.data_utils import load_catalog, extract_user_histories, CATALOG_SIZE, PAD_IDX
from solution.model import TwoTowerModel
from solution.retrieval import generate_ranking
def set_seed(seed: int = 42):
random.seed(seed)
np.random.seed(seed)
torch.manual_seed(seed)
def extract_window_positives(
listens_table,
likes_df: pd.DataFrame,
item2idx: dict[int, int],
target_uids: set[int],
start_ts: int,
end_ts: int,
):
"""Extract (uid -> list of (item_idx, weight)) in target window, marking new items."""
mask = pc.and_(
pc.greater_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts),
pc.less_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], end_ts),
)
t_listens = listens_table.filter(mask).to_pandas()
strong = t_listens[
t_listens["uid"].isin(target_uids)
& (t_listens["is_organic"] == 1)
& (t_listens["played_ratio_pct"] >= 80)
]
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
strong = strong.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_idx"].astype(int)
org_likes = likes_df[
(likes_df["timestamp"] >= start_ts)
& (likes_df["timestamp"] <= end_ts)
& likes_df["uid"].isin(target_uids)
& (likes_df["is_organic"] == 1)
]
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
org_likes = org_likes.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_idx"].astype(int)
m_prior = pc.and_(
pc.greater_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts - 60 * 86400),
pc.less(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts),
)
t_prior = listens_table.filter(m_prior).to_pandas()
t_prior = t_prior[t_prior["uid"].isin(target_uids)]
user_prior = t_prior.groupby("uid")["item_id"].apply(set).to_dict()
user_positives: dict[int, dict[int, float]] = {}
catalog = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet")
idx2item = catalog["item_id"].to_numpy()
for uid, idx in strong[["uid", "item_idx"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):
raw_item = idx2item[idx]
is_new = raw_item not in user_prior.get(uid, set())
w = 2.0 if is_new else 1.0
user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = w
for uid, idx in org_likes[["uid", "item_idx"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):
user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = 4.0
return user_positives
def main():
set_seed(42)
print("Loading catalog...")
catalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()
targets_df = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/target_users.parquet")
target_uids = targets_df["uid"].tolist()
target_set = set(target_uids)
T_val_cutoff = 24786800
print("Extracting validation user histories at T =", T_val_cutoff)
val_pref = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet")
val_hist = extract_user_histories(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
val_pref,
item2idx,
target_uids,
T_val_cutoff,
window_days=60,
)
print("Reading listens parquet...")
listens_table = pq.read_table(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
columns=["uid", "timestamp", "item_id", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
)
likes_df = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/train_likes.parquet")
T_w0_split = T_val_cutoff - 7 * 86400
T_w1_split = T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400
print("Building Window 0 & 1 targets and histories...")
w0_pos = extract_window_positives(
listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, T_w0_split, T_val_cutoff
)
w1_pos = extract_window_positives(
listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, T_w1_split, T_w0_split
)
w0_hist = extract_user_histories(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
val_pref,
item2idx,
target_uids,
T_w0_split,
window_days=60,
)
w1_hist = extract_user_histories(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
val_pref,
item2idx,
target_uids,
T_w1_split,
window_days=60,
)
model = TwoTowerModel(
catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,
embed_dim=64,
out_dim=64,
hidden_dim=128,
temperature=0.08,
)
# Moderate learning rate and higher weight decay
optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=3e-4, weight_decay=1e-3)
epochs = 10
scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=epochs, eta_min=1e-5)
batch_size = 512
num_negatives = 128 # moderate catalog negatives to avoid over-penalizing head items
best_score = 0.0
best_ranking_path = "/app/solution/val_best.parquet"
print(f"Training for {epochs} epochs...")
for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1):
model.train()
total_loss = 0.0
num_batches = 0
windows = [(w0_hist, w0_pos), (w1_hist, w1_pos)]
for hist, pos_dict in windows:
active_uids = [u for u in target_uids if u in pos_dict]
random.shuffle(active_uids)
uid2row = hist["uid2row"]
for b_start in range(0, len(active_uids), batch_size):
b_uids = active_uids[b_start : b_start + batch_size]
if len(b_uids) < 32:
continue
b_pos_items = []
b_weights = []
for u in b_uids:
items_dict = pos_dict[u]
items = list(items_dict.keys())
weights = list(items_dict.values())
chosen = random.choices(items, weights=weights, k=1)[0]
b_pos_items.append(chosen)
b_weights.append(items_dict[chosen])
b_liked_idx, b_liked_off = [], [0]
b_disliked_idx, b_disliked_off = [], [0]
b_listen_idx, b_listen_w, b_listen_off = [], [], [0]
b_stats = []
for u in b_uids:
r = uid2row[u]
l_start = hist["liked_offsets"][r].item()
l_end = (
hist["liked_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["liked_offsets"])
else len(hist["liked_indices"])
)
b_liked_idx.extend(hist["liked_indices"][l_start:l_end].tolist())
b_liked_off.append(len(b_liked_idx))
d_start = hist["disliked_offsets"][r].item()
d_end = (
hist["disliked_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["disliked_offsets"])
else len(hist["disliked_indices"])
)
b_disliked_idx.extend(hist["disliked_indices"][d_start:d_end].tolist())
b_disliked_off.append(len(b_disliked_idx))
ls_start = hist["listen_offsets"][r].item()
ls_end = (
hist["listen_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["listen_offsets"])
else len(hist["listen_indices"])
)
b_listen_idx.extend(hist["listen_indices"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())
b_listen_w.extend(hist["listen_weights"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())
b_listen_off.append(len(b_listen_idx))
b_stats.append(hist["user_stats"][r])
t_liked_idx = torch.tensor(b_liked_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_liked_off = torch.tensor(b_liked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_disliked_idx = torch.tensor(b_disliked_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_disliked_off = torch.tensor(b_disliked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_listen_idx = torch.tensor(b_listen_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_listen_w = torch.tensor(b_listen_w, dtype=torch.float32)
t_listen_off = torch.tensor(b_listen_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_stats = torch.stack(b_stats, dim=0)
t_pos_items = torch.tensor(b_pos_items, dtype=torch.long)
t_pos_feats = feat_matrix[t_pos_items]
t_weights = torch.tensor(b_weights, dtype=torch.float32)
# Uniform catalog negatives
t_neg_items = torch.randint(0, CATALOG_SIZE, (num_negatives,))
t_neg_feats = feat_matrix[t_neg_items]
optimizer.zero_grad()
u_emb = model.user_tower(
t_liked_idx,
t_liked_off,
t_disliked_idx,
t_disliked_off,
t_listen_idx,
t_listen_w,
t_listen_off,
t_stats,
)
v_pos = model.item_tower(t_pos_items, t_pos_feats)
v_neg = model.item_tower(t_neg_items, t_neg_feats)
v_all = torch.cat([v_pos, v_neg], dim=0)
B = len(b_uids)
scores = torch.matmul(u_emb, v_all.T) / model.temperature
labels = torch.arange(B, device=scores.device)
loss = F.cross_entropy(scores, labels, reduction="none")
weighted_loss = (loss * t_weights).sum() / t_weights.sum()
weighted_loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
total_loss += weighted_loss.item()
num_batches += 1
scheduler.step()
avg_loss = total_loss / max(1, num_batches)
current_lr = scheduler.get_last_lr()[0]
# Evaluate on validation every single epoch
model.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
val_u_emb = model.user_tower(
val_hist["liked_indices"],
val_hist["liked_offsets"],
val_hist["disliked_indices"],
val_hist["disliked_offsets"],
val_hist["listen_indices"],
val_hist["listen_weights"],
val_hist["listen_offsets"],
val_hist["user_stats"],
)
val_v_emb = model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)
val_ranking_path = f"/app/solution/val_exp3_ep{epoch}.parquet"
generate_ranking(
val_u_emb,
val_v_emb,
"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz",
val_ranking_path,
)
res = subprocess.run(
["python3", "/task/evaluate_public.py", val_ranking_path],
capture_output=True,
text=True,
)
score_data = json.loads(res.stdout.strip())
score = score_data["scores"]["quality_ndcg@10"]
print(f"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f} | Val NDCG@10: {score:.6f}")
if score > best_score:
best_score = score
torch.save(model.state_dict(), "/app/solution/best_model_exp3.pt")
subprocess.run(["cp", val_ranking_path, best_ranking_path])
print(f" *** New best model saved! Score: {score:.6f} ***")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
{
"description": "Run Experiment 3",
"command": "PYTHONPATH=/app python3 /app/solution/experiment_3.py"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: /app/solution/experiment_3.py:47: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_3.py:57: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_3.py:47: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_3.py:57: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
Loading catalog...
Extracting validation user histories at T = 24786800
Reading listens parquet...
Building Window 0 & 1 targets and histories...
Training for 10 epochs...
Epoch 01 | Loss: 6.4153 | LR: 0.000293 | Val NDCG@10: 0.001903
*** New best model saved! Score: 0.001903 ***
Epoch 02 | Loss: 6.3950 | LR: 0.000272 | Val NDCG@10: 0.004009
*** New best model saved! Score: 0.004009 ***
Epoch 03 | Loss: 6.3837 | LR: 0.000240 | Val NDCG@10: 0.005012
*** New best model saved! Score: 0.005012 ***
Epoch 04 | Loss: 6.3827 | LR: 0.000200 | Val NDCG@10: 0.006057
*** New best model saved! Score: 0.006057 ***
Epoch 05 | Loss: 6.3621 | LR: 0.000155 | Val NDCG@10: 0.006964
*** New best model saved! Score: 0.006964 ***
Epoch 06 | Loss: 6.3411 | LR: 0.000110 | Val NDCG@10: 0.008808
*** New best model saved! Score: 0.008808 ***
Epoch 07 | Loss: 6.2868 | LR: 0.000070 | Val NDCG@10: 0.005519
Epoch 08 | Loss: 6.2399 | LR: 0.000038 | Val NDCG@10: 0.007042
Epoch 09 | Loss: 6.2088 | LR: 0.000017 | Val NDCG@10: 0.006860
Epoch 10 | Loss: 6.1758 | LR: 0.000010 | Val NDCG@10: 0.006043
Process Group PGID: 3100
</untrusted_context>Analyzing Experiment Results
My current focus is on understanding the significant performance difference observed between Experiment 2 (0.021558 with popularity negatives) and Experiment 3 (0.008808 with uniform negatives). I'm investigating how popularity-biased negative sampling pushes the model towards learning nuanced preferences between plausible options.
Investigating Overfitting
I'm exploring why my model peaked early and then declined. My current hypothesis is that while initial training with popularity negatives helps capture broad categories, further reduction in loss leads to memorization of training data, negatively impacting performance by penalizing popular items too heavily. I plan to test this by observing validation scores at finer intervals with varied learning rates.
{
"command": "PYTHONPATH=/task python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\nfrom pathlib import Path\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, read_ranking, validate_ranking, ranked_items, ndcg_at_k\nfrom evaluate_public import validation_truth\n\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'].astype(int))\nelig = CandidateSet(Path('/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz'))\ntruth = validation_truth(elig, targets)\n\nsub = read_ranking(Path('/app/solution/val_exp2_ep2.parquet'))\nranked = ranked_items(validate_ranking(sub, targets))\n\nscores = [ndcg_at_k(ranked[uid], truth[uid], 10) for uid in truth]\nimport numpy as np\nprint('Num users scored:', len(scores))\nprint('Mean NDCG@10:', np.mean(scores))\nprint('Users with NDCG > 0:', np.sum(np.array(scores) > 0), 'fraction:', np.mean(np.array(scores) > 0))\nprint('Users with NDCG == 1.0:', np.sum(np.array(scores) == 1.0))\n\"",
"description": "Inspect per-user NDCG scores for val_exp2_ep2.parquet"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Num users scored: 4263
Mean NDCG@10: 0.021558411684225478
Users with NDCG > 0: 382 fraction: 0.08960825709594182
Users with NDCG == 1.0: 7
Process Group PGID: 3323
</untrusted_context>{
"command": "PYTHONPATH=/task python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\nfrom pathlib import Path\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, read_ranking, validate_ranking, ranked_items, ndcg_at_k\nfrom evaluate_public import validation_truth\n\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'].astype(int))\nelig = CandidateSet(Path('/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz'))\ntruth = validation_truth(elig, targets)\n\nsub = read_ranking(Path('/app/solution/validation_pop.parquet'))\nranked = ranked_items(validate_ranking(sub, targets))\n\nscores = [ndcg_at_k(ranked[uid], truth[uid], 10) for uid in truth]\nimport numpy as np\nprint('Popularity Baseline:')\nprint('Mean NDCG@10:', np.mean(scores))\nprint('Users with NDCG > 0:', np.sum(np.array(scores) > 0), 'fraction:', np.mean(np.array(scores) > 0))\n\"",
"description": "Check popularity baseline per-user NDCG"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Popularity Baseline:
Mean NDCG@10: 0.010709951701903768
Users with NDCG > 0: 229 fraction: 0.053718038939713816
Process Group PGID: 3343
</untrusted_context>Improving Recommendation Performance
My current focus is on the significant improvements observed with the two-tower model. I'm thrilled that it's more than doubled the popularity baseline's NDCG@10 and substantially increased the number of users showing positive results.
Exploring Popularity Integration
I'm investigating how to further enhance recommendations. A key idea is to see if incorporating item popularity directly into the ItemTower's features, and then allowing the UserTower to learn a preference for it through its dot product with the item embedding, could yield even better results.
Testing Popularity Embeddings
I'm exploring a new approach by dedicating specific dimensions within user and item embeddings to represent popularity. The idea is for the user embedding's popularity dimension to capture their affinity for mainstream or niche content, while the item embedding's dimension reflects its inherent popularity, allowing for a learned interaction.
{
"command": "PYTHONPATH=/task python3 -c \"\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nfrom pathlib import Path\nfrom ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, read_ranking, validate_ranking, ranked_items, ndcg_at_k\nfrom evaluate_public import validation_truth\n\ntargets = set(pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')['uid'].astype(int))\nelig = CandidateSet(Path('/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz'))\ntruth = validation_truth(elig, targets)\n\n# Load model weights from experiment 2\nfrom solution.model import TwoTowerModel\nfrom solution.data_utils import load_catalog, extract_user_histories\nimport torch\n\ncatalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')\ntarget_uids = targets_df['uid'].tolist()\nval_pref = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet')\nval_hist = extract_user_histories('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, 24786800, window_days=60)\n\nmodel = TwoTowerModel(embed_dim=64, out_dim=64, hidden_dim=128, temperature=0.07)\nmodel.load_state_dict(torch.load('/app/solution/best_model_exp2.pt'))\nmodel.eval()\n\nwith torch.no_grad():\n val_u = model.user_tower(\n val_hist['liked_indices'], val_hist['liked_offsets'],\n val_hist['disliked_indices'], val_hist['disliked_offsets'],\n val_hist['listen_indices'], val_hist['listen_weights'], val_hist['listen_offsets'],\n val_hist['user_stats']\n )\n val_v = model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)\n\n# Compute raw dot products\nscores_two_tower = torch.matmul(val_u, val_v.T) # (8456, 30000)\n\n# Catalog popularity score\ncatalog = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\npop_rank = catalog['popularity_rank'].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32) # 1 to 30000\n# Normalized log popularity\nlog_pop = torch.from_numpy(np.log1p(30000 - pop_rank)).unsqueeze(0) # (1, 30000)\n\npacked = np.load('/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz')['packed_eligible']\nmasks = torch.from_numpy(np.unpackbits(packed, axis=1, count=30000, bitorder='little').astype(bool))\n\n# Test different blending alpha: score = scores_two_tower + alpha * log_pop\nfor alpha in [0.0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2]:\n comb = scores_two_tower + alpha * log_pop\n comb[~masks] = -1e9\n top100 = torch.topk(comb, 100, dim=1).indices.cpu().numpy()\n \n # Format ranking dict\n uids_arr = np.array(target_uids)\n cat_items = catalog['item_id'].to_numpy()\n ranked = {int(uids_arr[r]): [int(cat_items[i]) for i in top100[r]] for r in range(len(uids_arr))}\n \n ndcg = np.mean([ndcg_at_k(ranked[uid], truth[uid], 10) for uid in truth])\n print(f'Alpha {alpha:0.2f} -> NDCG@10: {ndcg:.6f}')\n\"",
"description": "Test blending two-tower scores with popularity prior"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Alpha 0.00 -> NDCG@10: 0.021558
Alpha 0.01 -> NDCG@10: 0.021194
Alpha 0.02 -> NDCG@10: 0.020287
Alpha 0.05 -> NDCG@10: 0.018041
Alpha 0.10 -> NDCG@10: 0.013940
Alpha 0.20 -> NDCG@10: 0.010370
Process Group PGID: 3363
</untrusted_context>Discovering Embedding Power
I'm realizing the pure two-tower model, with zero popularity boost, is outperforming. Its learned user preference embeddings seem to capture personalized signals far more effectively than any popularity weighting could.
Expanding Model Capacity
I'm now investigating how to enhance the existing two-tower architecture. Specifically, I'm exploring increasing embedding dimensions, fine-tuning learning rates with more frequent evaluations, and incorporating additional historical data windows to capture richer user behavior.
{
"file_path": "/app/solution/experiment_4.py",
"content": "\"\"\"Experiment 4: Higher embedding dimension (128), 3 temporal windows, and fine-grained epoch search.\"\"\"\nfrom __future__ import annotations\n\nimport json\nimport random\nimport subprocess\nimport time\nfrom pathlib import Path\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nfrom solution.data_utils import load_catalog, extract_user_histories, CATALOG_SIZE, PAD_IDX\nfrom solution.model import TwoTowerModel\nfrom solution.retrieval import generate_ranking\n\n\ndef set_seed(seed: int = 42):\n random.seed(seed)\n np.random.seed(seed)\n torch.manual_seed(seed)\n\n\ndef extract_window_positives(\n listens_table,\n likes_df: pd.DataFrame,\n item2idx: dict[int, int],\n target_uids: set[int],\n start_ts: int,\n end_ts: int,\n):\n \"\"\"Extract (uid -> list of (item_idx, weight)) in target window, marking new items.\"\"\"\n mask = pc.and_(\n pc.greater_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts),\n pc.less_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], end_ts),\n )\n t_listens = listens_table.filter(mask).to_pandas()\n strong = t_listens[\n t_listens[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)\n & (t_listens[\"is_organic\"] == 1)\n & (t_listens[\"played_ratio_pct\"] >= 80)\n ]\n strong[\"item_idx\"] = strong[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n strong = strong.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n strong[\"item_idx\"] = strong[\"item_idx\"].astype(int)\n\n org_likes = likes_df[\n (likes_df[\"timestamp\"] >= start_ts)\n & (likes_df[\"timestamp\"] <= end_ts)\n & likes_df[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)\n & (likes_df[\"is_organic\"] == 1)\n ]\n org_likes[\"item_idx\"] = org_likes[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n org_likes = org_likes.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n org_likes[\"item_idx\"] = org_likes[\"item_idx\"].astype(int)\n\n m_prior = pc.and_(\n pc.greater_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts - 60 * 86400),\n pc.less(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts),\n )\n t_prior = listens_table.filter(m_prior).to_pandas()\n t_prior = t_prior[t_prior[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)]\n user_prior = t_prior.groupby(\"uid\")[\"item_id\"].apply(set).to_dict()\n\n user_positives: dict[int, dict[int, float]] = {}\n catalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\n idx2item = catalog[\"item_id\"].to_numpy()\n\n for uid, idx in strong[[\"uid\", \"item_idx\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n raw_item = idx2item[idx]\n is_new = raw_item not in user_prior.get(uid, set())\n w = 2.0 if is_new else 1.0\n user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = w\n\n for uid, idx in org_likes[[\"uid\", \"item_idx\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = 4.0\n\n return user_positives\n\n\ndef main():\n set_seed(42)\n print(\"Loading catalog...\")\n catalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()\n\n catalog_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\n counts = catalog_df[\"positive_listens\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float64)\n neg_probs = np.power(counts, 0.6)\n neg_probs /= neg_probs.sum()\n\n targets_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\n target_uids = targets_df[\"uid\"].tolist()\n target_set = set(target_uids)\n\n T_val_cutoff = 24786800\n print(\"Extracting validation user histories at T =\", T_val_cutoff)\n val_pref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\n val_hist = extract_user_histories(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n val_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_val_cutoff,\n window_days=60,\n )\n\n print(\"Reading listens parquet...\")\n listens_table = pq.read_table(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n columns=[\"uid\", \"timestamp\", \"item_id\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n )\n likes_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\n\n # 3 temporal windows\n w_splits = [\n (T_val_cutoff - 7 * 86400, T_val_cutoff),\n (T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400, T_val_cutoff - 7 * 86400),\n (T_val_cutoff - 21 * 86400, T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400),\n ]\n\n windows = []\n for w_idx, (w_start, w_end) in enumerate(w_splits):\n print(f\"Building Window {w_idx} (target {w_start} to {w_end})...\")\n pos = extract_window_positives(listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, w_start, w_end)\n hist = extract_user_histories(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n val_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n w_start,\n window_days=60,\n )\n windows.append((hist, pos))\n\n # Initialize model with dim=128\n model = TwoTowerModel(\n catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,\n embed_dim=128,\n out_dim=128,\n hidden_dim=256,\n temperature=0.07,\n )\n optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=5e-4, weight_decay=2e-4)\n epochs = 8\n scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=epochs, eta_min=1e-5)\n\n batch_size = 512\n num_negatives = 256\n best_score = 0.0\n\n print(f\"Training for {epochs} epochs (embed_dim=128)...\")\n for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1):\n model.train()\n total_loss = 0.0\n num_batches = 0\n\n for hist, pos_dict in windows:\n active_uids = [u for u in target_uids if u in pos_dict]\n random.shuffle(active_uids)\n uid2row = hist[\"uid2row\"]\n\n for b_start in range(0, len(active_uids), batch_size):\n b_uids = active_uids[b_start : b_start + batch_size]\n if len(b_uids) < 32:\n continue\n\n b_pos_items = []\n b_weights = []\n for u in b_uids:\n items_dict = pos_dict[u]\n items = list(items_dict.keys())\n weights = list(items_dict.values())\n chosen = random.choices(items, weights=weights, k=1)[0]\n b_pos_items.append(chosen)\n b_weights.append(items_dict[chosen])\n\n b_liked_idx, b_liked_off = [], [0]\n b_disliked_idx, b_disliked_off = [], [0]\n b_listen_idx, b_listen_w, b_listen_off = [], [], [0]\n b_stats = []\n\n for u in b_uids:\n r = uid2row[u]\n l_start = hist[\"liked_offsets\"][r].item()\n l_end = (\n hist[\"liked_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"liked_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"liked_indices\"])\n )\n b_liked_idx.extend(hist[\"liked_indices\"][l_start:l_end].tolist())\n b_liked_off.append(len(b_liked_idx))\n\n d_start = hist[\"disliked_offsets\"][r].item()\n d_end = (\n hist[\"disliked_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"disliked_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"disliked_indices\"])\n )\n b_disliked_idx.extend(hist[\"disliked_indices\"][d_start:d_end].tolist())\n b_disliked_off.append(len(b_disliked_idx))\n\n ls_start = hist[\"listen_offsets\"][r].item()\n ls_end = (\n hist[\"listen_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"listen_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"listen_indices\"])\n )\n b_listen_idx.extend(hist[\"listen_indices\"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())\n b_listen_w.extend(hist[\"listen_weights\"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())\n b_listen_off.append(len(b_listen_idx))\n\n b_stats.append(hist[\"user_stats\"][r])\n\n t_liked_idx = torch.tensor(b_liked_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_liked_off = torch.tensor(b_liked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_disliked_idx = torch.tensor(b_disliked_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_disliked_off = torch.tensor(b_disliked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_listen_idx = torch.tensor(b_listen_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_listen_w = torch.tensor(b_listen_w, dtype=torch.float32)\n t_listen_off = torch.tensor(b_listen_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_stats = torch.stack(b_stats, dim=0)\n\n t_pos_items = torch.tensor(b_pos_items, dtype=torch.long)\n t_pos_feats = feat_matrix[t_pos_items]\n t_weights = torch.tensor(b_weights, dtype=torch.float32)\n\n neg_indices = np.random.choice(CATALOG_SIZE, size=num_negatives, p=neg_probs)\n t_neg_items = torch.from_numpy(neg_indices).long()\n t_neg_feats = feat_matrix[t_neg_items]\n\n optimizer.zero_grad()\n u_emb = model.user_tower(\n t_liked_idx,\n t_liked_off,\n t_disliked_idx,\n t_disliked_off,\n t_listen_idx,\n t_listen_w,\n t_listen_off,\n t_stats,\n )\n v_pos = model.item_tower(t_pos_items, t_pos_feats)\n v_neg = model.item_tower(t_neg_items, t_neg_feats)\n\n v_all = torch.cat([v_pos, v_neg], dim=0)\n B = len(b_uids)\n scores = torch.matmul(u_emb, v_all.T) / model.temperature\n labels = torch.arange(B, device=scores.device)\n\n loss = F.cross_entropy(scores, labels, reduction=\"none\")\n weighted_loss = (loss * t_weights).sum() / t_weights.sum()\n\n weighted_loss.backward()\n optimizer.step()\n\n total_loss += weighted_loss.item()\n num_batches += 1\n\n scheduler.step()\n avg_loss = total_loss / max(1, num_batches)\n current_lr = scheduler.get_last_lr()[0]\n\n # Evaluate on validation\n model.eval()\n with torch.no_grad():\n val_u_emb = model.user_tower(\n val_hist[\"liked_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"liked_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"disliked_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"disliked_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_weights\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"user_stats\"],\n )\n val_v_emb = model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)\n\n val_ranking_path = f\"/app/solution/val_exp4_ep{epoch}.parquet\"\n generate_ranking(\n val_u_emb,\n val_v_emb,\n \"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\",\n val_ranking_path,\n )\n\n res = subprocess.run(\n [\"python3\", \"/task/evaluate_public.py\", val_ranking_path],\n capture_output=True,\n text=True,\n )\n score_data = json.loads(res.stdout.strip())\n score = score_data[\"scores\"][\"quality_ndcg@10\"]\n print(f\"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f} | Val NDCG@10: {score:.6f}\")\n if score > best_score:\n best_score = score\n torch.save(model.state_dict(), \"/app/solution/best_model_exp4.pt\")\n subprocess.run([\"cp\", val_ranking_path, \"/app/solution/val_best.parquet\"])\n print(f\" *** New best model saved! Score: {score:.6f} ***\")\n\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n main()\n"
}Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/experiment_4.py. Here is the updated code:
"""Experiment 4: Higher embedding dimension (128), 3 temporal windows, and fine-grained epoch search."""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
import random
import subprocess
import time
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import pyarrow.compute as pc
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F
from solution.data_utils import load_catalog, extract_user_histories, CATALOG_SIZE, PAD_IDX
from solution.model import TwoTowerModel
from solution.retrieval import generate_ranking
def set_seed(seed: int = 42):
random.seed(seed)
np.random.seed(seed)
torch.manual_seed(seed)
def extract_window_positives(
listens_table,
likes_df: pd.DataFrame,
item2idx: dict[int, int],
target_uids: set[int],
start_ts: int,
end_ts: int,
):
"""Extract (uid -> list of (item_idx, weight)) in target window, marking new items."""
mask = pc.and_(
pc.greater_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts),
pc.less_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], end_ts),
)
t_listens = listens_table.filter(mask).to_pandas()
strong = t_listens[
t_listens["uid"].isin(target_uids)
& (t_listens["is_organic"] == 1)
& (t_listens["played_ratio_pct"] >= 80)
]
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
strong = strong.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_idx"].astype(int)
org_likes = likes_df[
(likes_df["timestamp"] >= start_ts)
& (likes_df["timestamp"] <= end_ts)
& likes_df["uid"].isin(target_uids)
& (likes_df["is_organic"] == 1)
]
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
org_likes = org_likes.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_idx"].astype(int)
m_prior = pc.and_(
pc.greater_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts - 60 * 86400),
pc.less(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts),
)
t_prior = listens_table.filter(m_prior).to_pandas()
t_prior = t_prior[t_prior["uid"].isin(target_uids)]
user_prior = t_prior.groupby("uid")["item_id"].apply(set).to_dict()
user_positives: dict[int, dict[int, float]] = {}
catalog = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet")
idx2item = catalog["item_id"].to_numpy()
for uid, idx in strong[["uid", "item_idx"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):
raw_item = idx2item[idx]
is_new = raw_item not in user_prior.get(uid, set())
w = 2.0 if is_new else 1.0
user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = w
for uid, idx in org_likes[["uid", "item_idx"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):
user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = 4.0
return user_positives
def main():
set_seed(42)
print("Loading catalog...")
catalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()
catalog_df = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet")
counts = catalog_df["positive_listens"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float64)
neg_probs = np.power(counts, 0.6)
neg_probs /= neg_probs.sum()
targets_df = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/target_users.parquet")
target_uids = targets_df["uid"].tolist()
target_set = set(target_uids)
T_val_cutoff = 24786800
print("Extracting validation user histories at T =", T_val_cutoff)
val_pref = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet")
val_hist = extract_user_histories(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
val_pref,
item2idx,
target_uids,
T_val_cutoff,
window_days=60,
)
print("Reading listens parquet...")
listens_table = pq.read_table(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
columns=["uid", "timestamp", "item_id", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
)
likes_df = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/train_likes.parquet")
# 3 temporal windows
w_splits = [
(T_val_cutoff - 7 * 86400, T_val_cutoff),
(T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400, T_val_cutoff - 7 * 86400),
(T_val_cutoff - 21 * 86400, T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400),
]
windows = []
for w_idx, (w_start, w_end) in enumerate(w_splits):
print(f"Building Window {w_idx} (target {w_start} to {w_end})...")
pos = extract_window_positives(listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, w_start, w_end)
hist = extract_user_histories(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
val_pref,
item2idx,
target_uids,
w_start,
window_days=60,
)
windows.append((hist, pos))
# Initialize model with dim=128
model = TwoTowerModel(
catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,
embed_dim=128,
out_dim=128,
hidden_dim=256,
temperature=0.07,
)
optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=5e-4, weight_decay=2e-4)
epochs = 8
scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=epochs, eta_min=1e-5)
batch_size = 512
num_negatives = 256
best_score = 0.0
print(f"Training for {epochs} epochs (embed_dim=128)...")
for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1):
model.train()
total_loss = 0.0
num_batches = 0
for hist, pos_dict in windows:
active_uids = [u for u in target_uids if u in pos_dict]
random.shuffle(active_uids)
uid2row = hist["uid2row"]
for b_start in range(0, len(active_uids), batch_size):
b_uids = active_uids[b_start : b_start + batch_size]
if len(b_uids) < 32:
continue
b_pos_items = []
b_weights = []
for u in b_uids:
items_dict = pos_dict[u]
items = list(items_dict.keys())
weights = list(items_dict.values())
chosen = random.choices(items, weights=weights, k=1)[0]
b_pos_items.append(chosen)
b_weights.append(items_dict[chosen])
b_liked_idx, b_liked_off = [], [0]
b_disliked_idx, b_disliked_off = [], [0]
b_listen_idx, b_listen_w, b_listen_off = [], [], [0]
b_stats = []
for u in b_uids:
r = uid2row[u]
l_start = hist["liked_offsets"][r].item()
l_end = (
hist["liked_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["liked_offsets"])
else len(hist["liked_indices"])
)
b_liked_idx.extend(hist["liked_indices"][l_start:l_end].tolist())
b_liked_off.append(len(b_liked_idx))
d_start = hist["disliked_offsets"][r].item()
d_end = (
hist["disliked_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["disliked_offsets"])
else len(hist["disliked_indices"])
)
b_disliked_idx.extend(hist["disliked_indices"][d_start:d_end].tolist())
b_disliked_off.append(len(b_disliked_idx))
ls_start = hist["listen_offsets"][r].item()
ls_end = (
hist["listen_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["listen_offsets"])
else len(hist["listen_indices"])
)
b_listen_idx.extend(hist["listen_indices"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())
b_listen_w.extend(hist["listen_weights"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())
b_listen_off.append(len(b_listen_idx))
b_stats.append(hist["user_stats"][r])
t_liked_idx = torch.tensor(b_liked_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_liked_off = torch.tensor(b_liked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_disliked_idx = torch.tensor(b_disliked_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_disliked_off = torch.tensor(b_disliked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_listen_idx = torch.tensor(b_listen_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_listen_w = torch.tensor(b_listen_w, dtype=torch.float32)
t_listen_off = torch.tensor(b_listen_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_stats = torch.stack(b_stats, dim=0)
t_pos_items = torch.tensor(b_pos_items, dtype=torch.long)
t_pos_feats = feat_matrix[t_pos_items]
t_weights = torch.tensor(b_weights, dtype=torch.float32)
neg_indices = np.random.choice(CATALOG_SIZE, size=num_negatives, p=neg_probs)
t_neg_items = torch.from_numpy(neg_indices).long()
t_neg_feats = feat_matrix[t_neg_items]
optimizer.zero_grad()
u_emb = model.user_tower(
t_liked_idx,
t_liked_off,
t_disliked_idx,
t_disliked_off,
t_listen_idx,
t_listen_w,
t_listen_off,
t_stats,
)
v_pos = model.item_tower(t_pos_items, t_pos_feats)
v_neg = model.item_tower(t_neg_items, t_neg_feats)
v_all = torch.cat([v_pos, v_neg], dim=0)
B = len(b_uids)
scores = torch.matmul(u_emb, v_all.T) / model.temperature
labels = torch.arange(B, device=scores.device)
loss = F.cross_entropy(scores, labels, reduction="none")
weighted_loss = (loss * t_weights).sum() / t_weights.sum()
weighted_loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
total_loss += weighted_loss.item()
num_batches += 1
scheduler.step()
avg_loss = total_loss / max(1, num_batches)
current_lr = scheduler.get_last_lr()[0]
# Evaluate on validation
model.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
val_u_emb = model.user_tower(
val_hist["liked_indices"],
val_hist["liked_offsets"],
val_hist["disliked_indices"],
val_hist["disliked_offsets"],
val_hist["listen_indices"],
val_hist["listen_weights"],
val_hist["listen_offsets"],
val_hist["user_stats"],
)
val_v_emb = model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)
val_ranking_path = f"/app/solution/val_exp4_ep{epoch}.parquet"
generate_ranking(
val_u_emb,
val_v_emb,
"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz",
val_ranking_path,
)
res = subprocess.run(
["python3", "/task/evaluate_public.py", val_ranking_path],
capture_output=True,
text=True,
)
score_data = json.loads(res.stdout.strip())
score = score_data["scores"]["quality_ndcg@10"]
print(f"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f} | Val NDCG@10: {score:.6f}")
if score > best_score:
best_score = score
torch.save(model.state_dict(), "/app/solution/best_model_exp4.pt")
subprocess.run(["cp", val_ranking_path, "/app/solution/val_best.parquet"])
print(f" *** New best model saved! Score: {score:.6f} ***")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
{
"description": "Run Experiment 4",
"command": "PYTHONPATH=/app python3 /app/solution/experiment_4.py"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: /app/solution/experiment_4.py:47: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_4.py:57: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_4.py:47: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_4.py:57: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_4.py:47: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_4.py:57: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
Loading catalog...
Extracting validation user histories at T = 24786800
Reading listens parquet...
Building Window 0 (target 24182000 to 24786800)...
Building Window 1 (target 23577200 to 24182000)...
Building Window 2 (target 22972400 to 23577200)...
Training for 8 epochs (embed_dim=128)...
Epoch 01 | Loss: 6.5968 | LR: 0.000481 | Val NDCG@10: 0.010315
*** New best model saved! Score: 0.010315 ***
Epoch 02 | Loss: 6.5672 | LR: 0.000428 | Val NDCG@10: 0.015265
*** New best model saved! Score: 0.015265 ***
Epoch 03 | Loss: 6.5082 | LR: 0.000349 | Val NDCG@10: 0.017334
*** New best model saved! Score: 0.017334 ***
Epoch 04 | Loss: 6.3595 | LR: 0.000255 | Val NDCG@10: 0.007595
Epoch 05 | Loss: 6.2474 | LR: 0.000161 | Val NDCG@10: 0.007460
Epoch 06 | Loss: 6.1453 | LR: 0.000082 | Val NDCG@10: 0.006721
Epoch 07 | Loss: 6.0621 | LR: 0.000029 | Val NDCG@10: 0.005028
Epoch 08 | Loss: 6.0322 | LR: 0.000010 | Val NDCG@10: 0.004814
Process Group PGID: 3400
</untrusted_context>Observing NDCG Peaks
I'm noticing a consistent trend: NDCG peaks in every experiment when the loss hovers around 6.5 to 6.8. It's curious that as the loss drops below 6.4, the NDCG performance declines. I need to investigate why this occurs, particularly how minimizing InfoNCE loss below this threshold affects results.
Investigating NDCG Declines
I'm digging into why NDCG drops when the InfoNCE loss goes below 6.4. It seems my user embeddings are over-specializing on the specific tracks from the training set, which are different from those in the validation set. This specialization is hindering generalization. I'm considering regularization or validation-guided early stopping to address this.
Refining Training Data
I've identified a critical issue: recent listens with low played_ratio_pct, indicating skips, are negatively impacting training. I'm now excluding these skips from the user's positive listen history, aiming to improve the quality of my training data and, consequently, model performance.
{
"description": "Check played ratio distribution in train_listens",
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport numpy as np\n\ntable = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['played_ratio_pct'])\nratios = table['played_ratio_pct'].to_numpy()\nprint('Played ratio stats:')\nprint('Total rows:', len(ratios))\nprint('Ratio < 50%:', np.mean(ratios < 50))\nprint('Ratio >= 50%:', np.mean(ratios >= 50))\nprint('Ratio >= 80%:', np.mean(ratios >= 80))\nprint('Ratio == 100%:', np.mean(ratios == 100))\n\""
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Played ratio stats:
Total rows: 43484159
Ratio < 50%: 0.3675684287696584
Ratio >= 50%: 0.6324315712303417
Ratio >= 80%: 0.5922891828263254
Ratio == 100%: 0.5317305090343359
Process Group PGID: 3590
</untrusted_context>Analyzing Skip Data
My analysis reveals a significant portion, over 36%, of all listens were skipped before 50% completion. This suggests our current approach to user listening history may be unintentionally skewing positive signals by including these skipped tracks.
{
"file_path": "/app/solution/experiment_5.py",
"content": "\"\"\"Experiment 5: Clean user history (filter out skips < 50%), organic-boosted weights, and evaluate.\"\"\"\nfrom __future__ import annotations\n\nimport json\nimport random\nimport subprocess\nimport time\nfrom pathlib import Path\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nfrom solution.data_utils import load_catalog, CATALOG_SIZE, PAD_IDX\nfrom solution.model import TwoTowerModel\nfrom solution.retrieval import generate_ranking\n\n\ndef set_seed(seed: int = 42):\n random.seed(seed)\n np.random.seed(seed)\n torch.manual_seed(seed)\n\n\ndef extract_clean_user_histories(\n listens_path: str | Path,\n pref_df: pd.DataFrame,\n item2idx: dict[int, int],\n target_uids: list[int],\n cutoff_timestamp: int,\n window_days: int = 60,\n top_k_listens: int = 100,\n):\n \"\"\"Extract clean user history filtering out skips (< 50% played ratio).\"\"\"\n target_set = set(target_uids)\n uid2row = {int(uid): idx for idx, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}\n\n # 1. Preferences\n pref_df = pref_df[pref_df[\"uid\"].isin(target_set)]\n likes_grouped = (\n pref_df[pref_df[\"state\"] == \"liked\"].groupby(\"uid\")[\"item_id\"].apply(list).to_dict()\n )\n dislikes_grouped = (\n pref_df[pref_df[\"state\"] == \"disliked\"].groupby(\"uid\")[\"item_id\"].apply(list).to_dict()\n )\n\n # 2. Listens\n t_min = cutoff_timestamp - window_days * 86400\n t_max = cutoff_timestamp\n\n table = pq.read_table(\n listens_path,\n columns=[\"uid\", \"timestamp\", \"item_id\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n )\n mask = pc.and_(\n pc.greater_equal(table[\"timestamp\"], t_min),\n pc.less_equal(table[\"timestamp\"], t_max),\n )\n filtered = table.filter(mask).to_pandas()\n filtered = filtered[filtered[\"uid\"].isin(target_set)]\n\n # Compute listen stats before skip filter\n user_listen_counts = filtered.groupby(\"uid\").size().to_dict()\n user_listen_ratios = filtered.groupby(\"uid\")[\"played_ratio_pct\"].mean().to_dict()\n user_organic_ratios = filtered.groupby(\"uid\")[\"is_organic\"].mean().to_dict()\n\n # Filter out skips! Keep only positive listens (played_ratio >= 50%)\n filtered = filtered[filtered[\"played_ratio_pct\"] >= 50]\n\n # Map items to index\n filtered[\"item_idx\"] = filtered[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n filtered = filtered.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n filtered[\"item_idx\"] = filtered[\"item_idx\"].astype(np.int32)\n\n # Time decay and weight: higher weight for high completion and organic\n delta_days = (t_max - filtered[\"timestamp\"].to_numpy()) / 86400.0\n decay = np.exp(-0.04 * delta_days)\n ratio_score = (filtered[\"played_ratio_pct\"].to_numpy() - 40.0) / 60.0\n org_multiplier = 1.0 + 1.0 * filtered[\"is_organic\"].to_numpy()\n filtered[\"w\"] = (ratio_score * org_multiplier * decay).astype(np.float32)\n\n # Aggregate by (uid, item_idx)\n user_item = (\n filtered.groupby([\"uid\", \"item_idx\"], as_index=False)[\"w\"]\n .sum()\n .sort_values([\"uid\", \"w\"], ascending=[True, False])\n )\n top_user_item = user_item.groupby(\"uid\").head(top_k_listens)\n listens_grouped = top_user_item.groupby(\"uid\")[[\"item_idx\", \"w\"]].apply(\n lambda g: (g[\"item_idx\"].to_numpy(), g[\"w\"].to_numpy())\n ).to_dict()\n\n # Build flat arrays with offsets for EmbeddingBag\n liked_indices, liked_offsets = [], [0]\n disliked_indices, disliked_offsets = [], [0]\n listen_indices, listen_weights, listen_offsets = [], [], [0]\n stats_list = []\n\n for uid in target_uids:\n # Liked\n l_items = likes_grouped.get(uid, [])\n l_idx = [item2idx[i] for i in l_items if i in item2idx]\n if not l_idx:\n liked_indices.append(PAD_IDX)\n else:\n liked_indices.extend(l_idx)\n liked_offsets.append(len(liked_indices))\n\n # Disliked\n d_items = dislikes_grouped.get(uid, [])\n d_idx = [item2idx[i] for i in d_items if i in item2idx]\n if not d_idx:\n disliked_indices.append(PAD_IDX)\n else:\n disliked_indices.extend(d_idx)\n disliked_offsets.append(len(disliked_indices))\n\n # Listens\n if uid in listens_grouped:\n u_items, u_w = listens_grouped[uid]\n sum_w = u_w.sum()\n norm_w = u_w / (sum_w + 1e-6)\n listen_indices.extend(u_items)\n listen_weights.extend(norm_w)\n else:\n listen_indices.append(PAD_IDX)\n listen_weights.append(0.0)\n listen_offsets.append(len(listen_indices))\n\n num_likes = len(l_idx)\n num_dislikes = len(d_idx)\n num_listens = user_listen_counts.get(uid, 0)\n mean_ratio = user_listen_ratios.get(uid, 0.0) / 100.0\n org_ratio = user_organic_ratios.get(uid, 0.0)\n stats_list.append([\n np.log1p(num_likes) / 5.0,\n np.log1p(num_dislikes) / 3.0,\n np.log1p(num_listens) / 10.0,\n mean_ratio,\n org_ratio,\n ])\n\n return {\n \"liked_indices\": torch.tensor(liked_indices, dtype=torch.long),\n \"liked_offsets\": torch.tensor(liked_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),\n \"disliked_indices\": torch.tensor(disliked_indices, dtype=torch.long),\n \"disliked_offsets\": torch.tensor(disliked_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),\n \"listen_indices\": torch.tensor(listen_indices, dtype=torch.long),\n \"listen_weights\": torch.tensor(listen_weights, dtype=torch.float32),\n \"listen_offsets\": torch.tensor(listen_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),\n \"user_stats\": torch.tensor(stats_list, dtype=torch.float32),\n \"uid2row\": uid2row,\n }\n\n\ndef extract_window_positives(\n listens_table,\n likes_df: pd.DataFrame,\n item2idx: dict[int, int],\n target_uids: set[int],\n start_ts: int,\n end_ts: int,\n):\n \"\"\"Extract (uid -> list of (item_idx, weight)) in target window, marking new items.\"\"\"\n mask = pc.and_(\n pc.greater_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts),\n pc.less_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], end_ts),\n )\n t_listens = listens_table.filter(mask).to_pandas()\n strong = t_listens[\n t_listens[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)\n & (t_listens[\"is_organic\"] == 1)\n & (t_listens[\"played_ratio_pct\"] >= 80)\n ]\n strong[\"item_idx\"] = strong[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n strong = strong.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n strong[\"item_idx\"] = strong[\"item_idx\"].astype(int)\n\n org_likes = likes_df[\n (likes_df[\"timestamp\"] >= start_ts)\n & (likes_df[\"timestamp\"] <= end_ts)\n & likes_df[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)\n & (likes_df[\"is_organic\"] == 1)\n ]\n org_likes[\"item_idx\"] = org_likes[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n org_likes = org_likes.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n org_likes[\"item_idx\"] = org_likes[\"item_idx\"].astype(int)\n\n m_prior = pc.and_(\n pc.greater_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts - 60 * 86400),\n pc.less(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts),\n )\n t_prior = listens_table.filter(m_prior).to_pandas()\n t_prior = t_prior[t_prior[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)]\n user_prior = t_prior.groupby(\"uid\")[\"item_id\"].apply(set).to_dict()\n\n user_positives: dict[int, dict[int, float]] = {}\n catalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\n idx2item = catalog[\"item_id\"].to_numpy()\n\n for uid, idx in strong[[\"uid\", \"item_idx\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n raw_item = idx2item[idx]\n is_new = raw_item not in user_prior.get(uid, set())\n w = 2.0 if is_new else 1.0\n user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = w\n\n for uid, idx in org_likes[[\"uid\", \"item_idx\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = 4.0\n\n return user_positives\n\n\ndef main():\n set_seed(42)\n print(\"Loading catalog...\")\n catalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()\n\n catalog_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\n counts = catalog_df[\"positive_listens\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float64)\n neg_probs = np.power(counts, 0.6)\n neg_probs /= neg_probs.sum()\n\n targets_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\n target_uids = targets_df[\"uid\"].tolist()\n target_set = set(target_uids)\n\n T_val_cutoff = 24786800\n print(\"Extracting validation user histories at T =\", T_val_cutoff)\n val_pref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\n val_hist = extract_clean_user_histories(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n val_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_val_cutoff,\n window_days=60,\n )\n\n print(\"Reading listens parquet...\")\n listens_table = pq.read_table(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n columns=[\"uid\", \"timestamp\", \"item_id\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n )\n likes_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\n\n T_w0_split = T_val_cutoff - 7 * 86400\n T_w1_split = T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400\n\n print(\"Building Window 0 & 1 targets and histories...\")\n w0_pos = extract_window_positives(\n listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, T_w0_split, T_val_cutoff\n )\n w1_pos = extract_window_positives(\n listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, T_w1_split, T_w0_split\n )\n\n w0_hist = extract_clean_user_histories(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n val_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_w0_split,\n window_days=60,\n )\n w1_hist = extract_clean_user_histories(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n val_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_w1_split,\n window_days=60,\n )\n\n model = TwoTowerModel(\n catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,\n embed_dim=64,\n out_dim=64,\n hidden_dim=128,\n temperature=0.07,\n )\n optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=8e-4, weight_decay=2e-4)\n epochs = 6\n scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=epochs, eta_min=1e-5)\n\n batch_size = 512\n num_negatives = 512\n best_score = 0.0\n\n print(f\"Training for {epochs} epochs...\")\n for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1):\n model.train()\n total_loss = 0.0\n num_batches = 0\n\n windows = [(w0_hist, w0_pos), (w1_hist, w1_pos)]\n for hist, pos_dict in windows:\n active_uids = [u for u in target_uids if u in pos_dict]\n random.shuffle(active_uids)\n uid2row = hist[\"uid2row\"]\n\n for b_start in range(0, len(active_uids), batch_size):\n b_uids = active_uids[b_start : b_start + batch_size]\n if len(b_uids) < 32:\n continue\n\n b_pos_items = []\n b_weights = []\n for u in b_uids:\n items_dict = pos_dict[u]\n items = list(items_dict.keys())\n weights = list(items_dict.values())\n chosen = random.choices(items, weights=weights, k=1)[0]\n b_pos_items.append(chosen)\n b_weights.append(items_dict[chosen])\n\n b_liked_idx, b_liked_off = [], [0]\n b_disliked_idx, b_disliked_off = [], [0]\n b_listen_idx, b_listen_w, b_listen_off = [], [], [0]\n b_stats = []\n\n for u in b_uids:\n r = uid2row[u]\n l_start = hist[\"liked_offsets\"][r].item()\n l_end = (\n hist[\"liked_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"liked_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"liked_indices\"])\n )\n b_liked_idx.extend(hist[\"liked_indices\"][l_start:l_end].tolist())\n b_liked_off.append(len(b_liked_idx))\n\n d_start = hist[\"disliked_offsets\"][r].item()\n d_end = (\n hist[\"disliked_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"disliked_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"disliked_indices\"])\n )\n b_disliked_idx.extend(hist[\"disliked_indices\"][d_start:d_end].tolist())\n b_disliked_off.append(len(b_disliked_idx))\n\n ls_start = hist[\"listen_offsets\"][r].item()\n ls_end = (\n hist[\"listen_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"listen_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"listen_indices\"])\n )\n b_listen_idx.extend(hist[\"listen_indices\"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())\n b_listen_w.extend(hist[\"listen_weights\"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())\n b_listen_off.append(len(b_listen_idx))\n\n b_stats.append(hist[\"user_stats\"][r])\n\n t_liked_idx = torch.tensor(b_liked_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_liked_off = torch.tensor(b_liked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_disliked_idx = torch.tensor(b_disliked_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_disliked_off = torch.tensor(b_disliked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_listen_idx = torch.tensor(b_listen_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_listen_w = torch.tensor(b_listen_w, dtype=torch.float32)\n t_listen_off = torch.tensor(b_listen_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_stats = torch.stack(b_stats, dim=0)\n\n t_pos_items = torch.tensor(b_pos_items, dtype=torch.long)\n t_pos_feats = feat_matrix[t_pos_items]\n t_weights = torch.tensor(b_weights, dtype=torch.float32)\n\n neg_indices = np.random.choice(CATALOG_SIZE, size=num_negatives, p=neg_probs)\n t_neg_items = torch.from_numpy(neg_indices).long()\n t_neg_feats = feat_matrix[t_neg_items]\n\n optimizer.zero_grad()\n u_emb = model.user_tower(\n t_liked_idx,\n t_liked_off,\n t_disliked_idx,\n t_disliked_off,\n t_listen_idx,\n t_listen_w,\n t_listen_off,\n t_stats,\n )\n v_pos = model.item_tower(t_pos_items, t_pos_feats)\n v_neg = model.item_tower(t_neg_items, t_neg_feats)\n\n v_all = torch.cat([v_pos, v_neg], dim=0)\n B = len(b_uids)\n scores = torch.matmul(u_emb, v_all.T) / model.temperature\n labels = torch.arange(B, device=scores.device)\n\n loss = F.cross_entropy(scores, labels, reduction=\"none\")\n weighted_loss = (loss * t_weights).sum() / t_weights.sum()\n\n weighted_loss.backward()\n optimizer.step()\n\n total_loss += weighted_loss.item()\n num_batches += 1\n\n scheduler.step()\n avg_loss = total_loss / max(1, num_batches)\n current_lr = scheduler.get_last_lr()[0]\n\n # Evaluate on validation\n model.eval()\n with torch.no_grad():\n val_u_emb = model.user_tower(\n val_hist[\"liked_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"liked_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"disliked_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"disliked_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_weights\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"user_stats\"],\n )\n val_v_emb = model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)\n\n val_ranking_path = f\"/app/solution/val_exp5_ep{epoch}.parquet\"\n generate_ranking(\n val_u_emb,\n val_v_emb,\n \"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\",\n val_ranking_path,\n )\n\n res = subprocess.run(\n [\"python3\", \"/task/evaluate_public.py\", val_ranking_path],\n capture_output=True,\n text=True,\n )\n score_data = json.loads(res.stdout.strip())\n score = score_data[\"scores\"][\"quality_ndcg@10\"]\n print(f\"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f} | Val NDCG@10: {score:.6f}\")\n if score > best_score:\n best_score = score\n torch.save(model.state_dict(), \"/app/solution/best_model_exp5.pt\")\n subprocess.run([\"cp\", val_ranking_path, \"/app/solution/val_best.parquet\"])\n print(f\" *** New best model saved! Score: {score:.6f} ***\")\n\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n main()\n"
}Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/experiment_5.py. Here is the updated code:
"""Experiment 5: Clean user history (filter out skips < 50%), organic-boosted weights, and evaluate."""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
import random
import subprocess
import time
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import pyarrow.compute as pc
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F
from solution.data_utils import load_catalog, CATALOG_SIZE, PAD_IDX
from solution.model import TwoTowerModel
from solution.retrieval import generate_ranking
def set_seed(seed: int = 42):
random.seed(seed)
np.random.seed(seed)
torch.manual_seed(seed)
def extract_clean_user_histories(
listens_path: str | Path,
pref_df: pd.DataFrame,
item2idx: dict[int, int],
target_uids: list[int],
cutoff_timestamp: int,
window_days: int = 60,
top_k_listens: int = 100,
):
"""Extract clean user history filtering out skips (< 50% played ratio)."""
target_set = set(target_uids)
uid2row = {int(uid): idx for idx, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}
# 1. Preferences
pref_df = pref_df[pref_df["uid"].isin(target_set)]
likes_grouped = (
pref_df[pref_df["state"] == "liked"].groupby("uid")["item_id"].apply(list).to_dict()
)
dislikes_grouped = (
pref_df[pref_df["state"] == "disliked"].groupby("uid")["item_id"].apply(list).to_dict()
)
# 2. Listens
t_min = cutoff_timestamp - window_days * 86400
t_max = cutoff_timestamp
table = pq.read_table(
listens_path,
columns=["uid", "timestamp", "item_id", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
)
mask = pc.and_(
pc.greater_equal(table["timestamp"], t_min),
pc.less_equal(table["timestamp"], t_max),
)
filtered = table.filter(mask).to_pandas()
filtered = filtered[filtered["uid"].isin(target_set)]
# Compute listen stats before skip filter
user_listen_counts = filtered.groupby("uid").size().to_dict()
user_listen_ratios = filtered.groupby("uid")["played_ratio_pct"].mean().to_dict()
user_organic_ratios = filtered.groupby("uid")["is_organic"].mean().to_dict()
# Filter out skips! Keep only positive listens (played_ratio >= 50%)
filtered = filtered[filtered["played_ratio_pct"] >= 50]
# Map items to index
filtered["item_idx"] = filtered["item_id"].map(item2idx)
filtered = filtered.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
filtered["item_idx"] = filtered["item_idx"].astype(np.int32)
# Time decay and weight: higher weight for high completion and organic
delta_days = (t_max - filtered["timestamp"].to_numpy()) / 86400.0
decay = np.exp(-0.04 * delta_days)
ratio_score = (filtered["played_ratio_pct"].to_numpy() - 40.0) / 60.0
org_multiplier = 1.0 + 1.0 * filtered["is_organic"].to_numpy()
filtered["w"] = (ratio_score * org_multiplier * decay).astype(np.float32)
# Aggregate by (uid, item_idx)
user_item = (
filtered.groupby(["uid", "item_idx"], as_index=False)["w"]
.sum()
.sort_values(["uid", "w"], ascending=[True, False])
)
top_user_item = user_item.groupby("uid").head(top_k_listens)
listens_grouped = top_user_item.groupby("uid")[["item_idx", "w"]].apply(
lambda g: (g["item_idx"].to_numpy(), g["w"].to_numpy())
).to_dict()
# Build flat arrays with offsets for EmbeddingBag
liked_indices, liked_offsets = [], [0]
disliked_indices, disliked_offsets = [], [0]
listen_indices, listen_weights, listen_offsets = [], [], [0]
stats_list = []
for uid in target_uids:
# Liked
l_items = likes_grouped.get(uid, [])
l_idx = [item2idx[i] for i in l_items if i in item2idx]
if not l_idx:
liked_indices.append(PAD_IDX)
else:
liked_indices.extend(l_idx)
liked_offsets.append(len(liked_indices))
# Disliked
d_items = dislikes_grouped.get(uid, [])
d_idx = [item2idx[i] for i in d_items if i in item2idx]
if not d_idx:
disliked_indices.append(PAD_IDX)
else:
disliked_indices.extend(d_idx)
disliked_offsets.append(len(disliked_indices))
# Listens
if uid in listens_grouped:
u_items, u_w = listens_grouped[uid]
sum_w = u_w.sum()
norm_w = u_w / (sum_w + 1e-6)
listen_indices.extend(u_items)
listen_weights.extend(norm_w)
else:
listen_indices.append(PAD_IDX)
listen_weights.append(0.0)
listen_offsets.append(len(listen_indices))
num_likes = len(l_idx)
num_dislikes = len(d_idx)
num_listens = user_listen_counts.get(uid, 0)
mean_ratio = user_listen_ratios.get(uid, 0.0) / 100.0
org_ratio = user_organic_ratios.get(uid, 0.0)
stats_list.append([
np.log1p(num_likes) / 5.0,
np.log1p(num_dislikes) / 3.0,
np.log1p(num_listens) / 10.0,
mean_ratio,
org_ratio,
])
return {
"liked_indices": torch.tensor(liked_indices, dtype=torch.long),
"liked_offsets": torch.tensor(liked_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),
"disliked_indices": torch.tensor(disliked_indices, dtype=torch.long),
"disliked_offsets": torch.tensor(disliked_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),
"listen_indices": torch.tensor(listen_indices, dtype=torch.long),
"listen_weights": torch.tensor(listen_weights, dtype=torch.float32),
"listen_offsets": torch.tensor(listen_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),
"user_stats": torch.tensor(stats_list, dtype=torch.float32),
"uid2row": uid2row,
}
def extract_window_positives(
listens_table,
likes_df: pd.DataFrame,
item2idx: dict[int, int],
target_uids: set[int],
start_ts: int,
end_ts: int,
):
"""Extract (uid -> list of (item_idx, weight)) in target window, marking new items."""
mask = pc.and_(
pc.greater_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts),
pc.less_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], end_ts),
)
t_listens = listens_table.filter(mask).to_pandas()
strong = t_listens[
t_listens["uid"].isin(target_uids)
& (t_listens["is_organic"] == 1)
& (t_listens["played_ratio_pct"] >= 80)
]
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
strong = strong.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_idx"].astype(int)
org_likes = likes_df[
(likes_df["timestamp"] >= start_ts)
& (likes_df["timestamp"] <= end_ts)
& likes_df["uid"].isin(target_uids)
& (likes_df["is_organic"] == 1)
]
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
org_likes = org_likes.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_idx"].astype(int)
m_prior = pc.and_(
pc.greater_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts - 60 * 86400),
pc.less(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts),
)
t_prior = listens_table.filter(m_prior).to_pandas()
t_prior = t_prior[t_prior["uid"].isin(target_uids)]
user_prior = t_prior.groupby("uid")["item_id"].apply(set).to_dict()
user_positives: dict[int, dict[int, float]] = {}
catalog = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet")
idx2item = catalog["item_id"].to_numpy()
for uid, idx in strong[["uid", "item_idx"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):
raw_item = idx2item[idx]
is_new = raw_item not in user_prior.get(uid, set())
w = 2.0 if is_new else 1.0
user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = w
for uid, idx in org_likes[["uid", "item_idx"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):
user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = 4.0
return user_positives
def main():
set_seed(42)
print("Loading catalog...")
catalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()
catalog_df = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet")
counts = catalog_df["positive_listens"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float64)
neg_probs = np.power(counts, 0.6)
neg_probs /= neg_probs.sum()
targets_df = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/target_users.parquet")
target_uids = targets_df["uid"].tolist()
target_set = set(target_uids)
T_val_cutoff = 24786800
print("Extracting validation user histories at T =", T_val_cutoff)
val_pref = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet")
val_hist = extract_clean_user_histories(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
val_pref,
item2idx,
target_uids,
T_val_cutoff,
window_days=60,
)
print("Reading listens parquet...")
listens_table = pq.read_table(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
columns=["uid", "timestamp", "item_id", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
)
likes_df = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/train_likes.parquet")
T_w0_split = T_val_cutoff - 7 * 86400
T_w1_split = T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400
print("Building Window 0 & 1 targets and histories...")
w0_pos = extract_window_positives(
listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, T_w0_split, T_val_cutoff
)
w1_pos = extract_window_positives(
listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, T_w1_split, T_w0_split
)
w0_hist = extract_clean_user_histories(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
val_pref,
item2idx,
target_uids,
T_w0_split,
window_days=60,
)
w1_hist = extract_clean_user_histories(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
val_pref,
item2idx,
target_uids,
T_w1_split,
window_days=60,
)
model = TwoTowerModel(
catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,
embed_dim=64,
out_dim=64,
hidden_dim=128,
temperature=0.07,
)
optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=8e-4, weight_decay=2e-4)
epochs = 6
scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=epochs, eta_min=1e-5)
batch_size = 512
num_negatives = 512
best_score = 0.0
print(f"Training for {epochs} epochs...")
for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1):
model.train()
total_loss = 0.0
num_batches = 0
windows = [(w0_hist, w0_pos), (w1_hist, w1_pos)]
for hist, pos_dict in windows:
active_uids = [u for u in target_uids if u in pos_dict]
random.shuffle(active_uids)
uid2row = hist["uid2row"]
for b_start in range(0, len(active_uids), batch_size):
b_uids = active_uids[b_start : b_start + batch_size]
if len(b_uids) < 32:
continue
b_pos_items = []
b_weights = []
for u in b_uids:
items_dict = pos_dict[u]
items = list(items_dict.keys())
weights = list(items_dict.values())
chosen = random.choices(items, weights=weights, k=1)[0]
b_pos_items.append(chosen)
b_weights.append(items_dict[chosen])
b_liked_idx, b_liked_off = [], [0]
b_disliked_idx, b_disliked_off = [], [0]
b_listen_idx, b_listen_w, b_listen_off = [], [], [0]
b_stats = []
for u in b_uids:
r = uid2row[u]
l_start = hist["liked_offsets"][r].item()
l_end = (
hist["liked_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["liked_offsets"])
else len(hist["liked_indices"])
)
b_liked_idx.extend(hist["liked_indices"][l_start:l_end].tolist())
b_liked_off.append(len(b_liked_idx))
d_start = hist["disliked_offsets"][r].item()
d_end = (
hist["disliked_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["disliked_offsets"])
else len(hist["disliked_indices"])
)
b_disliked_idx.extend(hist["disliked_indices"][d_start:d_end].tolist())
b_disliked_off.append(len(b_disliked_idx))
ls_start = hist["listen_offsets"][r].item()
ls_end = (
hist["listen_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["listen_offsets"])
else len(hist["listen_indices"])
)
b_listen_idx.extend(hist["listen_indices"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())
b_listen_w.extend(hist["listen_weights"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())
b_listen_off.append(len(b_listen_idx))
b_stats.append(hist["user_stats"][r])
t_liked_idx = torch.tensor(b_liked_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_liked_off = torch.tensor(b_liked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_disliked_idx = torch.tensor(b_disliked_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_disliked_off = torch.tensor(b_disliked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_listen_idx = torch.tensor(b_listen_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_listen_w = torch.tensor(b_listen_w, dtype=torch.float32)
t_listen_off = torch.tensor(b_listen_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_stats = torch.stack(b_stats, dim=0)
t_pos_items = torch.tensor(b_pos_items, dtype=torch.long)
t_pos_feats = feat_matrix[t_pos_items]
t_weights = torch.tensor(b_weights, dtype=torch.float32)
neg_indices = np.random.choice(CATALOG_SIZE, size=num_negatives, p=neg_probs)
t_neg_items = torch.from_numpy(neg_indices).long()
t_neg_feats = feat_matrix[t_neg_items]
optimizer.zero_grad()
u_emb = model.user_tower(
t_liked_idx,
t_liked_off,
t_disliked_idx,
t_disliked_off,
t_listen_idx,
t_listen_w,
t_listen_off,
t_stats,
)
v_pos = model.item_tower(t_pos_items, t_pos_feats)
v_neg = model.item_tower(t_neg_items, t_neg_feats)
v_all = torch.cat([v_pos, v_neg], dim=0)
B = len(b_uids)
scores = torch.matmul(u_emb, v_all.T) / model.temperature
labels = torch.arange(B, device=scores.device)
loss = F.cross_entropy(scores, labels, reduction="none")
weighted_loss = (loss * t_weights).sum() / t_weights.sum()
weighted_loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
total_loss += weighted_loss.item()
num_batches += 1
scheduler.step()
avg_loss = total_loss / max(1, num_batches)
current_lr = scheduler.get_last_lr()[0]
# Evaluate on validation
model.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
val_u_emb = model.user_tower(
val_hist["liked_indices"],
val_hist["liked_offsets"],
val_hist["disliked_indices"],
val_hist["disliked_offsets"],
val_hist["listen_indices"],
val_hist["listen_weights"],
val_hist["listen_offsets"],
val_hist["user_stats"],
)
val_v_emb = model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)
val_ranking_path = f"/app/solution/val_exp5_ep{epoch}.parquet"
generate_ranking(
val_u_emb,
val_v_emb,
"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz",
val_ranking_path,
)
res = subprocess.run(
["python3", "/task/evaluate_public.py", val_ranking_path],
capture_output=True,
text=True,
)
score_data = json.loads(res.stdout.strip())
score = score_data["scores"]["quality_ndcg@10"]
print(f"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f} | Val NDCG@10: {score:.6f}")
if score > best_score:
best_score = score
torch.save(model.state_dict(), "/app/solution/best_model_exp5.pt")
subprocess.run(["cp", val_ranking_path, "/app/solution/val_best.parquet"])
print(f" *** New best model saved! Score: {score:.6f} ***")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
{
"command": "PYTHONPATH=/app python3 /app/solution/experiment_5.py",
"description": "Run Experiment 5"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: /app/solution/experiment_5.py:178: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_5.py:188: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_5.py:178: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_5.py:188: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
Loading catalog...
Extracting validation user histories at T = 24786800
Reading listens parquet...
Building Window 0 & 1 targets and histories...
Training for 6 epochs...
Epoch 01 | Loss: 6.8938 | LR: 0.000747 | Val NDCG@10: 0.009585
*** New best model saved! Score: 0.009585 ***
Epoch 02 | Loss: 6.8561 | LR: 0.000603 | Val NDCG@10: 0.018391
*** New best model saved! Score: 0.018391 ***
Epoch 03 | Loss: 6.8245 | LR: 0.000405 | Val NDCG@10: 0.018022
Epoch 04 | Loss: 6.7746 | LR: 0.000208 | Val NDCG@10: 0.020800
*** New best model saved! Score: 0.020800 ***
Epoch 05 | Loss: 6.6858 | LR: 0.000063 | Val NDCG@10: 0.014958
Epoch 06 | Loss: 6.6530 | LR: 0.000010 | Val NDCG@10: 0.015548
Process Group PGID: 3617
</untrusted_context>Observing Initial Results
I'm seeing promising stability in my NDCG@10 scores, holding steady between 0.018 and 0.021 across epochs 2, 3, and 4. This suggests the clean history filtering is indeed enhancing training robustness. Now, I'm ready to move on to comparing Experiment 2 with Experiment 5.
Comparing Experiment Outcomes
My recent comparisons show Experiment 2 achieved 0.021558 and Experiment 5 reached 0.020800, both significantly outperforming the baseline. I'm now focusing on the refitting requirements, specifically how to leverage both train_* and val_* datasets for the final hidden-test ranker after initial tuning.
Evaluating Refitting Strategies
I've identified that using val_* events as features during validation measurement is problematic. However, these events are crucial for refitting the final hidden-test ranker. My next step is to implement this distinction, ensuring the final submission adheres to the specified format and candidate sets.
Refining Training Windows
I'm now defining the training windows for refitting the final ranker. The validation period will become the most recent training target, using historical data prior to it for the feature set. This clearly separates the evaluation and refitting phases.
Defining Refitting Windows
I'm now defining the specific windows for refitting the final ranker. Window 1 targets the seven days prior to validation, with history preceding it. Window 2 covers the period just before that. Training on these windows will include validation interactions as targets, preparing for test inference.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow as pa\nimport time\n\nt0 = time.time()\nt1 = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\nt2 = pq.read_table('/task/data/val_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\ncombined = pa.concat_tables([t1, t2])\nprint(f'Combined listens table in {time.time()-t0:.2f}s, total rows: {len(combined)}')\n\"",
"description": "Benchmark concatenating train and val listens"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Combined listens table in 1.39s, total rows: 44985856
Process Group PGID: 3759
</untrusted_context>Optimizing PyArrow Efficiency
I'm thrilled to report that I've successfully integrated the PyArrow Table directly into the extract_clean_user_histories function. This eliminates the need for intermediate file reads, dramatically speeding up the process. My tests show a swift combination of all 44.98 million rows in just 1.39 seconds!
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow as pa\nimport pandas as pd\nimport time\nfrom solution.data_utils import load_catalog\nfrom solution.experiment_5 import extract_clean_user_histories\n\nt0 = time.time()\ncatalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')\ntarget_uids = targets_df['uid'].tolist()\n\nt1 = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\nt2 = pq.read_table('/task/data/val_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\ncombined = pa.concat_tables([t1, t2])\n\ntest_pref = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/test_preference_state.parquet')\nT_test_cutoff = 25393400\n\nt_start = time.time()\ntest_hist = extract_clean_user_histories(\n combined,\n test_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_test_cutoff,\n window_days=60\n)\nprint(f'Test histories extracted in {time.time()-t_start:.2f}s')\nprint('liked_indices:', test_hist['liked_indices'].shape)\nprint('disliked_indices:', test_hist['disliked_indices'].shape)\nprint('listen_indices:', test_hist['listen_indices'].shape)\nprint('user_stats:', test_hist['user_stats'].shape)\n\"",
"description": "Benchmark extracting test user histories"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 22, in <module>
File "/app/solution/experiment_5.py", line 54, in extract_clean_user_histories
table = pq.read_table(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/task-venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pyarrow/parquet/core.py", line 1793, in read_table
dataset = ParquetDataset(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/task-venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pyarrow/parquet/core.py", line 1357, in __init__
fragment = parquet_format.make_fragment(single_file, filesystem)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "pyarrow/_dataset_parquet.pyx", line 272, in pyarrow._dataset_parquet.ParquetFileFormat.make_fragment
File "pyarrow/_dataset.pyx", line 1337, in pyarrow._dataset.FileFormat.make_fragment
File "pyarrow/_dataset.pyx", line 132, in pyarrow._dataset._make_file_source
TypeError: cannot construct a FileSource from pyarrow.Table
uid: uint32
timestamp: uint32
item_id: uint32
is_organic: uint8
played_ratio_pct: uint16
----
uid: [[100,100,100,100,100,...,3900,3900,3900,3900,3900],[3900,3900,3900,3900,3900,...,7200,7200,7200,7200,7200],...,[870100,870100,870100,870100,870100,...,964200,964200,964200,964200,964200],[964200,964200,964200,964200,964200,...,1000000,1000000,1000000,1000000,1000000]]
timestamp: [[39420,39420,39625,40110,40360,...,19569630,19569630,19569630,19569630,19569630],[19569630,19569630,19569630,19569635,19569635,...,19221395,19221615,19222015,19222110,19222225],...,[25006525,25006545,25006735,25006885,25007075,...,24878435,24878555,24878770,24879360,24879360],[24879445,24912315,24941025,24943175,24943390,...,25266700,25276965,25276990,25277150,25277170]]
item_id: [[8326270,1441281,286361,732449,3397170,...,1173379,6183553,3263569,5300983,7124069],[1870967,4660740,2289350,5315938,1005397,...,4057026,6131831,2167211,4511149,57746],...,[5351040,229959,1548489,3796971,1751471,...,4059962,3338511,1762527,5289260,7375537],[709505,290137,519317,7928634,650900,...,8732545,6481109,7696733,7479030,9295648]]
is_organic: [[0,0,0,0,0,...,1,1,1,1,1],[1,1,1,1,1,...,0,0,0,0,0],...,[0,0,0,0,0,...,1,1,1,1,1],[1,1,1,1,1,...,1,0,0,0,0]]
played_ratio_pct: [[100,100,100,100,46,...,100,100,100,100,100],[100,100,100,100,47,...,100,100,100,100,100],...,[100,100,100,81,100,...,100,58,100,100,100],[100,1,100,100,100,...,72,99,6,99,15]]
Exit Code: 1
Process Group PGID: 3781
</untrusted_context>Accepting Paths and Tables
I've refined extract_clean_user_histories to be more flexible. It can now handle either a file path string or a Path object directly, or accept an already loaded PyArrow Table. This allows for greater convenience in how users provide their data.
Developing Data Utilities
I'm focusing on enhancing data_utils.py. My current thoughts revolve around refining extract_user_histories to seamlessly accept file paths or PyArrow Tables, incorporate a "clean positive listens" filter (played_ratio_pct >= 50), and return the complete structured dictionary. Testing within the module is the next immediate step.
{
"file_path": "/app/solution/data_utils.py",
"content": "\"\"\"Data loading and preprocessing utilities for the two-tower ranker.\"\"\"\nfrom __future__ import annotations\n\nfrom pathlib import Path\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow as pa\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport torch\n\nCATALOG_SIZE = 30000\nPAD_IDX = 30000\n\n\ndef load_catalog(path: str | Path = \"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\"):\n \"\"\"Load candidate catalog and construct feature tensor.\"\"\"\n catalog = pd.read_parquet(path)\n catalog_items = catalog[\"item_id\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.int64)\n item2idx = {int(item): idx for idx, item in enumerate(catalog_items)}\n\n # Features: normalized rank, log positive listens, log organic positive listens, organic ratio\n rank_feat = catalog[\"popularity_rank\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32) / 30000.0\n pos_feat = np.log1p(catalog[\"positive_listens\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32)) / 10.0\n org_feat = np.log1p(catalog[\"organic_positive_listens\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32)) / 10.0\n ratio_feat = (\n catalog[\"organic_positive_listens\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32)\n / (catalog[\"positive_listens\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32) + 1.0)\n )\n\n feat_matrix = np.column_stack([rank_feat, pos_feat, org_feat, ratio_feat]).astype(np.float32)\n # Add a zero row for padding index\n feat_matrix = np.vstack([feat_matrix, np.zeros((1, feat_matrix.shape[1]), dtype=np.float32)])\n return catalog_items, item2idx, torch.from_numpy(feat_matrix)\n\n\ndef extract_user_histories(\n listens_input: str | Path | pa.Table,\n pref_df: pd.DataFrame,\n item2idx: dict[int, int],\n target_uids: list[int],\n cutoff_timestamp: int,\n window_days: int = 60,\n top_k_listens: int = 100,\n):\n \"\"\"Extract clean user history filtering out skips (< 50% played ratio).\"\"\"\n target_set = set(target_uids)\n uid2row = {int(uid): idx for idx, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}\n\n # 1. Preferences\n pref_df = pref_df[pref_df[\"uid\"].isin(target_set)]\n likes_grouped = (\n pref_df[pref_df[\"state\"] == \"liked\"].groupby(\"uid\")[\"item_id\"].apply(list).to_dict()\n )\n dislikes_grouped = (\n pref_df[pref_df[\"state\"] == \"disliked\"].groupby(\"uid\")[\"item_id\"].apply(list).to_dict()\n )\n\n # 2. Listens\n t_min = cutoff_timestamp - window_days * 86400\n t_max = cutoff_timestamp\n\n if isinstance(listens_input, (str, Path)):\n table = pq.read_table(\n listens_input,\n columns=[\"uid\", \"timestamp\", \"item_id\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n )\n else:\n table = listens_input\n\n mask = pc.and_(\n pc.greater_equal(table[\"timestamp\"], t_min),\n pc.less_equal(table[\"timestamp\"], t_max),\n )\n filtered = table.filter(mask).to_pandas()\n filtered = filtered[filtered[\"uid\"].isin(target_set)]\n\n # Compute listen stats before skip filter\n user_listen_counts = filtered.groupby(\"uid\").size().to_dict()\n user_listen_ratios = filtered.groupby(\"uid\")[\"played_ratio_pct\"].mean().to_dict()\n user_organic_ratios = filtered.groupby(\"uid\")[\"is_organic\"].mean().to_dict()\n\n # Filter out skips! Keep only positive listens (played_ratio >= 50%)\n filtered = filtered[filtered[\"played_ratio_pct\"] >= 50]\n\n # Map items to index\n filtered[\"item_idx\"] = filtered[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n filtered = filtered.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n filtered[\"item_idx\"] = filtered[\"item_idx\"].astype(np.int32)\n\n # Time decay and weight: higher weight for high completion and organic\n delta_days = (t_max - filtered[\"timestamp\"].to_numpy()) / 86400.0\n decay = np.exp(-0.04 * delta_days)\n ratio_score = (filtered[\"played_ratio_pct\"].to_numpy() - 40.0) / 60.0\n org_multiplier = 1.0 + 1.0 * filtered[\"is_organic\"].to_numpy()\n filtered[\"w\"] = (ratio_score * org_multiplier * decay).astype(np.float32)\n\n # Aggregate by (uid, item_idx)\n user_item = (\n filtered.groupby([\"uid\", \"item_idx\"], as_index=False)[\"w\"]\n .sum()\n .sort_values([\"uid\", \"w\"], ascending=[True, False])\n )\n top_user_item = user_item.groupby(\"uid\").head(top_k_listens)\n listens_grouped = top_user_item.groupby(\"uid\")[[\"item_idx\", \"w\"]].apply(\n lambda g: (g[\"item_idx\"].to_numpy(), g[\"w\"].to_numpy())\n ).to_dict()\n\n # Build flat arrays with offsets for EmbeddingBag\n liked_indices, liked_offsets = [], [0]\n disliked_indices, disliked_offsets = [], [0]\n listen_indices, listen_weights, listen_offsets = [], [], [0]\n stats_list = []\n\n for uid in target_uids:\n # Liked\n l_items = likes_grouped.get(uid, [])\n l_idx = [item2idx[i] for i in l_items if i in item2idx]\n if not l_idx:\n liked_indices.append(PAD_IDX)\n else:\n liked_indices.extend(l_idx)\n liked_offsets.append(len(liked_indices))\n\n # Disliked\n d_items = dislikes_grouped.get(uid, [])\n d_idx = [item2idx[i] for i in d_items if i in item2idx]\n if not d_idx:\n disliked_indices.append(PAD_IDX)\n else:\n disliked_indices.extend(d_idx)\n disliked_offsets.append(len(disliked_indices))\n\n # Listens\n if uid in listens_grouped:\n u_items, u_w = listens_grouped[uid]\n sum_w = u_w.sum()\n norm_w = u_w / (sum_w + 1e-6)\n listen_indices.extend(u_items)\n listen_weights.extend(norm_w)\n else:\n listen_indices.append(PAD_IDX)\n listen_weights.append(0.0)\n listen_offsets.append(len(listen_indices))\n\n num_likes = len(l_idx)\n num_dislikes = len(d_idx)\n num_listens = user_listen_counts.get(uid, 0)\n mean_ratio = user_listen_ratios.get(uid, 0.0) / 100.0\n org_ratio = user_organic_ratios.get(uid, 0.0)\n stats_list.append([\n np.log1p(num_likes) / 5.0,\n np.log1p(num_dislikes) / 3.0,\n np.log1p(num_listens) / 10.0,\n mean_ratio,\n org_ratio,\n ])\n\n return {\n \"liked_indices\": torch.tensor(liked_indices, dtype=torch.long),\n \"liked_offsets\": torch.tensor(liked_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),\n \"disliked_indices\": torch.tensor(disliked_indices, dtype=torch.long),\n \"disliked_offsets\": torch.tensor(disliked_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),\n \"listen_indices\": torch.tensor(listen_indices, dtype=torch.long),\n \"listen_weights\": torch.tensor(listen_weights, dtype=torch.float32),\n \"listen_offsets\": torch.tensor(listen_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),\n \"user_stats\": torch.tensor(stats_list, dtype=torch.float32),\n \"uid2row\": uid2row,\n }\n\n\ndef extract_window_positives(\n listens_table: pa.Table,\n likes_df: pd.DataFrame,\n item2idx: dict[int, int],\n target_uids: set[int],\n start_ts: int,\n end_ts: int,\n):\n \"\"\"Extract (uid -> list of (item_idx, weight)) in target window, marking new items.\"\"\"\n mask = pc.and_(\n pc.greater_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts),\n pc.less_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], end_ts),\n )\n t_listens = listens_table.filter(mask).to_pandas()\n strong = t_listens[\n t_listens[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)\n & (t_listens[\"is_organic\"] == 1)\n & (t_listens[\"played_ratio_pct\"] >= 80)\n ].copy()\n strong[\"item_idx\"] = strong[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n strong = strong.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n strong[\"item_idx\"] = strong[\"item_idx\"].astype(int)\n\n org_likes = likes_df[\n (likes_df[\"timestamp\"] >= start_ts)\n & (likes_df[\"timestamp\"] <= end_ts)\n & likes_df[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)\n & (likes_df[\"is_organic\"] == 1)\n ].copy()\n org_likes[\"item_idx\"] = org_likes[\"item_id\"].map(item2idx)\n org_likes = org_likes.dropna(subset=[\"item_idx\"])\n org_likes[\"item_idx\"] = org_likes[\"item_idx\"].astype(int)\n\n m_prior = pc.and_(\n pc.greater_equal(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts - 60 * 86400),\n pc.less(listens_table[\"timestamp\"], start_ts),\n )\n t_prior = listens_table.filter(m_prior).to_pandas()\n t_prior = t_prior[t_prior[\"uid\"].isin(target_uids)]\n user_prior = t_prior.groupby(\"uid\")[\"item_id\"].apply(set).to_dict()\n\n user_positives: dict[int, dict[int, float]] = {}\n catalog = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\n idx2item = catalog[\"item_id\"].to_numpy()\n\n for uid, idx in strong[[\"uid\", \"item_idx\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n raw_item = idx2item[idx]\n is_new = raw_item not in user_prior.get(uid, set())\n w = 2.0 if is_new else 1.0\n user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = w\n\n for uid, idx in org_likes[[\"uid\", \"item_idx\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = 4.0\n\n return user_positives\n"
}Successfully overwrote file: /app/solution/data_utils.py. Here is the updated code:
...
from __future__ import annotations
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow as pa
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import pyarrow.compute as pc
import torch
CATALOG_SIZE = 30000
...
feat_matrix = np.vstack([feat_matrix, np.zeros((1, feat_matrix.shape[1]), dtype=np.float32)])
return catalog_items, item2idx, torch.from_numpy(feat_matrix)
def extract_user_histories(
listens_input: str | Path | pa.Table,
pref_df: pd.DataFrame,
item2idx: dict[int, int],
target_uids: list[int],
cutoff_timestamp: int,
window_days: int = 60,
top_k_listens: int = 100,
):
"""Extract clean user history filtering out skips (< 50% played ratio)."""
target_set = set(target_uids)
uid2row = {int(uid): idx for idx, uid in enumerate(target_uids)}
# 1. Preferences
pref_df = pref_df[pref_df["uid"].isin(target_set)]
likes_grouped = (
pref_df[pref_df["state"] == "liked"].groupby("uid")["item_id"].apply(list).to_dict()
...
# 2. Listens
t_min = cutoff_timestamp - window_days * 86400
t_max = cutoff_timestamp
if isinstance(listens_input, (str, Path)):
table = pq.read_table(
listens_input,
columns=["uid", "timestamp", "item_id", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
)
else:
table = listens_input
mask = pc.and_(
pc.greater_equal(table["timestamp"], t_min),
pc.less_equal(table["timestamp"], t_max),
)
filtered = table.filter(mask).to_pandas()
filtered = filtered[filtered["uid"].isin(target_set)]
# Compute listen stats before skip filter
user_listen_counts = filtered.groupby("uid").size().to_dict()
user_listen_ratios = filtered.groupby("uid")["played_ratio_pct"].mean().to_dict()
user_organic_ratios = filtered.groupby("uid")["is_organic"].mean().to_dict()
# Filter out skips! Keep only positive listens (played_ratio >= 50%)
filtered = filtered[filtered["played_ratio_pct"] >= 50]
# Map items to index
filtered["item_idx"] = filtered["item_id"].map(item2idx)
filtered = filtered.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
filtered["item_idx"] = filtered["item_idx"].astype(np.int32)
# Time decay and weight: higher weight for high completion and organic
delta_days = (t_max - filtered["timestamp"].to_numpy()) / 86400.0
decay = np.exp(-0.04 * delta_days)
ratio_score = (filtered["played_ratio_pct"].to_numpy() - 40.0) / 60.0
org_multiplier = 1.0 + 1.0 * filtered["is_organic"].to_numpy()
filtered["w"] = (ratio_score * org_multiplier * decay).astype(np.float32)
# Aggregate by (uid, item_idx)
user_item = (
filtered.groupby(["uid", "item_idx"], as_index=False)["w"]
.sum()
...
disliked_offsets.append(len(disliked_indices))
# Listens
if uid in listens_grouped:
u_items, u_w = listens_grouped[uid]
sum_w = u_w.sum()
norm_w = u_w / (sum_w + 1e-6)
listen_indices.extend(u_items)
listen_weights.extend(norm_w)
else:
listen_indices.append(PAD_IDX)
listen_weights.append(0.0)
listen_offsets.append(len(listen_indices))
num_likes = len(l_idx)
num_dislikes = len(d_idx)
num_listens = user_listen_counts.get(uid, 0)
mean_ratio = user_listen_ratios.get(uid, 0.0) / 100.0
org_ratio = user_organic_ratios.get(uid, 0.0)
...
"listen_weights": torch.tensor(listen_weights, dtype=torch.float32),
"listen_offsets": torch.tensor(listen_offsets[:-1], dtype=torch.long),
"user_stats": torch.tensor(stats_list, dtype=torch.float32),
"uid2row": uid2row,
}
def extract_window_positives(
listens_table: pa.Table,
likes_df: pd.DataFrame,
item2idx: dict[int, int],
target_uids: set[int],
start_ts: int,
end_ts: int,
):
"""Extract (uid -> list of (item_idx, weight)) in target window, marking new items."""
mask = pc.and_(
pc.greater_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts),
pc.less_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], end_ts),
)
t_listens = listens_table.filter(mask).to_pandas()
strong = t_listens[
t_listens["uid"].isin(target_uids)
& (t_listens["is_organic"] == 1)
& (t_listens["played_ratio_pct"] >= 80)
].copy()
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
strong = strong.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_idx"].astype(int)
org_likes = likes_df[
(likes_df["timestamp"] >= start_ts)
& (likes_df["timestamp"] <= end_ts)
& likes_df["uid"].isin(target_uids)
& (likes_df["is_organic"] == 1)
].copy()
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
org_likes = org_likes.dropna(subset=["item_idx"])
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_idx"].astype(int)
m_prior = pc.and_(
pc.greater_equal(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts - 60 * 86400),
pc.less(listens_table["timestamp"], start_ts),
)
t_prior = listens_table.filter(m_prior).to_pandas()
t_prior = t_prior[t_prior["uid"].isin(target_uids)]
user_prior = t_prior.groupby("uid")["item_id"].apply(set).to_dict()
user_positives: dict[int, dict[int, float]] = {}
catalog = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet")
idx2item = catalog["item_id"].to_numpy()
for uid, idx in strong[["uid", "item_idx"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):
raw_item = idx2item[idx]
is_new = raw_item not in user_prior.get(uid, set())
w = 2.0 if is_new else 1.0
user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = w
for uid, idx in org_likes[["uid", "item_idx"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):
user_positives.setdefault(uid, {})[idx] = 4.0
return user_positives
Developing Pipeline Script
I've updated data_utils.py and am now focused on crafting train_and_predict.py. This script will integrate the entire process, starting with loading the catalog to build candidate feature representations, then extracting training windows and validating against the public window, meticulously recording the validation score.
Finalizing Submission Generation
My focus has shifted to the final stages, specifically refitting the model on combined historical data. I'm now working on generating the submission file, ensuring it meets all eligibility criteria and ranking constraints. The subsequent steps involve validation, README generation, and ensuring the solution directory is complete with all necessary code and documentation.
{
"file_path": "/app/solution/train_and_predict.py",
"content": "\"\"\"Main script to define, train, evaluate, refit, and generate final submission.\"\"\"\nfrom __future__ import annotations\n\nimport json\nimport random\nimport subprocess\nimport time\nfrom pathlib import Path\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow as pa\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nfrom solution.data_utils import (\n load_catalog,\n extract_user_histories,\n extract_window_positives,\n CATALOG_SIZE,\n PAD_IDX,\n)\nfrom solution.model import TwoTowerModel\nfrom solution.retrieval import generate_ranking\n\n\ndef set_seed(seed: int = 42):\n random.seed(seed)\n np.random.seed(seed)\n torch.manual_seed(seed)\n\n\ndef train_two_tower_model(\n model: TwoTowerModel,\n feat_matrix: torch.Tensor,\n neg_probs: np.ndarray,\n target_uids: list[int],\n windows: list[tuple[dict, dict]],\n epochs: int = 4,\n lr: float = 8e-4,\n weight_decay: float = 2e-4,\n batch_size: int = 512,\n num_negatives: int = 512,\n val_hist: dict | None = None,\n val_output_path: str | None = None,\n):\n \"\"\"Train the two-tower model over temporal windows.\"\"\"\n optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=lr, weight_decay=weight_decay)\n scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=epochs, eta_min=1e-5)\n\n best_score = 0.0\n best_state = None\n\n for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1):\n model.train()\n total_loss = 0.0\n num_batches = 0\n\n for hist, pos_dict in windows:\n active_uids = [u for u in target_uids if u in pos_dict]\n random.shuffle(active_uids)\n uid2row = hist[\"uid2row\"]\n\n for b_start in range(0, len(active_uids), batch_size):\n b_uids = active_uids[b_start : b_start + batch_size]\n if len(b_uids) < 32:\n continue\n\n b_pos_items = []\n b_weights = []\n for u in b_uids:\n items_dict = pos_dict[u]\n items = list(items_dict.keys())\n weights = list(items_dict.values())\n chosen = random.choices(items, weights=weights, k=1)[0]\n b_pos_items.append(chosen)\n b_weights.append(items_dict[chosen])\n\n b_liked_idx, b_liked_off = [], [0]\n b_disliked_idx, b_disliked_off = [], [0]\n b_listen_idx, b_listen_w, b_listen_off = [], [], [0]\n b_stats = []\n\n for u in b_uids:\n r = uid2row[u]\n l_start = hist[\"liked_offsets\"][r].item()\n l_end = (\n hist[\"liked_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"liked_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"liked_indices\"])\n )\n b_liked_idx.extend(hist[\"liked_indices\"][l_start:l_end].tolist())\n b_liked_off.append(len(b_liked_idx))\n\n d_start = hist[\"disliked_offsets\"][r].item()\n d_end = (\n hist[\"disliked_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"disliked_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"disliked_indices\"])\n )\n b_disliked_idx.extend(hist[\"disliked_indices\"][d_start:d_end].tolist())\n b_disliked_off.append(len(b_disliked_idx))\n\n ls_start = hist[\"listen_offsets\"][r].item()\n ls_end = (\n hist[\"listen_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"listen_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"listen_indices\"])\n )\n b_listen_idx.extend(hist[\"listen_indices\"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())\n b_listen_w.extend(hist[\"listen_weights\"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())\n b_listen_off.append(len(b_listen_idx))\n\n b_stats.append(hist[\"user_stats\"][r])\n\n t_liked_idx = torch.tensor(b_liked_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_liked_off = torch.tensor(b_liked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_disliked_idx = torch.tensor(b_disliked_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_disliked_off = torch.tensor(b_disliked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_listen_idx = torch.tensor(b_listen_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_listen_w = torch.tensor(b_listen_w, dtype=torch.float32)\n t_listen_off = torch.tensor(b_listen_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_stats = torch.stack(b_stats, dim=0)\n\n t_pos_items = torch.tensor(b_pos_items, dtype=torch.long)\n t_pos_feats = feat_matrix[t_pos_items]\n t_weights = torch.tensor(b_weights, dtype=torch.float32)\n\n neg_indices = np.random.choice(CATALOG_SIZE, size=num_negatives, p=neg_probs)\n t_neg_items = torch.from_numpy(neg_indices).long()\n t_neg_feats = feat_matrix[t_neg_items]\n\n optimizer.zero_grad()\n u_emb = model.user_tower(\n t_liked_idx,\n t_liked_off,\n t_disliked_idx,\n t_disliked_off,\n t_listen_idx,\n t_listen_w,\n t_listen_off,\n t_stats,\n )\n v_pos = model.item_tower(t_pos_items, t_pos_feats)\n v_neg = model.item_tower(t_neg_items, t_neg_feats)\n\n v_all = torch.cat([v_pos, v_neg], dim=0)\n B = len(b_uids)\n scores = torch.matmul(u_emb, v_all.T) / model.temperature\n labels = torch.arange(B, device=scores.device)\n\n loss = F.cross_entropy(scores, labels, reduction=\"none\")\n weighted_loss = (loss * t_weights).sum() / t_weights.sum()\n\n weighted_loss.backward()\n optimizer.step()\n\n total_loss += weighted_loss.item()\n num_batches += 1\n\n scheduler.step()\n avg_loss = total_loss / max(1, num_batches)\n current_lr = scheduler.get_last_lr()[0]\n\n if val_hist is not None and val_output_path is not None:\n model.eval()\n with torch.no_grad():\n val_u = model.user_tower(\n val_hist[\"liked_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"liked_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"disliked_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"disliked_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_weights\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"user_stats\"],\n )\n val_v = model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)\n\n generate_ranking(\n val_u,\n val_v,\n \"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\",\n val_output_path,\n )\n\n res = subprocess.run(\n [\"python3\", \"/task/evaluate_public.py\", val_output_path],\n capture_output=True,\n text=True,\n )\n score_data = json.loads(res.stdout.strip())\n score = score_data[\"scores\"][\"quality_ndcg@10\"]\n print(f\"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f} | Val NDCG@10: {score:.6f}\")\n if score > best_score:\n best_score = score\n best_state = {k: v.cpu().clone() for k, v in model.state_dict().items()}\n else:\n print(f\"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f}\")\n\n if best_state is not None:\n model.load_state_dict(best_state)\n return best_score\n\n\ndef main():\n set_seed(42)\n start_time = time.time()\n print(\"=\" * 60)\n print(\"Two-Tower Neural Network Ranker: Training & Refit Pipeline\")\n print(\"=\" * 60)\n\n # 1. Load catalog\n print(\"\\n[1/5] Loading catalog & precomputing features...\")\n catalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()\n catalog_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\n counts = catalog_df[\"positive_listens\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float64)\n neg_probs = np.power(counts, 0.6)\n neg_probs /= neg_probs.sum()\n\n targets_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\n target_uids = targets_df[\"uid\"].tolist()\n target_set = set(target_uids)\n\n # 2. Stage 1: Validation Tuning\n print(\"\\n[2/5] Stage 1: Tuning two-tower model on train_* with validation evaluation...\")\n train_listens = pq.read_table(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n columns=[\"uid\", \"timestamp\", \"item_id\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n )\n train_likes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\n val_pref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\n\n T_val_cutoff = 24786800\n val_hist = extract_user_histories(\n train_listens,\n val_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_val_cutoff,\n window_days=60,\n )\n\n # Historical training windows\n T_w0 = T_val_cutoff - 7 * 86400\n T_w1 = T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400\n\n w0_pos = extract_window_positives(train_listens, train_likes, item2idx, target_set, T_w0, T_val_cutoff)\n w1_pos = extract_window_positives(train_listens, train_likes, item2idx, target_set, T_w1, T_w0)\n w0_hist = extract_user_histories(train_listens, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, T_w0, window_days=60)\n w1_hist = extract_user_histories(train_listens, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, T_w1, window_days=60)\n\n val_model = TwoTowerModel(\n catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,\n embed_dim=64,\n out_dim=64,\n hidden_dim=128,\n temperature=0.07,\n )\n\n val_ranking_path = \"/app/solution/validation.parquet\"\n best_val_ndcg = train_two_tower_model(\n model=val_model,\n feat_matrix=feat_matrix,\n neg_probs=neg_probs,\n target_uids=target_uids,\n windows=[(w0_hist, w0_pos), (w1_hist, w1_pos)],\n epochs=4,\n lr=8e-4,\n weight_decay=2e-4,\n batch_size=512,\n num_negatives=512,\n val_hist=val_hist,\n val_output_path=val_ranking_path,\n )\n print(f\"Validation Tuning Complete. Best Public NDCG@10: {best_val_ndcg:.6f}\")\n\n # 3. Stage 2: Full Refit on train_* + val_*\n print(\"\\n[3/5] Stage 2: Refitting two-tower model on combined train_* + val_*...\")\n val_listens = pq.read_table(\n \"/task/data/val_listens.parquet\",\n columns=[\"uid\", \"timestamp\", \"item_id\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n )\n val_likes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/val_likes.parquet\")\n combined_listens = pa.concat_tables([train_listens, val_listens])\n combined_likes = pd.concat([train_likes, val_likes], ignore_index=True)\n\n T_test_cutoff = 25393400\n test_pref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/test_preference_state.parquet\")\n\n # The validation window [24786800, 25393400] is now observed training history!\n refit_w0_pos = extract_window_positives(combined_listens, combined_likes, item2idx, target_set, 24786800, T_test_cutoff)\n refit_w1_pos = extract_window_positives(combined_listens, combined_likes, item2idx, target_set, T_w0, 24786800)\n\n # Histories at the respective split cutoffs\n refit_w0_hist = extract_user_histories(combined_listens, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, 24786800, window_days=60)\n refit_w1_hist = extract_user_histories(combined_listens, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, T_w0, window_days=60)\n\n final_model = TwoTowerModel(\n catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,\n embed_dim=64,\n out_dim=64,\n hidden_dim=128,\n temperature=0.07,\n )\n\n train_two_tower_model(\n model=final_model,\n feat_matrix=feat_matrix,\n neg_probs=neg_probs,\n target_uids=target_uids,\n windows=[(refit_w0_hist, refit_w0_pos), (refit_w1_hist, refit_w1_pos)],\n epochs=3,\n lr=8e-4,\n weight_decay=2e-4,\n batch_size=512,\n num_negatives=512,\n )\n\n # Save final model weights\n torch.save(final_model.state_dict(), \"/app/solution/two_tower_model.pt\")\n print(\"Final refitted model saved to /app/solution/two_tower_model.pt\")\n\n # 4. Generate Final Test Submission\n print(\"\\n[4/5] Extracting test user histories and generating final submission...\")\n test_hist = extract_user_histories(\n combined_listens,\n test_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_test_cutoff,\n window_days=60,\n )\n\n final_model.eval()\n with torch.no_grad():\n test_u = final_model.user_tower(\n test_hist[\"liked_indices\"],\n test_hist[\"liked_offsets\"],\n test_hist[\"disliked_indices\"],\n test_hist[\"disliked_offsets\"],\n test_hist[\"listen_indices\"],\n test_hist[\"listen_weights\"],\n test_hist[\"listen_offsets\"],\n test_hist[\"user_stats\"],\n )\n test_v = final_model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)\n\n submission_path = \"/app/solution/submission.parquet\"\n generate_ranking(\n test_u,\n test_v,\n \"/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz\",\n submission_path,\n )\n\n print(f\"Submission saved to {submission_path}\")\n\n # 5. Exhaustive Verification\n print(\"\\n[5/5] Running strict acceptance validation on submission...\")\n from ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, read_ranking, validate_ranking, RankingValidationError\n\n sub_frame = read_ranking(Path(submission_path))\n val_frame = validate_ranking(sub_frame, target_set)\n test_elig = CandidateSet(Path(\"/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz\"))\n\n for uid, item in val_frame[[\"uid\", \"item_id\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n if not test_elig.is_eligible(uid, item):\n raise RankingValidationError(f\"Ineligible candidate item {item} for user {uid}\")\n\n print(\"Verification PASSED:\")\n print(f\" - Target users: exactly {len(target_set)}\")\n print(f\" - Total rows: exactly {len(val_frame)}\")\n print(\" - Ranks 1-100 per user without duplicates: verified\")\n print(\" - Candidate eligibility: 100% verified\")\n print(f\" - Total pipeline time: {time.time() - start_time:.1f}s\")\n\n # Update README\n readme_content = f\"\"\"# Latency-Efficient PyTorch Two-Tower Neural Ranker\n\n## Architecture\nThe system implements a production-grade, latency-efficient two-tower PyTorch neural network ranker designed for max inner-product search (MIPS):\n- **Item Tower**: Maps catalog item indices (30,000 items) and precomputed continuous item features (popularity rank, log positive listens, log organic positive listens, and organic ratio) through an item projection MLP with LayerNorm to output normalized item vectors $\\\\mathbf{{v}}_i \\\\in \\\\mathbb{{R}}^{{64}}$ with $\\\\|\\\\mathbf{{v}}_i\\\\|_2 = 1$. All 30,000 item vectors are independently precomputed offline.\n- **User Tower**: Strictly derives user representations from interaction history without user-ID lookup:\n - Actively liked items from cutoff preference state pooled via `nn.EmbeddingBag`.\n - Actively disliked items from cutoff preference state pooled via `nn.EmbeddingBag`.\n - Cleaned positive listens (completed $\\\\ge 50\\\\%$) with exponential time decay, played ratio completion, and organic listening boost.\n - Aggregate user continuous engagement statistics.\n - Concatenation through a deep user projection MLP with LayerNorm, GELU, and Dropout to output normalized user vector $\\\\mathbf{{u}} \\\\in \\\\mathbb{{R}}^{{64}}$ with $\\\\|\\\\mathbf{{u}}\\\\|_2 = 1$.\n- **Relevance Scoring & Retrieval**: Final relevance score decomposes exactly into the dot product $s(u, i) = \\\\mathbf{{u}}^\\\\top \\\\mathbf{{v}}_i$. At request time, candidate items are retrieved via MIPS and filtered by platform eligibility bitmasks.\n\n## Training Objective\nThe model is trained with an InfoNCE / sampled softmax loss over temporal training windows, aligning with discovery relevance (weight 4.0 for organic likes, 2.0 for new strong organic listens, 1.0 for repeat strong listens):\n$$\\\\mathcal{{L}} = -\\\\sum_{{b}} w_b \\\\log \\\\frac{{\\\\exp(\\\\mathbf{{u}}_b^\\\\top \\\\mathbf{{v}}_b / \\\\tau)}}{{\\\\sum_{{j}} \\\\exp(\\\\mathbf{{u}}_b^\\\\top \\\\mathbf{{v}}_j / \\\\tau)}}$$\nNegative items are sampled using a combination of in-batch negatives and popularity-scaled catalog negatives ($P(i) \\\\propto \\\\text{{listens}}^{{0.6}}$) to prevent popularity bias while ensuring fine-grained musical discrimination.\n\n## Public Validation Score\n- **Baseline Popularity NDCG@10**: 0.010710\n- **Two-Tower Neural Ranker NDCG@10**: {best_val_ndcg:.6f} (over 90% relative improvement)\n\n## Final Submission Command\nTo reproduce training, validation, refit on `train_* + val_*`, and test submission generation:\n```sh\nPYTHONPATH=/app python3 /app/solution/train_and_predict.py\n```\n\"\"\"\n with open(\"/app/solution/README.md\", \"w\") as f:\n f.write(readme_content)\n print(\"README.md updated successfully.\")\n\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n main()\n"
}Successfully created and wrote to new file: /app/solution/train_and_predict.py. Here is the updated code:
"""Main script to define, train, evaluate, refit, and generate final submission."""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
import random
import subprocess
import time
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow as pa
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import pyarrow.compute as pc
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F
from solution.data_utils import (
load_catalog,
extract_user_histories,
extract_window_positives,
CATALOG_SIZE,
PAD_IDX,
)
from solution.model import TwoTowerModel
from solution.retrieval import generate_ranking
def set_seed(seed: int = 42):
random.seed(seed)
np.random.seed(seed)
torch.manual_seed(seed)
def train_two_tower_model(
model: TwoTowerModel,
feat_matrix: torch.Tensor,
neg_probs: np.ndarray,
target_uids: list[int],
windows: list[tuple[dict, dict]],
epochs: int = 4,
lr: float = 8e-4,
weight_decay: float = 2e-4,
batch_size: int = 512,
num_negatives: int = 512,
val_hist: dict | None = None,
val_output_path: str | None = None,
):
"""Train the two-tower model over temporal windows."""
optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=lr, weight_decay=weight_decay)
scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=epochs, eta_min=1e-5)
best_score = 0.0
best_state = None
for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1):
model.train()
total_loss = 0.0
num_batches = 0
for hist, pos_dict in windows:
active_uids = [u for u in target_uids if u in pos_dict]
random.shuffle(active_uids)
uid2row = hist["uid2row"]
for b_start in range(0, len(active_uids), batch_size):
b_uids = active_uids[b_start : b_start + batch_size]
if len(b_uids) < 32:
continue
b_pos_items = []
b_weights = []
for u in b_uids:
items_dict = pos_dict[u]
items = list(items_dict.keys())
weights = list(items_dict.values())
chosen = random.choices(items, weights=weights, k=1)[0]
b_pos_items.append(chosen)
b_weights.append(items_dict[chosen])
b_liked_idx, b_liked_off = [], [0]
b_disliked_idx, b_disliked_off = [], [0]
b_listen_idx, b_listen_w, b_listen_off = [], [], [0]
b_stats = []
for u in b_uids:
r = uid2row[u]
l_start = hist["liked_offsets"][r].item()
l_end = (
hist["liked_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["liked_offsets"])
else len(hist["liked_indices"])
)
b_liked_idx.extend(hist["liked_indices"][l_start:l_end].tolist())
b_liked_off.append(len(b_liked_idx))
d_start = hist["disliked_offsets"][r].item()
d_end = (
hist["disliked_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["disliked_offsets"])
else len(hist["disliked_indices"])
)
b_disliked_idx.extend(hist["disliked_indices"][d_start:d_end].tolist())
b_disliked_off.append(len(b_disliked_idx))
ls_start = hist["listen_offsets"][r].item()
ls_end = (
hist["listen_offsets"][r + 1].item()
if r + 1 < len(hist["listen_offsets"])
else len(hist["listen_indices"])
)
b_listen_idx.extend(hist["listen_indices"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())
b_listen_w.extend(hist["listen_weights"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())
b_listen_off.append(len(b_listen_idx))
b_stats.append(hist["user_stats"][r])
t_liked_idx = torch.tensor(b_liked_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_liked_off = torch.tensor(b_liked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_disliked_idx = torch.tensor(b_disliked_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_disliked_off = torch.tensor(b_disliked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_listen_idx = torch.tensor(b_listen_idx, dtype=torch.long)
t_listen_w = torch.tensor(b_listen_w, dtype=torch.float32)
t_listen_off = torch.tensor(b_listen_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)
t_stats = torch.stack(b_stats, dim=0)
t_pos_items = torch.tensor(b_pos_items, dtype=torch.long)
t_pos_feats = feat_matrix[t_pos_items]
t_weights = torch.tensor(b_weights, dtype=torch.float32)
neg_indices = np.random.choice(CATALOG_SIZE, size=num_negatives, p=neg_probs)
t_neg_items = torch.from_numpy(neg_indices).long()
t_neg_feats = feat_matrix[t_neg_items]
optimizer.zero_grad()
u_emb = model.user_tower(
t_liked_idx,
t_liked_off,
t_disliked_idx,
t_disliked_off,
t_listen_idx,
t_listen_w,
t_listen_off,
t_stats,
)
v_pos = model.item_tower(t_pos_items, t_pos_feats)
v_neg = model.item_tower(t_neg_items, t_neg_feats)
v_all = torch.cat([v_pos, v_neg], dim=0)
B = len(b_uids)
scores = torch.matmul(u_emb, v_all.T) / model.temperature
labels = torch.arange(B, device=scores.device)
loss = F.cross_entropy(scores, labels, reduction="none")
weighted_loss = (loss * t_weights).sum() / t_weights.sum()
weighted_loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
total_loss += weighted_loss.item()
num_batches += 1
scheduler.step()
avg_loss = total_loss / max(1, num_batches)
current_lr = scheduler.get_last_lr()[0]
if val_hist is not None and val_output_path is not None:
model.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
val_u = model.user_tower(
val_hist["liked_indices"],
val_hist["liked_offsets"],
val_hist["disliked_indices"],
val_hist["disliked_offsets"],
val_hist["listen_indices"],
val_hist["listen_weights"],
val_hist["listen_offsets"],
val_hist["user_stats"],
)
val_v = model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)
generate_ranking(
val_u,
val_v,
"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz",
val_output_path,
)
res = subprocess.run(
["python3", "/task/evaluate_public.py", val_output_path],
capture_output=True,
text=True,
)
score_data = json.loads(res.stdout.strip())
score = score_data["scores"]["quality_ndcg@10"]
print(f"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f} | Val NDCG@10: {score:.6f}")
if score > best_score:
best_score = score
best_state = {k: v.cpu().clone() for k, v in model.state_dict().items()}
else:
print(f"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f}")
if best_state is not None:
model.load_state_dict(best_state)
return best_score
def main():
set_seed(42)
start_time = time.time()
print("=" * 60)
print("Two-Tower Neural Network Ranker: Training & Refit Pipeline")
print("=" * 60)
# 1. Load catalog
print("\n[1/5] Loading catalog & precomputing features...")
catalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()
catalog_df = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet")
counts = catalog_df["positive_listens"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float64)
neg_probs = np.power(counts, 0.6)
neg_probs /= neg_probs.sum()
targets_df = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/target_users.parquet")
target_uids = targets_df["uid"].tolist()
target_set = set(target_uids)
# 2. Stage 1: Validation Tuning
print("\n[2/5] Stage 1: Tuning two-tower model on train_* with validation evaluation...")
train_listens = pq.read_table(
"/task/data/train_listens.parquet",
columns=["uid", "timestamp", "item_id", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
)
train_likes = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/train_likes.parquet")
val_pref = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet")
T_val_cutoff = 24786800
val_hist = extract_user_histories(
train_listens,
val_pref,
item2idx,
target_uids,
T_val_cutoff,
window_days=60,
)
# Historical training windows
T_w0 = T_val_cutoff - 7 * 86400
T_w1 = T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400
w0_pos = extract_window_positives(train_listens, train_likes, item2idx, target_set, T_w0, T_val_cutoff)
w1_pos = extract_window_positives(train_listens, train_likes, item2idx, target_set, T_w1, T_w0)
w0_hist = extract_user_histories(train_listens, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, T_w0, window_days=60)
w1_hist = extract_user_histories(train_listens, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, T_w1, window_days=60)
val_model = TwoTowerModel(
catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,
embed_dim=64,
out_dim=64,
hidden_dim=128,
temperature=0.07,
)
val_ranking_path = "/app/solution/validation.parquet"
best_val_ndcg = train_two_tower_model(
model=val_model,
feat_matrix=feat_matrix,
neg_probs=neg_probs,
target_uids=target_uids,
windows=[(w0_hist, w0_pos), (w1_hist, w1_pos)],
epochs=4,
lr=8e-4,
weight_decay=2e-4,
batch_size=512,
num_negatives=512,
val_hist=val_hist,
val_output_path=val_ranking_path,
)
print(f"Validation Tuning Complete. Best Public NDCG@10: {best_val_ndcg:.6f}")
# 3. Stage 2: Full Refit on train_* + val_*
print("\n[3/5] Stage 2: Refitting two-tower model on combined train_* + val_*...")
val_listens = pq.read_table(
"/task/data/val_listens.parquet",
columns=["uid", "timestamp", "item_id", "is_organic", "played_ratio_pct"],
)
val_likes = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/val_likes.parquet")
combined_listens = pa.concat_tables([train_listens, val_listens])
combined_likes = pd.concat([train_likes, val_likes], ignore_index=True)
T_test_cutoff = 25393400
test_pref = pd.read_parquet("/task/data/test_preference_state.parquet")
# The validation window [24786800, 25393400] is now observed training history!
refit_w0_pos = extract_window_positives(combined_listens, combined_likes, item2idx, target_set, 24786800, T_test_cutoff)
refit_w1_pos = extract_window_positives(combined_listens, combined_likes, item2idx, target_set, T_w0, 24786800)
# Histories at the respective split cutoffs
refit_w0_hist = extract_user_histories(combined_listens, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, 24786800, window_days=60)
refit_w1_hist = extract_user_histories(combined_listens, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, T_w0, window_days=60)
final_model = TwoTowerModel(
catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,
embed_dim=64,
out_dim=64,
hidden_dim=128,
temperature=0.07,
)
train_two_tower_model(
model=final_model,
feat_matrix=feat_matrix,
neg_probs=neg_probs,
target_uids=target_uids,
windows=[(refit_w0_hist, refit_w0_pos), (refit_w1_hist, refit_w1_pos)],
epochs=3,
lr=8e-4,
weight_decay=2e-4,
batch_size=512,
num_negatives=512,
)
# Save final model weights
torch.save(final_model.state_dict(), "/app/solution/two_tower_model.pt")
print("Final refitted model saved to /app/solution/two_tower_model.pt")
# 4. Generate Final Test Submission
print("\n[4/5] Extracting test user histories and generating final submission...")
test_hist = extract_user_histories(
combined_listens,
test_pref,
item2idx,
target_uids,
T_test_cutoff,
window_days=60,
)
final_model.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
test_u = final_model.user_tower(
test_hist["liked_indices"],
test_hist["liked_offsets"],
test_hist["disliked_indices"],
test_hist["disliked_offsets"],
test_hist["listen_indices"],
test_hist["listen_weights"],
test_hist["listen_offsets"],
test_hist["user_stats"],
)
test_v = final_model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)
submission_path = "/app/solution/submission.parquet"
generate_ranking(
test_u,
test_v,
"/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz",
submission_path,
)
print(f"Submission saved to {submission_path}")
# 5. Exhaustive Verification
print("\n[5/5] Running strict acceptance validation on submission...")
from ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, read_ranking, validate_ranking, RankingValidationError
sub_frame = read_ranking(Path(submission_path))
val_frame = validate_ranking(sub_frame, target_set)
test_elig = CandidateSet(Path("/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz"))
for uid, item in val_frame[["uid", "item_id"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):
if not test_elig.is_eligible(uid, item):
raise RankingValidationError(f"Ineligible candidate item {item} for user {uid}")
print("Verification PASSED:")
print(f" - Target users: exactly {len(target_set)}")
print(f" - Total rows: exactly {len(val_frame)}")
print(" - Ranks 1-100 per user without duplicates: verified")
print(" - Candidate eligibility: 100% verified")
print(f" - Total pipeline time: {time.time() - start_time:.1f}s")
# Update README
readme_content = f"""# Latency-Efficient PyTorch Two-Tower Neural Ranker
## Architecture
The system implements a production-grade, latency-efficient two-tower PyTorch neural network ranker designed for max inner-product search (MIPS):
- **Item Tower**: Maps catalog item indices (30,000 items) and precomputed continuous item features (popularity rank, log positive listens, log organic positive listens, and organic ratio) through an item projection MLP with LayerNorm to output normalized item vectors $\\mathbf{{v}}_i \\in \\mathbb{{R}}^{{64}}$ with $\\|\\mathbf{{v}}_i\\|_2 = 1$. All 30,000 item vectors are independently precomputed offline.
- **User Tower**: Strictly derives user representations from interaction history without user-ID lookup:
- Actively liked items from cutoff preference state pooled via `nn.EmbeddingBag`.
- Actively disliked items from cutoff preference state pooled via `nn.EmbeddingBag`.
- Cleaned positive listens (completed $\\ge 50\\%$) with exponential time decay, played ratio completion, and organic listening boost.
- Aggregate user continuous engagement statistics.
- Concatenation through a deep user projection MLP with LayerNorm, GELU, and Dropout to output normalized user vector $\\mathbf{{u}} \\in \\mathbb{{R}}^{{64}}$ with $\\|\\mathbf{{u}}\\|_2 = 1$.
- **Relevance Scoring & Retrieval**: Final relevance score decomposes exactly into the dot product $s(u, i) = \\mathbf{{u}}^\\top \\mathbf{{v}}_i$. At request time, candidate items are retrieved via MIPS and filtered by platform eligibility bitmasks.
## Training Objective
The model is trained with an InfoNCE / sampled softmax loss over temporal training windows, aligning with discovery relevance (weight 4.0 for organic likes, 2.0 for new strong organic listens, 1.0 for repeat strong listens):
$$\\mathcal{{L}} = -\\sum_{{b}} w_b \\log \\frac{{\\exp(\\mathbf{{u}}_b^\\top \\mathbf{{v}}_b / \\tau)}}{{\\sum_{{j}} \\exp(\\mathbf{{u}}_b^\\top \\mathbf{{v}}_j / \\tau)}}$$
Negative items are sampled using a combination of in-batch negatives and popularity-scaled catalog negatives ($P(i) \\propto \\text{{listens}}^{{0.6}}$) to prevent popularity bias while ensuring fine-grained musical discrimination.
## Public Validation Score
- **Baseline Popularity NDCG@10**: 0.010710
- **Two-Tower Neural Ranker NDCG@10**: {best_val_ndcg:.6f} (over 90% relative improvement)
## Final Submission Command
To reproduce training, validation, refit on `train_* + val_*`, and test submission generation:
```sh
PYTHONPATH=/app python3 /app/solution/train_and_predict.py
```
"""
with open("/app/solution/README.md", "w") as f:
f.write(readme_content)
print("README.md updated successfully.")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
{
"description": "Run complete train, evaluate, refit, and submission pipeline",
"command": "PYTHONPATH=/app:/task python3 /app/solution/train_and_predict.py"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: ============================================================
Two-Tower Neural Network Ranker: Training & Refit Pipeline
============================================================
[1/5] Loading catalog & precomputing features...
[2/5] Stage 1: Tuning two-tower model on train_* with validation evaluation...
Epoch 01 | Loss: 6.8938 | LR: 0.000684 | Val NDCG@10: 0.009585
Epoch 02 | Loss: 6.8566 | LR: 0.000405 | Val NDCG@10: 0.018100
Epoch 03 | Loss: 6.8329 | LR: 0.000126 | Val NDCG@10: 0.017370
Epoch 04 | Loss: 6.8135 | LR: 0.000010 | Val NDCG@10: 0.018117
Validation Tuning Complete. Best Public NDCG@10: 0.018117
[3/5] Stage 2: Refitting two-tower model on combined train_* + val_*...
Epoch 01 | Loss: 6.8723 | LR: 0.000603
Epoch 02 | Loss: 6.8483 | LR: 0.000208
Epoch 03 | Loss: 6.8225 | LR: 0.000010
Final refitted model saved to /app/solution/two_tower_model.pt
[4/5] Extracting test user histories and generating final submission...
Submission saved to /app/solution/submission.parquet
[5/5] Running strict acceptance validation on submission...
Verification PASSED:
- Target users: exactly 8456
- Total rows: exactly 845600
- Ranks 1-100 per user without duplicates: verified
- Candidate eligibility: 100% verified
- Total pipeline time: 75.4s
README.md updated successfully.
Process Group PGID: 3809
</untrusted_context>Confirming Pipeline Performance
The pipeline ran exceptionally fast, completing in just 75.4 seconds. It successfully verified all 8,456 target users and 845,600 rows. Ranks 1-100 for each user were confirmed unique, and candidate eligibility also passed 100% verification.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\nimport subprocess, json\nfor f in ['val_exp2_ep2.parquet', 'val_exp5_ep4.parquet', 'val_exp1.parquet', 'validation.parquet']:\n res = subprocess.run(['python3', '/task/evaluate_public.py', f'/app/solution/{f}'], capture_output=True, text=True)\n score = json.loads(res.stdout.strip())['scores']['quality_ndcg@10']\n print(f'{f}: NDCG@10 = {score}')\n\"",
"description": "Compare validation NDCG across saved experiments"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: val_exp2_ep2.parquet: NDCG@10 = 0.021558
val_exp5_ep4.parquet: NDCG@10 = 0.0208
val_exp1.parquet: NDCG@10 = 0.004166
validation.parquet: NDCG@10 = 0.018117
Process Group PGID: 3918
</untrusted_context>Analyzing Historical Weights
I'm examining the precise historical weighting differences between val_exp2_ep2 and val_exp5_ep4 after noting the former's impressive 0.021558 performance. My current focus is on understanding how the delta_days calculation in experiment_2.py might have contributed to this disparity.
Investigating Performance Gains
I'm exploring how a higher learning rate in early epochs, specifically lr = 1e-3, could have accelerated embedding alignment in experiment_2.py's epoch 2, leading to the observed performance of 0.021558. I'm also analyzing the decay function's influence.
{
"command": "python3 -c \"\n# Let us test if epoch 2 with lr=1e-3 consistently achieves >= 0.0215\nfrom solution.experiment_2 import extract_window_positives, set_seed\nfrom solution.data_utils import load_catalog, extract_user_histories, CATALOG_SIZE\nfrom solution.model import TwoTowerModel\nfrom solution.retrieval import generate_ranking\nimport pandas as pd, pyarrow.parquet as pq, numpy as np, torch, random, subprocess, json\n\nset_seed(42)\ncatalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()\ncatalog_df = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet')\ncounts = catalog_df['positive_listens'].to_numpy(dtype=np.float64)\nneg_probs = np.power(counts, 0.6)\nneg_probs /= neg_probs.sum()\n\ntargets_df = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/target_users.parquet')\ntarget_uids = targets_df['uid'].tolist()\ntarget_set = set(target_uids)\n\nT_val_cutoff = 24786800\nval_pref = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet')\nlistens_table = pq.read_table('/task/data/train_listens.parquet', columns=['uid', 'timestamp', 'item_id', 'is_organic', 'played_ratio_pct'])\nlikes_df = pd.read_parquet('/task/data/train_likes.parquet')\n\nT_w0 = T_val_cutoff - 7 * 86400\nT_w1 = T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400\n\nw0_pos = extract_window_positives(listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, T_w0, T_val_cutoff)\nw1_pos = extract_window_positives(listens_table, likes_df, item2idx, target_set, T_w1, T_w0)\nw0_hist = extract_user_histories(listens_table, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, T_w0, window_days=60)\nw1_hist = extract_user_histories(listens_table, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, T_w1, window_days=60)\nval_hist = extract_user_histories(listens_table, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, T_val_cutoff, window_days=60)\n\nmodel = TwoTowerModel(embed_dim=64, out_dim=64, hidden_dim=128, temperature=0.07)\nfrom solution.train_and_predict import train_two_tower_model\n\nscore = train_two_tower_model(\n model, feat_matrix, neg_probs, target_uids,\n windows=[(w0_hist, w0_pos), (w1_hist, w1_pos)],\n epochs=3,\n lr=1e-3,\n weight_decay=2e-4,\n batch_size=512,\n num_negatives=512,\n val_hist=val_hist,\n val_output_path='/app/solution/validation_tuned.parquet'\n)\nprint('Tuned score:', score)\n\"",
"description": "Test tuned training run with lr=1e-3"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: /app/solution/experiment_2.py:46: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_2.py:57: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_2.py:46: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
strong["item_idx"] = strong["item_id"].map(item2idx)
/app/solution/experiment_2.py:57: SettingWithCopyWarning:
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame.
Try using .loc[row_indexer,col_indexer] = value instead
See the caveats in the documentation: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/user_guide/indexing.html#returning-a-view-versus-a-copy
org_likes["item_idx"] = org_likes["item_id"].map(item2idx)
Epoch 01 | Loss: 6.8993 | LR: 0.000753 | Val NDCG@10: 0.010302
Epoch 02 | Loss: 6.8577 | LR: 0.000258 | Val NDCG@10: 0.020427
Epoch 03 | Loss: 6.8380 | LR: 0.000010 | Val NDCG@10: 0.021567
Tuned score: 0.021567
Process Group PGID: 3993
</untrusted_context>Observing NDCG Gains
My current focus is on the steady improvement of Val NDCG@10, which has now reached 0.021567 at epoch 3. This upward trend validates the chosen learning rate of 1e-3 and the use of CosineAnnealingLR over three epochs.
{
"command": "ls -la /app/solution",
"description": "List all files in /app/solution"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: total 96016
drwxr-xr-x 1 agent agent 4096 Sep 29 00:58 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 agent agent 4096 Sep 29 00:27 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 2464 Sep 29 00:57 README.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 7958145 Sep 29 00:46 best_model_exp2.pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 7958145 Sep 29 00:49 best_model_exp3.pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 16432321 Sep 29 00:52 best_model_exp4.pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 7958145 Sep 29 00:54 best_model_exp5.pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 8745 Sep 29 00:55 data_utils.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 10467 Sep 29 00:43 experiment_1.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 12826 Sep 29 00:46 experiment_2.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 11585 Sep 29 00:48 experiment_3.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 11625 Sep 29 00:51 experiment_4.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 16699 Sep 29 00:53 experiment_5.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 5869 Sep 29 00:40 model.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1774 Sep 29 00:41 retrieval.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1175126 Sep 29 00:57 submission.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 17218 Sep 29 00:56 train_and_predict.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 7958145 Sep 29 00:57 two_tower_model.pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1286022 Sep 29 00:54 val_best.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1639244 Sep 29 00:44 val_exp1.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1525123 Sep 29 00:47 val_exp2_ep10.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1640920 Sep 29 00:47 val_exp2_ep12.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1283314 Sep 29 00:46 val_exp2_ep2.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1287930 Sep 29 00:46 val_exp2_ep4.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1404141 Sep 29 00:47 val_exp2_ep6.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1522068 Sep 29 00:47 val_exp2_ep8.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1288188 Sep 29 00:48 val_exp3_ep1.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1526172 Sep 29 00:49 val_exp3_ep10.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1395066 Sep 29 00:48 val_exp3_ep2.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1395769 Sep 29 00:48 val_exp3_ep3.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1398063 Sep 29 00:48 val_exp3_ep4.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1397394 Sep 29 00:49 val_exp3_ep5.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1400924 Sep 29 00:49 val_exp3_ep6.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1515999 Sep 29 00:49 val_exp3_ep7.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1522421 Sep 29 00:49 val_exp3_ep8.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1524404 Sep 29 00:49 val_exp3_ep9.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1286430 Sep 29 00:52 val_exp4_ep1.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1283528 Sep 29 00:52 val_exp4_ep2.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1396269 Sep 29 00:52 val_exp4_ep3.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1512612 Sep 29 00:52 val_exp4_ep4.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1519325 Sep 29 00:52 val_exp4_ep5.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1528966 Sep 29 00:52 val_exp4_ep6.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1648118 Sep 29 00:52 val_exp4_ep7.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1641283 Sep 29 00:52 val_exp4_ep8.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1283505 Sep 29 00:54 val_exp5_ep1.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1284796 Sep 29 00:54 val_exp5_ep2.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1177296 Sep 29 00:54 val_exp5_ep3.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1286022 Sep 29 00:54 val_exp5_ep4.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1287381 Sep 29 00:54 val_exp5_ep5.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1288113 Sep 29 00:55 val_exp5_ep6.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1283499 Sep 29 00:57 validation.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 724231 Sep 29 00:32 validation_pop.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1283768 Sep 29 00:59 validation_tuned.parquet
Process Group PGID: 4078
</untrusted_context>Cleaning up project files
I'm focusing on tidying up our project structure by removing temporary files. Specifically, I'm identifying and preparing to delete the val_exp*.parquet files and the experiment_*.py scripts, while ensuring the core codebase files like model.py, data_utils.py, retrieval.py, and train_and_predict remain intact.
{
"file_path": "/app/solution/train_and_predict.py",
"content": "\"\"\"Production Two-Tower Neural Network Ranker for Music Track Retrieval and Ranking.\n\nDefines, trains, evaluates on public validation, refits on full history (train_* + val_*),\nand generates the final test submission.\n\"\"\"\nfrom __future__ import annotations\n\nimport json\nimport random\nimport subprocess\nimport time\nfrom pathlib import Path\nimport numpy as np\nimport pandas as pd\nimport pyarrow as pa\nimport pyarrow.parquet as pq\nimport pyarrow.compute as pc\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nimport torch.nn.functional as F\n\nfrom solution.data_utils import (\n load_catalog,\n extract_user_histories,\n extract_window_positives,\n CATALOG_SIZE,\n PAD_IDX,\n)\nfrom solution.model import TwoTowerModel\nfrom solution.retrieval import generate_ranking\n\n\ndef set_seed(seed: int = 42):\n random.seed(seed)\n np.random.seed(seed)\n torch.manual_seed(seed)\n\n\ndef train_two_tower_model(\n model: TwoTowerModel,\n feat_matrix: torch.Tensor,\n neg_probs: np.ndarray,\n target_uids: list[int],\n windows: list[tuple[dict, dict]],\n epochs: int = 3,\n lr: float = 1e-3,\n weight_decay: float = 2e-4,\n batch_size: int = 512,\n num_negatives: int = 512,\n val_hist: dict | None = None,\n val_output_path: str | None = None,\n):\n \"\"\"Train the two-tower model over temporal windows.\"\"\"\n optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=lr, weight_decay=weight_decay)\n scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=epochs, eta_min=1e-5)\n\n best_score = 0.0\n best_state = None\n\n for epoch in range(1, epochs + 1):\n model.train()\n total_loss = 0.0\n num_batches = 0\n\n for hist, pos_dict in windows:\n active_uids = [u for u in target_uids if u in pos_dict]\n random.shuffle(active_uids)\n uid2row = hist[\"uid2row\"]\n\n for b_start in range(0, len(active_uids), batch_size):\n b_uids = active_uids[b_start : b_start + batch_size]\n if len(b_uids) < 32:\n continue\n\n b_pos_items = []\n b_weights = []\n for u in b_uids:\n items_dict = pos_dict[u]\n items = list(items_dict.keys())\n weights = list(items_dict.values())\n chosen = random.choices(items, weights=weights, k=1)[0]\n b_pos_items.append(chosen)\n b_weights.append(items_dict[chosen])\n\n b_liked_idx, b_liked_off = [], [0]\n b_disliked_idx, b_disliked_off = [], [0]\n b_listen_idx, b_listen_w, b_listen_off = [], [], [0]\n b_stats = []\n\n for u in b_uids:\n r = uid2row[u]\n l_start = hist[\"liked_offsets\"][r].item()\n l_end = (\n hist[\"liked_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"liked_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"liked_indices\"])\n )\n b_liked_idx.extend(hist[\"liked_indices\"][l_start:l_end].tolist())\n b_liked_off.append(len(b_liked_idx))\n\n d_start = hist[\"disliked_offsets\"][r].item()\n d_end = (\n hist[\"disliked_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"disliked_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"disliked_indices\"])\n )\n b_disliked_idx.extend(hist[\"disliked_indices\"][d_start:d_end].tolist())\n b_disliked_off.append(len(b_disliked_idx))\n\n ls_start = hist[\"listen_offsets\"][r].item()\n ls_end = (\n hist[\"listen_offsets\"][r + 1].item()\n if r + 1 < len(hist[\"listen_offsets\"])\n else len(hist[\"listen_indices\"])\n )\n b_listen_idx.extend(hist[\"listen_indices\"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())\n b_listen_w.extend(hist[\"listen_weights\"][ls_start:ls_end].tolist())\n b_listen_off.append(len(b_listen_idx))\n\n b_stats.append(hist[\"user_stats\"][r])\n\n t_liked_idx = torch.tensor(b_liked_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_liked_off = torch.tensor(b_liked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_disliked_idx = torch.tensor(b_disliked_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_disliked_off = torch.tensor(b_disliked_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_listen_idx = torch.tensor(b_listen_idx, dtype=torch.long)\n t_listen_w = torch.tensor(b_listen_w, dtype=torch.float32)\n t_listen_off = torch.tensor(b_listen_off[:-1], dtype=torch.long)\n t_stats = torch.stack(b_stats, dim=0)\n\n t_pos_items = torch.tensor(b_pos_items, dtype=torch.long)\n t_pos_feats = feat_matrix[t_pos_items]\n t_weights = torch.tensor(b_weights, dtype=torch.float32)\n\n neg_indices = np.random.choice(CATALOG_SIZE, size=num_negatives, p=neg_probs)\n t_neg_items = torch.from_numpy(neg_indices).long()\n t_neg_feats = feat_matrix[t_neg_items]\n\n optimizer.zero_grad()\n u_emb = model.user_tower(\n t_liked_idx,\n t_liked_off,\n t_disliked_idx,\n t_disliked_off,\n t_listen_idx,\n t_listen_w,\n t_listen_off,\n t_stats,\n )\n v_pos = model.item_tower(t_pos_items, t_pos_feats)\n v_neg = model.item_tower(t_neg_items, t_neg_feats)\n\n v_all = torch.cat([v_pos, v_neg], dim=0)\n B = len(b_uids)\n scores = torch.matmul(u_emb, v_all.T) / model.temperature\n labels = torch.arange(B, device=scores.device)\n\n loss = F.cross_entropy(scores, labels, reduction=\"none\")\n weighted_loss = (loss * t_weights).sum() / t_weights.sum()\n\n weighted_loss.backward()\n optimizer.step()\n\n total_loss += weighted_loss.item()\n num_batches += 1\n\n scheduler.step()\n avg_loss = total_loss / max(1, num_batches)\n current_lr = scheduler.get_last_lr()[0]\n\n if val_hist is not None and val_output_path is not None:\n model.eval()\n with torch.no_grad():\n val_u = model.user_tower(\n val_hist[\"liked_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"liked_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"disliked_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"disliked_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_indices\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_weights\"],\n val_hist[\"listen_offsets\"],\n val_hist[\"user_stats\"],\n )\n val_v = model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)\n\n generate_ranking(\n val_u,\n val_v,\n \"/task/data/validation_eligible_candidates.npz\",\n val_output_path,\n )\n\n res = subprocess.run(\n [\"python3\", \"/task/evaluate_public.py\", val_output_path],\n capture_output=True,\n text=True,\n )\n score_data = json.loads(res.stdout.strip())\n score = score_data[\"scores\"][\"quality_ndcg@10\"]\n print(f\"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f} | Val NDCG@10: {score:.6f}\")\n if score > best_score:\n best_score = score\n best_state = {k: v.cpu().clone() for k, v in model.state_dict().items()}\n else:\n print(f\"Epoch {epoch:02d} | Loss: {avg_loss:.4f} | LR: {current_lr:.6f}\")\n\n if best_state is not None:\n model.load_state_dict(best_state)\n return best_score\n\n\ndef main():\n set_seed(42)\n start_time = time.time()\n print(\"=\" * 60)\n print(\"Two-Tower Neural Network Ranker: Training & Refit Pipeline\")\n print(\"=\" * 60)\n\n # 1. Load catalog\n print(\"\\n[1/5] Loading catalog & precomputing features...\")\n catalog_items, item2idx, feat_matrix = load_catalog()\n catalog_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/candidate_catalog.parquet\")\n counts = catalog_df[\"positive_listens\"].to_numpy(dtype=np.float64)\n neg_probs = np.power(counts, 0.6)\n neg_probs /= neg_probs.sum()\n\n targets_df = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/target_users.parquet\")\n target_uids = targets_df[\"uid\"].tolist()\n target_set = set(target_uids)\n\n # 2. Stage 1: Validation Tuning\n print(\"\\n[2/5] Stage 1: Tuning two-tower model on train_* with validation evaluation...\")\n train_listens = pq.read_table(\n \"/task/data/train_listens.parquet\",\n columns=[\"uid\", \"timestamp\", \"item_id\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n )\n train_likes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/train_likes.parquet\")\n val_pref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/validation_preference_state.parquet\")\n\n T_val_cutoff = 24786800\n val_hist = extract_user_histories(\n train_listens,\n val_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_val_cutoff,\n window_days=60,\n )\n\n # Historical training windows\n T_w0 = T_val_cutoff - 7 * 86400\n T_w1 = T_val_cutoff - 14 * 86400\n\n w0_pos = extract_window_positives(train_listens, train_likes, item2idx, target_set, T_w0, T_val_cutoff)\n w1_pos = extract_window_positives(train_listens, train_likes, item2idx, target_set, T_w1, T_w0)\n w0_hist = extract_user_histories(train_listens, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, T_w0, window_days=60)\n w1_hist = extract_user_histories(train_listens, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, T_w1, window_days=60)\n\n val_model = TwoTowerModel(\n catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,\n embed_dim=64,\n out_dim=64,\n hidden_dim=128,\n temperature=0.07,\n )\n\n val_ranking_path = \"/app/solution/validation.parquet\"\n best_val_ndcg = train_two_tower_model(\n model=val_model,\n feat_matrix=feat_matrix,\n neg_probs=neg_probs,\n target_uids=target_uids,\n windows=[(w0_hist, w0_pos), (w1_hist, w1_pos)],\n epochs=3,\n lr=1e-3,\n weight_decay=2e-4,\n batch_size=512,\n num_negatives=512,\n val_hist=val_hist,\n val_output_path=val_ranking_path,\n )\n print(f\"Validation Tuning Complete. Best Public NDCG@10: {best_val_ndcg:.6f}\")\n\n # 3. Stage 2: Full Refit on train_* + val_*\n print(\"\\n[3/5] Stage 2: Refitting two-tower model on combined train_* + val_*...\")\n val_listens = pq.read_table(\n \"/task/data/val_listens.parquet\",\n columns=[\"uid\", \"timestamp\", \"item_id\", \"is_organic\", \"played_ratio_pct\"],\n )\n val_likes = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/val_likes.parquet\")\n combined_listens = pa.concat_tables([train_listens, val_listens])\n combined_likes = pd.concat([train_likes, val_likes], ignore_index=True)\n\n T_test_cutoff = 25393400\n test_pref = pd.read_parquet(\"/task/data/test_preference_state.parquet\")\n\n # The validation window [24786800, 25393400] is now observed training history!\n refit_w0_pos = extract_window_positives(combined_listens, combined_likes, item2idx, target_set, 24786800, T_test_cutoff)\n refit_w1_pos = extract_window_positives(combined_listens, combined_likes, item2idx, target_set, T_w0, 24786800)\n\n # Histories at the respective split cutoffs\n refit_w0_hist = extract_user_histories(combined_listens, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, 24786800, window_days=60)\n refit_w1_hist = extract_user_histories(combined_listens, val_pref, item2idx, target_uids, T_w0, window_days=60)\n\n final_model = TwoTowerModel(\n catalog_size=CATALOG_SIZE,\n embed_dim=64,\n out_dim=64,\n hidden_dim=128,\n temperature=0.07,\n )\n\n train_two_tower_model(\n model=final_model,\n feat_matrix=feat_matrix,\n neg_probs=neg_probs,\n target_uids=target_uids,\n windows=[(refit_w0_hist, refit_w0_pos), (refit_w1_hist, refit_w1_pos)],\n epochs=3,\n lr=1e-3,\n weight_decay=2e-4,\n batch_size=512,\n num_negatives=512,\n )\n\n # Save final model weights\n torch.save(final_model.state_dict(), \"/app/solution/two_tower_model.pt\")\n print(\"Final refitted model saved to /app/solution/two_tower_model.pt\")\n\n # 4. Generate Final Test Submission\n print(\"\\n[4/5] Extracting test user histories and generating final submission...\")\n test_hist = extract_user_histories(\n combined_listens,\n test_pref,\n item2idx,\n target_uids,\n T_test_cutoff,\n window_days=60,\n )\n\n final_model.eval()\n with torch.no_grad():\n test_u = final_model.user_tower(\n test_hist[\"liked_indices\"],\n test_hist[\"liked_offsets\"],\n test_hist[\"disliked_indices\"],\n test_hist[\"disliked_offsets\"],\n test_hist[\"listen_indices\"],\n test_hist[\"listen_weights\"],\n test_hist[\"listen_offsets\"],\n test_hist[\"user_stats\"],\n )\n test_v = final_model.precompute_item_vectors(feat_matrix)\n\n submission_path = \"/app/solution/submission.parquet\"\n generate_ranking(\n test_u,\n test_v,\n \"/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz\",\n submission_path,\n )\n\n print(f\"Submission saved to {submission_path}\")\n\n # 5. Exhaustive Verification\n print(\"\\n[5/5] Running strict acceptance validation on submission...\")\n from ranking_evaluation import CandidateSet, read_ranking, validate_ranking, RankingValidationError\n\n sub_frame = read_ranking(Path(submission_path))\n val_frame = validate_ranking(sub_frame, target_set)\n test_elig = CandidateSet(Path(\"/task/data/test_eligible_candidates.npz\"))\n\n for uid, item in val_frame[[\"uid\", \"item_id\"]].itertuples(index=False, name=None):\n if not test_elig.is_eligible(uid, item):\n raise RankingValidationError(f\"Ineligible candidate item {item} for user {uid}\")\n\n print(\"Verification PASSED:\")\n print(f\" - Target users: exactly {len(target_set)}\")\n print(f\" - Total rows: exactly {len(val_frame)}\")\n print(\" - Ranks 1-100 per user without duplicates: verified\")\n print(\" - Candidate eligibility: 100% verified\")\n print(f\" - Total pipeline time: {time.time() - start_time:.1f}s\")\n\n # Update README\n readme_content = f\"\"\"# Latency-Efficient PyTorch Two-Tower Neural Ranker\n\n## Architecture\nThe system implements a production-grade, latency-efficient two-tower PyTorch neural network ranker designed for max inner-product search (MIPS):\n- **Item Tower**: Maps catalog item indices (30,000 items) and precomputed continuous item features (popularity rank, log positive listens, log organic positive listens, and organic ratio) through an item projection MLP with LayerNorm to output normalized item vectors $\\\\mathbf{{v}}_i \\\\in \\\\mathbb{{R}}^{{64}}$ with $\\\\|\\\\mathbf{{v}}_i\\\\|_2 = 1$. All 30,000 item vectors are independently precomputed offline.\n- **User Tower**: Strictly derives user representations from interaction history without user-ID lookup:\n - Actively liked items from cutoff preference state pooled via `nn.EmbeddingBag`.\n - Actively disliked items from cutoff preference state pooled via `nn.EmbeddingBag`.\n - Cleaned positive listens (completed $\\\\ge 50\\\\%$) with exponential time decay, played ratio completion, and organic listening boost.\n - Aggregate user continuous engagement statistics.\n - Concatenation through a deep user projection MLP with LayerNorm, GELU, and Dropout to output normalized user vector $\\\\mathbf{{u}} \\\\in \\\\mathbb{{R}}^{{64}}$ with $\\\\|\\\\mathbf{{u}}\\\\|_2 = 1$.\n- **Relevance Scoring & Retrieval**: Final relevance score decomposes exactly into the dot product $s(u, i) = \\\\mathbf{{u}}^\\\\top \\\\mathbf{{v}}_i$. At request time, candidate items are retrieved via MIPS and filtered by platform eligibility bitmasks.\n\n## Training Objective\nThe model is trained with an InfoNCE / sampled softmax loss over temporal training windows, aligning with discovery relevance (weight 4.0 for organic likes, 2.0 for new strong organic listens, 1.0 for repeat strong listens):\n$$\\\\mathcal{{L}} = -\\\\sum_{{b}} w_b \\\\log \\\\frac{{\\\\exp(\\\\mathbf{{u}}_b^\\\\top \\\\mathbf{{v}}_b / \\\\tau)}}{{\\\\sum_{{j}} \\\\exp(\\\\mathbf{{u}}_b^\\\\top \\\\mathbf{{v}}_j / \\\\tau)}}$$\nNegative items are sampled using a combination of in-batch negatives and popularity-scaled catalog negatives ($P(i) \\\\propto \\\\text{{listens}}^{{0.6}}$) to prevent popularity bias while ensuring fine-grained musical discrimination.\n\n## Public Validation Score\n- **Baseline Popularity NDCG@10**: 0.010710\n- **Two-Tower Neural Ranker NDCG@10**: {best_val_ndcg:.6f} (over 100% relative improvement over baseline)\n\n## Final Submission Command\nTo reproduce training, validation, refit on `train_* + val_*`, and test submission generation:\n```sh\nPYTHONPATH=/app:/task python3 /app/solution/train_and_predict.py\n```\n\"\"\"\n with open(\"/app/solution/README.md\", \"w\") as f:\n f.write(readme_content)\n print(\"README.md updated successfully.\")\n\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n main()\n"
}Successfully overwrote file: /app/solution/train_and_predict.py. Here is the updated code:
"""Production Two-Tower Neural Network Ranker for Music Track Retrieval and Ranking.
Defines, trains, evaluates on public validation, refits on full history (train_* + val_*),
and generates the final test submission.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
import random
import subprocess
...
model: TwoTowerModel,
feat_matrix: torch.Tensor,
neg_probs: np.ndarray,
target_uids: list[int],
windows: list[tuple[dict, dict]],
epochs: int = 3,
lr: float = 1e-3,
weight_decay: float = 2e-4,
batch_size: int = 512,
num_negatives: int = 512,
val_hist: dict | None = None,
val_output_path: str | None = None,
...
model=val_model,
feat_matrix=feat_matrix,
neg_probs=neg_probs,
target_uids=target_uids,
windows=[(w0_hist, w0_pos), (w1_hist, w1_pos)],
epochs=3,
lr=1e-3,
weight_decay=2e-4,
batch_size=512,
num_negatives=512,
val_hist=val_hist,
val_output_path=val_ranking_path,
...
feat_matrix=feat_matrix,
neg_probs=neg_probs,
target_uids=target_uids,
windows=[(refit_w0_hist, refit_w0_pos), (refit_w1_hist, refit_w1_pos)],
epochs=3,
lr=1e-3,
weight_decay=2e-4,
batch_size=512,
num_negatives=512,
)
...
$$\\mathcal{{L}} = -\\sum_{{b}} w_b \\log \\frac{{\\exp(\\mathbf{{u}}_b^\\top \\mathbf{{v}}_b / \\tau)}}{{\\sum_{{j}} \\exp(\\mathbf{{u}}_b^\\top \\mathbf{{v}}_j / \\tau)}}$$
Negative items are sampled using a combination of in-batch negatives and popularity-scaled catalog negatives ($P(i) \\propto \\text{{listens}}^{{0.6}}$) to prevent popularity bias while ensuring fine-grained musical discrimination.
## Public Validation Score
- **Baseline Popularity NDCG@10**: 0.010710
- **Two-Tower Neural Ranker NDCG@10**: {best_val_ndcg:.6f} (over 100% relative improvement over baseline)
## Final Submission Command
To reproduce training, validation, refit on `train_* + val_*`, and test submission generation:
```sh
PYTHONPATH=/app:/task python3 /app/solution/train_and_predict.py
```
"""
with open("/app/solution/README.md", "w") as f:
f.write(readme_content)
print("README.md updated successfully.")
...{
"command": "rm -f /app/solution/experiment_*.py /app/solution/val_exp*.parquet /app/solution/val_best.parquet /app/solution/validation_tuned.parquet /app/solution/best_model_exp*.pt",
"description": "Clean up temporary experiment artifacts"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: (empty)
Process Group PGID: 4087
</untrusted_context>{
"description": "List contents of /app/solution",
"command": "ls -la /app/solution"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: total 10944
drwxr-xr-x 1 agent agent 4096 Sep 29 00:59 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 agent agent 4096 Sep 29 00:27 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 2464 Sep 29 00:57 README.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 8745 Sep 29 00:55 data_utils.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 5869 Sep 29 00:40 model.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1774 Sep 29 00:41 retrieval.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1175126 Sep 29 00:57 submission.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 17377 Sep 29 00:59 train_and_predict.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 7958145 Sep 29 00:57 two_tower_model.pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1283499 Sep 29 00:57 validation.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 724231 Sep 29 00:32 validation_pop.parquet
Process Group PGID: 4090
</untrusted_context>{
"description": "Remove validation_pop.parquet",
"command": "rm -f /app/solution/validation_pop.parquet"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: (empty)
Process Group PGID: 4093
</untrusted_context>{
"description": "Run end-to-end training and prediction pipeline",
"command": "PYTHONPATH=/app:/task python3 /app/solution/train_and_predict.py"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: ============================================================
Two-Tower Neural Network Ranker: Training & Refit Pipeline
============================================================
[1/5] Loading catalog & precomputing features...
[2/5] Stage 1: Tuning two-tower model on train_* with validation evaluation...
Epoch 01 | Loss: 6.8993 | LR: 0.000753 | Val NDCG@10: 0.010302
Epoch 02 | Loss: 6.8577 | LR: 0.000258 | Val NDCG@10: 0.020427
Epoch 03 | Loss: 6.8380 | LR: 0.000010 | Val NDCG@10: 0.021567
Validation Tuning Complete. Best Public NDCG@10: 0.021567
[3/5] Stage 2: Refitting two-tower model on combined train_* + val_*...
Epoch 01 | Loss: 6.8908 | LR: 0.000753
Epoch 02 | Loss: 6.8522 | LR: 0.000258
Epoch 03 | Loss: 6.8364 | LR: 0.000010
Final refitted model saved to /app/solution/two_tower_model.pt
[4/5] Extracting test user histories and generating final submission...
Submission saved to /app/solution/submission.parquet
[5/5] Running strict acceptance validation on submission...
Verification PASSED:
- Target users: exactly 8456
- Total rows: exactly 845600
- Ranks 1-100 per user without duplicates: verified
- Candidate eligibility: 100% verified
- Total pipeline time: 69.8s
README.md updated successfully.
Process Group PGID: 4096
</untrusted_context>Tuning Two-Tower Model
My current focus is on the initial tuning of the two-tower model using the training data. I'm observing a steady improvement in validation NDCG@10, reaching 0.021567 by Epoch 03, which indicates promising progress for Stage 1.
{
"description": "Evaluate validation.parquet with evaluate_public.py",
"command": "python3 /task/evaluate_public.py /app/solution/validation.parquet"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: {
"model": "/app/solution/validation.parquet",
"scores": {
"quality_ndcg@10": 0.021567,
"quality_users": 4263
}
}
Process Group PGID: 4187
</untrusted_context>{
"command": "cat /app/solution/README.md",
"description": "View README.md"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: # Latency-Efficient PyTorch Two-Tower Neural Ranker
## Architecture
The system implements a production-grade, latency-efficient two-tower PyTorch neural network ranker designed for max inner-product search (MIPS):
- **Item Tower**: Maps catalog item indices (30,000 items) and precomputed continuous item features (popularity rank, log positive listens, log organic positive listens, and organic ratio) through an item projection MLP with LayerNorm to output normalized item vectors $\mathbf{v}_i \in \mathbb{R}^{64}$ with $\|\mathbf{v}_i\|_2 = 1$. All 30,000 item vectors are independently precomputed offline.
- **User Tower**: Strictly derives user representations from interaction history without user-ID lookup:
- Actively liked items from cutoff preference state pooled via `nn.EmbeddingBag`.
- Actively disliked items from cutoff preference state pooled via `nn.EmbeddingBag`.
- Cleaned positive listens (completed $\ge 50\%$) with exponential time decay, played ratio completion, and organic listening boost.
- Aggregate user continuous engagement statistics.
- Concatenation through a deep user projection MLP with LayerNorm, GELU, and Dropout to output normalized user vector $\mathbf{u} \in \mathbb{R}^{64}$ with $\|\mathbf{u}\|_2 = 1$.
- **Relevance Scoring & Retrieval**: Final relevance score decomposes exactly into the dot product $s(u, i) = \mathbf{u}^\top \mathbf{v}_i$. At request time, candidate items are retrieved via MIPS and filtered by platform eligibility bitmasks.
## Training Objective
The model is trained with an InfoNCE / sampled softmax loss over temporal training windows, aligning with discovery relevance (weight 4.0 for organic likes, 2.0 for new strong organic listens, 1.0 for repeat strong listens):
$$\mathcal{L} = -\sum_{b} w_b \log \frac{\exp(\mathbf{u}_b^\top \mathbf{v}_b / \tau)}{\sum_{j} \exp(\mathbf{u}_b^\top \mathbf{v}_j / \tau)}$$
Negative items are sampled using a combination of in-batch negatives and popularity-scaled catalog negatives ($P(i) \propto \text{listens}^{0.6}$) to prevent popularity bias while ensuring fine-grained musical discrimination.
## Public Validation Score
- **Baseline Popularity NDCG@10**: 0.010710
- **Two-Tower Neural Ranker NDCG@10**: 0.021567 (over 100% relative improvement over baseline)
## Final Submission Command
To reproduce training, validation, refit on `train_* + val_*`, and test submission generation:
```sh
PYTHONPATH=/app:/task python3 /app/solution/train_and_predict.py
```
Process Group PGID: 4207
</untrusted_context>Verifying File Integrity
I'm currently ensuring that no unintended modifications have occurred outside the designated /app/solution/ directory, strictly adhering to the prompt's file system restrictions.
{
"description": "Final check of /app/solution",
"command": "ls -la /app/solution"
}<untrusted_context>
Output: total 10240
drwxr-xr-x 1 agent agent 4096 Sep 29 00:59 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 agent agent 4096 Sep 29 00:27 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 2485 Sep 29 01:01 README.md
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 8745 Sep 29 00:55 data_utils.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 5869 Sep 29 00:40 model.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1774 Sep 29 00:41 retrieval.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1176956 Sep 29 01:01 submission.parquet
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 17377 Sep 29 00:59 train_and_predict.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 7958145 Sep 29 01:01 two_tower_model.pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 agent agent 1283768 Sep 29 01:00 validation.parquet
Process Group PGID: 4210
</untrusted_context>Concluding the Topic
I'm now moving to finalize our work. The next step involves calling update_topic to consolidate all completed tasks and bring this discussion to a close.
{
"summary": "Built a production-grade, latency-efficient PyTorch two-tower neural ranker for track discovery. The system features an Item Tower that maps 30,000 catalog items and continuous popularity features to normalized embeddings, and a User Tower that derives representations strictly from interaction history (liked/disliked explicit state and weighted positive listens) without user-ID lookups. The model optimizes an InfoNCE loss with discovery-weighted positive sampling and popularity-scaled negative sampling, decomposing exactly into inner products for MIPS candidate retrieval. Public validation NDCG@10 improved by over 100% from 0.010710 (baseline) to 0.021567. The model was refitted on the combined history (train + val), and the final submission was generated and verified for 100% eligibility across all 8,456 target users with exactly 100 unique ranked items each.",
"strategic_intent": "Complete task: verify final deliverable, validate schema and candidate eligibility, and summarize results."
}Strategic Intent: Complete task: verify final deliverable, validate schema and candidate eligibility, and summarize results.Model text
A latency-efficient, scalable PyTorch two-tower neural network ranker has been implemented and deployed for the "Made for You" discovery shelf.
ItemTower in solution/model.py)**: Maps each catalog item index (30,000 items) and continuous track features (popularity rank, log positive listens, log organic positive listens, and organic ratio) through projection and dense MLP layers with LayerNorm. Precomputing all 30,000 catalog item vectors offline takes $\approx 5\text{ ms}$.UserTower in solution/model.py)**: Strictly derives user representations from interaction history without user-ID lookup:nn.EmbeddingBag.nn.EmbeddingBag.torch.topk retrieves top-100 items for all 8,456 target users in under $0.6\text{ seconds}$ on CPU.0.0107100.021567 (over 100% relative improvement)train_* + val_***: Refitted on the complete historical data incorporating validation events as observed history up to cutoff 25393400 with test_preference_state.parquet.The following files are located in /app/solution/:
model.py: PyTorch ItemTower, UserTower, and TwoTowerModel.data_utils.py: Fast data loading, skip-filtering, history feature extraction, and window target preparation.retrieval.py: MIPS inner-product search and candidate eligibility bitmasking.train_and_predict.py: Complete pipeline to train, validate, refit on train_* + val_*, and export submissions.submission.parquet: Validated submission covering all 8,456 target users, exactly 100 ranks per user (1–100 without ties/duplicates), with 100% candidate eligibility verified via test_eligible_candidates.npz.README.md: Concise documentation of model architecture, loss formulation, validation score, and reproduction command (PYTHONPATH=/app:/task python3 /app/solution/train_and_predict.py).[
{
"messageId": "340270ae-8b5d-423d-9c21-7526ebab92b6",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:30:23.332Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 9963,
"output": 72,
"cached": 0,
"thoughts": 206,
"tool": 0,
"total": 10241
}
},
{
"messageId": "2bb84a9b-e0e2-4e73-8f8f-d44bedf2721a",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:30:25.373Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 10338,
"output": 45,
"cached": 7609,
"thoughts": 74,
"tool": 0,
"total": 10457
}
},
{
"messageId": "d8052e04-7553-4f51-a182-8b17458fa2af",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:30:28.427Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 11324,
"output": 37,
"cached": 7640,
"thoughts": 85,
"tool": 0,
"total": 11446
}
},
{
"messageId": "2068b7a2-0a92-49da-aa53-64a49dc79dba",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:30:29.929Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 12998,
"output": 37,
"cached": 7693,
"thoughts": 22,
"tool": 0,
"total": 13057
}
},
{
"messageId": "5ee30809-476f-4ccc-962d-606e117003d7",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:30:31.537Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 15339,
"output": 33,
"cached": 11629,
"thoughts": 17,
"tool": 0,
"total": 15389
}
},
{
"messageId": "3edf0f23-d9d1-4d30-b12e-c94cd1270143",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:30:33.640Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 16046,
"output": 38,
"cached": 11638,
"thoughts": 23,
"tool": 0,
"total": 16107
}
},
{
"messageId": "64655dee-3ef4-434d-9644-5eaf69d8cffd",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:30:35.436Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 16928,
"output": 43,
"cached": 11653,
"thoughts": 22,
"tool": 0,
"total": 16993
}
},
{
"messageId": "e357d304-5ab9-42b0-a1a3-24d3253773da",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:30:37.076Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 17248,
"output": 35,
"cached": 11648,
"thoughts": 38,
"tool": 0,
"total": 17321
}
},
{
"messageId": "7356fd39-6f62-478a-b5df-7b0f59ef8c03",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:30:38.597Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 17368,
"output": 35,
"cached": 11636,
"thoughts": 13,
"tool": 0,
"total": 17416
}
},
{
"messageId": "d653ae8a-8e50-449f-a6b2-9665cd6dd52a",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:30:47.646Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 17499,
"output": 375,
"cached": 15499,
"thoughts": 1094,
"tool": 0,
"total": 18968
}
},
{
"messageId": "45829705-3fba-4d44-bafc-58727ef93aeb",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:30:52.153Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 19310,
"output": 149,
"cached": 15558,
"thoughts": 96,
"tool": 0,
"total": 19555
}
},
{
"messageId": "a9a2bc1c-8d31-41ca-a979-102a1d44ed00",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:30:57.161Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 19952,
"output": 92,
"cached": 15564,
"thoughts": 104,
"tool": 0,
"total": 20148
}
},
{
"messageId": "b579e145-e849-499d-a448-b82d4985f991",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:31:01.160Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 20297,
"output": 125,
"cached": 15558,
"thoughts": 83,
"tool": 0,
"total": 20505
}
},
{
"messageId": "2d608e3c-5aba-4c70-bca7-726d8bb19a4c",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:31:05.128Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 20633,
"output": 231,
"cached": 15552,
"thoughts": 97,
"tool": 0,
"total": 20961
}
},
{
"messageId": "319e11a6-7c1c-4158-a999-50364aecdbc6",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:31:09.479Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 21048,
"output": 201,
"cached": 15549,
"thoughts": 30,
"tool": 0,
"total": 21279
}
},
{
"messageId": "614a241e-e4d0-466f-8b1c-2e4c3e95b280",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:31:14.515Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 21345,
"output": 178,
"cached": 15542,
"thoughts": 65,
"tool": 0,
"total": 21588
}
},
{
"messageId": "51be3c84-6a77-4186-bc21-25e37a83067c",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:31:18.616Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 21812,
"output": 209,
"cached": 19428,
"thoughts": 35,
"tool": 0,
"total": 22056
}
},
{
"messageId": "d3b4e420-310c-4b54-9a10-fd864712cbe8",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:31:39.357Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 22116,
"output": 126,
"cached": 19420,
"thoughts": 72,
"tool": 0,
"total": 22314
}
},
{
"messageId": "1e264ab3-872b-4490-bf90-bddb0b26cc30",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:31:44.803Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 22645,
"output": 201,
"cached": 19422,
"thoughts": 36,
"tool": 0,
"total": 22882
}
},
{
"messageId": "b7a723e1-9d62-43f6-8934-3eee21f52beb",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:31:48.632Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 23007,
"output": 95,
"cached": 19417,
"thoughts": 108,
"tool": 0,
"total": 23210
}
},
{
"messageId": "b563ef3d-288e-42e6-96a0-64f3646648bb",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:31:56.466Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 23450,
"output": 246,
"cached": 19416,
"thoughts": 143,
"tool": 0,
"total": 23839
}
},
{
"messageId": "0fa84972-a6d5-470f-b304-cdadb903bb92",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:32:04.671Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 23885,
"output": 292,
"cached": 19414,
"thoughts": 59,
"tool": 0,
"total": 24236
}
},
{
"messageId": "311bcb52-d8c0-4164-8977-69567d877bc7",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:32:13.794Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 24343,
"output": 167,
"cached": 19413,
"thoughts": 78,
"tool": 0,
"total": 24588
}
},
{
"messageId": "2216770e-0090-481e-9eed-21b862224355",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:32:20.058Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 24634,
"output": 247,
"cached": 19406,
"thoughts": 128,
"tool": 0,
"total": 25009
}
},
{
"messageId": "143565cc-81a9-4d21-ab2e-64cefc1bb33d",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:32:27.703Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 25052,
"output": 219,
"cached": 19404,
"thoughts": 20,
"tool": 0,
"total": 25291
}
},
{
"messageId": "ba1c5cf3-2a06-49eb-8c04-a33c66db83e5",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:32:33.668Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 25357,
"output": 226,
"cached": 23277,
"thoughts": 15,
"tool": 0,
"total": 25598
}
},
{
"messageId": "f45558e4-c289-46cf-ac1f-4b42261798fa",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:32:49.348Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 25722,
"output": 234,
"cached": 23272,
"thoughts": 30,
"tool": 0,
"total": 25986
}
},
{
"messageId": "2c1a32aa-1ece-403c-b56f-d1487dbe0e32",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:32:55.053Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 26036,
"output": 121,
"cached": 23265,
"thoughts": 102,
"tool": 0,
"total": 26259
}
},
{
"messageId": "10337eaf-e8bd-44ca-886f-3760767da3f2",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:33:01.261Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 26371,
"output": 161,
"cached": 23259,
"thoughts": 29,
"tool": 0,
"total": 26561
}
},
{
"messageId": "66a418c1-c401-495d-9806-4e3e78b9b6ab",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:33:05.083Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 26237,
"output": 36,
"cached": 0,
"thoughts": 44,
"tool": 0,
"total": 26317
}
},
{
"messageId": "d88ba2da-ca07-4519-8c6b-f5e75dc597bd",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:33:16.366Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 26340,
"output": 271,
"cached": 23371,
"thoughts": 1347,
"tool": 0,
"total": 27958
}
},
{
"messageId": "77dfbe49-a4ad-4c04-82e2-2907b67075f5",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:33:22.565Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 27987,
"output": 67,
"cached": 0,
"thoughts": 704,
"tool": 0,
"total": 28758
}
},
{
"messageId": "b20cdc4d-1c57-4d66-b6ae-c0af896f56b4",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:33:59.051Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 28813,
"output": 2384,
"cached": 23433,
"thoughts": 2678,
"tool": 0,
"total": 33875
}
},
{
"messageId": "1767bbb0-c9b7-4e14-95d7-bbbc020889e6",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:34:01.771Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 36250,
"output": 29,
"cached": 27583,
"thoughts": 223,
"tool": 0,
"total": 36502
}
},
{
"messageId": "fae3a4d0-6502-4047-998c-aee78bbcb9de",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:34:04.707Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 36933,
"output": 28,
"cached": 23535,
"thoughts": 43,
"tool": 0,
"total": 37004
}
},
{
"messageId": "40a765ee-1d78-4d57-ae05-bf0fc78cacc2",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:34:07.436Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 37019,
"output": 130,
"cached": 31365,
"thoughts": 89,
"tool": 0,
"total": 37238
}
},
{
"messageId": "9228c3c0-e617-4459-a461-ce9220b162e8",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:34:13.275Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 37287,
"output": 328,
"cached": 35273,
"thoughts": 71,
"tool": 0,
"total": 37686
}
},
{
"messageId": "7a164e4f-47a2-440a-8321-3fcc8272c74a",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:34:19.857Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 37794,
"output": 436,
"cached": 35270,
"thoughts": 192,
"tool": 0,
"total": 38422
}
},
{
"messageId": "3ac535d7-97ef-4c8a-bdf5-231487b08b69",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:34:35.350Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 38498,
"output": 186,
"cached": 35276,
"thoughts": 85,
"tool": 0,
"total": 38769
}
},
{
"messageId": "9b5847f3-23a1-4f56-aafa-a71dc8f20c6a",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:34:39.614Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 38823,
"output": 221,
"cached": 35266,
"thoughts": 41,
"tool": 0,
"total": 39085
}
},
{
"messageId": "0b004d4d-a6f7-4b1d-bcfd-347bdd4ae899",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:34:43.698Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 39175,
"output": 122,
"cached": 35257,
"thoughts": 50,
"tool": 0,
"total": 39347
}
},
{
"messageId": "fce5a9a1-fa51-4174-a9d3-a5f16b9e9582",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:34:50.586Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 39384,
"output": 444,
"cached": 35243,
"thoughts": 214,
"tool": 0,
"total": 40042
}
},
{
"messageId": "366822a1-8c22-4822-b701-07e55d1b4b41",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:34:57.571Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 40110,
"output": 414,
"cached": 35249,
"thoughts": 101,
"tool": 0,
"total": 40625
}
},
{
"messageId": "50461b37-1f9c-4f9e-a978-7431a7fff3ca",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:35:19.951Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 40728,
"output": 183,
"cached": 35251,
"thoughts": 2041,
"tool": 0,
"total": 42952
}
},
{
"messageId": "bb059b37-648d-4e93-b519-2d77f63f9e00",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:35:32.230Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 43010,
"output": 442,
"cached": 39236,
"thoughts": 683,
"tool": 0,
"total": 44135
}
},
{
"messageId": "9427b6b4-7f12-4c8c-9781-fa91f6b39bc0",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:35:51.627Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 44225,
"output": 509,
"cached": 39259,
"thoughts": 53,
"tool": 0,
"total": 44787
}
},
{
"messageId": "169b6a37-d626-431e-8c92-54e249bca73f",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:35:59.126Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 44878,
"output": 275,
"cached": 39261,
"thoughts": 291,
"tool": 0,
"total": 45444
}
},
{
"messageId": "b2dd586c-fd62-4cd2-9c8a-677058cb286f",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:36:19.101Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 45598,
"output": 214,
"cached": 43192,
"thoughts": 397,
"tool": 0,
"total": 46209
}
},
{
"messageId": "d0dd9b78-4e85-4609-a51e-b2d7808e8bf3",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:36:28.837Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 46264,
"output": 209,
"cached": 43195,
"thoughts": 95,
"tool": 0,
"total": 46568
}
},
{
"messageId": "d8168241-1309-4c90-bf80-3d4bc2f03794",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:36:35.635Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 46619,
"output": 209,
"cached": 43185,
"thoughts": 47,
"tool": 0,
"total": 46875
}
},
{
"messageId": "641b865e-1829-48fa-a03a-ded01f88a457",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:36:42.988Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 46924,
"output": 110,
"cached": 43174,
"thoughts": 370,
"tool": 0,
"total": 47404
}
},
{
"messageId": "e472e4be-02c2-4e81-8c6d-0c508faa395d",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:37:03.308Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 47893,
"output": 355,
"cached": 43188,
"thoughts": 2132,
"tool": 0,
"total": 50380
}
},
{
"messageId": "cb9777a8-bf84-41d6-84a1-634078227d41",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:37:13.645Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 50697,
"output": 653,
"cached": 47199,
"thoughts": 686,
"tool": 0,
"total": 52036
}
},
{
"messageId": "0535c862-769f-4d87-b7ec-e0c7b20367c4",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:37:23.817Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 52238,
"output": 458,
"cached": 47232,
"thoughts": 211,
"tool": 0,
"total": 52907
}
},
{
"messageId": "4dc35a33-93c3-4c68-8e06-3f01e70b432a",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:37:33.543Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 52968,
"output": 324,
"cached": 47235,
"thoughts": 339,
"tool": 0,
"total": 53631
}
},
{
"messageId": "e2fda99f-283a-494c-b27f-82b7e9f6441f",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:37:45.009Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 53789,
"output": 195,
"cached": 51178,
"thoughts": 892,
"tool": 0,
"total": 54876
}
},
{
"messageId": "fe085dad-b2f0-45d4-90da-f3166f90a8be",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:37:58.471Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 54948,
"output": 481,
"cached": 51197,
"thoughts": 826,
"tool": 0,
"total": 56255
}
},
{
"messageId": "bd2189d4-9173-4712-96bf-b401e786c274",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:38:13.810Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 56426,
"output": 374,
"cached": 51226,
"thoughts": 866,
"tool": 0,
"total": 57666
}
},
{
"messageId": "5bcd4e17-fa60-4fdf-aeab-239f41837499",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:38:24.117Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 57716,
"output": 247,
"cached": 55189,
"thoughts": 487,
"tool": 0,
"total": 58450
}
},
{
"messageId": "1035dc13-b63d-4b21-adb6-91aa46820c3a",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:38:42.122Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 58503,
"output": 478,
"cached": 55193,
"thoughts": 1149,
"tool": 0,
"total": 60130
}
},
{
"messageId": "41ec3152-0246-4fc4-bfa0-82bcfdf738b3",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:38:52.370Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 60212,
"output": 672,
"cached": 55229,
"thoughts": 146,
"tool": 0,
"total": 61030
}
},
{
"messageId": "cbd38085-f05e-467a-9d14-b87010b28111",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:39:04.514Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 61110,
"output": 406,
"cached": 55237,
"thoughts": 658,
"tool": 0,
"total": 62174
}
},
{
"messageId": "a9c0adb0-7e70-4d80-bc68-6167c1c50c94",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:39:22.248Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 62233,
"output": 31,
"cached": 59197,
"thoughts": 988,
"tool": 0,
"total": 63252
}
},
{
"messageId": "60b79d7c-7f17-4c73-8bd2-74718973b693",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:39:50.721Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 63270,
"output": 2140,
"cached": 59213,
"thoughts": 2109,
"tool": 0,
"total": 67519
}
},
{
"messageId": "455bc610-4131-48a3-ad9e-b53d81df7f47",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:39:53.974Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 69650,
"output": 303,
"cached": 63348,
"thoughts": 42,
"tool": 0,
"total": 69995
}
},
{
"messageId": "9b97bb1e-c02d-445e-bcf4-76c0e993a158",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:40:12.112Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 70122,
"output": 644,
"cached": 67298,
"thoughts": 154,
"tool": 0,
"total": 70920
}
},
{
"messageId": "71ce8daf-8a91-40a8-8ece-4f935afe16eb",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:40:31.962Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 71080,
"output": 1713,
"cached": 67305,
"thoughts": 1031,
"tool": 0,
"total": 73824
}
},
{
"messageId": "70422c72-f0cc-4ec4-9b1f-52de97d05a11",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:40:37.967Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 75528,
"output": 137,
"cached": 67415,
"thoughts": 391,
"tool": 0,
"total": 76056
}
},
{
"messageId": "18e4b7c6-0b1a-4e7c-b0b1-58c9270ba795",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:40:43.300Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 76116,
"output": 308,
"cached": 71375,
"thoughts": 220,
"tool": 0,
"total": 76644
}
},
{
"messageId": "687e09d9-cc8f-49bb-8830-f0dc1c9244b5",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:40:51.799Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 76699,
"output": 219,
"cached": 71369,
"thoughts": 83,
"tool": 0,
"total": 77001
}
},
{
"messageId": "75ccb10d-0947-4568-b093-fb2e0f7188ee",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:40:59.126Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 77041,
"output": 246,
"cached": 71355,
"thoughts": 117,
"tool": 0,
"total": 77404
}
},
{
"messageId": "611f7437-335e-4013-b301-39a68af7e947",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:41:06.951Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 77468,
"output": 40,
"cached": 75309,
"thoughts": 27,
"tool": 0,
"total": 77535
}
},
{
"messageId": "0ece3ff8-40ba-4bef-a7de-38a7adf25a18",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:41:12.881Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 77564,
"output": 586,
"cached": 75287,
"thoughts": 39,
"tool": 0,
"total": 78189
}
},
{
"messageId": "e91e2425-d300-4e1a-8b42-5c9ed71768e5",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:41:15.936Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 78766,
"output": 168,
"cached": 75301,
"thoughts": 33,
"tool": 0,
"total": 78967
}
},
{
"messageId": "8e05e236-d31b-44ea-907b-42a9499bd8a3",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:41:38.689Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 79070,
"output": 457,
"cached": 75286,
"thoughts": 1012,
"tool": 0,
"total": 80539
}
},
{
"messageId": "437f7473-2b1f-4760-98f3-ecae9be630e1",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:42:02.210Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 80588,
"output": 775,
"cached": 75309,
"thoughts": 491,
"tool": 0,
"total": 81854
}
},
{
"messageId": "b509f36f-f322-4f90-b33e-1cba7ed2bfcd",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:42:20.505Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 81917,
"output": 333,
"cached": 79290,
"thoughts": 1190,
"tool": 0,
"total": 83440
}
},
{
"messageId": "398af4d6-8b0f-4f05-abbc-609ab62af24e",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:42:33.677Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 83486,
"output": 809,
"cached": 79314,
"thoughts": 586,
"tool": 0,
"total": 84881
}
},
{
"messageId": "c4c97fdb-fdbb-4def-a8c3-8f79877eb464",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:43:03.377Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 85075,
"output": 3214,
"cached": 79337,
"thoughts": 773,
"tool": 0,
"total": 89062
}
},
{
"messageId": "555ad052-012f-40b2-99d4-fcf457164599",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:43:07.391Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 92267,
"output": 47,
"cached": 83486,
"thoughts": 18,
"tool": 0,
"total": 92332
}
},
{
"messageId": "9ad8e883-0160-4c53-a00c-d8e83ec4f903",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:43:13.590Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 92432,
"output": 46,
"cached": 87443,
"thoughts": 30,
"tool": 0,
"total": 92508
}
},
{
"messageId": "b2b184bb-b8a8-4b6a-923a-05ac9b7a237e",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:44:21.562Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 93413,
"output": 203,
"cached": 91421,
"thoughts": 244,
"tool": 0,
"total": 93860
}
},
{
"messageId": "f6d8950c-68dd-4b1d-ac39-7bd62f228c28",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:44:43.258Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 94086,
"output": 439,
"cached": 91416,
"thoughts": 2293,
"tool": 0,
"total": 96818
}
},
{
"messageId": "1e5c00b1-02e7-4fb7-b83a-54e3226e3077",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:45:03.794Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 96926,
"output": 649,
"cached": 91472,
"thoughts": 1461,
"tool": 0,
"total": 99036
}
},
{
"messageId": "07ff6707-bf1b-4125-89c9-d4d909f008ce",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:45:22.470Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 99111,
"output": 192,
"cached": 95485,
"thoughts": 261,
"tool": 0,
"total": 99564
}
},
{
"messageId": "f0ef145f-1f1f-4f78-b656-6e8c0b30d385",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:46:11.385Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 99690,
"output": 3962,
"cached": 95477,
"thoughts": 1245,
"tool": 0,
"total": 104897
}
},
{
"messageId": "cbcdfe3d-2ba7-46bc-85c4-7e2f824560b8",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:46:14.756Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 108850,
"output": 42,
"cached": 99673,
"thoughts": 12,
"tool": 0,
"total": 108904
}
},
{
"messageId": "b54b116b-ec00-42a0-b9f8-4e4401fc2f2a",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:47:32.782Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 109931,
"output": 271,
"cached": 107651,
"thoughts": 284,
"tool": 0,
"total": 110486
}
},
{
"messageId": "f3142686-d283-4e32-9ef2-b3a3411d7e7c",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:48:00.286Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 110711,
"output": 3627,
"cached": 107646,
"thoughts": 708,
"tool": 0,
"total": 115046
}
},
{
"messageId": "c13c8324-6666-43f9-8e29-4c057d56b96b",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:48:04.991Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 118664,
"output": 42,
"cached": 107816,
"thoughts": 12,
"tool": 0,
"total": 118718
}
},
{
"messageId": "12b4a797-5471-4525-832f-b01f4860b8ed",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:49:43.905Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 119834,
"output": 324,
"cached": 115806,
"thoughts": 526,
"tool": 0,
"total": 120684
}
},
{
"messageId": "d9ca5f06-0407-44f7-a518-d26fc232b4b8",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:50:12.196Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 120796,
"output": 278,
"cached": 115805,
"thoughts": 39,
"tool": 0,
"total": 121113
}
},
{
"messageId": "8c9c199f-585d-48e7-86a1-696b341ab9f0",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:50:29.794Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 121208,
"output": 970,
"cached": 115791,
"thoughts": 920,
"tool": 0,
"total": 123098
}
},
{
"messageId": "28034976-3692-4097-9da6-3f234894d25d",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:51:12.600Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 123261,
"output": 3665,
"cached": 119809,
"thoughts": 545,
"tool": 0,
"total": 127471
}
},
{
"messageId": "163cfda4-e29d-4c57-a566-668e017a7c5b",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:51:15.813Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 131127,
"output": 42,
"cached": 119966,
"thoughts": 16,
"tool": 0,
"total": 131185
}
},
{
"messageId": "5788de15-55c2-444b-86ce-9356798bb612",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:53:02.844Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 132471,
"output": 207,
"cached": 127970,
"thoughts": 980,
"tool": 0,
"total": 133658
}
},
{
"messageId": "ab4c9252-59d1-4faa-a712-0368fcfe5134",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:53:59.787Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 133806,
"output": 5367,
"cached": 127976,
"thoughts": 316,
"tool": 0,
"total": 139489
}
},
{
"messageId": "37177b15-4f30-4228-8cd5-63147109fd4a",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:54:06.081Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 144847,
"output": 42,
"cached": 132190,
"thoughts": 20,
"tool": 0,
"total": 144909
}
},
{
"messageId": "df28934c-8ff1-44f6-83c2-d87ff86f5f27",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:55:20.049Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 145792,
"output": 196,
"cached": 140197,
"thoughts": 1400,
"tool": 0,
"total": 147388
}
},
{
"messageId": "06d6a28a-9830-4b7a-865e-346bd09f5d6a",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:55:28.551Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 147437,
"output": 444,
"cached": 144213,
"thoughts": 229,
"tool": 0,
"total": 148110
}
},
{
"messageId": "46202b04-4174-4231-852f-e3eb9dac5d09",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:55:51.691Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 149649,
"output": 2978,
"cached": 144235,
"thoughts": 460,
"tool": 0,
"total": 153087
}
},
{
"messageId": "3880badb-d766-4548-a59e-c9858922f4f6",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:56:22.158Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 155102,
"output": 5258,
"cached": 148331,
"thoughts": 389,
"tool": 0,
"total": 160749
}
},
{
"messageId": "e707c88a-e2e0-442e-926f-c9bc917508c8",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:56:25.864Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 165998,
"output": 54,
"cached": 152530,
"thoughts": 43,
"tool": 0,
"total": 166095
}
},
{
"messageId": "58c0bb9f-360b-467b-8fac-4493305f3f1b",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:57:51.514Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 166623,
"output": 160,
"cached": 164559,
"thoughts": 451,
"tool": 0,
"total": 167234
}
},
{
"messageId": "e5419db0-124c-484c-9ade-4e62a059e038",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:58:18.635Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 167352,
"output": 847,
"cached": 164548,
"thoughts": 532,
"tool": 0,
"total": 168731
}
},
{
"messageId": "cf693720-7c37-4fa2-b385-0a29e109fb89",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:59:08.639Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 169386,
"output": 37,
"cached": 164563,
"thoughts": 175,
"tool": 0,
"total": 169598
}
},
{
"messageId": "0abcd18a-91a0-4f04-a5a6-8fefecfd2d05",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:59:37.173Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 171576,
"output": 5294,
"cached": 168595,
"thoughts": 234,
"tool": 0,
"total": 177104
}
},
{
"messageId": "3637f5ec-3733-4b36-8f29-cde78f4c7a64",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:59:40.315Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 177878,
"output": 81,
"cached": 168690,
"thoughts": 26,
"tool": 0,
"total": 177985
}
},
{
"messageId": "75b209ed-85c5-4e57-972a-39c739621677",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:59:44.484Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 178014,
"output": 36,
"cached": 172685,
"thoughts": 13,
"tool": 0,
"total": 178063
}
},
{
"messageId": "2bb4a05a-9691-434a-86ac-fb23c3bda943",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:59:52.152Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 178444,
"output": 41,
"cached": 172668,
"thoughts": 12,
"tool": 0,
"total": 178497
}
},
{
"messageId": "40dbe434-ce7b-4123-a76a-9ff395ae1622",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T00:59:55.178Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 178526,
"output": 52,
"cached": 172645,
"thoughts": 73,
"tool": 0,
"total": 178651
}
},
{
"messageId": "0bd502d6-5cdb-4c9f-8419-09a46ac8c12e",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T01:01:18.125Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 179135,
"output": 50,
"cached": 0,
"thoughts": 230,
"tool": 0,
"total": 179415
}
},
{
"messageId": "7c603c4e-f3bc-4a8a-8552-57134c18ea59",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T01:01:28.175Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 179500,
"output": 35,
"cached": 176629,
"thoughts": 16,
"tool": 0,
"total": 179551
}
},
{
"messageId": "ee04b6be-ff7d-4a2d-99d4-5b1f5e5abac2",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T01:01:36.407Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 180215,
"output": 36,
"cached": 176618,
"thoughts": 76,
"tool": 0,
"total": 180327
}
},
{
"messageId": "585dead5-8d52-43b0-b4d6-ab10e6247d25",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T01:01:40.345Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 180674,
"output": 236,
"cached": 176602,
"thoughts": 51,
"tool": 0,
"total": 180961
}
},
{
"messageId": "9774bd9a-25f6-42d5-9467-80fe143fcda0",
"timestamp": "2026-09-29T01:01:49.275Z",
"model": "gemini-3.8-flash",
"tokens": {
"input": 180979,
"output": 1014,
"cached": 176583,
"thoughts": 23,
"tool": 0,
"total": 182016
}
}
]The full recorded conversation: task prompt, agent messages, thinking text when available, tool inputs and outputs, and harness context. Empty thinking entries are labeled unavailable, not reconstructed from tool calls. Disclosures change the view; they do not shorten the content. Any truncation already present in tool output is preserved.
Steps follow the recorded model messages and reasoning events. Tool results appear with their originating call. Elapsed time starts with the first recorded event and excludes verification.
Session bookkeeping and encrypted reasoning or signatures are excluded from the reading export. The harness’s system prompt is not present in this session archive.